Table of Contents
International Scholarly Research Notices
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 817102, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/817102
Research Article

Relationship between Metabolic Fluxes and Sequence-Derived Properties of Enzymes

Institute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Latvia, Kronvalda Boulevard 4, Riga LV-1010, Latvia

Received 16 April 2014; Accepted 24 August 2014; Published 29 October 2014

Academic Editor: Fernando Tadeo

Copyright © 2014 Peteris Zikmanis and Inara Kampenusa. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. Gerosa and U. Sauer, “Regulation and control of metabolic fluxes in microbes,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 566–575, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. V. A. Likić, M. J. McConville, T. Lithgow, and A. Bacic, “Systems biology: the next frontier for bioinformatics,” Advances in Bioinformatics, vol. 2010, Article ID 268925, 10 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. M. Vieites, M.-E. Guazzaroni, A. Beloqui, P. N. Golyshin, and M. Ferrer, “Metagenomics approaches in systems microbiology,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 236–255, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Stephanopoulos, “Metabolic fluxes and metabolic engineering,” Metabolic Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. Plaxton, “Principles of metabolic control,” in Functional Metabolism: Regulation and Adaptation, pp. 1–24, Wiley- Liss, New York, NY, USA, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  6. P. K. Agarwal, “Enzymes: an integrated view of structure, dynamics and function,” Microbial Cell Factories, vol. 5, no. 2, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Rackovsky, “Sequence physical properties encode the global organization of protein structure space,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 34, pp. 14345–14348, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Deiana and A. Giansanti, “Predictors of natively unfolded proteins: unanimous consensus score to detect a twilight zone between order and disorder in generic datasets,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 11, article 198, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. M. Gromiha, “Intrinsic relationship of amino acid composition/occurrence with topological parameters and protein folding rates,” Open Structural Biology Journal, vol. 3, pp. 126–142, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  10. S. Roy, D. Martinez, H. Platero, T. Lane, and M. Werner-Washburne, “Exploiting amino acid composition for predicting protein-protein interactions,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 11, Article ID e7813, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. Zikmanis and I. Kampenusa, “Relationships between kinetic constants and the amino acid composition of enzymes from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae glycolysis pathway,” EURASIP Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, vol. 2012, article 11, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. I. Kampenusa and P. Zikmanis, “Relationships between metabolic fluxes and enzyme amino acid composition,” Central European Journal of Biology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 107–120, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Sarda, G. H. Chua, K.-B. Li, and A. Krishnan, “pSLIP: SVM based protein subcellular localization prediction using multiple physicochemical properties,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 6, article 152, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Zhou, F. Tian, Y. Wu, Z. Li, and Z. Shang, “Quantitative sequence-activity model (QSAM): applying QSAR strategy to model and predict bioactivity and function of peptides, proteins and nucleic acids,” Current Computer-Aided Drug Design, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 311–321, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. R. Atchley, J. Zhao, A. D. Fernandes, and T. Drüke, “Solving the protein sequence metric problem,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 18, pp. 6395–6400, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. M. Gromiha, A. M. Thangakani, and S. Selvaraj, “FOLD-RATE: prediction of protein folding rates from amino acid sequence,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 34, pp. W70–W74, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Kawashima, P. Pokarowski, M. Pokarowska, A. Kolinski, T. Katayama, and M. Kanehisa, “AAindex: amino acid index database, progress report,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. D202–D205, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. G. Georgiev, “Interpretable numerical descriptors of amino acid space,” Journal of Computational Biology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 703–723, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Kidera, Y. Konishi, and M. Oka, “Statistical analysis of the physical properties of the 20 naturally occurring amino acids,” Journal of Protein Chemistry, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23–55, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. Hynne, S. Danø, and P. G. Sørensen, “Full-scale model of glycolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Biophysical Chemistry, vol. 94, no. 1-2, pp. 121–163, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. Teusink, J. Passarge, C. A. Reijenga et al., “Can yeast glycolysis be understood in terms of in vitro kinetics of the constituent enzymes? Testing Biochemistry,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 267, no. 17, pp. 5313–5329, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. N. Kock and G. S. Lynn, “Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: an illustration and recommendations,” Journal of the Association of Information Systems, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 546–580, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. P. Burnham and D. R. Anderson, “Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection,” Sociological Methods and Research, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 261–304, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Arlot and A. Celisse, “A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection,” Statistics Surveys, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 40–79, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. N. J. Stanford, T. Lubitz, K. Smallbone, E. Klipp, P. Mendes, and W. Liebermeister, “Systematic construction of kinetic models from genome-scale metabolic networks,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e79195, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. A. S. Juncker, L. J. Jensen, A. Pierleoni et al., “Sequence-based feature prediction and annotation of proteins,” Genome biology, vol. 10, no. 2, article 206, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T. Lindeberg, “Scale-space,” in Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering, B. Wah, Ed., pp. 2495–2505, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  28. F. B. du Preez, Comparative cross-species analysis of detailed kinetic models of glycolysis [Ph.D. thesis], University of Stellenbosh, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 2009.
  29. D. A. Kraut, K. S. Carroll, and D. Herschlag, “Challenges in enzyme mechanism and energetics,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 72, pp. 517–571, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. Magyar, É. Tüdos, and I. Simon, “Functionally and structurally relevant residues of enzymes: are they segregated or overlapping?” FEBS Letters, vol. 567, no. 2-3, pp. 239–242, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S.-M. Yan, D.-Q. Shi, H. Nong, and G. Wu, “Predicting Km values of beta-glucosidases using cellobiose as substrate,” Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. M. Yan and G. Wu, “Prediction of michaelis-menten constant of beta-glucosidases using nitrophenyl-beta-D-glucopyranoside as substrate,” Protein and Peptide Letters, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1053–1057, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. R. Gabdoulline, M. Stein, and R. C. Wade, “qPIPSA: relating enzymatic kinetic parameters and interaction fields,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 8, article 373, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. D. Boehr, R. Nussinov, and P. E. Wright, “The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 789–796, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. Segrè, J. Zucker, J. Katz et al., “From annotated genomes to metabolic flux models and kinetic parameter fitting,” OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 301–316, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus