Table of Contents
ISRN Family Medicine
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 631732, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/631732
Research Article

Home Care Learning Model for Medical Students in Chile: A Mixed Methods Study

Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Vicuña Mackenna 4686, Macul, Santiago, Chile

Received 15 November 2013; Accepted 11 December 2013; Published 16 January 2014

Academic Editors: S. Byford, P. Pluye, and A. Vellinga

Copyright © 2014 Diego Garcia-Huidobro et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. K. Steel, “Home care—the time to teach about it is now,” Academic Medicine, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 928–930, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Sankar and S. L. Becker, “The home as a site for teaching gerontology and chronic illness,” Journal of Medical Education, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 308–313, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Council on Scientific Affairs and Council on Medical Education, “Educating physicians in home health care,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 265, pp. 769–771, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  4. A. I. Goldberg, “Pediatric home health: the need for physician education,” Pediatrics, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 928–930, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. K. Steel, M. C. Musliner, and P. A. Boling, “Home care the urban setting—a challenge to medical education,” Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 87–94, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. Augustovski, A. Pichon Riviere, A. Alcaraz et al., “Evaluation of home care utility: pneumonia, cerebrovascular disease, urinary tract infections and postsurgical infections. Ciudad de Buenos Aires: Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS),” Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2007, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/crdweb/ShowRecord.asp?View=Full&ID=32007000428.
  7. R. L. Perkel, V. M. B. Silenzio, and M. Z. Kairys, “A house call program as an essential component of primary care training,” Primary Care, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 47–65, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. M. Harden, “Curriculum planning and development,” in A Practical Guide for Medical Teachers, J. Dent and R. M. Harden, Eds., Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Edinburgh, UK, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  9. G. M. Sullivan, P. A. Boling, C. Ritchie, and S. Levine, “Curriculum recommendations for resident training in home care,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 910–912, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Belos, C. Lionis, M. Fioretos, J. Vlachonicolis, and A. Philalithis, “Clinical undergraduate training and assessment in primary health care: experiences gained from Crete, Greece,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 5, article 13, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Kawabata, M. Kawabata, M. Murakami, and M. Maezawa, “The educational impact of home care in community medicine training in a Japanese medical residency program,” The Hokkaido Journal of Medical Science, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 251–256, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Zabar, K. Hanley, J. Adams, and T. K. Ark, “No place like home: teaching home visits,” Medical Education, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1102–1103, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. H. Flaherty, D. A. Fabacher, R. Miller, A. Fox, and J. Boal, “The determinants of attitudinal change among medical students participating in home care training: a multi-center study,” Academic Medicine, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 336–343, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Hervada-Page, K. S. Fayock, R. Sifri, and F. W. Markham, “The home visit experience: a medical student's perspective,” Care Management Journals, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 206–210, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano-Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2011.
  16. I. Sánchez, A. Riquelme, R. Moreno, B. Mena, J. Dagnino, and G. Grebe, “Revitalising medical education: the School of Medicine at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile,” Clinical Teacher, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 57–61, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. P. Weber, Basic Content Analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 1990.
  18. A. L. Strauss and J. Corbin, Basic Qualitative Research, Sage, London, UK, 1990.
  19. C. Moustakas, Phenomenological Research Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 1994.
  20. J. Boal, D. Fabacher, R. Miller, A. Siu, B. Kantor, and J. Flaherty, “Validation of an instrument designed to assess medical student attitudes toward home care,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 470–473, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. V. Graham and J. P. Krick, “Family home assessment in family practice residency programs,” Journal of Family Practice, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 217–221, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. V. Neale, B. J. Hodgkins, and R. Y. Demers, “The home visit in resident education: program description and evaluation,” Family Medicine, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 36–40, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Sadovsky and D. Brecher, “Structuring a home visit program for residents,” Family Medicine, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 361–362, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Garcia-Huidobro, S. Skewes, X. Barros, C. Pizarro, and B. A. Gawinski, “Learning together to work together: interprofessional education for students in a primary care setting in chile,” Family Medicine, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 272–275, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  25. P. G. Clark, “What would a theory of interprofessional education look like? Some suggestions for developing a theoretical framework for teamwork training,” Journal of Interprofessional Care, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 577–589, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. P. Byar, R. M. Simon, and W. T. Friedewald, “Randomized clinical trials. Perspectives on some recent ideas,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 295, no. 2, pp. 74–80, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. Kirkpatrick, “Evaluation of training,” in Training and Development Handbook, R. Graig and L. Bittel, Eds., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1967. View at Google Scholar