Table of Contents
ISRN Industrial Engineering
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 953915, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/953915
Research Article

Early Stakeholder Involvement in the Project Definition Phase: Case Renovation

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 4610, 90014 Oulu, Finland

Received 27 May 2013; Accepted 1 August 2013

Academic Editors: D. Brunelli and C. A. Bulucea

Copyright © 2013 Aki Aapaoja et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Kauppinen, J. Savolainen, L. Lehtola, M. Komssi, H. Töhönen, and A. Davis, “From feature development to customer value creation,” in Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE '09), pp. 275–280, Atlanta, Ga, USA, September 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. Tillman, G. Ballard, P. Tzortzopolous, and C. Formosa, “How integrated governance contributes to value generation—insights from An IPD case study,” in Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2012.
  3. G. Ballard, “The lean project delivery system: an update,” Lean Construction Journal, pp. 1–19, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  4. P. Mitropoulos and G. A. Howell, “Renovation projects: design process problems and improvement mechanisms,” Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 179–185, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Lahdenperä, “Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery,” Construction Management and Economics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 57–79, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Cohen, Integrated Project Delivery: Case Studies, AIA National, AIA California Council, AGC California and McGraw-Hill, 2010.
  7. K. Wikström, K. Artto, J. Kujala, and J. Söderlund, “Business models in project business,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 832–841, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Yang, P. Q. Shen, L. Bourne, C. M. Ho, and X. Xue, “A typology of operational approaches for stakeholder analysis and engagement,” Construction Management and Economics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 145–162, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. O. Matthews and G. A. Howell, “Integrated project delivery an example of relational contracting,” Lean Construction Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 46–61, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  10. Department of Treasury and Finance, The Practitioners’ Guide to Alliance Contracting, Department of Treasury and Finance, Melbourne, Australia, 2006.
  11. C. Thomsen, J. Darrington, D. Dunne, and W. Lichtig, Managing Integrated Project Delivery, Construction Management Association of America (CMAA), McLean, Va, USA, 2009.
  12. The American Institute of Architects (AIA), Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide, pp. 2–57, The American Institute of Architects, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
  13. M. Möttönen, J. Härkönen, P. Belt, H. Haapasalo, and J. Similä, “Managerial view on design for manufacturing,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 859–872, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  14. J. Lehto, J. Härkönen, H. Haapasalo, P. Belt, M. Möttönen, and P. Kuvaja, “Benefits of DfX in requirements engineering,” Technology and Investment, vol. 2, pp. 27–37, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Dowlatshahi, “Implementing early supplier involvement: a conceptual framework,” International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 143–167, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. van Valkenburg, S. Lenferink, R. Nijsten, and J. Arts, “Early contractor involvement: a new strategy for “buying the best” in infrastructure development in the netherlands,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Public Procurement Conference, August 2008.
  17. J. G. Bralla, Design for Excellence, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 1996.
  18. M. G. Whelton, The development of purpose in the project definition phase of construction projects—implications for project management [dissertation], Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2004.
  19. W. Lichtig, “The integrated agreement for lean project delivery,” Construction Lawyer, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. Ross, “Introduction to project alliancing (on engineering and construction projects),” in Proceedings of the Alliance Contracting Conference, Sydney, Australia, April 2003.
  21. E. R. Freeman, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman Publishing, Marshfield, Mass, USA, 1984.
  22. R. Brugha and Z. Varvasovszky, “Stakeholder analysis: a review,” Health Policy and Planning, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 239–246, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. Lahdenperä, “Project alliance. The competitive single target-cost approach,” VTT Tiedotteita-Research Notes 2472, VTT Tiedotteita, Espoo, Finland, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  24. H. W. Ashcraft, Negotiating an Integrated Project Delivery Agreement, Hanson Bridgett, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2010.
  25. A. Aapaoja, T. Kinnunen, and H. Haapasalo, “Stakeholder salience assessment for construction project initiation,” International Journal of Performance Measurement. In press.
  26. B. K. Baiden, A. D. F. Price, and A. R. J. Dainty, “The extent of team integration within construction projects,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 13–23, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. A. Goodman, “Snowball sampling,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 148–170, 1961. View at Google Scholar
  28. T. Brady, A. Davies, and D. Gann, “Can integrated solutions business models work in construction?” Building Research and Information, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 571–579, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. V. Ramaswamy and F. Gouillart, The Power of Co-Creation: Build It with Them to Boost Growth, ProductivIty, and ProfIts, Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 2010.
  30. K. J. Petersen, R. B. Handfield, and G. L. Ragatz, “A model of supplier integration into new product development,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 284–299, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Aapaoja, M. Herrala, A. Pekuri, and H. Haapasalo, “The characteristics of and cornerstones for creating integrated teams,” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 695–713, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  32. M. Sobrero and E. B. Roberts, “Strategic management of supplier-manufacturer relations in new product development,” Research Policy, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 159–182, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. J. Trent and R. M. Monczka, “Achieving world-class supplier quality,” Total Quality Management, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 927–938, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Hobday, “Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation,” Research Policy, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 689–710, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Davies, T. Brady, and P. Tang, Delivering Integrated Solution, SPRU/CENTRIM, Brighton, UK, 2003.
  36. G. Winch, “Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction,” Building Research and Information, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 268–279, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. G. L. Ragatz, R. B. Handfield, and K. J. Petersen, “Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 389–400, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. W. Altschuld and B. R. Witkin, From Needs Assessment to Action: Transforming Needs into Solution Strategies, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2000.
  39. D. I. Cleland, “Project Stakeholder management,” Project Management Journal, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 36–44, 1986. View at Google Scholar