Table of Contents
ISRN Radiology
Volume 2014, Article ID 658929, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/658929
Clinical Study

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Changes Management in Patients Seen at a Tertiary Care Breast Center

1Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave Levy Place, P.O. Box 1234, New York, NY 10029, USA
2Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave Levy Place, P.O. Box 1148, New York, NY 10029, USA
3Department of Preventive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 17 East 102 Street, New York, NY 10029, USA

Received 14 November 2013; Accepted 24 December 2013; Published 3 March 2014

Academic Editors: G. Borasi, J.-H. Chen, and M. D. Noseworthy

Copyright © 2014 L. Margolies et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. A. Smith, S. W. Duffy, and L. Tabar, “Breast cancer screening: the evolving evidence,” Oncology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 471–486, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  2. L. Tabár, B. Vitak, T. H.-H. Chen et al., “Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades,” Radiology, vol. 260, no. 3, pp. 658–663, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. US Preventive Services Task Force, “Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 151, no. 10, pp. 716–726, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. W. A. Berg, J. D. Blume, J. B. Cormack et al., “Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs. Mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 299, no. 18, pp. 2151–2163, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. A. Berg, Z. Zhang, D. Lehrer et al., “Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 307, no. 13, pp. 1394–1404, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Saslow, C. Boetes, W. Burke et al., “American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 75–89, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H.R. 3102–112th Congress: Breast Density and Mammography Reporting Act of 2011, http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr3102.
  8. An Act to Add and Repeal Section 123222.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Mammograms, California State Senate, 11th Senate District, 2012.
  9. E. D. Pisano, R. E. Hendrick, M. J. Yaffe et al., “Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST,” Radiology, vol. 246, no. 2, pp. 376–383, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. D. Pisano, C. Gatsonis, E. Hendrick et al., “Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 17, pp. 1773–1783, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. F. Brem, J. Baum, M. Lechner et al., “Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 181, no. 3, pp. 687–693, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. T. Niklason, B. T. Christian, L. E. Niklason et al., “Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging,” Radiology, vol. 205, no. 2, pp. 399–406, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. Houssami and P. Skaane, “Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection,” The Breast, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 101–108, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. P. Skaane, R. Gullien, H. Bjorndal et al., “Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 524–529, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. E. A. Rafferty, J. M. Park, L. E. Philpotts et al., “Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial,” Radiology, vol. 266, no. 1, pp. 104–113, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. M. G. Wallis, E. Moa, F. Zanca, K. Leifland, and M. Danielsson, “Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study,” Radiology, vol. 262, no. 3, pp. 788–796, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Noroozian, L. Hadjiiski, S. Rahnama-Moghadam et al., “Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization,” Radiology, vol. 262, no. 1, pp. 61–68, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Gur, M. L. Zuley, M. I. Anello et al., “Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study,” Academic Radiology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 166–171, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. J. D'Orsi, L. W. Bassett, W. A. Berg et al., “BI-RADS: mammography,” in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS—Breast Imaging Atlas, C. J. D'Orsi, E. B. Mendelson, and D. M. Ikeda, Eds., American College of Radiology, Reston, Va, USA, 4th edition, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  20. P. Skaane, A. I. Bandos, R. Gullien et al., “Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program,” Radiology, vol. 267, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. B. M. Haas, V. Kalra, J. Geisel, M. Raghu, M. Durand, and L. E. Philpotts, “Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening,” Radiology, vol. 269, no. 3, pp. 694–700, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. A. Tagliafico, D. Astengo, F. Cavagnetto et al., “One-to-one comparison between digital spot compression view and digital breast tomosynthesis,” European Radiology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 539–544, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. P. Poplack, T. D. Tosteson, C. A. Kogel, and H. M. Nagy, “Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 189, no. 3, pp. 616–623, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. M. Tamimi, C. Byrne, G. A. Colditz, and S. E. Hankinson, “Endogenous hormone levels, mammographic density, and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 99, no. 15, pp. 1178–1187, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. N. F. Boyd, L. J. Martin, J. M. Rommens et al., “Mammographic density: a heritable risk factor for breast cancer,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 472, pp. 343–360, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. T. Mandelson, N. Oestreicher, P. L. Porter et al., “Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval-and screen-detected cancers,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 92, no. 13, pp. 1081–1087, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K. Kerlikowske, D. Grady, J. Barclay, E. A. Sickles, and V. Ernster, “Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 276, no. 1, pp. 33–38, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. N. F. Boyd, H. Guo, L. J. Martin et al., “Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 3, pp. 227–236, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. B. Kopans, “Digital breast tomosynthesis: a better mammogram,” Radiology, vol. 267, no. 3, pp. 968–969, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. C. Waldherr, P. Cerny, H. J. Altermatt et al., “Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 200, no. 1, pp. 226–231, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. M. J. Michell, A. Iqbal, R. K. Wasan et al., “A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 976–981, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. C. M. Hakim, D. M. Chough, M. A. Ganott, J. H. Sumkin, M. L. Zuley, and D. Gur, “Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: a subjective side-by-side review,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. W172–W176, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. K. R. Brandt, D. A. Craig, T. L. Hoskins et al., “Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 200, no. 2, pp. 291–298, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. R. J. Hooley, K. L. Greenberg, R. M. Stackhouse, J. L. Geisel, R. S. Butler, and L. E. Philpotts, “Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut public act 09-41,” Radiology, vol. 265, no. 1, pp. 59–69, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. F. M. Hall, R. J. Hooley, K. Greenberg et al., “Breast density legislation,” Radiology, vol. 266, no. 3, pp. 997–998, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. I. J. Hall, A. Middlebrooks, and S. S. Coughlin, “Population prevalence of first-degree family history of breast and ovarian cancer in the United States: implications for genetic testing,” The Open Health Services and Policy Journal, vol. 1, pp. 34–37, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar