Research Article
A Hybrid Feature Selection Method Based on Rough Conditional Mutual Information and Naive Bayesian Classifier
Table 2
Number and accuracy of selected features with different algorithms tested by naive Bayes.
| Number | Unselect | CFS | Consistency | mRMR | RCMI | Accuracy | Accuracy | Feature number | Accuracy | Feature number | Accuracy | Feature number | Accuracy | Feature number |
| 1 | 75.00% | 78.54% | 22 | 75.66% | 24 | 75.00% | 21 | 77.43% | 16 | 2 | 84.52% | 89.03% | 8 | 85.81% | 13 | 87.74% | 7 | 85.13% | 8 | 3 | 90.60% | 92.59% | 13 | 90.88% | 7 | 90.60% | 7 | 94.87% | 6 | 4 | 91.52% | 93.51% | 8 | 93.20% | 9 | 93.98% | 5 | 93.07% | 3 | 5 | 85.58% | 77.88% | 19 | 82.21% | 14 | 84.13% | 10 | 86.06% | 15 | 6 | 92.09% | 91.80% | 24 | 84.63% | 13 | 90.48% | 21 | 91.22% | 24 | 7 | 90.11% | 94.71% | 5 | 91.95% | 12 | 95.63% | 1 | 95.63% | 2 | 8 | 95.78% | 96.66% | 11 | 96.84% | 8 | 95.78% | 9 | 95.43% | 4 | 9 | 98.31% | 98.88% | 10 | 99.44% | 5 | 98.88% | 8 | 98.88% | 5 | 10 | 95.05% | 95.05% | 10 | 93.07% | 5 | 94.06% | 4 | 95.05% | 10 |
| Average | 89.86% | 90.87% | 13 | 89.37% | 11 | 90.63% | 9.3 | 91.28% | 9.3 |
|
|