Research Article

Dynamic of Plant Composition and Regeneration following Windthrow in a Temperate Beech Forest

Table 3

Mean (standard error of mean) plant diversity indices and regeneration status in PM different ages and microsites.

Diversity parameters/treatmentYoungMediumAdultOldStatistic description
PMCCPMCCPMCCPMCC

Simpson
(herbal)
0.42 ± 0.050.09 ± 0.010.56 ± 0.070.28 ± 0.090.06 ± 0.610.09 ± 0.260.09 ± 0.600.06 ± 0.45Age: F = 2.96, P = 0.04 (A4a > A3ab, A2ab > A1b); 
Position: F = 17.50, P = 0.00 (PMa > CCb);  
Age × Position: F = 0.50, P = 0.68.

Margalef
(herbal)
0.84 ± 0.050.70 ± 0.050.85 ± 0.030.36 ± 0.130.06 ± 0.830.16 ± 0.220.08 ± 0.900.54 ± 0.02Age: F = 0.24, P = 0.86; 
Position: F = 3.35, P = 0.07; 
Age × Position: F = 0.21, P = 0.88.

Camargo
(herbal)
0.32 ± 0.030.60 ± 0.040.53 ± 0.150.71 ± 0.060.11 ± 0.380.06 ± 0.650.10 ± 0.400.07 ± 0.68Age: F = 0.78, P = 0.50; 
Position: F = 11.40, P = 0.00 (CCa > PMb); 
Age × Position: F = 0.12, P = 0.94.

Simpson
(regeneration)
0.01 ± 0.280.03 ± 0.390.04 ± 0.380.05 ± 0.240.05 ± 0.540.02 ± 0.300.02 ± 0.550.05 ± 0.35Age: F = 2.91, P = 0.04 (A4a > A3ab, A1ab > A2b); 
Position: F = 9.06, P = 0.00 (PMa > CCb); 
Age × Position: F = 3.88, P = 0.01.

Margalef
(regeneration)
0.02 ± 0.610.07 ± 0.250.01 ± 0.100.02 ± 0.120.03 ± 0.360.03 ± 0.550.04 ± 0.460.14 ± 0.52 Age: F = 3.06, P = 0.04 (A4a, A3a, A1a> A2b); 
Position: F = 0.04, P = 0.84; 
Age × Position: F = 1.33, P = 0.27.

Camargo
(regeneration)
0.01 ± 0.360.04 ± 0.360.05 ± 0.280.03 ± 0.580.07 ± 0.360.02 ± 0.400.07 ± 0.350.04 ± 0.67Age: F = 2.03, P = 0.12; 
Position: F = 13.59, P = 0.00 (CCa > PMb); 
Age × Position: F = 3.39, P = 0.03.

N = 5 for young, N = 5 for medium, N = 5 for adult, N = 5 for old, N = 20 for PM, and N = 20 for CC.
Contrasting letters a, b, and c refer to significant differences between ages (young, medium, adult, and old) or pit and mound (PM) and closed canopy (CC) microsites.