A Study of Transmigrated Canine in an Indian Population

Table 2

Clinical and radiographic features of transmigrated mandibular canines in 19 patients.

Case	Gender	Age	Transmigrated canine^a	Type; (mandibular canine); Mupparapu’s classification	Presence of overretained canine with respect to transmigrated tooth	Other coexisting dental anomalies; (except third molars)	Associated pathologies; in relation to transmigrated tooth
1	F	17	33	1	No	—	None
2	M	22	33	1	Yes	Agenesis of 12, 22,; retained 53, 63	None
3	F	29	43	1	No	Impacted 13, 23, retained 53, 63, 85, agenesis of 45, peg lateral 12, 22	None
4	F	19	33	2	Yes	Retained 53, 63, agenesis of 13, 35, microdont 12, 22	None
5	M	28	33	1	Yes	Retained 73	None
6	F	18	43	5	No	Agenesis of 22, 31, 32, 41	None
7	M	24	33	1	No	—	None
8	M	19	43	1	Yes	Retained 73, 63, missing 12, 22	None
9	M	23	33	1	Yes	—	None
10	M	19	33	1	No	Retained 63	None
11	F	34	13	NA	No	—	None
12	F	19	33	2	No	—	None
13	F	22	23	NA	No	Impacted 13	None
14	M	53	23	NA	No	—	None
15	M	26	33	1	No	—	None
16	M	15	33	4	Yes	Retained 63, impacted 23	FE^*, mandibular incisors crowding
17	F	18	23	NA	No	—	None
18	M	23	43	4	No	—	FE
19	M	27	33	1	No	—	None
20	M	32	13	NA	Yes	—	None

M: male; F: female; ^*FE: follicular enlargement; NA: not applicable; ^atooth numbering in accordance with FDI World Dental Federation notations.