ISRN Mathematical Analysis

Volume 2014, Article ID 626327, 10 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/626327

## Multilinear Singular Integrals and Commutators on Herz Space with Variable Exponent

^{1}Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China^{2}Department of Mathematics, HITEC University, Taxila, Pakistan^{3}School of Science, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received 7 October 2013; Accepted 23 December 2013; Published 12 February 2014

Academic Editors: V. Maiorov and Q. Xu

Copyright © 2014 Amjad Hussain and Guilian Gao. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

The paper establishes some sufficient conditions for the boundedness of singular integral operators and their commutators from products of variable exponent Herz spaces to variable exponent Herz spaces.

#### 1. Introduction

In recent years, the interest in multilinear analysis for studying boundedness properties of multilinear integral operators has grown rapidly. The subject was founded by Coifman and Meyer [1] in their seminal work on singular integral operators like Calderón commutators and pseudosdifferential operators having multiparameter function input. Subsequently, many authors including Christ and Journé [2], Kenig and Stein [3], and Grafakos and Torres [4] have substantially added to the exiting theory.

Let be a locally integrable function defined away from the diagonal in , which for satisfies the estimates and for , whenever , and whenever for all . Then is called -linear Calderón-Zygmund kernel. In this paper, we consider an -linear singular integral operator associated with the kernel , which is initially defined on product of the Schwartz space and takes its values in the space of tempered distribution such that for , where , the space of compactly supported bounded functions. If is bounded from to with and , then we say that is an -linear Calderón-Zygmund operator. It has been proved in [4] that is a bounded operator on product of Lebesgue spaces and endpoint weak estimates hold. For the boundedness of and its commutators on the product of Herz-type spaces we refer the reader to see [5, 6] and [7], respectively.

In the last few decades, however, a number of research papers have appeared in the literature which study the boundedness of integral operators, including the maximal function, singular operators, and fractional integral and commutators on function spaces with nonstandard growth conditions. Such kind of spaces is named as variable exponent function spaces which include variable exponent Lebesgue, Sobolev, Lorentz, Orlicz, and Herz-type function spaces. Among them the most fundamental and widely explored space is the Lebesgue space with the exponent depending on the point of the space. We will describe it briefly in the next section; however, we refer to the book [8] and the survey paper [9] for historical background and recent developments in the theory of spaces. Despite the progress made, the problems of boundedness of multilinear singular integral operators and their commutators on spaces remain open. Recently, Huang and Xu [10] proved the boundedness of such integral operators on the product of variable exponent Lebesgue space. Motivated by their results, in this paper we will study the multilinear singular integral on Herz space with variable exponent. Similar results for the boundedness of commutators generated by these operators and BMO functions are also provided.

Herz-type spaces are an important class of function spaces in harmonic analysis. In [11, 12], Izuki independently introduced Herz space with variable exponent , by keeping the remaining two exponents and as constants. Variability of alpha was recently considered by Almeida and Drihem [13] in proving the boundedness results for some classical operators on such spaces. More recently, Samko [14] introduced the generalized Herz-type spaces where all the three exponents were allowed to vary. In this paper, we will study the multilinear singular operators on variable exponent Herz space introduced in [12].

Throughout this paper, denotes a positive constant which may change from one occurrence to another. The next section contains some basic definitions and the main results of this study. Finally, the last section includes the proofs of main results along with some supporting lemmas.

#### 2. Main Results

Let be a measurable subset of with Lebesgue measure . Given a measurable function , then for some we define the variable exponent Lebesgue space as and the space as The Lebesgue space becomes a Banach function space when equipped with the norm

Given a locally integrable function on , the Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator is defined by where . We denote We also define

Cruz-Uribe et al. [15] and Nekvinda [16] independently proved the following sufficient conditions for the boundedness of on .

Proposition 1. *Let be an open set. If satisfies
**
then one has .*

Define to be the set of measurable functions such that Given , one can define the space as above. Since we will not use it in the this paper, we omit the details here and refer the reader to see [10, 17].

Let , and be the characteristic function of the set for .

*Definition 2. *For , and , the homogeneous Herz space with variable exponent is defined by
where

In the sequel, unless stated otherwise, we will work on the whole space and will not mention it. Taking and in , Huang and Xu in [10] define the three commutator operators for suitable functions and . One of them is the operator As corollaries of their main results they give the following estimates.

Theorem A. *Let be 2-linear Calderón-Zygmund operator and . If such that , then there exists a constant independent of the functions , and such that
**
hold, where for and .*

Theorem B. *Let be 2-linear Calderón-Zygmund operator, , and . If such that , then there exists a constant independent of the functions , and such that
**
hold, where for and .*

Motivated by these results, here we give the following two theorems.

Theorem 3. *Let be 2-linear Calderón-Zygmund operator and . Furthermore, let , , , , where are constants defined in the next section such that , , and . If is bounded from to , then
**
hold for all , , where for and .*

Theorem 4. *Let be 2-linear Calderón-Zygmund operator, , and . Furthermore, let , , , , where are constants defined in the next section, such that , , . If is bounded from to , then
**
hold for all , , where for and .*

#### 3. Proofs of the Main Results

In this section, we will prove main results stated in the last section. The ideas of these proofs mainly come from [5, 7]. We use the notation to denote the conjugate index of . Here we give some lemmas which will be helpful in proving Theorems 3 and 4.

Lemma 5 (see [10, 18], generalized Hölder's inequality). *Let .*(a)*If , , then one has
where .*(b)*If , and , then there exists a constant such that
holds, where .*

Lemma 6 (see [12]). *If , then there exist a constant such that for all balls in ,
*

Lemma 7 (see [12]). *If , then there exists constants such that for all balls in and all measurable subsets ,
*

Lemma 8 (see [19, Remark ]). *If , , then by Proposition 1 one has . Therefore, applying Lemma 7, one can take positive constants such that
**
for all balls in and all measurable subsets .*

Recently, Izuki [19] established a relationship between Lebesgue space with variable exponent and space which can be stated in the form of the following lemma.

Lemma 9. *One has that for all and all with ,
*

The next lemma is the generalized Minkowski's inequality and is useful in proving vector valued inequalities.

Lemma 10 (see [19]). *If , then there exists a constant such that for all sequences of functions satisfying ,
*

*Proof of Theorem 3. *In order to make computations easy, first we have to prove the following inequality:
where for , ,
If , , then we have ; hence by the boundedness of , we obtain
In the other cases, we see that , for , , . Thus by the generalized Hölder's inequality,
Applying Lemma 5, we have
Now, for , , by Lemmas 6 and 8, it is easy to show that
By a similar argument for , , we get

In view of (29)–(33), (27) is obvious. Now by Minkowski’s inequality and (27), we get
Since , then by definition

It remains to show that and . By symmetry, we only approximate . If , then by the well-known inequality and the inequality
we have

If , Hölder's inequality and inequality (36) yield
Therefore, for
By symmetry, for we have
Finally, we obtain
By virtue of Lemma 10 and the fact that , it is easy to show that
holds for all , , where for .

Thus the proof of Theorem 3 is complete.

*Proof of Theorem 4. *Similar to the proof of Theorem 3, for the case , , we use boundedness of to obtain

For other possibilities we have for , , . Thus, we consider the following two cases.*Case I (*, *).* We denote by , where
and consider the following decomposition:
Thus,
Now, we will estimate each , separately. Applying Lemma 5, we have
Therefore, by virtue of generalized Hölder's inequality and Lemmas 6, 8, and 9, we get
Similarly, using Lemma 9, we approximate as
Therefore, in view of Lemmas 6, 9, and 8, we have
By symmetry, the estimate for is similar to that for ; therefore,
Finally, it remains to estimate . For that, we use Lemma 9 to write
Thus, by Hölder's inequality and Lemmas 6 and 8, we obtain
Combining the estimates for , , , and , we have
*Case II**(*, *).* We denote by , where . In this case, we consider the following decomposition:
Thus,
Let us first compute . As in the proof of Theorem 3, in this case we estimate as
By virtue of generalized Hölder's inequality and Lemmas 6–9, we obtain
Next, we approximate . Using Lemma 9, it is easy to see that
Thus, in view of Lemmas 6, 9, and 8, we get
By symmetry, the estimate for is similar to that for ; thus
Lastly, it remains to compute . For this purpose we use generalized Höder's inequality and lemmas 6 and 9 to obtain
Thus, an application of Lemma 8 yields
Combining the estimates for , , , and , we have
In view of (43), (54), and (64), we arrive at
where for , ,
Under the assumption , it is easy to see that
Now by the Minkowski's inequality and (65), we get
Finally, by definition and the fact that