International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 123194 | 6 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/123194

Electrochemical Synthesis of Magnesium Hexaboride by Molten Salt Technique

Academic Editor: Sarkarainadar Balamurugan
Received24 Mar 2014
Revised23 May 2014
Accepted26 May 2014
Published31 Aug 2014

Abstract

The present work reports electrochemical synthesis of MgB6 from molten salts using the precursor consists of LiF–B2O3–MgCl2. An attempt has been made to synthesize metastable phase MgB6 crystal by electrolysis method. DTA/TGA studies were made to determine the eutectic point of the melt and it was found to be around 900°C. The electrolysis was performed at 900°C under argon atmosphere, at current density of 1.5 A/cm2. The electrodeposited crystals were examined using XRD, SEM, and XPS. From the above studies, the electrochemical synthesis method for hypothetical MgB6 from chloro-oxy-fluoride molten salt system is provided. Mechanism for the formation of magnesium hexaboride is discussed.

1. Introduction

Rare earth and alkaline earth metal borides belong to the group of nonoxide type metal-like compounds and have high melting point, high chemical stability, stable specific resistance, low expansion coefficient at certain temperature ranges, diverse magnetic orders, and high neutron absorbability [1, 2]. They have possessed excellent corrosion and wear resistance, chemical inertness, and thermal shock resistance more than that of oxide ceramics [3, 4]. The alkaline earth hexaborides were long thought to be simple polar semiconductors with single particle gap energy of several tenths of an eV and the energy gap is narrow as well as indirect band gap ( Ry).

Electrochemical synthesis of Mg–B system from molten salts is an economic feasible and environmental friendly way for the preparation of different binary phases [5]. Particularly, the Mg–B system was reported early [6, 7] to contain five phases, whereas Serebryakova [8] reported only four phases. Borides can exist as a wide range of compositions and display structural features, which depends strongly on the metal and boron ratio. Markowsky et al. proposed formation of three phases with higher B content as the result of thermal decomposition of MgB2: (1) MgB6, (2) unknown, and (3) MgB12 [9]. However, Duhart reexamined these data and claimed that phase 1 corresponds to MgB4 and phase 2 to MgB6 and the formation of MgB12 (phase 3) was not confirmed [10]. MgB6 and MgB4 do not exist as individual phases and obviously are metastable with rather long equilibration times. According to Somsonov et al. [11], Mg–B system has four stable borides: MgB2, MgB4, MgB6, and MgB12. Mg–B system contains the phases of MgB2, MgB4, MgB6, MgB12, and Mg2B14. So the Mg–B system is known as multiphase system. The aim of the present work is to study whether the thermodynamically unstable MgB6 [12, 13] could be prepared as thermally stable compound by electrochemical synthesis method.

2. Experimental Procedure

The mixture of the salts LiF (12.95 mol%), B2O3 (22.27 mol%), and MgCl2 (17.14 mol%) (analytical grade from Merck, India) was taken as an electrolyte in high-density graphite crucible and acts as an electrolyte cell as well as anode for the electrolytic process. The Molybdenum rod of 1 cm diameter fitted to a stainless steel rod is used as cathode. The crucible was filled with the stoichiometric quantities of electrolyte salts, which were dried at 500°C under argon atmosphere. The whole assembly was placed in an inconel reactor, which was kept in an electrical heating furnace with thermocouple. The experimental setup for the electrosynthesis of magnesium hexaboride is described elsewhere [1417]. Then the salts were melted slowly under a continuous flow of argon gas. The melt was equilibrated at 900°C for one hour before proceeding electrolysis [1517]. The bath was preelectrolyzed at 2.0 V for one hour to remove the impurities and moisture prior to electrolysis. The cathode was centrally positioned at the electrolytic cell. Experiment was carried out at current density of 1.5 A/cm2 with the molar ratio of Mg : B as 1 : 6. After 5 hours of electrolysis the cathode was removed and the deposit was cooled in atmosphere. The deposit was then scraped off and the electrolyte adhering to it was leached with warm 5% HCl solution. Finally washing was done with distilled water for several times, the weight of the deposit was determined, and the nature of the powder was analyzed.

The phase formation and the structural details of the synthesized compound were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) using CuKα ( Å) radiation with value range of 20 to 90 using PAnalytical X’pert powder diffractometer. Differential thermal analysis and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA/DTA) of the reaction mixture was done using Rigaku Thermal—Plus TG 8120 with heating speed 20°C/min in a flow of air. The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded in the range of 400 to 4000 cm−1 using Perkin Elmer UK Paragon—500 spectrometer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed for the morphological studies using JEOL JSM 3.5 CF Japan make model. UV Visible Spectrophotometer was employed for the absorbance study using JASCO Model 7800 UV Visible Spectrophotometer. Studying the binding energy of boron and magnesium was done using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy Thermo Scientific UK Multilab 2000.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 presents the powder XRD pattern of the MgB6 synthesized by molten salt technique. The lattice constant value  Å is determined from the XRD data and is well matched with the reported value ( Å) [1820] for MgB6 (JCPDS data card number 08-0421) existing in body centered cubic crystal structure (the space group Pm3m) [20]. But indexing the plans for MgB6 is difficult because the information on its lattice parameters and structure system is not available in 08-0421. The main building blocks of the MgB6 structure are B6 octahedra. Other than MgB6 some additional traces of MgO are also present at and 62.5° due to the partial oxidation of Mg [21]. The crystalline size is found to be 42 nm calculated by using Debye-Scherrer equation as follows:

where is the Scherrer constant usually taken as 0.9, is the wavelength characteristics of the Cu-Kα radiation ( Å), is the full width at half-maximum (FWHM) in radiations, is the reflecting angle, and is the crystal size.

The TGA/DTA curve for the reaction mixture is shown in Figure 2. The figure showed that the eutectic point of the melt is found to be 820°C. The melt temperature is kept approximately 80°C higher than the eutectic point to reduce the melt viscosity. The LiF is used to increase the fluidity and electrical conductivity of the melt. Its decomposition potential is more cathodic than any other salts chosen. A gradual weight loss observed up to 497°C may be due to the removal of moisture and inbound water associated with the salts. The weight gain which is observed up to 761°C from 497°C, due to B2O3, begins to turn into liquid (melting point 450°C) in the heating process. These reactants whether in the liquid or gaseous state play a crucial role in determining the shape of the final product. Further, this weight gain is mainly due to the oxidation of the reactants (2) [22, 23]. MgCl2 stretches excess Mg and also increases the electrical conductivity of the melt. This excess Mg combines with O forming MgO (from residual B2O3). The formation of 2MgCl2·3B2O3 is due to the solid-state reaction between residual B2O3 and MgCl2, turn into molten state (melting point of MgCl2: 708°C) is confirmed by an exothermic peak at 761°C. Finally, the reactants can be oxidized thoroughly at 761°C [24]. Further weight loss observed up to 1000°C is responsible for the transformation of the reactants into desired product. In the DTA curve, a sharp exothermic spike is observed at 742°C which may also be verified by confirming this process. This is gratuitous to the DSC curve (Figure 3) at 745°C; a sharp exothermic spine is observed that the heat of decomposition of salts is about 513.3 J/g.

The reaction was carried out for MgB6 in MgCl2–B2O3–LiF system; the main chemical reactions are

The overall reaction is

Trace amount of the unreacted intermediate MgO was present in the synthesized compound as 0.6% and the remaining 99.4% was MgB6 as depicted from XRD pattern.

The XPS spectrum for B 1s is shown in Figure 4(a). The higher binding energy value for B 1s exists at 198.6 eV. This reflects contributions from both trigonal BO3 and tetrahedral BO4 groups. The electron transfer would come from trigonal B 1s to B–O orbital and from the unfilled tetrahedral B 2p orbital to B–O [25, 26]. This B 1s → resonance as expected for sp2-bonded boron incorporated in the crystal [27]. Figure 4(b) shows the Mg 1s spectra for MgB6 at 1314 eV revealed that the auger spectral distribution over an extruded energy range far from the threshold; there is an extra energy for Mg rich compound [28]. Figure 4(c) shows the O 1s spectrum for MgB6 existing at 544 eV. This may be due to the core-hole Rydberg states containing O 1s → resonance [29, 30]. Figure 4(d) shows C 1s spectrum at 296 eV and reveals energy transitions between a carbon core level and an antibonding molecular orbital [31]. The surface is contaminated due to exposure to air during the processing of the sample.

The Mg2+ cations in MgB6 complex species have C6v pyramidal structures interacting with a planar hexagonal dianion. The bonding between these two may be due the electrostatic attraction [12].

