Table of Contents
International Scholarly Research Notices
Volume 2014, Article ID 326832, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/326832
Research Article

Covariations between Shell-Growth Parameters and the Control of the Ranges of Variation of Functionally Relevant Shell-Shape Parameters in Bivalves: A Theoretical Approach

1Société d’Histoire Naturelle du Creusot, 12 rue des Pyrénées, 71200 Le Creusot, France
2Biogéosciences, Université de Bourgogne, 21000 Dijon, France

Received 25 April 2014; Revised 22 September 2014; Accepted 23 September 2014; Published 18 November 2014

Academic Editor: Julian Blasco

Copyright © 2014 Jean Béguinot. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. A. Holme, “Notes on the mode of life of the Tellinidae (Lamellibranchia),” Journal of the Marine Biology Association UK, vol. 41, pp. 699–703, 1961. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. S. M. Stanley, Relation of Shell Form to Life Habits of the Bivalvia (Mollusca), The Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colo, USA, 1970.
  3. R. M. C. Eagar, “Shape and function of the shell: a comparison of some living and fossil bivalve molluscs,” Biological Reviews, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 169–210, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  4. G. J. Vermeij, A Natural History of Shells, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1993.
  5. O. Ellers, “Form and motion of Donax variabilis in flow,” Biological Bulletin, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 138–147, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. G. Soares, R. K. Callahan, and A. M. C. de Ruyck, “Microevolution and phenotypic plasticity in Donax serra roding (Bivalvia: Donacidae) on high energy sandy beaches,” Journal of Molluscan Studies, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 407–421, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. C. Anderson and P. D. Roopnarine, “Role of constraint and selection in the morphologic evolution of Caryocorbula (Mollusca: Corbulidae) from the Caribbean Neogene,” Palaeontologia Electronica, vol. 8, no. 2, article 32A, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. S. Freeman and J. E. Byers, “Divergent induced responses to an invasive predator in marine mussel populations,” Science, vol. 313, no. 5788, pp. 831–833, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Hollander, D. C. Adams, and K. Johannesson, “Evolution of adaptation through allometric shifts in a marine snail,” Evolution, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 2490–2497, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Hollander, M. L. Collyer, D. C. Adams, and K. Johannesson, “Phenotypic plasticity in two marine snails: constraints superseding life history,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1861–1872, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Sokołowski, K. Pawlikowski, M. Wołowicz, P. Garcia, and J. Namieśnik, “Shell deformations in the Baltic clam Macoma balthica from southern Baltic Sea (the Gulf of Gdansk): Hypotheses on environmental effects,” Ambio, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 93–100, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. Lakowitz, C. Bronmark, and P. Nystrom, “Tuning in to multiple predators: conflicting demands for shell morphology in a freshwater snail,” Freshwater Biology, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 2184–2191, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. C. Edgell and R. Rochette, “Differential snail predation by an exotic crab and the geography of shell-claw covariance in the northwest Atlantic,” Evolution, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 1216–1228, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. D. G. Harley, M. W. Denny, K. J. MacH, and L. P. Miller, “Thermal stress and morphological adaptations in limpets,” Functional Ecology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 292–301, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. M. Peyer, J. C. Hermanson, and C. E. Lee, “Developmental plasticity of shell morphology of quagga mussels from shallow and deep-water habitats of the Great Lakes,” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 213, no. 15, pp. 2602–2609, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. L. Minton, E. M. Lewis, B. Netherland, and D. M. Hayes, “Large differences over small distances: plasticity in the shells of Elimia potosiensis (Gastropoda: Pleuroceridae),” International Journal of Biology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. S. M. Peyer, J. C. Hermanson, and C. E. Lee, “Effects of shell morphology on mechanics of zebra and quagga mussel locomotion,” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 214, no. 13, pp. 2226–2236, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. M. Serb, A. Alejandrino, E. Otárola-Castillo, and D. C. Adams, “Morphological convergence of shell shape in distantly related scallop species (Mollusca: Pectinidae),” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 571–584, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. Caill-Milly, N. Bru, K. Mahé, C. Borie, and F. D’Amico, “Shell shape analysis and spatial allometry patterns of Manila Clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) in a mesotidal coastal lagoon,” Journal of Marine Biology, vol. 2012, Article ID 281206, 11 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. P. Morais, M. M. Rufino, J. Reis, E. Dias, and R. Sousa, “Assessing the morphological variability of Unio delphinus Spengler, 1783 (Bivalvia: Unionidae) using geometric morphometry,” Journal of Molluscan Studies, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T. D. Levine, H. B. Hansen, and G. W. Gerald, “Effects of shell shape, size, and sculpture in burrowing and anchoring abilities in the freshwater mussel Potamilus alatus (Unionidae),” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 136–144, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. D. K. Thomas, “Functional morphology, ecology and evolutionary conservatism in the Glycymerididae (Bivalvia),” Palaeontology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 217–254, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  23. A. Boettiger, B. Ermentrout, and G. Oster, “The neural origins of shell structure and pattern in aquatic mollusks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 16, pp. 6837–6842, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. S. Galtsoff, “The American Oyster, Crassostrea virginica Gmelin—morphology and structure of shell,” Fishery Bulletin, vol. 64, pp. 16–47, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  25. M. J. Rogers, “A description of the generating curve of bivalves with straight hinges,” Palaeontology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 109–117, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  26. G. M. Gil, J. S. Troncoso, and J. W. Thomé, “Handling and optimization of bivalves molluscs exploitation: shell shape stabilisation indicator,” Porto Alegre, 2007.
  27. S. J. Gould, “A developmental constraint in Cerion, with comments on the definition and interpretation of constraint in evolution,” Evolution, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 516–539, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Béguinot, “Variabilité intra-spécifique du taux de croissance de la coquille et régulation stabilisatrice de la taille adulte chez les gastéropodes: outil d’investigation dédié et exemple d’utilisation,” Bulletin Société Histoire Naturelle Autun, vol. 205, pp. 29–40, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  29. S. C. Ackerly, “Morphogenetic regulation in the shells of bivalves and brachiopods: evidence from the geometry of the spiral,” Lethaia, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 249–256, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. Maynard-Smith, R. Burian, S. Kauffman et al., “Developmental constraints and evolution: a perspective from the Mountain Lake Conference on development and evolution,” Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 265–287, 1975. View at Google Scholar