Table of Contents
ISRN Structural Biology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 827201, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/827201
Research Article

AtTRB1–3 Mediates Structural Changes in AtPOT1b to Hold ssDNA

Centre for Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Pondicherry University, Pondicherry 605014, India

Received 31 October 2013; Accepted 19 November 2013; Published 16 February 2014

Academic Editors: V. Mathura and Y.-D. Park

Copyright © 2014 Amit Jaiswal. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. de Lange, “Telomere capping: one strand fits all,” Science, vol. 292, no. 5519, pp. 1075–1076, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Z.-S. Ye, D. Hockemeyer, A. N. Krutchinsky et al., “POT1-interaction protein PIP1: a telomere length regulator that recruits POT1 to the TIN2/TRF1 complex,” Genes and Development, vol. 18, no. 14, pp. 1649–1654, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. V. Shakirov, Y. V. Surovtseva, N. Osbun, and D. E. Shippen, “The Arabidopsis Pot1 and Pot2 proteins function in telomere length homeostasis and chromosome end protection,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 25, no. 17, pp. 7725–7733, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. Baumann and T. R. Cech, “Pot1, the putative telomere end-binding protein in fission yeast and humans,” Science, vol. 292, no. 5519, pp. 1171–1175, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. V. Shakirov, T. D. McKnight, and D. E. Shippen, “POT1-independent single-strand telomeric DNA binding activities in Brassicaceae,” Plant Journal, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1004–1015, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Z. N. Karamysheva, Y. V. Surovtseva, L. Vespa, E. V. Shakirov, and D. E. Shippen, “A C-terminal Myb extension domain defines a novel family of double-strand telomeric DNA-binding proteins in arabidopsis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 46, pp. 47799–47807, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. P. Schrumpfová, M. Kuchař, J. Paleček, and J. Fajkus, “Mapping of interaction domains of putative telomere-binding proteins AtTRB1 and AtPOT1b from Arabidopsis thaliana,” FEBS Letters, vol. 582, no. 10, pp. 1400–1406, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. M. Mitton-Fry, E. M. Anderson, T. R. Hughes, V. Lundblad, and D. S. Wuttke, “Conserved structure for single-stranded telomeric DNA recognition,” Science, vol. 296, no. 5565, pp. 145–147, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Churikov and C. M. Price, “Pot1 and cell cycle progression cooperate in telomere length regulation,” Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 79–84, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Bairoch, R. Apweiler, C. H. Wu et al., “The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt),” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, pp. D154–D159, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. Quevillon, V. Silventoinen, S. Pillai et al., “InterProScan: protein domains identifier,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. W116–W120, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Gasteiger, C. Hoogland, A. Gattiker et al., “Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server,” in The Proteomics Protocols Handbook, pp. 571–607, Springer, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  13. J. L. Sussman, D. Lin, J. Jiang et al., “Protein Data Bank (PDB): database of three-dimensional structural information of biological macromolecules,” Acta Crystallographica D, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1078–1084, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Roy, A. Kucukural, and Y. Zhang, “I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction,” Nature protocols, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 725–738, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Wu and Y. Zhang, “LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 3375–3382, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. R. Rodriguez, G. Chinea, N. Lopez, T. Pons, and G. Vriend, “Homology modeling, model and software evaluation: three related resources,” Bioinformatics, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 523–528, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Pronk, S. Páll, R. Schulz et al., “GROMACS 4. 5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit,” Bioinformatics, vol. 29, pp. 845–854, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  18. K. Lindorff-Larsen, S. Piana, K. Palmo et al., “Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field,” Proteins, vol. 78, no. 8, pp. 1950–1958, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. A. Laskowski, M. W. MacArthur, D. S. Moss, and J. M. Thornton, “PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures,” Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 26, pp. 283–291, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  20. C. Colovos and T. O. Yeates, “Verification of protein structures: patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions,” Protein Science, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 1511–1519, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. U. Bowie, R. Luthy, and D. Eisenberg, “A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure,” Science, vol. 253, no. 5016, pp. 164–170, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. A. Laskowski and M. B. Swindells, “LigPlot+: multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 2778–2786, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Bakan, L. M. Meireles, and I. Bahar, “ProDy: protein dynamics inferred from theory and experiments,” Bioinformatics, vol. 27, no. 11, Article ID btr168, pp. 1575–1577, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. Aasland, A. F. Stewart, and T. Gibson, “The SANT domain: a putative DNA-binding domain in the SWI-SNF and ADA complexes, the transcriptional co-repressor N-CoR and TFIIIB,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 87–88, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. V. Ramakrishnan, J. T. Finch, V. Graziano, P. L. Lee, and R. M. Sweet, “Crystal structure of globular domain of histone H5 and its implications for nucleosome binding,” Nature, vol. 362, no. 6417, pp. 219–223, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Y. Zhang and J. Skolnick, “Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality,” Proteins, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 702–710, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. A. Laskowski, V. V. Chistyakov, and J. M. Thornton, “PDBsum more: new summaries and analyses of the known 3D structures of proteins and nucleic acids,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, pp. D266–D268, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. Aasland, A. F. Stewart, and T. Gibson, “The SANT domain: a putative DNA-binding domain in the SWI-SNF and ADA complexes, the transcriptional co-repressor N-CoR and TFIIIB,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 87–88, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. N. Ramachandran, C. Ramakrishnan, and V. Sasisekharan, “Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 7, pp. 95–99, 1963. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. G. G. R. Desiraju and T. Steiner, The Weak Hydrogen Bond: In Structural Chemistry and Biology, vol. 9, Oxford University Press, 2001.