Table of Contents
ISRN Textiles
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 634041, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/634041
Research Article

Performance Optimization, Prediction, and Adequacy by Response Surfaces Methodology with Allusion to DRF Technique

1Government Central Textile Institute, Kanpur, India
2Apollo Institute of Engineering and Technology, Kanpur, India

Received 14 September 2013; Accepted 20 November 2013; Published 4 March 2014

Academic Editors: L. Andronic and W. Xu

Copyright © 2014 Lokesh Shukla and Anita Nishkam. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. M. Wardrop and R. H. Myers, “Some response surface designs for finding optimal conditions,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 7–28, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. E. P. Box and K. B. Wilson, “On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 13, pp. 1–14, 1951. View at Google Scholar
  3. D. C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments: Response Surface Method and Designs, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
  4. A. I. Khuri and S. Mukhopadhyay, “Response surface methodology,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 128–149, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. A. Sakkas, M. A. Islam, C. Stalikas, and T. A. Albanis, “Photocatalytic degradation using design of experiments: a review and example of the Congo red degradation,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 175, no. 1-3, pp. 33–44, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. A. Bezerra, R. E. Santelli, E. P. Oliveira, L. S. Villar, and L. A. Escaleira, “Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry,” Talanta, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 965–977, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. H. Doehlert, “Uniform shell designs,” Journals of the Royal Statistical Society C, vol. 19, pp. 231–239, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  8. C. R. T. Tarley, G. Silveira, W. N. L. dos Santos et al., “Chemometric tools in electroanalytical chemistry: methods for optimization based on factorial design and response surface methodology,” Microchemical Journal, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 58–67, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. E. P. Box and D. W. Behnken, “Some new three-level designs for the study of quantitative variables,” Technometrics, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 455–475, 1960. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. S. Brown, R. Tauler, and R. Walczak, “Response surface methodology,” in Comprehensive Chemometrics, vol. 1, pp. 345–390, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  11. F. Oughlis-Hammache, N. Hamaidi-Maouche, F. Aissani-Benissad, and S. Bourouina-Bacha, “Central composite design for the modeling of the phenol adsorption process in a fixed-bed reactor,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 2489–2494, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. H. Myers and D. C. Montgomery, Response Surface Methodology, Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
  13. A. T. Hoke, “Economical second-order designs based on irregular fractions of the 3k factorial,” Technometrics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 375–384, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. J. Box and N. R. Draper, “Factorial designs, the |X′X| criterion and some related matters,” Technometrics, vol. 13, pp. 731–742, 1971. View at Google Scholar
  15. K. G. Roquemore, “Hybrid designs for quadratic response surfaces,” Technometrics, vol. 18, pp. 419–423, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  16. W. G. Cochran and G. M. Cox, Experimental Design, Asia Publishing House, Delhi, India, 1963.
  17. J. Skilling and R. K. Bryan, “Maximum entropy image reconstruction—general algorithm,” Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 211, pp. 111–124, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  18. R. Ghasemi, R. Mozafari-Dana, S. M. Etrati, and S. Shaikhzadeh Najar, “Comparing the physical properties of produced sirospun and new hybrid solo-siro spun blend wool/polyester worsted yarns,” Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 66, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. Geriche, The Indian Textile Journal, pp. 102–111, 1995.
  20. S. Bhatnagar, K. R. Salotra, and R. C. D. Kaushik, The Indian Textile Journal, pp. 52–53, 1994.