The FTIR spectrum of MgB6 is shown in Figure 5. The O–H stretching vibrations of water crystallization are represent at 3743 and 3413 cm−1, respectively. The absorption at 2225 cm−1 is assigned to O–H stretching vibration of cluster of water molecules of crystallization, respectively. The characteristic peak of Mg–B is observed at 1642 cm−1 [32]. Longitudinal optic mode frequency of Mg–O is observed at 705 cm−1; this MgO as impurity phases is also observed in the XRD pattern. The bending vibration for MgB6 is observed at 437 cm−1. The bending mode of Mg–B of BO4 anion is assigned to 499 cm−1. The asymmetric stretching vibration of Mg–B of BO4 anion is observed at 1021 cm−1. The asymmetric stretching vibration of B–O bond of trigonal BO3 units is observed at 1367 cm−1. The frequencies observed in the spectrum are in good agreement with the reported values [33, 34].

The SEM image of the sample is shown in Figure 6. The microstructure indicates that the particle diameters are in the range 4–8 μm. From the microstructure, the molten regions are clearly visible, which give the clear indication of MgB6 formation. The white regions in SEM represent the impurity phase MgO present in the sample [35, 36]. The present study reveals the formation of MgB6 phase as cubic crystal structure.

The mechanism of hexaboride formation was proposed by many authors [12, 1417, 3747]. According to Li and Jin, the negative charged boron atoms and the positive charged alkaline earth metal atoms form complexes of M2+ metal cation and dianion due to electrostatic attraction. They also suggested that the metal cations M2+ have definite role on stabilizing the dianion [12]. Kaptay and Kuznetsov reported that the boron components are dissolved in ionic form in the melt, to form boride phase on the cathode joint with metal cations [37]. Jose et al. reported the “unstable stoichiometric way” for the deposition of Barium hexaboride [14]. We reported earlier that the electrolytically dissociated metal and B ions deposit on the cathode as CeB6 and SmB6, respectively [15, 16]. We also reported in our earlier study on CaB6 that the calcium and boron are reduced at the cathode to form submicron sized crystals [17]. As reported by Chen et al. [38], the formation of MgB6 at 900°C as one of the secondary phases along with MgB4 due the volatile nature of Mg at this temperature resulted in Mg deficiency on in situ Cu doping of MgB2. The commonly accepted mechanism of boron deposition in molten salts is a single-step three-electron electrochemical reaction [3943]. Gloor et al. investigated the multiexciton bound state of molecules in divalent hexaborides. They proposed that the larger energy gain per one electron-hole pair decreases the semiconducting gap and produced intermediate phase. This may be the reason for the formation of intermediate phase MgB6 [44]. Li et al. described the diffusion of Mg vapour into boron creating a complex of Mg–B supersaturated solution, encompassing the formation of nonequilibrium MgB6 [45]. Lee et al. and J. Q. Li also authenticated with S. Li [45] and postulated that the path of the reaction of supersaturated Mg–B cluster complex via spinodal decomposition leads to the formation of hypothetical phase MgB6 [46, 47].

4. Conclusion

In summary, the electrochemical synthesis of hypothetical magnesium hexaboride by molten salt technology is presented. Various mechanisms for the formation of magnesium hexaboride are discussed. It is believed that the supersaturated MgB6 cluster complex is postulated for the metastable magnesium hexaboride compound. Further experimental evidence is more needed to explore the thermodynamically unstable magnesium hexaboride.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Director of CSIR-CECRI for his keen interest and encouragement and staff of EMP Division for their support. S. Angappan acknowledges the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India, for providing the financial assistant to the project EMPOWER (OLP 0060).

References

  1. K. Segawa, A. Tomita, K. Iwashita, M. Kasaya, T. Suzuki, and S. Kunii, “Electronic and magnetic properties of heavy rare-earth hexaboride single crystals,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 104–107, no. 2, pp. 1233–1234, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. L. Perkins, M. Trenary, T. Tanaka, and S. Otani, “X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy investigation of the initial oxygen adsorption sites on the LaB6(100) surface,” Surface Science, vol. 423, no. 1, pp. L222–L228, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. Chen, W. Zhou, and L. Zhang, “Oriented structure and crystallography of directionally solidified LaB6-ZrB2 eutectic,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 237–240, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  4. S.-Q. Zheng, Z.-D. Zou, G.H. Min, H. Yu, J. Han, and W. Wang, “Synthesis of strontium hexaboride powder by the reaction of strontium carbonate with boron carbide and carbon,” Journal of Materials Science Letters, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 313–315, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G. Kaptay, I. Sytchev, M. S. Yaghmaee, A. Kovacs, E. Cserta, and M. Ark, in Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Molten Salt Chemistry and Technology, p. 168, Shanghai, China, 2001.
  6. T. Y. Kosolapova, Ed., Preparation and Application of Refractory Compounds, Metallurgiya, Moscow, Russia, 1986.
  7. T. I. Serebryakova, V. A. Neronov, and P. D. Peshev, High Temperature Borides, Metallurgiya, Chelyabinsk, Russia, 1991.
  8. T. A. Serebryakova, “Classification of borides,” Journal of the Less-Common Metals, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 499–503, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. Markowsky, Y. Kondrashevsky, and G. Kaputovskaya, “The composition and the chemical properties of magnesium borides,” Zhurnal Organicheskoi Khimii, vol. 25, p. 433, 1955. View at: Google Scholar
  10. P. Duhart, “The borides of magnesium and aluminium,” Annali di Chimica, vol. 7, pp. 339–365, 1962. View at: Google Scholar
  11. G. V. Samsonov, T. I. Serebriakova, and V. A. Neronov, Borides, Atomizdat, Moscow, Russia, 1975 (Russian).
  12. Q. S. Li and Q. Jin, “Theoretical study on the aromaticity of the pyramidal MB6 (M = Be, Mg, Ca, and Sr) clusters,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 107, no. 39, pp. 7869–7873, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. G. K. Moiseev and A. L. Ivanovskii, “Thermodynamic properties and thermal stability of magnesium borides,” Inorganic Materials, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1061–1066, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. P. Jose, L. Sundar, L. J. Berchmans, A. Visuvasam, and S. Angappan, “Electrochemical synthesis and characterization of BaB6 from molten melt,” Journal of Mining and Metallurgy B: Metallurgy, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 101–109, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. Amalajyothi, L. J. Berchmans, S. Angappan, and A. Visuvasam, “Electrosynthesis of cerium hexaboride by the molten salt technique,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 310, no. 14, pp. 3376–3379, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. J. Berchmans, A. Visuvasam, S. Angappan, C. Subramanian, and A. K. Suri, “Electrosynthesis of samarium hexaboride using tetra borate melt,” Ionics, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 833–838, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Angappan, M. Helan, A. Visuvasam, L. J. Berchmans, and V. Ananth, “Electrolytic preparation of CaB6 by molten salt technique,” Ionics, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 527–533, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. I. Popov, N. Baadji, and S. Sanvito, “Magnetism and antiferroelectricity in MgB6,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, no. 10, Article ID 107205, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. V. Okatov, A. L. Ivanovskii, Yu. E. Medvedeva, and N. I. Medvedeva, “The electronic band structures of superconducting MgB2 and related borides CaB2, MgB6 and CaB6,” Physica Status Solidi B, vol. 225, pp. R3–R5, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. L. Ivanovskii, “Superconducting MgB2 and related compounds: synthesis, properties and electronic structure,” Russian Chemical Reviews, vol. 70, pp. 717–734, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. V. G. Pol, S. V. Pol, I. Felner, and A. Gedanken, “Critical current density in the MgB2 nanoparticles prepared under autogenic pressure at elevated temperature,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 433, no. 1–3, pp. 115–119, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Zhang, X. Wang, X. Zhang et al., “Direct low-temperature synthesis of RB6 (R= Ce, Pr, Nd) nanocubes and nanoparticles,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 182, no. 11, pp. 3098–3104, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. Peshev, “A thermodynamic analysis of lanthanum hexaboride crystal preparation from aluminum flux with the use of compound precursors,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 237–242, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Ma, Y. Du, M. Wu et al., “A simple inorganic-solvent-thermal route to nanocrystalline niobium diboride,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 468, no. 1-2, pp. 473–476, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. M. Duffin, C. P. Schwartz, A. H. England, J. S. Uejio, D. Prendergast, and R. J. Saykally, “pH-dependent x-ray absorption spectra of aqueous boron oxides,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 134, no. 15, Article ID 154503, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. E. Fleet and S. Muthupari, “Boron K-edge XANES of borate and borosilicate minerals,” American Mineralogist, vol. 85, no. 7-8, pp. 1009–1021, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  27. J. L. Blackburn, Y. Yan, C. Engtrakul et al., “Synthesis and characterization of boron-doped single-wall carbon nanotubes produced by the laser vaporization technique,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 2558–2566, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. Altieri, L. H. Tjeng, F. C. Voogt, T. Hibma, O. Rogojanu, and G. A. Sawatzky, “Charge fluctuations and image potential at oxide-metal interfaces,” Physical Review B, vol. 66, no. 15, Article ID 155432, pp. 1554321–1554326, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  29. S. Sorensen, T. Tanaka, R. Feifel et al., “Application of an atomic relaxation model for the interpretation of O1s to Rydberg excited Auger electron spectra of molecular oxygen,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 398, no. 1–3, pp. 168–174, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. R. Feifel, T. Tanaka, M. Kitajima et al., “Probing the valence character of O 1s Rydberg excited O2 by participator Auger decay measurements and partial ion yield spectroscopy following x-ray absorption,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 126, Article ID 174304, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  31. A. Talapatra, S. K. Bandyopadhyay, P. Sen, P. Barat, S. Mukherjee, and M. Mukherjee, “X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies of MgB2 for valence state of Mg,” Physica C: Superconductivity, vol. 419, no. 3-4, pp. 141–147, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. N. Kumar, S. Das, C. Bernhard, and G. D. Varma, “Effect of graphene oxide doping on superconducting properties of bulk MgB2,” Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 26, no. 9, Article ID 095008, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. K. Nakamato, Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds, John Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 5th edition, 1977.
  34. S. D. Ross, Inorganic Infrared and Raman Spectra, McGraw Hill, London, UK, 1972.
  35. X. Chen, T. Xia, M. Wang, W. Zhao, and T. Liu, “Microstructural transformation during combustion synthesis of MgB2 superconductor,” Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications, vol. 454, no. 1-2, pp. 38–42, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. R. G. Abhilash Kumar, K. Vinod, R. P. Aloysius, and U. Syamaprasad, “A simple and inexpensive method for rapid synthesis of MgB2 superconductor,” Materials Letters, vol. 60, no. 28, pp. 3328–3331, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G. Kaptay and S. A. Kuznetsov, “Electrochemical synthesis of refractory borides from molten salts—review paper,” Plasmas & Ions, vol. 2, pp. 45–56, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  38. S. K. Chen, M. Majoros, J. L. MacManus-Driscoll, and B. A. Glowacki, “In situ and ex situ Cu doping of MgB2,” Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications, vol. 418, no. 3-4, pp. 99–106, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. Thompson, “The chemistry of metal borides & related compounds,” in Progress in Boron Chemistry, R. J. Brotherton and H. Steinberg, Eds., vol. 2, pp. 178–230, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1970. View at: Google Scholar
  40. P. R. Davis, M. A. Gesley, G. A. Schwind, L. W. Swanson, and J. J. Hutta, “Comparison of thermionic cathode parameters of low index single crystal faces of LaB6, CeB6 and PrB6,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 381–394, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. V. Meschel and O. J. Kleppa, “Standard enthalpies of formation of some borides of Ce, Pr, Nd and Gd by high-temperature reaction calorimetry,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 226, no. 1-2, pp. 243–247, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. G. Balakrishnan, M. R. Lees, and D. M. K. Paul, “Growth of large single crystals of rare earth hexaborides,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 256, no. 1-2, pp. 206–209, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. C. Y. Zou, Y. M. Zhao, and J. Q. Xu, “Synthesis of single-crystalline CeB6 nanowires,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 291, no. 1, pp. 112–116, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. T. A. Gloor, M. E. Zhitomirsky, and T. M. Rice, “Multiexciton molecules in the hexaborides,” European Physical Journal B, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 491–497, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Li, O. Prabhakar, T. T. Tan et al., “Intrinsic nanostructural domains: possible origin of weaklinkless superconductivity in the quenched reaction product of Mg and amorphous B,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 874–876, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. Lee, H. Mori, T. Masui, Y. Eltsev, A. Yamamoto, and S. Tajima, “Growth, structure analysis and anisotropic superconducting properties of MgB2 single crystals,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 2255–2258, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. J. Q. Li, L. Li, Y. Q. Zhou, Z. A. Ren, G. C. Che, and Z. X. Zhao, “Structural features, stacking faults, and grain boundaries in MgB2 superconducting materials,” http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0104350. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 S. Angappan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

859 Views | 431 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.