Table of Contents
ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2014, Article ID 124206, 4 pages
Clinical Study

Perineal Distensibility Using Epi-no in Twin Pregnancies: Comparative Study with Singleton Pregnancies

Pelvic Floor Sector, Department of Obstetrics, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Carlos Weber, 956 Apartment 113 Visage, Vila Leopoldina, 05303-000 São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Received 18 January 2014; Accepted 9 March 2014; Published 27 March 2014

Academic Editors: M. Friedrich and E. Shalev

Copyright © 2014 Juliana Sayuri Kubotani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. A. Ashton-Miller and J. O. L. DeLancey, “On the biomechanics of vaginal birth and common sequelae,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 11, pp. 163–176, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. R. Zanetti and C. D. Petricelli, “Fisioterapia obstétrica: considerações terapêuticas e exercícios físicos,” in Obstetrícia, A. F. Moron, L. Camano, and L. Kulay Jr, Eds., p. 155, Manole, Barueri, Brazil, 1st edition, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Wijma, A. E. Weis Potters, B. T. H. M. De Wolf, D. J. Tinga, and J. G. Aarnoudse, “Anatomical and functional changes in the lower urinary tract following spontaneous vaginal delivery,” An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 110, no. 7, pp. 658–663, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Hillebrenner, S. Wagenpfeil, R. Schuchardt, M. Schelling, and K. T. Schneider, “Initial experiences with primiparous women using a new king of Epi-no labor trainer,” in Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie, vol. 205, pp. 12–19, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. G. T. Kovacs, P. Heath, and C. Heather, “First Australian trial of the birth-training device Epi-no: a highly significant increased chance of an intact perineum,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 347–348, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Kok, K. H. Tan, S. Koh et al., “Antenatal use of a novel vaginal birth training device by term primiparous women in Singapore,” Singapore Medical Journal, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 318–323, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. Cochran, Sampling Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, Boston, Mass, USA, 2nd edition, 1985.
  8. K. L. Shek, J. Kruger, and H. P. Dietz, “The effect of pregnancy on hiatal dimensions and urethral mobility: an observational study,” International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 23, pp. 1561–1567, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. Polden and J. Mantle, Fisioterapia em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil, 2000.
  10. E. Baracho, Fisioterapia Aplicada à Obstetrícia, Urogin Ecologia e Aspectos de Mastologia, Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 4th edition, 2007.
  11. R. P. Goldberg, C. Kwon, S. Gandhi et al., “Urinary incontinence among mothers of multiples: the protective effect of cesarean delivery,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 188, no. 6, pp. 1447–1453, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. Legendre, J. Tassel, L.-J. Salomon, A. Fauconnier, and G. Bader, “Impact of twin gestation on the risk of postpartum stress incontinence,” Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 238–243, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. J. Cuerva González, N. López Carpintero, M. M. de la Calle Fernández, R. Usandizaga, and A. González, “Postpartum urinary and fecal incontinence in gemelar pregnancy according to route and mode of delivery,” Ginecología y Obstetricia de México, vol. 79, pp. 540–546, 2011. View at Google Scholar