Table of Contents
ISRN Education
Volume 2014, Article ID 345146, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/345146
Research Article

Using Technology in Elementary Mathematics Teacher Education: A Sociocultural Perspective

1State University of New York at Potsdam, Potsdam, NY 13676, USA
2University of Houston Downtown, Houston, TX 77002, USA

Received 31 December 2013; Accepted 21 January 2014; Published 4 March 2014

Academic Editors: B. Marlow and N. R. Riggs

Copyright © 2014 Sergei Abramovich and Michael L. Connell. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. A. R. Guring, N. L. Chick, and A. A. Ciccone, Eds., Exploring Signature Pedagogies, Stylus, Sterling, Va, USA, 2009.
  2. L. S. Shulman, “Signature pedagogies in the professions,” Daedalus, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 52–59, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. J. Cooney, “Research and teacher education: in search of common ground,” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 608–636, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  4. S. Abramovich, J. Easton, and V. O. Hayes, “Parallel structures of computer-assisted signature pedagogy: the case of integrated spreadsheets,” Computers in the Schools, vol. 29, no. 1-2, pp. 174–190, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Abramovich and E. Cho, “On mathematical problem posing by elementary pre-teachers: the case of spreadsheets,” Spreadsheets in Education, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Abramovich, “Cognitive heterogeneity in computer-mediated mathematical action as a vehicle for concept development,” Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 19–41, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  7. H. Freudenthal, Mathematics as an Educational Task, Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1973.
  8. J. Hadamard, The Mathematician's Mind: The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1996.
  9. Common Core State Standards, “Common core standards initiative: preparing America’s students for college and career,” 2010, http://www.corestandards.org/.
  10. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, The Author, Reston, Va, USA, 2000.
  11. C. Fernyhough, “Getting Vygotskian about theory of mind: mediation, dialogue, and the development of social understanding,” Developmental Review, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 225–262, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics, The Author, Reston, Va, USA, 1991.
  13. P. Cobb, “Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development,” Educational Researcher, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 13–20, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  14. P. Cobb, B. Jaworski, and N. Presmeg, “Emergent and sociocultural views of mathematical activity,” in Theories of Mathematical Learning, L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, and B. Greer, Eds., pp. 3–20, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  15. A. H. Schoenfeld, “Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics,” in Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, D. A. Grouws, Ed., pp. 334–370, MacMillan, New York, NY, USA, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  16. S. Abramovich, “Counting and reasoning with manipulative materials: a North American perspective,” in The Interfaces of Subjects Taught in the Primary Schools and Possible Models of Integrating Them, N. Petrovic, Ed., pp. 9–20, The University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Education Press, Sombor, Serbia, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. L. Connell, “Actions upon objects: a metaphor for technology enhanced mathematics instruction,” in Using Information Technology in Mathematics, D. Tooke and N. Henderson, Eds., pp. 143–171, Haworth Press, Binghamton, NY, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. L. Connell and S. Abramovich, “New tools for new thoughts: effects of changing the “Tools-to-Think-With” on the elementary mathematics methods course,” in Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 1052–1057, 1999.
  19. M. L. Connell and M. Bounieav, “Shared recommendations of SSDMA and Constructivism upon technology in mathematics education,” The Researcher, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. V. Wertsch, The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, USA, 1981.
  21. P. Cobb, “Cultural tools and mathematics learning: A Case Study,” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 362–385, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  22. P. Cobb, M. Stephan, K. McClain, and K. Gravemeijer, “Participating in classroom mathematical practices,” in A Journey in Mathematics Education Research, E. Yackel, K. Gravemeijer, and A. Sfard, Eds., pp. 117–163, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Goos, “A sociocultural analysis of the development of pre-service and beginning teachers' pedagogical identities as users of technology,” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 35–59, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. J. Knuth and D. Peressini, “The dualistic nature of school mathematics discourse,” in Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME-NA '98), S. Berenson, K. Dawkins, M. Blanton et al., Eds., vol. 1, pp. 227–233, 1998.
  25. J. Moschkovich, “A situated and sociocultural perspective on bilingual mathematics learners,” Mathematical Thinking and Learning, vol. 4, no. 2-3, pp. 189–212, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  26. N. Mercer, “Neo-Vygotskian theory and classroom education,” in Language, Literacy and Learning in Educational Practice: A Reader, B. Stierer and J. Maybin, Eds., pp. 92–110, The Open University, Bristol, Pa, USA, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  27. J. V. Wertsch, Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1991.
  28. N. Chomsky, Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought, Harper and Row, New York, NY, USA, 1966.
  29. W. Bevan, “Contemporary psychology: a tour inside the onion,” American Psychologist, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 475–483, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. Cobb, E. Yackel, and T. Wood, “A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education,” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 2–33, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  31. L. M. Rosenblatt, “Writing and reading: the transactional theory,” Tech. Rep. 13, Carnegie Mellon University, Center for the Study of Writing, Pittsburg, Pa, USA, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  32. A. Cuoco, E. P. Goldenberg, and J. Mark, “Contemporary curriculum issues: organizing a curriculum around mathematical habits of mind,” Mathematics Teacher, vol. 103, no. 9, pp. 682–688, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  33. W.-M. Roth and Y.-J. Lee, “‘Vygotsky's neglected Legacy’: cultural-historical activity theory,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 186–232, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. L. Connell, D. M. Peck, W. Buxton, and D. Kilburn, “True collaboration: an analysis of a conceptual change program in elementary mathematics,” in Teacher Education Yearbook: Partnerships in Education II, S. Odell and M. O. 'Hair, Eds., pp. 255–274, Harcourt Brace and Javonovich, New York, NY, USA, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  35. G. Pólya, How to Solve It, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1945.
  36. G. Bateson, Steps to an Ecology of Mind: A Revolutionary Approach to Man's Understanding of Himself, Ballantine, New York, NY, USA, 1972.
  37. B. Rogoff, Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1990.
  38. Y. Lotman, “Text within a text,” Soviet Psychology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 32–51, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  39. H. Mehan, Learning Lessons, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1979.
  40. L. S. Vygotsky, “Consciousness as a problem in the psychology of behavior,” Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 3–35, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  41. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, The Mathematical Education of Teachers II, The Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
  42. M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, J. A. Middleton, and L. Streefland, “Student-generated problems: easy and difficult problems on percentage,” For the Learning of Mathematics, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 21–27, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  43. F. Depaepe, E. De Corte, P. Op’t Eynde, and L. Verschaffel, “Teaching percentages in the primary school: a four country comparative study,” in Powerful Environments for Promoting Deep Conceptual and Strategic Learning, L. Verschaffel, E. De Corte, G. Kanselaar, and M. Valcke, Eds., pp. 147–171, Leuven University Press, Leuven, Belgium, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  44. S. Abramovich, “Mathematical concepts as emerging tools in computing applications,” Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 21–46, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  45. G. Hatano, “Social and motivational bases for mathematical understanding,” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, no. 41, pp. 55–70, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  46. G. Hatano and K. Inagaki, “When is conceptual change intended? A cognitive-sociocultural view,” in Intentional Conceptual Change, G. M. Sinatra and P. R. Pintrich, Eds., pp. 407–427, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  47. J. V. Knapp, “Teaching poetry via HEI (Hypothesis-Experiment-Instruction),” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 718–729, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. Y. Kobayashi, “Conceptual acquisition and change through social interaction,” Human Development, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 233–241, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  49. J. V. Wertsch and C. Toma, “Discourse and learning in the classroom: a sociocultural approach,” in Constructivism in Education, L. P. Steffe and J. Gale, Eds., pp. 159–174, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  50. R. Noss and C. Hoyles, Windows on Mathematical Meaning, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996.