Table of Contents
ISRN Radiology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 396368, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/396368
Clinical Study

Diagnostic Performance and Additional Value of Elastosonography in Focal Breast Lesions: Statistical Correlation between Size-Dependant Strain Index Measurements, Multimodality-BI-RADS Score, and Histopathology in a Clinical Routine Setting

1Department for Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Inselspital Bern, Freiburgstraße 10, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
2Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zürich, Virtopsy, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland

Received 12 December 2013; Accepted 21 January 2014; Published 9 March 2014

Academic Editors: J.-H. Chen and A. Samani

Copyright © 2014 Lukas Ebner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. L. Botha, F. Bray, R. Sankila, and D. M. Parkin, “Breast cancer incidence and mortality trends in 16 European countries,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1718–1729, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. E. Bird, T. W. Wallace, and B. C. Yankaskas, “Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography,” Radiology, vol. 184, no. 3, pp. 613–617, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. S. Garra, E. I. Cespedes, J. Ophir et al., “Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results,” Radiology, vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 79–86, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. M. Hiltawsky, M. Krüger, C. Starke, L. Heuser, H. Ermert, and A. Jensen, “Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions: clinical results,” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1461–1469, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Frey, “Realtime elastography. A new ultrasound procedure for the reconstruction of tissue elasticity,” Radiologe, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 850–855, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Fischer, U. Peisker, S. Fiedor et al., “Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio,” Ultraschall in der Medizin, vol. 33, pp. 372–379, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. Itoh, E. Ueno, E. Tohno et al., “Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis,” Radiology, vol. 239, no. 2, pp. 341–350, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. American College of Radiology, American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS Atlas), American College of Radiology, Reston, Va, USA, 2003.
  9. T. A. Krouskop, T. M. Wheeler, F. Kallel, B. S. Garra, and T. Hall, “Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression,” Ultrasonic Imaging, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 260–274, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. M. Tan, H. S. Teh, J. F. K. Mancer, and W. T. Poh, “Improving B mode ultrasound evaluation of breast lesions with real-time ultrasound elastography—a clinical approach,” Breast, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 252–257, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. H. Zar, Biostatistical Analysis, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 5th edition, 2010.
  12. D. G. Altman, Practical Statistics for Medical Research, Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 1991.
  13. P. Samardar, E. Shaw de Paredes, M. M. Grimes, and J. D. Wilson, “Focal asymmetric densities seen at mammography: US and pathologic correlation,” Radiographics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 19–33, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Hatzung, S. Grunwald, M. Zygmunt et al., “Sonoelastography in the diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions: initial clinical experiences,” Ultraschall in der Medizin, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 596–603, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Thomas, T. Fischer, H. Frey et al., “Real-time elastography—an advanced method of ultrasound: first results in 108 patients with breast lesions,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 335–340, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. Cho, W. K. Moon, J. S. Park, J. H. Cha, M. Jang, and M. H. Seong, “Nonpalpable breast masses: evaluation by US elastography,” Korean Journal of Radiology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 111–118, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Balleyguier, S. Canale, W. B. Hassen et al., “Breast elasticity: principles, technique, results: an update and overview of commercially available software,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 82, pp. 427–434, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. M. Mansour and S. Omar, “Elastography ultrasound and questionable breast lesions: does it count?” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 81, pp. 3234–3244, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  19. H. Zhi, B. Ou, B.-M. Luo, X. Feng, Y.-L. Wen, and H.-Y. Yang, “Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 807–815, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Mori, H. Tsunoda, N. Kawauchi et al., “Elastographic evaluation of mucinous carcinoma of the breast,” Breast Cancer, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 60–63, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. H. Yoon, M. H. Kim, E.-K. Kim, H. J. Moon, J. Y. Kwak, and M. J. Kim, “Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography: how it affects the diagnosis of breast lesions,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 196, no. 3, pp. 730–736, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. M. Chang, W. K. Moon, N. Cho, and S. J. Kim, “Breast mass evaluation: factors influencing the quality of US elastography,” Radiology, vol. 259, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus