Table of Contents
ISRN Ophthalmology
Volume 2014, Article ID 672146, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/672146
Review Article

Laser-Assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy versus Laser In Situ Keratomileusis in Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

1Department of Ophthalmology, No. 181 Hospital of the PLA, Guilin, Guangxi 541002, China
2Department of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China

Received 16 February 2014; Accepted 25 March 2014; Published 12 June 2014

Academic Editors: Y. F. Shih and I.-J. Wang

Copyright © 2014 Li-Quan Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. de Benito-Llopis, M. A. Teus, J. M. Sánchez-Pina, and J. L. Hernández-Verdejo, “Comparison between LASEK and LASIK for the correction of low myopia,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 139–145, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. V. Kaya, B. Oncel, H. Sivrikaya, and O. F. Yilmaz, “Prospective, paired comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia less than −6.00 diopters,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 223–228, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. Kirwan and M. O'Keefe, “Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 77–83, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S.-H. Chung, I. S. Lee, Y. G. Lee et al., “Comparison of higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 779–784, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. M. Tobaigy, R. C. Ghanem, R. R. Sayegh, J. A. Hallak, and D. T. Azar, “A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 142, no. 6, pp. 901–908, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Richter-Mueksch, S. Kaminski, A. Kuchar, E. Stifter, M. Velikay-Parel, and W. Radner, “Influence of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratectomy on patients' reading performance,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1544–1548, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Tietjen, C. Müller, and W. Sekundo, “A prospective intraindividual comparison between laser in situ keratomileusis and laser subepithelial keratectomy for myopia: 1-year follow-up results,” Ophthalmologe, vol. 105, no. 10, pp. 921–926, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. A. Teus, L. de Benito-Llopis, and J. M. Sánchez-Pina, “LASEK versus LASIK for the correction of moderate myopia,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 84, no. 7, pp. 605–610, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. W. Kim, W. R. Wee, J. H. Lee, and M. K. Kim, “Contrast sensitivity after LASIK, LASEK, and wavefront-guided LASEK with the VISX S4 laser,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 355–361, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Buzzonetti, G. Iarossi, P. Valente, M. Volpi, G. Petrocelli, and L. Scullica, “Comparison of wavefront aberration changes in the anterior corneal surface after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: preliminary study,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1929–1933, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Kim, J. K. Hyun, and C.-K. Joo, “Comparison of forward shift of posterior corneal surface after operation between LASIK and LASEK,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 220, no. 1, pp. 37–42, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. K. Kim, S. S. Kim, H. K. Lee et al., “Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1405–1411, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. W. Yee and S. B. Yee, “Update on laser subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK),” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 333–341, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Taneri, J. D. Zieske, and D. T. Azar, “Evolution, techniques, clinical outcomes, and pathophysiology of LASEK: review of the literature,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 576–602, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. P. Higgins and S. Green, Eds., Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009.
  16. L.-Q. Zhao, R.-L. Wei, J.-W. Cheng, Y. Li, J.-P. Cai, and X.-Y. Ma, “Meta-analysis: clinical outcomes of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy in myopia,” Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 10, pp. 1912–1922, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N. Lin, S. B. Yee, S. Mitra, A. Z. Chuang, and R. W. Yee, “Prediction of corneal haze using an ablation depth/corneal thickness ratio after laser epithelial keratomileusis,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 797–802, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. G. Iskander, T. Peters, E. A. Penno, and H. V. Gimbel, “Postoperative complications in laser in situ keratomileusis,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 273–279, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. de Benito-Llopis, M. A. Teus, and J. M. Sánchez-Pina, “Comparison between LASEK with mitomycin C and LASIK for the correction of myopia of −7.00 to −13.75 D,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 516–523, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. D. Wallau and M. Campos, “One-year outcomes of a bilateral randomised prospective clinical trial comparing PRK with mitomycin C and LASIK,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 93, no. 12, pp. 1634–1638, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Egger, G. D. Smith, and A. N. Phillips, “Meta-analysis: principles and procedures,” British Medical Journal, vol. 315, pp. 1533–1537, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. D. Moher, D. J. Cook, S. Eastwood, I. Olkin, D. Rennie, and D. F. Stroup, “Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement,” The Lancet, vol. 354, no. 9193, pp. 1896–1900, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus