Table of Contents
ISRN Spectroscopy
Volume 2014, Article ID 245125, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/245125
Research Article

Gamma Emitting Radionuclides in Soils from Selected Areas in Douala-Bassa Zone, Littoral Region of Cameroon

1National Radiation Protection Agency, P.O. Box 33732, Yaounde, Cameroon
2Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Douala, P.O. Box 24157, Douala, Cameroon
3Department of Physics, Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai, Niger State, Nigeria
4Radioanalysis and Spectrometry Service, National Radiation and Protection Agency, Yaounde, Cameroon

Received 12 November 2013; Accepted 10 December 2013; Published 22 January 2014

Academic Editors: B. Liu and T. Stafilov

Copyright © 2014 Maurice Moyo Ndontchueng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

A study of natural radioactivity levels in some composites of eighteen soil samples selected within Douala-Bassa zone of Littoral Region has been evaluated. The samples were analysed using gamma spectrometry based broad energy germanium detector (BEGe 6350). The activity profile of radionuclide shows low activity across the studied areas. The obtained mean values of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in the two campuses were 25.48 Bq/kg, 65.96 Bq/kg, and 39.14 Bq/kg for Campus 1 and 24.50 Bq/kg, 66.71 Bq/kg, and 28.19 Bq/kg for Campus 2, respectively. In terms of health analysis, some radiation health hazard parameters were calculated within the two campuses. The mean values of radium equivalent activity were 122.81 Bq/kg and 122.08 Bq/kg, absorbed dose rate in air was 99.13 nGy/h and 98.18 nGy/y, annual outdoor effective dose was 0.12 mSv/y and 0.12 mSv/y, and external health hazard index was 0.34 and 0.33 in Campus 1 and Campus 2, respectively. These health hazard parameters were seen to be below the safe limit of UNSCEAR 2000 except the absorbed dose rate in air and the annual outdoor effective doses which are relatively high compared to the values of 60 nGy/h and 0.07 mSv/y. These results reveal no significant radiological health hazards for inhabitance within the study areas.

1. Introduction

Gamma radiation emitted from naturally occurring radioisotopes, also called terrestrial background radiation, represents the main source of radiation of the human body. Natural environmental radioactivity and the associated external exposure due to gamma radiation depend primarily on the geological and geographical conditions and appear at different levels in the soils of each region in the world [1, 2]. Only radionuclides with half-lives comparable with the age of the earth or their corresponding decay products existing in terrestrial materials such as 232Th, 238U, and 40K are of great interest. Abnormal occurrences of uranium and its decay products in rocks and soils and thorium in monazite sands are the main sources of high natural background areas that have been identified in several areas of the world [3]. Outdoors exposure to this radiation originates predominantly from the upper 30 cm of the soil [1]. According to the literature of natural radioactivity in soil, there is lack of information on natural radioactivity levels in soils from various living sites in Cameroon. Radionuclides in soil generate a significant component of the background radiation exposure to the population [3].

The knowledge of specific activities or concentrations and distributions of the radionuclides in soil is of great interest for many researchers throughout the world and serves as the reference in documenting changes to environmental radioactivity due anthropogenic activities or any release of radioactive elements [4, 5]. Monitoring of radioactive materials is therefore of primary importance to humans, organisms, and environmental protection. The accumulation of such radioactivity may substantially contribute to collective radiation dose received by the local population living within this particular environment. Radiation exposure can damage living cells, causing death in some of them and modifying others.

There have been many surveys to determine the background levels of radionuclides in soils, which can in turn be related to the absorbed dose rates in air. All of these spectrometric measurements indicate that the three components of external radiation field, namely, from the -emitting radionuclides in the 238U and 232Th series and 40K, made approximately equal contributions to the externally incident γ-radiation dose to individuals in typical situations both outdoors and indoors. Since 98.5% of the radiological effects of the uranium series are produced by radium and its daughter products, the contribution from the 238U and other contributions of 226Ra precursors are normally ignored.

The aim of the present study tends to assess the specific activity and examine radiation hazard indices of the naturally occurring radionuclides (226Ra, 232Th, and 40K) in soil samples from the two campuses of the University of Douala-Cameroon using broad energy gamma-ray spectrometry based high purity germanium detector.

1.1. Overview of the Study Area

The field experiment was carried out at the two campuses of the University of Douala-Cameroon (04°03′14.8′′–04°03′29.7′′N and 09°44′00.1′′–09°44′45.2′′W). The studied sites are located within the Douala-Bassa zone where the geology of the region is compromised by the sedimentary rocks, namely, by the tertiary to quaternary sediments as seen in Figure 1. These sedimentary rocks found in the Douala-Bassa zone (within the Douala basin) consist of poorly consolidated grits and sandstones that occasionally display bedding with a few intercalations of limestone and shale. Soils in Douala-Bassa zone vary from yellow through brown to back, freely drained, sandy ferralitic [6].

245125.fig.001
Figure 1: Map indicating the study area.
1.2. Samples Collection and Preparation Techniques

Composites of eighteen soil samples were randomly chosen from the two campuses of University of Douala (seven from small area coverage of Campus 1 ESSEC situated at Angel-Raphael and eleven from large area coverage of Campus 2 located at Ndong-Bong Douala-Bassa). The vertical or near vertical surface was dressed (scraped) to remove smeared soil. This was necessary to minimize the effects of contaminant migration interferences due to smearing of material from other levels. Each composite sample was a mixture of five samples collected within an area of 5 m2 separated from each other by a distance of 300 m to cover the study site and to observe a significant local spatial variation in terrestrial radioactivity. Each sampling point was marked using a global positioning system (GPS). Four samples were collected at the edges (end corners) and one at the centre. These five samples collected at a depth of approximately 20 cm from the top surface layer were mixed thoroughly to form a composite sample and packed into a polyethylene bag to prevent contamination. The samples were transferred into the laboratory after they were labelled accordingly.

At the laboratory, the samples were air-dried for a week then oven-dried at 105°C for 24 hours. The dried samples were grinded into powder and sieved through a 2 mm wire mesh to obtain a uniform particles size. In order to maintain radioactive equilibrium between 226Ra and its daughters, the soil samples were then packed in a 360 mL air tight polyethylene cylindrical container, dry-weighed, and stored for a period of 32 days for equilibrium between the long-lived parent and daughter nuclides.

2. Experimental

Each sample was subjected to a coaxial gamma-ray spectrometer consisting of broad energy germanium detector (BE6530) manufactured by Canberra Industries. The resolution of this detector is 0.5 keV at 5.9 keV for 55Fe, 0.75 keV at 122 keV for 57Co, and 2.2 keV at 1332 keV for 60Co. The detector is placed in a low-level Canberra Model 747 lead shield with thickness of 10 cm.

The energy distributions of the radioactive samples were generated by the computer inbuilt Multiport II Multichannel Analyzer (MCA). Each sample was counted for 86400 seconds for effective peak area statistics of above 0.1%.

Following the sample analysis process, the specific activity concentration in Becquerel per kilogram (Bq·kg−1) for each radionuclide was calculated after background separation using the Genie-2000 software incorporated with cascade summing correction coefficient.

Assuming a state of secular equilibrium between 238U and 232Th and their respective decay daughter products, the following relatively intense gamma-ray transitions were used to measure the activity concentrations for the above-mentioned radionuclides.(a)226Ra concentration was calculated as a weighted mean of the activity concentrations of the gamma-rays of 214Pb (295.1 keV, 351.9 keV), 214Bi (609.3 keV and 1120.29 keV), and its specific gamma-ray at 186.2 keV. Interference correction due to the presence of 185.7 keV energy peak of 235U has been taken into account and subtracted accordingly.(b)The gamma-ray photopeaks used for the determination of the 232Th contents were 338.4 keV, 911.2 keV, and 969.11 keV of  228Ac and 238.6 keV of  212Pb.(c)40K was directly determined by using 1460.8 (10.7%) gamma-ray.

2.1. Health Hazard Parameters
2.1.1. Absorbed Dose Rate in Air ()

A direct connection between radioactivity concentrations of natural radionuclides and their exposure is known as the absorbed dose rate in the air at 1 metre above the ground surface. The mean activity concentrations of  226Ra (of the 238U series), 232Th, and 40K (Bq·kg−1) in the soil samples were used to calculate the absorbed dose rate using the following formula provided by UNSCEAR [7] and European Commission [8]: where is the absorbed dose rate in nGy·h−1 and , , and are the activity concentrations of 226Ra (238U), 232Th, and 40K, respectively. The dose coefficients in units of nGy·h−1 per Bq·kg−1 were taken from the UNSCEAR (2000) report [79].

2.1.2. Annual Effective Dose Equivalent

The absorbed dose rate in air at 1 metre above the ground surface does not directly provide the radiological risk to which an individual is exposed [10]. The absorbed dose can be considered in terms of the annual effective dose equivalent from outdoor terrestrial gamma radiation which is converted from the absorbed dose by taking into account two factors, namely, the conversion coefficient from absorbed dose in air to effective dose and the outdoor occupancy factor. The annual effective dose equivalent can be estimated using the following formula [7, 11]:

The values of those parameters used in the UNSCEAR report (2000) are 0.70 Sv·Gy−1 for the conversion coefficient from absorbed dose in air to effective dose received by adults and 0.20 for the outdoor occupancy factor [7].

2.1.3. Radium Equivalent Activity

As a result of nonuniform distribution of natural radionuclides in the soil samples, the actual activity levels of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in the samples can be evaluated by means of a common radiological index called radium equivalent activity () [10, 12]. It is the most widely used index to assess the radiation hazards and can be calculated as given by Beretka and Mathew [10, 12]: where , , and are the activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in Bq·kg−1, respectively.

The maximum permissible value of the radium equivalent activity is 370.00 Bq·kg−1 [7, 10]. This value corresponds to an effective dose of 1 mSv for the general public and radiation dose rate of 1.50 mGy·y−1 [7, 13].

2.1.4. External and Internal Hazard Indices

Many radionuclides occur naturally in terrestrial soils and rocks and, upon decay, these radionuclides produce an external radiation field to which all human beings are exposed. In terms of dose, the principal primordial radionuclides are 232Th, 238U, and 40K. The decay of naturally occurring radionuclides in soil produces a gamma-beta radiation field in soil that crosses the soil-air interface to produce exposures to humans. The main factors which determine the exposure rate to a particular individual are the concentrations of radionuclides in the soil and the time spent outdoors. To limit the radiation exposure attributable to natural radionuclides in the samples to the permissible dose equivalent limit of 1.00 mSv·y−1, the external hazard index based on a criterion has been introduced using a model proposed by Krieger (1981) which is given by [7, 14]:

In order to keep the radiation hazard insignificant, the value of external hazard index must not exceed the limit of unity. The maximum value of equal to unity corresponds to the upper limit of radium equivalent activity of 370.00 Bq·kg−1 [15, 16].

In addition to the external hazard, radon and its short-lived products are also hazardous to the repository organs. To account for this threat, the maximum permissible concentration for 226Ra must be reduced to half of the normal limit (185.00 Bq·kg−1). The internal exposure to carcinogenic radon and its short-lived progeny is quantified by the internal hazard index () given by the expression [17].

3. Results and Discussion

The activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in soil samples from the University of Douala-Cameroon have been measured and presented in Table 1 with the geological coordinates of each sampling point. The radiological health hazards indices in the investigated soil samples have been calculated and displaced in Table 2. The comparison of specify activities of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K in soil samples from the University of Douala-Cameroon with data from other countries is reported in Table 3.

tab1
Table 1: Specify activities of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in soil samples from Campuses 1 and 2 of the University of Douala.
tab2
Table 2: The radiological health hazard parameters due to the activity contents of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in soil samples.
tab3
Table 3: Comparison of specific gamma activities (Bq/kg) in soil with that of other countries.

For Campus 1, in Tables 1 and 3, the activity concentrations of 226Ra varied from to  Bq/kg with an average of 25.48 Bq/kg. The activity concentrations of 232Th and 40K ranged from to  Bq/kg with an average value of 65.96 Bq/kg and from to  Bq/kg with a mean of 39.15 Bq/kg, respectively.

For Campus 2, in Tables 1 and 3, the activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K ranged from to  Bq/kg with an average value of 24.50 Bq/kg, from to  Bq/kg with a mean of 66.72 Bq/kg, and from to  Bq/kg with an average value of 28.19 Bq/kg, respectively.

The distributions of radioactivity measured in both studied sites are present in Figures 2(a) and 2(b). As shown in the figures, the radioactivity concentration slightly varied from one point to another. These variation observed in both studied sites may result from the nonuniform distribution of radioactivity contents present under the earth crust. It is generally considered that igneous rocks contain higher levels of radioactivity than sedimentary rocks. The areas under study are part of the Littoral Region observed to be the major sedimentary basin of Cameroon [6]. This formation has variations in sediments, limestone, shale, and clay. From the recorded activities of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in the present study, it can be noticed that the obtained average value of 232Th in both locations was observed to be comparably higher than both of 226Ra and 40K in almost all the soil-sampling locations. This could be due to the high content of thorium present in sedimentary rocks.

fig2
Figure 2: (a) Distribution of specific activities of 226Ra, 40K, and 232Th in soil samples from Campus 1. (b) Distribution of specific activities of 226Ra, 40K, and 232Th in soil samples from Campus 2.

Comparing the average activity values of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K obtained in both studied sites, as shown in Figure 3(a), it can be seen that the obtained average values of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in the analyzed soil samples from both studied sites were relatively the same with the exception of the 40K average value which was slightly higher in Campus 2 than in Campus 1. The observed similar variation range in activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K is due to the fact that both studied sites are closed to one another and the soil samples collected in both sites originated from the same geology formation. The slight difference in activity concentration average value of 40K is also due to the irregular distribution of uranium, thorium, and potassium contents present in the studied soils.

fig3
Figure 3: (a) Comparison of the mean specific gamma activities in soil from both studied sites. (b) Comparison of the mean specific gamma activities in soil samples with the worldwide value.

The calculated average activity values of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in both studied sites were compared with the established worldwide ones by UNSCEAR [7] as represented in Figure 3(b). It can be observed that the values obtained in both studied sites are comparably lower that the recommended worldwide values with the exception of the 226Ra values.

The observed activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in the present work were compared with other published values obtained from the literature of radioactivity in soil by many authors as dispatched in Table 3. The obtained average activity concentrations of 226Ra and 40K in both studied sites were comparably lower than the values published by other authors with the exception of the recorded values of 226Ra in Nigeria Delta published by Agbalagba and Onoja [25] which were relatively low. Similar observations were observed for 232Th as recorded in the activity concentration in this work. It can be seen that the average values of 232Th recorded in the present study were slightly lower than the published values recorded in China (Xiaz-hung area), Ghana (Greater Accra), and India (Himwchal Pradesh) [18, 20, 21] and higher than the recorded and published average values in Namibia and Nigeria Delta [23, 25]. The present values were compared favourably with the recorded average values published by other countries selected from the worldwide investigation of natural radioactivity in soils.

Uniformity with respect to exposure to radiation defined in terms of radium equivalent activity to compare the specific activity of geological materials contain in different amounts of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K. This was calculated and the results were presented in Table 2. It can be seen that values ranged from 116.36 Bq/kg to 144.46 Bq/kg with an average of 122.81 Bq/kg in Campus 1 and from 100.93 Bq/kg to 141.11 Bq/kg with a mean value of 122.08 Bq/kg in Campus 2. The obtained values of radium equivalent in the present investigation are comparably less than the safe limit (370.00 Bq/kg) recommended by UNSCEAR [7].

The ionising radiation affects the biological systems and it depends, along with the other factors, on the time and place of exposure and population involved. In most cases, the risk appears to be higher outdoors than indoors. As shown in Table 2, the calculated absorbed dose in air is in the range of 90.95 nGy/h to 115.77 nGy/h with a mean of 99.13 nGy/h in Campus 1 and from 81.92 nGy/h to 112.96 nGy/h with an average of 98.18 nGy/h in Campus 2. The estimated annual outdoor effective dose in the present study varies from 0.11 mSv/y to 0.14 mSv/y with a mean of 0.12 mSv/y and from 0.10 mSv/y to 0.14 mSv/y with an average of 0.12 mSv/y in Campuses 1 and 2, respectively. The external health hazard index calculated in the present study ranges from 0.31–0.40 with a mean of 0.34 and from 0.28–0.39 with an average of 0.33 in Campuses 1 and 2, respectively. The obtained values of the absorbed dose rate in air and the annual outdoor effective dose in the present investigation are comparably higher than the recommended values of 18.00–93.00 (60.00) nGy/h and 0.07 mSv/y UNSCEAR [7], whilst those of external health hazard index obtained are comparably less than the unity.

4. Conclusion

The natural radioactivity levels of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K have been measured in soils from the selected areas within the Douala-Bassa zone in the Littoral Region of Cameroon using gamma spectrometry based broad energy germanium detector (BE6530). The recorded mean values of 232Th in both studied sites were relatively high than those of 226Ra and 40K. Considering the nonuniform distribution of radioactivity in geological materials, the radium equivalent was calculated and observed to be lower than the recommended safe value (370.00 Bq/kg) by UNSCEAR. The radiological health hazards parameters calculated in the present work were comparably higher than the recommended safe limit of the absorbed dose rate in air, the annual outdoor effective dose, and external health hazard index by UNSCEAR except those values of the external health hazard index which were less than unity.

The results obtained in this work have established baseline information on natural radioactivity in the two campuses of the University of Douala-Cameroon. It is expected that the results obtained may be used as baseline data for future work.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support and technical cooperation provided by the National Radiation Protection Agency of Cameroon in granting access to the facilities to successfully complete this study. The authors also appreciate the Administration Committee of the University of Douala and their vicinity for the understanding during sampling period.

References

  1. M. Tzortzis, E. Svoukis, and H. Tsertos, “A comprehensive study of natural gamma radioactivity levels and associated dose rates from surface soils in Cyprus,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 217–224, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Rani and S. Singh, “Natural radioactivity levels in soil samples from some areas of Himachal Pradesh, India using γ-ray spectrometry,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 39, no. 34, pp. 6306–6314, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Orabi, A. Al-Shareaif, and M. El Galefi, “Gamma-ray measurements of naturally occurring radioactive sample from Alkharje City,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 269, no. 1, pp. 99–102, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Al-Jundi, B. A. Al-Bataina, Y. Abu-Rukah, and H. M. Shehadeh, “Natural radioactivity concentrations in soil samples along the Amman Aqaba Highway, Jordan,” Radiation Measurements, vol. 36, no. 1–6, pp. 555–560, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. C. Goddard, “Measurement of outdoor terrestrial gamma radiation in the sultanate of Oman,” Health Physics, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 869–874, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. V. A. Asaah, A. F. Abimbola, and C. E. Suh, “Heavy metal concentrations and distribution in surface soils of the Bassa Industrial Zone 1, Douala, Cameroon,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 147–158, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), “Report to the general assembly,” in Exposures From Natural Radiation Sources, B. Annex, Ed., 2000. View at Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (EC) Radiation Protection 112-radiological protection principles concerning the natural radioactivity of building materials Directorate- General Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection, 1999.
  9. L. Xinwei, “Natural radioactivity in some building materials and by-products of Shaanxi, China,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 262, no. 3, pp. 775–777, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Beretka and P. J. Mathew, “Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and by-products,” Health Physics, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 87–95, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N. Damla, U. Cevik, A. I. Kobya, A. Celik, N. Celik, and R. Van Grieken, “Radiation dose estimation and mass attenuation coefficients of cement samples used in Turkey,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 176, no. 1–3, pp. 644–649, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. I. F. Al-Hamarneh and M. I. Awadallah, “Soil radioactivity levels and radiation hazard assessment in the highlands of northern Jordan,” Radiation Measurements, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 102–110, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. N. Jibiri, I. P. Farai, and S. K. Alausa, “Estimation of annual effective dose due to natural radioactive elements in ingestion of foodstuffs in tin mining area of Jos-Plateau, Nigeria,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. O. Kpeglo, H. Lawluvi, A. Faanu et al., “Natural radioactivity and its associated radiological hazards in ghanaian cement,” Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 161–167, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  15. R. Krieger, “Radioactivity of construction materials,” Betonwerk und Fertigteil-Technik/Concrete Precasting Plant and Technology, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 468–446, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Ş. Turhan and L. Gündüz, “Determination of specific activity of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K for assessment of radiation hazards from Turkish pumice samples,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 332–342, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Xinwei, “Natural radioactivity in some building materials and by-products of Shaanxi, China,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 262, no. 3, pp. 775–777, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y.-X. Yang, X.-M. Wu, Z.-Y. Jiang et al., “Radioactivity concentrations in soils of the Xiazhuang granite area, China,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 255–259, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. V. R. K. Murty and N. Karunakara, “Natural radioactivity in the soil samples of Botswana,” Radiation Measurements, vol. 43, no. 9-10, pp. 1541–1545, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. O. Darko, “Natural radioactivity in soils and rocks within the Greater Accra Region of Ghana,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 249, no. 3, pp. 629–632, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Rani and S. Singh, “Natural radioactivity levels in soil samples from some areas of Himachal Pradesh, India using γ-ray spectrometry,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 39, no. 34, pp. 6306–6314, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Bellia, M. Brai, S. Hauser, P. Puccio, and S. Rizzo, “Natural radioactivity in a Volcanic Island: ustica, Southern Italy,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 287–293, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. F. Steinhausler and H. Lettner, “Radiometric survey in Namibia,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 45, no. 1-4, pp. 553–555, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. N. Jibiri and I. P. Farai, “Assessment of dose rate and collective effective dose equivalent due to terrestrial gamma radiation in the city of Lagos, Nigeria,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 191–194, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. O. Agbalagba and R. A. Onoja, “Evaluation of natural radioactivity in soil, sediment and water samples of Niger Delta (Biseni) flood plain lakes, Nigeria,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, vol. 102, no. 7, pp. 667–671, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus