Table of Contents
ISRN Cardiology
Volume 2014, Article ID 506348, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/506348
Research Article

Mouse Bone Marrow-Derived Endothelial Progenitor Cells Do Not Restore Radiation-Induced Microvascular Damage

Division of Biological Stress Response (H3), The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 4 December 2013; Accepted 6 February 2014; Published 27 March 2014

Academic Editors: S. Gielen and M. Takahashi

Copyright © 2014 Ingar Seemann et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. M. Aleman, A. W. van den Belt-Dusebout, M. L. de Bruin et al., “Late cardiotoxicity after treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma,” Blood, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 1878–1886, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. C. Darby, M. Ewertz, and P. Hall, “Omalizumab for chronic urticaria,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 368, no. 26, pp. 2527–2530, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. G. Gyenes, L. E. Rutqvist, A. Liedberg, and T. Fornander, “Long-term cardiac morbidity and mortality in a randomized trial of pre- and postoperative radiation therapy versus surgery alone in primary breast cancer,” Radiotherapy & Oncology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 185–190, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. McGale, S. C. Darby, P. Hall et al., “Incidence of heart disease in 35,000 women treated with radiotherapy for breast cancer in Denmark and Sweden,” Radiotherapy & Oncology, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 167–175, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. C. Aznar, S.-S. Korreman, A. N. Pedersen, G. F. Persson, M. Josipovic, and L. Specht, “Evaluation of dose to cardiac structures during breast irradiation,” The British Journal of Radiology, vol. 84, no. 1004, pp. 743–746, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Jagsi, J. Moran, R. Marsh, K. Masi, K. A. Griffith, and L. J. Pierce, “Evaluation of four techniques using intensity-modulated radiation therapy for comprehensive locoregional irradiation of breast cancer,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 1594–1603, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. F. Lohr, M. El-Haddad, B. Dobler et al., “Potential effect of robust and simple IMRT approach for left-sided breast cancer on cardiac mortality,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 73–80, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. K. Schubert, V. Gondi, E. Sengbusch et al., “Dosimetric comparison of left-sided whole breast irradiation with 3DCRT, forward-planned IMRT, inverse-planned IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and topotherapy,” Radiotherapy & Oncology, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 241–246, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Boerma, J. J. Kruse, M. M. van Loenen et al., “Increased deposition of von Willebrand factor in the rat heart after local ionizing irradiation,” Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 109–116, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Gabriels, S. Hoving, I. Seemann, N. L. Visser, M. J. Gijbels et al., “Local heart irradiation of ApoE−/− mice induces microvascular and endocardial damage and accelerates coronary atherosclerosis,” Radiotherapy & Oncology, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 358–364, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. I. Seemann, K. Gabriels, N. L. Visser et al., “Irradiation induced modest changes in murine cardiac function despite progressive structural damage to the myocardium and microvasculature,” Radiotherapy & Oncology, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 143–150, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Schultz-Hector and K. Balz, “Radiation-induced loss of endothelial alkaline phosphatase activity and development of myocardial degeneration: an ultrastructural study,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 252–260, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. B. Marks, X. Yu, R. G. Prosnitz et al., “The incidence and functional consequences of RT-associated cardiac perfusion defects,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 214–223, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. Seddon, A. Cook, L. Gothard et al., “Detection of defects in myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with early breast cancer treated with radiotherapy,” Radiotherapy & Oncology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. M. Isner and T. Asahara, “Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis as therapeutic strategies for postnatal neovascularization,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 103, no. 9, pp. 1231–1236, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Takahashi, C. Kalka, H. Masuda et al., “Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization,” Nature Medicine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 434–438, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. B. Vailhé, D. Vittet, and J.-J. Feige, “In vitro models of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 439–452, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. W. Losordo and S. Dimmeler, “Therapeutic angiogenesis and vasculogenesis for ischemic disease. Part II: cell-based therapies,” Circulation, vol. 109, no. 22, pp. 2692–2697, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. Urbich, C. Heeschen, A. Aicher, E. Dernbach, A. M. Zeiher, and S. Dimmeler, “Relevance of monocytic features for neovascularization capacity of circulating endothelial progenitor cells,” Circulation, vol. 108, no. 20, pp. 2511–2516, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Asahara, H. Masuda, T. Takahashi et al., “Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization,” Circulation Research, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 221–228, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. A. Abdalla and M. Letarte, “Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia: current views on genetics and mechanisms of disease,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 97–110, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. van den Driesche, C. L. Mummery, and C. J. Westermann, “Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: an update on transforming growth factor β signaling in vasculogenesis and angiogenesis,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 20–31, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. H. M. Arthur, J. Ure, A. J. Smith et al., “Endoglin, an ancillary TGFβ receptor, is required for extraembryonic angiogenesis and plays a key role in heart development,” Developmental Biology, vol. 217, no. 1, pp. 42–53, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Bourdeau, D. J. Dumont, and M. Letarte, “A murine model of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 104, no. 10, pp. 1343–1351, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Post, A. M. Smits, A. J. van den Broek et al., “Impaired recruitment of HHT-1 mononuclear cells to the ischaemic heart is due to an altered CXCR4/CD26 balance,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 494–502, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. F. Lebrin and C. L. Mummery, “Endoglin-mediated vascular remodeling: mechanisms underlying hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 25–32, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K. A. Hinds, J. M. Hill, E. M. Shapiro et al., “Highly efficient endosomal labeling of progenitor and stem cells with large magnetic particles allows magnetic resonance imaging of single cells,” Blood, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 867–872, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Y. Cheng, S. Guo, G. Liu, Y. Feng, B. Yan et al., “Transplantation of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells attenuates myocardial interstitial fibrosis and cardiac dysfunction in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 870–876, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. H. Sekiguchi, M. Ii, K. Jujo, A. Yokoyama, N. Hagiwara, and T. Asahara, “Improved culture-based isolation of differentiating endothelial progenitor cells from mouse bone marrow mononuclear cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 12, Article ID e28639, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. W. Qi, H. W. Bao, H. H. Yan, G. Dai, M. L. Wei, and Q. Yan, “Purification and growth of endothelial progenitor cells from murine bone marrow mononuclear cells,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 21–29, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus