Table of Contents
ISRN Cardiology
Volume 2014, Article ID 149243, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/149243
Review Article

Open versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the Elective and Emergent Setting in a Pooled Population of 37,781 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

1Cardiology Service MCHE-MDC, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Drive, San Antonio, TX 78234-6200, USA
2Cardiology Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
3Medicine, USUHS, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA

Received 11 December 2013; Accepted 3 February 2014; Published 2 April 2014

Academic Editors: W. S. Aronow and F. Cademartiri

Copyright © 2014 Dustin M. Thomas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. A. Lederle, J. A. Freischlag, T. C. Kyriakides et al., “Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 302, no. 14, pp. 1535–1542, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. M. Greenhalgh, L. C. Brown, G. P. S. Kwong, and S. G. Thompson, “Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomized controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 364, no. 9437, pp. 843–848, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. R. M. Greenhalgh, L. C. Brown, J. T. Powell et al., “Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, no. 20, pp. 1863–1871, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. J. D. Blankensteijn, S. E. C. A. de Jong, M. Prinssen et al., “Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 23, pp. 2398–2405, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. F. Stroup, J. A. Berlin, S. C. Morton et al., “Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 283, no. 15, pp. 2008–2012, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm.
  7. J. McPhee, M. H. Eslami, E. J. Arous, L. M. Messina, and A. Schanzer, “Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States (2001–2006): a significant survival benefit over open repair is independently associated with increased institutional volume,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 817–826, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. E. Nedeau, F. B. Pomposelli, A. D. Hamdan et al., “Endovascular versus open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 15–20, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. N. Saqib, S. C. Park, T. Park et al., “Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm does not confer survival benefits over open repair,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 614–619, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. P. Sarac, M. Bannazadeh, A. F. Rowan et al., “Comparative predictors of mortality for endovascular and open repair of ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 461–468, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. A. Sharif, B. Lee, R. R. Makar, W. Loan, and C. V. Soong, “Role of the Hardman index in predicting mortality for open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 528–535, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. K. Vaddineni, G. C. Russo, M. A. Patterson, S. M. Taylor, and W. D. Jordan Jr., “Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a retrospective assessment of open versus endovascular repair,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 782–786, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. L. Verhoeven, M. R. Kapma, H. Groen et al., “Mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with open or endovascular repair,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1396–1400, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. J. Visser, M. Williams, J. Kievit, and J. L. Bosch, “Prediction of 30-day mortality after endovascular repair or open surgery in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1093–1099, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J.-M. Alsac, P. Desgranges, H. Kobeiter, and J.-P. Becquemin, “Emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: feasibility and comparison of early results with conventional open repair,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 632–639, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. Coppi, R. Silingardi, S. Gennai, G. Saitta, and A. V. Ciardullo, “A single-center experience in open and endovascular treatment of hemodynamically unstable and stable patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1140–1147, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. A. T. Bosch, J. A. W. Teijink, E. M. Willigendael, and M. H. Prins, “Endovascular aneurysm repair is superior to open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in EVAR-suitable patients,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Franks, G. Lloyd, G. Fishwick, M. Bown, and R. Sayers, “Endovascular treatment of ruptured and symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 345–350, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. S. Matsumura, D. C. Brewster, M. S. Makaroun, and D. C. Naftel, “A multicenter controlled clinical trial of open versus endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 262–271, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J.-P. Becquemin, J.-C. Pillet, F. Lescalie et al., “A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1167.e1–1173.e1, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Prinssen, E. L. G. Verhoeven, J. Buth et al., “A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 16, pp. 1607–1618, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. F. Hansman, D. Neuzil, T. M. Quigley et al., “A comparison of 50 initial endoluminal endograft repairs for abdominal aortic aneurysm with 50 concurrent open repairs,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 185, no. 5, pp. 441–444, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. S. Moore, V. S. Kashyap, C. L. Vescera, and W. J. Quiñones-Baldrich, “Abdominal aortic aneurysm: a 6-year comparison of endovascular versus transabdominal repair,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 230, no. 3, pp. 298–308, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. May, G. H. White, W. Yu et al., “Concurrent comparison of endoluminal versus open repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: analysis of 303 patients by life table method,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 213–221, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. May, G. H. White, R. Waugh et al., “Improved survival after endoluminal repair with second-generation prostheses compared with open repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a 5-year concurrent comparison using life table method,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. S21–S26, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Porcellini, P. Nastro, U. Bracale, S. Brearley, and P. Giordano, “Endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with concomitant malignancy,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 16–23, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. V. Raval and M. K. Eskandari, “Outcomes of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair among the elderly: endovascular versus open repair,” Surgery, vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 245–260, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. L. Schermerhorn, A. J. O'Malley, A. Jhaveri, P. Cotterill, F. Pomposelli, and B. E. Landon, “Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the medicare population,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 5, pp. 464–474, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. O. Schouten, V. H. van Waning, M. D. Kertai et al., “Perioperative and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular treatment compared with open vascular surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm or Iliaco-Femoro-Popliteal bypass,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 861–866, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. E. Steinmetz, N. Abello, B. Kretz, E. Gauthier, O. Bouchot, and R. Brenot, “Analysis of outcome after using high-risk criteria selection to surgery versus endovascular repair in the modern era of abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 403–409, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. Tefera, S. C. Carr, and W. D. Turnipseed, “Endovascular aortic repair or minimal incision aortic surgery: which procedure to choose for treatment of high-risk aneurysms?” Surgery, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 748–753, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. W. Turnipseed, G. Tefera, and S. Carr, “Comparison of minimal incision aortic surgery with endovascular aortic repair,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 186, no. 3, pp. 287–291, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. F. Aarts, S. van Sterkenburg, and J. D. Blankensteijn, “Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open aneurysm repair: comparison of treatment outcome and procedure-related reintervention rate,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 699–704, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. F. R. Arko, W. A. Lee, B. B. Hill et al., “Aneurysm-related death: primary endpoint analysis for comparison of open and endovascular repair,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 297–304, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. L. de Bruin, A. F. Baas, J. Buth et al., “Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, no. 20, pp. 1881–1889, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J.-P. Becquemin, A. Bourriez, A. D'Audiffret et al., “Mid-term results of endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients anatomically suitable for endovascular repair,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 656–661, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. P. Cao, F. Verzini, G. Parlani et al., “Clinical effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm endografting: 7-year concurrent comparison with open repair,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 841–848, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. Y. C. Chan, J. P. Morales, N. Gulamhuseinwala et al., “Large infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysms: endovascular versus open repair—single centre experience,” International Journal of Clinical Practice, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 373–378, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. E. Chisci, T. Kristmundsson, G. de Donato et al., “The AAA with a challenging neck: outcome of open versus endovascular repair with standard and fenestrated stent-grafts,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 137–146, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. F. J. Criado, R. M. Fairman, and G. J. Becker, “Talent LPS AAA stent graft: results of a pivotal clinical trial,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 709–715, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. Elkouri, P. Gloviczki, M. A. McKusick et al., “Perioperative complications and early outcome after endovascular and open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 497–505, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. C. García-Madrid, M. Josa, V. Riambau, C. Mestres, J. Muntaña, and J. Mulet, “Endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a comparison of early and intermediate results in patients suitable for both techniques,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 365–372, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. Gawenda, M. Zaehringer, and J. Brunkwall, “Open versus endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aneurysms in patients who were morphological candidates for endovascular treatment,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 745–751, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. P. K. Gupta, B. Ramanan, T. G. Lynch et al., “Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm does not improve early survival versus open repair in patients younger than 60 years,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 506–512, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. K. Hoshina, A. Hosaka, T. Takayama et al., “Outcomes after open surgery and endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with massive neck atheroma,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 257–261, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. R. J. Hinchliffe, L. Bruijstens, S. T. R. MacSweeney, and B. D. Braithwaite, “A randomised trial of endovascular and open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm—results of a pilot study and lessons learned for future studies,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 506–513, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. D. Paolini, S. Chahwan, D. Wojnarowski, J. P. Pigott, F. LaPorte, and A. J. Comerota, “Elective endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 924–927, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. C. J. Zeebregts, R. H. Geelkerken, J. van der Palen, A. B. Huisman, P. de Smit, and R. J. van Det, “Outcome of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the era of endovascular treatment,” The British Journal of Surgery, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 563–568, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. R. L. Bush, M. L. Johnson, N. Hedayati, W. G. Henderson, P. H. Lin, and A. B. Lumsden, “Performance of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in high-risk patients: results from the veterans affairs national surgical quality improvement program,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 227–e1, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. E. L. Verhoeven, M. R. Kapma, H. Groen et al., “Mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with open or endovascular repair,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1396–1400, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. R. E. Lovegrove, M. Javid, T. R. Magee, and R. B. Galland, “A meta-analysis of 21178 patients undergoing open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” The British Journal of Surgery, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 677–684, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. N. Hynes and S. Sultan, “A prospective clinical, economic, and quality-of-life analysis comparing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), open repair, and best medical treatment in high-risk patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms suitable for EVAR: the Irish patient trial,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 763–776, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. P. P. Mistry, P. Becker, and J. van Marle, “A prospective comparison of secondary interventions and mortality in open and endovascular infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair,” South African Journal of Surgery, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 39–42, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. W. S. Moore, J. S. Matsumura, M. S. Makaroun et al., “Five-year interim comparison of the Guidant bifurcated endograft with open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 46–55, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. H. Teufelsbauer, A. M. Prusa, K. Wolff et al., “Endovascular stent grafting versus open surgical operation in patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms: a propensity score-adjusted analysis,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. 782–787, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. C. M. Wahlgren and J. Malmstedt, “Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair compared with open surgical repair in high-risk patients: results from the Swedish vascular registry,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1382–1388, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. G. J. Wang and J. P. Carpenter, “The Powerlink system for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: six-year results,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 535.e3–545.e3, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. L. C. Brown, S. G. Thompson, R. M. Greenhalgh, and J. T. Powell, “Incidence of cardiovascular events and death after open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the randomized EVAR trial 1,” The British Journal of Surgery, vol. 98, no. 7, pp. 935–942, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. C. de Virgilio, H. Bui, C. Donayre et al., “Endovascular versus open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a comparison of cardiac morbidity and mortality,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 134, no. 9, pp. 947–951, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. Y. Gouëffic, J.-P. Becquemin, P. Desgranges, and H. Kobeiter, “Midterm survival after endovascular versus open repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 47–57, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. B. B. Hill, Y. G. Wolf, W. A. Lee et al., “Open versus endovascular AAA repair in patients who are morphological candidates for endovascular treatment,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 255–261, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. N. Diehm, A. I. Tsoukas, B. T. Katzen et al., “Matched-pair analysis of endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in young patients at low risk,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 645–651, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus