Table of Contents
ISRN Minimally Invasive Surgery
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 989727, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/989727
Clinical Study

Lift-Assisted Laparoscopy in Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study of 32 Consecutive Cases

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Nordfjord Hospital, 6770 Nordfjordeid, Norway

Received 14 August 2013; Accepted 19 September 2013

Academic Editors: F. Agresta and A. Tinelli

Copyright © 2013 Bo S. Bergström. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. N. Giep, H. N. Giep, and H. B. Hubert, “Comparison of minimally invasive surgical approaches for hysterectomy at a community hospital: robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy,” Journal of Robotic Surgery, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 167–175, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. “Swedish Gynop Register for Hysterectomy 2011,” June 2012, http://www.gynop.org/rapportering/rapporter/GynopHystrapport2012.pdf.
  3. AAGL Position Statement, “Route of hysterectomy to treat benign uterine disease,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. I. Einarsson, K. A. Matteson, J. Schulkin, N. R. Chavan, and H. Sangi-Haghpeykar, “Minimally Invasive Hysterectomies: a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 167–175, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Persson, T. Hellborg, J. Brynhildsen, M. Fredrikson, and P. Kjølhede, “Attitudes to mode of hysterectomy: a survey-based study among Swedish gynecologists,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 267–274, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. S. Bergström, “Camera trocar lifting in office gasless laparoscopic sterilization under local anesthesia,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 89, no. 7, pp. 975–979, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Ruiz-Tovar, P. Priego-Jimenez, and G. A. Paiva-Coronel, “Use of Foley's catheter to control port-site bleeding in bariatric surgery,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 306–308, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Liverani, M. Chiarot, M. Bezzi, and L. Angelini, “Is really operative time a complication factor?” Minerva Chirurgica, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 747–750, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. J. Fogarty, K. Khan, G. Ashall, and A. G. Leonard, “Complications of long operations: a prospective study of morbidity associated with prolonged operative time (> 6 h),” British Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 33–36, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Ellström, J. Ferraz-Nunes, M. Hahlin, and J.-H. Olsson, “A randomized trial with a cost-consequence analysis after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 30–34, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Diez R-Labajo, “Office-based surgery and anesthesia,” Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 615–621, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Nezhat, N. S. Saberi, B. Shahmohamady, and F. Nezhat, “Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery,” Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 317–320, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus