International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2014 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 928461 |

Julio Gálvez, "Role of Th17 Cells in the Pathogenesis of Human IBD", International Scholarly Research Notices, vol. 2014, Article ID 928461, 14 pages, 2014.

Role of Th17 Cells in the Pathogenesis of Human IBD

Academic Editor: G. Matteoli
Received30 Sep 2013
Accepted24 Dec 2013
Published25 Mar 2014


The gastrointestinal tract plays a central role in immune system, being able to mount efficient immune responses against pathogens, keeping the homeostasis of the human gut. However, conditions like Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC), the main forms of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), are related to an excessive and uncontrolled immune response against normal microbiota, through the activation of CD4+ T helper (Th) cells. Classically, IBD was thought to be primarily mediated by Th1 cells in CD or Th2 cells in UC, but it is now known that Th17 cells and their related cytokines are crucial mediators in both conditions. Th17 cells massively infiltrate the inflamed intestine of IBD patients, where they produce interleukin- (IL-) 17A and other cytokines, triggering and amplifying the inflammatory process. However, these cells show functional plasticity, and they can be converted into either IFN-γ producing Th1 cells or regulatory T cells. This review will summarize the current knowledge regarding the regulation and functional role of Th17 cells in the gut. Deeper insights into their plasticity in inflammatory conditions will contribute to advancing our understanding of the mechanisms that regulate mucosal homeostasis and inflammation in the gut, promoting the design of novel therapeutic approaches for IBD.

1. Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract that comprises two major conditions: Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). These pathologies are characterized by abdominal pain, fever, chronic diarrhea, and rectal bleeding due to ulceration of the inner lining of the colon and/or rectum, which can be accompanied by complications such as fistulation, stenosis, and abscesses in CD and megacolon in UC. Acute flares severely impair patient’s ability to lead a normal life, frequently requiring hospitalization and surgery, and may even be life threatening. At present, the pathogenesis of IBD remains elusive; however, the altered and chronic activation of the immune and inflammatory cascade in genetically susceptible individuals against unknown components of the luminal microflora seems to play a key role [1, 2] (Figure 1). The intestinal immune system is the largest and most complex component of the immune system in the human being. As the intestine comprises the major single epithelial interface in the body, which is populated by the greatest number and diversity of resident microbes, the intestinal immune system encounters therefore more antigens than any other part of the body and it must discriminate between invasive organisms and harmless antigens, such as food proteins and commensal bacteria [3]. At the same time, strong immune responses are required to protect this physiologically essential tissue, and, in consequence, a fine tuning in the immune responses to luminal antigens is essential to maintain homeostasis.

As expected in any inflammatory process, during the initial inflammatory response that takes place in IBD, the different innate immune cells located in the intestine, including natural killer cells, mast cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells, must be activated by foreign antigens, which at present remain unknown. Afterwards, the maintenance of the inflammatory response with time is promoted through the stimulation of the adaptative immune response, mainly mediated by abnormally activated effector T helper (Th) cells, in concordance with the reduced rates of apoptosis that have been reported to occur in these cells in human IBD [4]. As a result of this cell activity, there is an upregulation of the synthesis and release of different proinflammatory mediators including reactive oxygen and nitrogen metabolites, eicosanoids, chemokines, and cytokines, which actively contribute to the pathogenic cascade that initiates and perpetuates the intestine inflammatory response in these conditions [5].

When considering effector Th cells, these typically show functional heterogeneity associated with a different profile of cytokine production, which correlates with the nature of the offending microorganism. The differentiation in specific T-cell types significantly depends on the interactions of specific cytokines with signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) factors. The cytokines that promote Th cell polarization are mostly derived from innate immune cells that recognize microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) in an attempt to establish proinflammatory antimicrobial responses. Initially, when considering immunological functions, transcription factor expression, and cytokine secretion, activated Th cells were divided into two different subsets: Th1 and Th2. Th1 cells secrete interferon-γ (IFN-), a potent activator of intracellular killing by macrophages, with the main role of protecting the host against intracellular pathogens, like some bacteria and viruses, that are capable to survive or replicate within macrophages. Th1 cell development requires the sequential actions of STAT1 and STAT4, induced by IFN- and interleukin-12 (IL-12), respectively, which promote an enhanced expression of the T-box transcription factor normally expressed in T cells, T-bet. However, Th2 cells express the transcription factor GATA binding protein 3 (GATA-3) and secrete IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13, thus collaborating to host defence against helminths. The existence of a reciprocal regulation of Th1 and Th2 polarization is well known, achieved through the production of their main corresponding cytokines, IFN- and IL-4, thus enforcing their own expression while inhibiting alternative commitment [6]. Similarly, the related Th1- and Th2-specific transcription factors participate in this process, since T-bet activation can suppress GATA-3 expression [7]. Nevertheless, in addition to their protective functions against invading pathogens, each subtype of Th cells also participates in the development of different immune-related human conditions. In fact, considering human IBD, CD has been traditionally linked with Th1 cells [8], with a predominance of Th1-related cytokines such as IL-12 and IFN in the mucosa, while UC is characterized by an increased production of IL-5 and IL-13, being therefore linked with Th2 cells [9].

Nevertheless, and more recently, a new subset of Th cells capable of producing IL-17 has been reported to play a key pathogenic role in chronic inflammatory conditions, including IBD [10]. The first reports suggesting the existence of these cells were published in 1999, in studies performed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and cutaneous inflammation [11, 12]. However, it was six years later when Langrish et al. [13] first described “Th17 cells” as a new subtype of effector Th cells. They were further characterized by the expression of the transcription factor retinoic acid orphan receptor (ROR)t, but not T-bet or GATA-3 [14], and by their ability to selectively produce high levels of IL-17A and IL-17F, crucial cytokines for host defence against extracellular pathogens. A prominent feature in these cells is a functional plasticity towards the Th1 subset, being reported that some Th17 cells are able to produce both IL-17 and IFN- [15].

The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge regarding the regulation and functional role of Th17 cells, in the context of IBD, focusing on their novel features such as their plasticity and their relationship with regulatory T (Treg) cells, as well as on their heterogeneity in the inflammatory microenvironment of the intestine.

2. Th17 Cell Differentiation in the Gut: Role in Intestine Inflammatory Conditions

Th17 cells have been proposed to be exclusively originated from a small subset of naive T cells expressing the lectin receptor CD161 ( T cell progenitors) [16]. It is well known that Th cell development begins in the thymus; however, the functional differentiation of Th cells in the intestinal mucosa occurs when the T cell encounters an activated antigen-presenting cell (APC), such as dendritic cells (DCs). Naive T cells have the potential to differentiate into Th1, Th2, induced regulatory T (iTreg) cells, and Th17 cells, being this process driven by the specific effector cytokines produced by APCs (Figure 2). It has been reported that monocytes and circulating conventional DCs (cDCs) activated by LPS and peptidoglycan, that are able to produce large amounts of IL-1 and IL-6 but little IL-12, are the most efficient inducers of Th17 differentiation; on the contrary, monocyte-derived DCs that produce IL-12, but not IL-1β, when activated by LPS or peptidoglycan, do not promote the differentiation of Th17 cells [17]. It is well known that the cytokines released by APCs activate the Jak-STAT pathway to exert their biological actions; in this regard, the transcription factor STAT3 is crucial for Th17 differentiation when activated by both IL-6 and IL-23 [18]. Supporting this, it has been reported that STAT3 overexpression promoted Th17 development, whereas this process was greatly impaired in mice with STAT3-deficient T cells [19]. Furthermore, STAT3 has also been reported to regulate the expression of the transcription factor RORt, which is critical for Th17 differentiation and development; in fact, an impaired RORt expression leads in turn to increased expression of other transcription factors such as T-bet and Forkhead box P3 (Foxp3) [19], promoting the development of other Th lineages rather than Th17 cells.

Both constitutive and inducible/inflammatory chemokines actively participate in the migration of both effector and memory T cells to specific intestine tissue sites to exert their corresponding biological function [20]. Therefore, chemokine receptors are differentially expressed on the different effector T-cell subsets: CXCR3 and CCR5 are preferentially expressed on Th1 cells, and CCR3, CCR4 and CRTH2 are preferentially expressed on Th2 cells [21], whereas CCR6 expression has been associated with Th17-cell differentiation [17]. In fact, it has been shown that the specific transcription factors for these lineages, T-bet for Th1 cells, GATA-3 for Th2 cells, and RORt for Th17 cells, respectively, control CXCR3, CCR3, and CCR6 genes’ transcription in a direct fashion [15].

In addition to chemokine receptors, the Th17 cell progenitors, T cells, also express several cytokine receptors, including IL-6 receptor (IL-6R), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF) receptor, IL-23R, IL-21R, and IL-1R. Of note, it has been proposed that when these cells are found within a proinflammatory environment in the intestine, characterised by the presence of high levels of IL-6, IL-1, and IL-23, their polarization into Th17 cells is induced [17, 22], as it can occur in intestine inflammation. However, not all these cytokines play the same role in this process. Whereas IL-6 can be considered as an essential cytokine for Th17 differentiation of naive T cells [23], the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-) assist in the efficiency of this process [24]. The role of IL-23 has not been clearly defined yet: although it was initially reported to be required for Th17 differentiation [25], subsequent studies have revealed that this cytokine might be essential for IL-17-mediated effector function and Th17 cell survival, but not for their differentiation [26].

The controversial role of TGF in the differentiation of human Th17 cells is interesting; while in some studies its presence in the culture media was found indispensable for the induction of RORt expression and in turn Th17 differentiation in vitro [27], other studies have not stated this requirement [17]. It was then proposed that the role of TGF in Th17 differentiation is dose dependent: while low doses of this cytokine are essential for Th17 differentiation, at high concentrations it inhibits the expression and functions of RORt [28, 29]. Additionally, TGF can also promote human Th17 differentiation indirectly due to its ability to suppress T-bet expression and the generation of Th1 cells [30], or by blocking expression of the transcription factors signal STAT4 and GATA-3, thus preventing Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation [31].

2.1. Th17 Cell Function

Mature Th17 cells are able to produce several effector molecules, including the cytokines IL-17A and IL-17F, IL-21, IL-22, IL-26, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), as well as the chemokine CXC ligands CXCL8 and CCL20. IL-17A is the prototype member of the IL-17 family that is composed by six cytokines: IL-17A, IL-17B, IL-17C, IL-17D, IL-17E, and IL-17F [32]. Both IL-17A and IL-17F have similar functions by targeting both immune and nonimmune cells, and they have been reported to play a key role in the Th17-mediated inflammatory response [33], through the IL-17 receptor A (IL-17RA)-IL-17RC heterodimer [34], showing a much higher affinity for IL-17A than for IL-17F. The binding of IL-17 to its receptor induces the recruitment of the adaptor protein ACT1, which in turn stimulates TNF receptor-associated factor 6 to activate the NF-B and MAPK pathways [32]. Both IL-17A and IL-17F play a key role in the recruitment, activation, and migration of granulocytes, being also able to target other cells, including epithelial cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and macrophages, to induce proinflammatory mediators like IL-6, TNF-, IL-1, GM-CSF, G-CSF, PGE2, nitric oxide and matrix metalloproteinases, and different chemokines, such as CXCLI, CXCL8, CCL2, CCL7, and CCL20 [32, 35]. CCL20 has antimicrobial and chemoattractive properties and it is a ligand for the chemokine CC receptor CCR6, which is expressed by dendritic cells, B cells, and different subsets of T cells. Of note, Th17 cells also express CCR6, and the release of CCL20 in response to IL-17 promotes further attraction and recruitment of Th17 cells to the inflammatory site [36], indicating that CCL20 may have an important role in sustaining Th17-mediated effects in inflammation.

Regarding the other cytokines produced by Th17 cells, IL-21 is a member of the IL-2 family of cytokines and exerts its function via the IL-21 receptor, which is expressed in different myeloid cells, as well as in B and T cells [32]. Among the biological effects of IL-21, it has been reported that this cytokine promotes Th1 responses [37] and also potently induces Th17 differentiation from T cells in an autocrine way, amplifying Th17 responses and therefore inducing its own expression in an autocrine loop [38, 39]. IL-22 belongs to the IL-10 family of cytokines, and it is produced by mature Th17 cells through IL-23-mediated STAT3 activation [32]. The binding of IL-22 to its corresponding receptor (IL-22R), which is highly expressed in epithelial cells and parenchymal tissues, but not on immune cells, activates the STAT3 and MAPK pathways and promotes the production and release of antimicrobial agents and -defensins, being therefore considered an essential cytokine for the immune barrier function of epithelial cells [40, 41]. Finally, the production of either TNF- or GM-CSF by Th17 cells contributes to the activation, survival, and recruitment of neutrophils in different inflammatory conditions, including IBD [42].

2.2. Th17 Cells in Intestine Inflammation

Nowadays, it is well known that the inflamed gastrointestinal mucosa of patients with IBD has a massive infiltration of Th17 cells and that Th17-related cytokines are produced in excess in both CD and UC tissues [43], thus proposing a key role for these cells in these intestine conditions [44]. Fujino et al. [45] showed that there are an increased number of IL-17-producing cells in the inflamed gut of patients with IBD in comparison to healthy controls. In line with this, it has been shown that RNA transcripts for IL-17A and IL-17F are upregulated in the inflamed mucosa of IBD patients [45, 46]. Supporting these observations, a correlation between disease severity and levels of IL-17 secreted by PBMCs from UC patients has also been observed [47]. In addition to IL-17A and IL-17F, various studies have reported an increased production of other Th17 cytokines in the inflamed gut of IBD patients, such as IL-22 and IL-26 [48], or IL-21 and IL-23, which in turn exacerbate inflammation by promoting Th1 and Th17 responses [49]. Moreover, IBD genomewide association studies and candidate gene studies have shown that several polymorphisms in Th17-related genes, such as STAT3 or IL-23R, are associated with IBD, thus supporting the involvement of the Th17 pathway in its IBD pathogenesis [50].

Based on this, it is obvious that Th17 cells play an important role in IBD pathogenesis, which was solely attributed to Th1 and Th2 cells in the past. Different studies have proposed a singular prominent role for each Th cell subset in either CD or UC. In this sense, it has been shown that the numbers of IFN- secreting T cells in peripheral blood from IBD patients significantly correlated with disease severity in CD but not in UC [47]. Other laboratories have reported that, in response to IL-23, IL-17 production by intestinal lymphocytes was only significantly enhanced in UC, while in CD, IFN- production was induced instead [51]. These observations might indicate that IFN- mediates Th1 inflammation in CD while IL-17 mediates disease in UC or that the capacity to produce IL-17 by Th17 cells may be disturbed by the enhanced Th1 cytokines present in CD intestinal mucosa [51]. Furthermore, elevated levels of CCL20, a Th17 cell chemoattractant [52], have also been documented in IBD mucosa, where CCL20 production seems to be positively regulated by IL-21 [53]. IL-21 is overproduced in the intestine of IBD patients, but the vast majority of IL-21-producing T cells coexpress IFN- and not IL-17A, thus suggesting that Th1, and not Th17, cells are the major sources of IL-21 in the human gut [54].

However, although a pathogenic role in intestine inflammation has been ascribed to Th17 cells, different studies in experimental colitis have reported tissue-protective effects of Th17-type cytokines in the gut. In fact, the neutralization of IL-17A, either by antibody treatment or by genetic ablation, leads to exacerbated intestinal inflammation in the dextran sulphate sodium (DSS) colitis model [55, 56], which is typically associated with intestine epithelial barrier dysfunction and increased permeability to luminal agents that promote the inflammatory response [57]. In this model, IL-17A may exert its protective effects through facilitating tight-junction formation by inducing the expression of claudins in intestinal epithelial cells and by stimulating mucin production, thereby increasing mucosal barrier function [58]. Furthermore, when compared with wild-type mice, animals deficient in IL-22 show aggravation of the intestine inflammatory process following DSS administration, suggesting a tissue-protective role for this cytokine, that is produced by Th17 cells, which has been reported to stimulate intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and to enhance goblet cell function and mucus production, thus promoting intestinal barrier integrity [40, 59, 60]. Conversely, and opposed to the tissue-protective effects described for IL-17A and IL-22, it has been reported that IL-17F-deficient mice develop milder DSS-induced colitic symptoms than wild-type animals, thus suggesting that IL-17F exacerbates inflammation in this experimental model of colitis [56]. In fact, when DSS was administered to IL-17F knockout (KO) mice, a reduced chemokine mRNA colonic expression was observed compared with similarly treated wild-type controls [56]. At present, it is not known why IL-17A KO and IL-17F KO mice show different disease outcomes following DSS administration, even more when considering the fact that both cytokines bind the same receptor subunits IL-17RA and IL-17RC [34]; probably, the different ligand affinity, downstream signalling cascades, and receptor tissue distribution could clarify these differences. Considering all the above, Th17 cytokines have differential effects on the course and pathogenesis of IBD, and most probably, the final effect of these cytokines would depend on their relative abundance.

Moreover, recent studies have revealed the existence of an interaction between the Th17 and Th1 pathways in IBD. In fact, Annunziato et al. [15] demonstrated that some of the IL-17-producing T-cells found increased in CD mucosa also produce IFN-. Since then, different studies have corroborated the existence a functional plasticity of Th17 cells towards the Th1 cell linage. This process, although slightly controversial, seems to be responsible for the different biological functions ascribed to Th17 cells in intestine inflammatory conditions.

3. Th17 Cell Plasticity

An essential approach by which the adaptive immune system orchestrates protective or tolerogenic responses to microorganisms relies on the differentiation of distinct functional subsets of T cells from naive precursors, of a fixed, single antigenic specificity. This also ensures appropriate coordination between the innate and adaptive immune responses. In fact, it is well know that Th1 and Th2 cells control reciprocally their differentiation, since IL-12, IFN-, and the expression of T-bet inhibit Th2 differentiation, whereas IL-4 and GATA3 expressions antagonize Th1 polarization [7, 61]. This has been also reported, at least in murine models, for Th17 cells: both IFN- production by Th1 and IL-4 by Th2 cells exert inhibitory effects on IL-17A release by Th17 cells [62]. It is now established that once a T cell has committed to either the Th1 or the Th2 lineages, conversion to the other lineage does not occur; in consequence, Th1 and Th2 cells develop into mature effector cells with rather stable phenotypes. Although this observation of a fixed phenotype and function was also initially applied to Th17 cells, research over the recent past years has ruled out this consideration.

3.1. Th1/Th17 Balance

As commented above, the existence of Th17 cells able to produce both IL-17 and IFN- was first reported by Annunziato et al. [15], who found them in the gut of patients with CD, thus suggesting that some of these Th17 cells could, at least in part, act like Th1 cells. As commented previously, Th17 cells required TGFβ for sustained expression of IL-17F and IL-17A, but in the absence of TGF, both IL-23 and IL-12 may act to suppress IL-17 and enhance IFN- production in a STAT4- and T-bet-dependent manner, albeit with distinct efficiencies [63]. In vitro experiments supported these findings, since the incubation of Th17 cells with IL-12 induced either the production of IFN- and IL-17 (termed as Th17/Th1 cells) or IFN- instead of IL-17A (Th17-driven Th1 cells, or “nonclassic” Th1 cells) [15]. In fact, stimulation of these Th17 cells with IL-12 also enhanced the expression of the Th1-related transcription factor T-bet (and IFN-) and downregulated RORt and IL-17 expression, thus indicating that IL-17-secreting T cells can be induced to differentiate into fully polarized Th1 cells [15] (Figure 3). Of note, whereas the in vitro assays reveal that IL-12 causes a rapid and an almost total suppression of the Th17 programme with the simultaneous upregulation of the Th1 transcription factor T-bet and IFN-, IL-23 requires several rounds of stimulation to cause a moderate deviation from a Th17 to a Th1 [63]. However, the role of IL-23 in promoting the switch from an IL-17A-producing T cell to an IFN--secreting cells seems to be crucial in vivo [64].

It is interesting to note that the Th1 cells derived from Th17 cells express CD161, the surface marker of Th17 cells progenitors [17], as opposed to classic CD161 Th1 cells, which are devoid of this marker. This shift of Th17 cells towards the Th1 phenotype has also been reported in murine experimental models, including IBD [6366], and in other human conditions, including autoimmune polyarthritis [67] or oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis [68].

It has been proposed that the ability of Th17 cells to evolve into Th1 cells can be considered as a mechanism to prevent severe immunopathology, given the highly detrimental effects that can be derived from Th17 cell activity. All these findings would support the hypothesis that Th17-derived Th17/Th1 and Th1 cells, rather than Th17 cells alone, play a critical role in IBD [63, 64]. In consequence, those compounds interfering with both Th1 and Th17 cells’ activity could be useful to facilitate the resolution of the ongoing mucosal inflammation in IBD.

3.2. Treg-Th17 Balance

In addition to natural regulatory T cells (nTregs), which are of thymic origin, Tregs can be induced (iTregs) in the periphery under specific conditions. It has been reported that developmental pathways of Th17 and iTregs are closely related, being the differentiation of one another regulated to maintain their equilibrium, and thus influencing the outcome of immune responses in the context of inflammatory conditions, including IBD (Figure 4) [69]. It has been reported that Th17 cells reside mainly at barrier surfaces, particularly in the mucosa of the gut, where they protect the host from microorganisms that invade through the epithelium [23]. Similarly, iTreg cells are also mainly found in the intestinal mucosa, where they act to control excessive effector T-cell responses that might damage host tissues [70].

TGF has been proposed as the critical common factor for Th17 and iTreg cells; thus, TGF is able to promote the differentiation of naive T cells into regulatory cells in peripheral tissues, while in the presence of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, it favors the differentiation of Th17 cells [23, 71]. Further in vitro studies have confirmed the relationship between these two T-cell subsets. TGF upregulates RORt expression [72], the central transcription factor for Th17 differentiation [26, 73, 74]. Similarly, TGF induces the regulatory transcription factor Foxp3, which is crucial for the development of Tregs [75, 76]. However, it has been reported that the concurrent administration of IL-6 and TGF to the culture media of naive T cells resulted in the inhibition of iTreg generation while the differentiation Th17 was promoted, a process that was associated with an increase in the expression of IL-23R and RORt [23, 77]. On the contrary, in the absence of IL-23, the colonic Treg population is greater [78]. Supporting the reciprocal development of Th17 and Treg cells, it was reported that TGF-induced Foxp3 expression represses IL-23R and RORt expression, thus suggesting that the Treg phenotype regulates Th17 cell differentiation [69]. Similar conclusions were derived from studies of retinoic acid function, which induces Foxp3 and inhibits RORt in Th17-inducing conditions, therefore promoting the development of Tregs [79, 80], and in STAT3 deficiency, a critical transcription factor related to Th17 development in humans [81, 82]. In fact, an increase in these suppressive cells might contribute to limiting the destructive Th effector responses. More recently, mouse studies have revealed the existence of dual Th17/Treg cell precursor, expressing both RORt and Foxp3 simultaneously. The hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), a target gene of activated STAT3 [83], has been implicated in the regulation of Th17/Treg balance by promoting Th17 differentiation from these precursors [84]. One of the mechanisms proposed for this implies that HIF-1α inhibits Treg differentiation by targeting Foxp3 for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, thus stimulating Th17 differentiation in a STAT3-dependent fashion [84]. Furthermore, it has been described that the hypoxia-induced pathway can be itself activated by IL-17A and IL-17F, thus maintaining the HIF-1 pool and, as a result, perpetuating an existing Th17 response [85].

In consequence, it is interesting to note the important role that Th cell plasticity, driven by specific cytokines, can play in intestine conditions in which there is an altered immune response, like IBD. The active participation of TGF in the development of two different T cell subsets is remarkable, that is, iTreg (anti-inflammatory) or Th17 (proinflammatory). In addition, the presence of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 in the intestine facilitates TGF-induced Th17 differentiation instead of iTreg, thus providing a mechanism to combine immune homeostasis and pathogen clearance to extracellular bacteria at mucosal barrier locations, where a permanent interplay with intestinal microbiota occurs [86].

4. Intestinal Microbiota in IBD: Interaction with Th17 Cells

The interaction of microbes with mucosal immune cells in the gastrointestinal tract seems to have a major role in priming and regulating immunity. In fact, different studies support the key role that intestine microbiota plays in the pathogenesis of human IBD (Figure 5). It has been reported that the intestinal mucosal damage that characterizes IBD is generated by an excessive or deregulated immune response against commensal microbes in the gut in individuals with a genetic susceptibility [87]. Increasing evidence also shows that there are substantial changes in the microbiota composition of IBD patients, leading to a situation termed as dysbiosis [88]. In this sense, Lepage et al. [89] have reported that in mucosal biopsy samples from UC patients there was a higher proportion of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria and a lower proportion of Bacteroidetes. Similarly, a reduction of bacterial diversity has also been described in patients with CD [90]. Considering this, it has been proposed that these changes in the microbiota composition are responsible for switching the tolerogenic response that normally occurs in healthy individuals, to an activated, potentially pathogenic, immune response in IBD patients [91]. In the presence of “danger signals” triggered by microbe-associated molecular patterns, conditioned antigen-presenting cells might induce, through the secretion of different cytokines, the Th effector immune-inflammatory responses.

As commented before, Th17 cells are especially prominent in intestine mucosal surfaces, where they contribute, in cooperation with other T cells, to maintaining intestinal homeostasis and providing protection against invading microorganisms [92]. Strikingly, the endogenous microbiota seems to be involved in Th17 cell differentiation in the intestine under steady-state conditions [93, 94], being the presence of Th17 cells within different parts of the intestine reliant on the grade of colonization with commensal bacteria. Thus, in conventionally raised mice, Th17 cells are found at high numbers in ileum and colon lamina propria, but not in the duodenum, jejunum, mesenteric lymph nodes, or spleen [95, 96]. Supporting this, different studies have shown that the presence of Th17 cells in the intestine is noticeably reduced in antibiotic-treated or germ-free mice [72, 97]. In fact, when germ-free mice are subjected to fecal transplantation from control mice, an increased presence of Th17 cells in the gut lamina propria is evidenced within two weeks after colonization [72]. In particular, segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB), specific species of the Clostridia-related commensal bacteria, have been specially associated with the generation of Th17 cells [72, 93, 98]. Correspondingly, the inoculation of Gram-positive spore-forming bacteria to germ-free mice promotes the induction of IL-17- and IL-22-producing Th17 cells in the gut lamina propria [93]; furthermore, a direct correlation between the quantity of Gram-negative cytophaga-flavobacter-bacteroidetes and the presence of Th17 cells in the small intestine lamina propria has also been reported [72]. At present, the specific bacterial products involved in the homeostatic intestinal Th17 differentiation have not been fully elucidated, although several facts support flagellins as one of those: they are expressed by SFB, recognized by TLR5-expressing intestinal phagocytes, they induce IL-23 from CD103+ dendritic cells, and they are known to drive Th17 responses to enteric pathogens [99103]. Microbiota-produced extracellular ATP can also be considered as an inducer of Th17 cells [97]. Likewise, indirect mechanisms may be involved, like IL-1 production induced by TLR recognition of intestinal bacteria by macrophages, since IL-1R signaling on intestinal T cells is required for homeostatic differentiation of Th17 cells [104]. How local production of IL-1 in the lamina propria directly affects naive T-cell differentiation within secondary lymphoid tissues remains to be clarified, but it is known that Peyer’s patches are the location where naive CD4 T cells are closely associated with SFB and lamina propria macrophages [105].

It is remarkable that the homeostatic development of Th17 cells in response to commensal bacteria seems to be substantially different from the development of Th17 responses during inflammatory conditions; that is, Th17 cells highly infiltrate the inflamed areas of the intestine in mice subjected to experimental colitis [99, 103]. Different studies have confirmed the contribution of commensal gut microbiota to Th17 cell expansion in IBD. In this sense, it has been reported that bacteria-infected apoptotic IECs provide both TLR ligands and phosphatidylserine, which promote the production of IL-6 and TGF from DCs, thus facilitating Th17 differentiation [106]. Supporting this, Elson et al. [107] demonstrated that the transfer of cecal bacterial antigen-specific C3H/HeJBir (C3Bir) CD4 (+) T-cell line to C3H/HeSnJ SCID mice induced a colitic process associated with enhanced production of Th17-derived cytokines, which is more severe than that caused by the transfer of Th1 cells.

New insights into Th17 cell involvement in inflammatory or infectious diseases have recently been derived from the generation of an IL-17A-eYFP reporter mouse. Using this reporter mouse, Hirota et al. have demonstrated that IFN--producing T cells are actually IL-17A producers, as identified by their expression of eYFP [64]. Moreover, they have shown that the production of other proinflammatory cytokines such as GM-CSF, IL-2, and TNF- by effector T cells is derived almost exclusively from “ex-Th17” cells, with no apparent contribution of Th1 cells [64]. All these findings indicate that Th17 cell fate is shaped by the in vivo microenvironment, in which chronic inflammatory states promote phenotype switching and the expression of IFN- (and other proinflammatory cytokines) by Th17 cells. It is also evident that the ability of the intestinal microbiota to strongly modulate the induction of Th17 responses can influence the susceptibility to intestinal inflammation [108, 109].

5. Novel Th17-Targeted Therapies in Intestine Inflammation

Given the key role attributed to Th17 cells in intestine inflammation, they have been proposed as a feasible therapeutic target to control intestinal inflammatory conditions. Theoretically, potential strategies would include the blockade of Th17 cell differentiation and expansion, the neutralization of the cytokines produced by these cells, and the inhibition of the specific transcription factors required for Th17 cell function. Studies evaluating these possibilities have been performed on experimental models of mouse colitis, revealing in some cases conflicting results.

5.1. Blocking the Differentiation and Amplification of Th17 Cells

Since different innate immune cells, like DC and macrophages, and their inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-6, IL-21, and IL-23, have a key role in promoting the differentiation and proliferation of Th17 cells, the use of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for these cytokines or the antagonism of their receptors may well be a reasonable strategy for the treatment of IBD.

In this sense, Fina et al. [39] have demonstrated that the blockade of IL-21R by the administration of IL-21R/Fc attenuates inflammation in mice with established DSS colitis. The same authors have observed that the neutralization of IL-21 by an anti-IL-21 antibody reduces IL-17 secretion by lamina propria lymphocytes isolated from IBD patients [39]. Similarly, the administration of a neutralizing IL-21 antibody to DSS-colitis mice decreased the colonic T-cell infiltrate and the production of IL-6 and IL-17A in the inflamed colonic tissue [110].

Monoclonal antibodies directed against interleukin-12/23 p40 have also shown efficacy in murine colitis models [111, 112]. More recently, the human monoclonal antibody against IL-12 and IL-23, ustekinumab, has shown effectiveness in patients with moderate-to-severe CD, especially in those in which anti-TNF therapy had previously failed [113]. The success of ustekinumab might be due to its ability to simultaneously inhibit Th1 and Th17 cells; both of them are clearly implicated in IBD pathogenesis.

5.2. Inhibition and/or Neutralization of Th17 Cytokines

Using an acute model of trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid- (TNBS-) induced colitis, Zhang et al. [114] have demonstrated that IL-17R knockout mice are significantly protected against colonic inflammation, even though they have equivalent amounts of local IL-23 and higher levels of IL-12p70 and IFN in comparison to wild-type mice. Moreover, in this study, these authors also stated that the overexpression of an IL-17R IgG1 fusion protein significantly attenuated colonic inflammation after acute TNBS-colitis induction [114]. However, contrasting results have been obtained after the inhibition of the function of IL-17 in animal models of IBD, probably due to the different functions exerted by IL-17A and IL-17F in the specific context of intestinal inflammation. Whereas murine DSS-induced colitis was worsened in IL-17A KO mice, a clear improvement of the colonic inflammatory process was observed in IL-17F KO mice [56]. The results obtained in humans regarding IL-17 inhibition are also controversial, since secukinumab, a human anti-IL-17A antibody, failed to show any beneficial effect in CD patients [115]. For this reason, current studies are now focused on evaluating combined IL-17A and IL-17F blockade as a potential strategy for IBD therapy [116].

The inhibition of IL-17 production by T cells has also been given some attention recently. In this context, vidofludimus, a novel oral immunomodulatory drug that inhibits dihydroorotate dehydrogenase and lymphocyte proliferation in vitro, has been demonstrated to reduce the expression of IL-17A and IL-17F, as well as IFN-, independently of its effects on lymphocyte proliferation, through the inhibition of STAT3 and nuclear factor-B activation [117]. In addition, recent clinical trials have shown the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vidofludimus in IBD patients [118].

When considering Th17 cells plasticity, it has been described that when Th17 cells lose their ability to secrete IL-17A and turn into IFN- producers, they express high levels of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) [119, 120], suggesting that AhR might be controlling the activity of these cells. AhR is a transcription factor ubiquitously expressed in vertebrate cells, which mediates a range of cellular events in response to different ligands including derivatives of tryptophan, such as 6-formylindolo(3, 2-b)carbazole (Ficz) [121]. Activation of AhR results in enhanced production of IL-22, together with a reduction of Th1 and Th2 cytokines [119, 122, 123]. Monteleone et al. [124] have shown that Ficz administration to colitis mice ameliorates colonic inflammation, an effect associated with an inhibition of Th1 cytokines and upregulation of IL-22. This beneficial effect was reversed after blockade of IL-22 with a neutralizing antibody, thus indicating that induction of IL-22 is one of the major mechanisms by which AhR signals control pathogenic responses in the gut. In fact, AhR expression is markedly downregulated in the inflamed tissue of CD patients [124], and, in agreement to what observed in mice, treatment of human IBD mucosal cells with Ficz resulted in decreased IFN- expression and upregulation of IL-22.

5.3. Inhibition of Th17-Cell-Specific Transcription Factors

Possible pharmacological targets in this regard comprise mainly the transcription factors RORt and STAT3, which control TH17 polarization and function. In this sense, pioglitazone, a nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR- agonist, has been shown to inhibit human and murine Th17 differentiation by reducing TGF/IL-6-induced expression of RORt [125], and indeed, it has proven to be favourable in mouse DSS-induced colitis [126]. More recently, it has been proposed that the beneficial effects exerted by mesenchymal stem cells in experimental colitis can be associated with a downregulation of both Th1-Th17-driven autoimmune and inflammatory responses derived from the inhibition of RORt activity together with the activation of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+)Treg cells [127]. Finally, the recently described synthetic triterpenoids, dual small-molecule inhibitors of NF-B and STAT3, may as well have potential benefits in intestinal inflammation [128].

All in all, further randomized clinical trials are required to confirm the benefits of targeting Th17 cells in IBD patients.

6. Concluding Remarks

Being the immune system the main mediator of tissue injury in IBD, it represents one of the key targets for future therapeutic interventions aimed at controlling this chronic and debilitating disease. New cellular components and features of the immune system have been discovered in the past decades that have revolutionized our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the development of IBD, that is, the case of Th17 cells, which hold a key position in IBD immunopathogenesis, especially due to their location and their remarkable ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions. It is now acknowledged that Th17 cells exhibit a certain degree of plasticity, which accounts for their key role in preserving homeostasis, especially in barrier tissues. This is particularly relevant in the gastrointestinal tract, where the immune system has to carefully balance the sustainability of a needed commensal microbiota, while preventing the invasion of host tissues. Although much progress has been made in revealing the role of Th17 cells during intestinal inflammation, there is still much to be learned. Targeting Th17 cells in an attempt to control other autoimmune diseases is already showing promising results. Therefore, a better understanding of this T-cell subset could lead to solid foundations for the development of novel effective biological agents for IBD management.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


Thanks to Natividad Garrido-Mesa, Francesca Algieri, and Alba Rodriguez-Nogales for the critical reading of this review. This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity (SAF2011-29648) and Junta de Andalucía (AGR-6826 and CTS 164) with funds from the European Union. The CIBER-EHD is funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III.


  1. R. J. Xavier and D. K. Podolsky, “Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease,” Nature, vol. 448, no. 7152, pp. 427–434, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. E. Glocker and B. Grimbacher, “Inflammatory bowel disease: is it a primary immunodeficiency?” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. M. Mowat, “Anatomical basis of tolerance and immunity to intestinal antigens,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 331–341, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  4. G. Bouma and W. Strober, “The immunological and genetic basis of inflammatory bowel disease,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 521–533, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. Strober and I. J. Fuss, “Proinflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases,” Gastroenterology, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 1756–1767, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. J. Lafaille, “The role of helper T cell subsets in autoimmune diseases,” Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 139–151, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. Usui, J. C. Preiss, Y. Kanno et al., “T-bet regulates Th1 responses through essential effects on GATA-3 function rather than on IFNG gene acetylation and transcription,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 203, no. 3, pp. 755–766, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Castellanos-Rubio, I. Santin, I. Irastorza, L. Castaño, J. Carlos Vitoria, and J. R. Bilbao, “TH17 (and TH1) signatures of intestinal biopsies of CD patients in response to gliadin,” Autoimmunity, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 69–73, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. F. Heller, P. Florian, C. Bojarski et al., “Interleukin-13 is the key effector Th2 cytokine in ulcerative colitis that affects epithelial tight junctions, apoptosis, and cell restitution,” Gastroenterology, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 550–564, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. L. A. Fouser, J. F. Wright, K. Dunussi-Joannopoulos, and M. Collins, “Th17 cytokines and their emerging roles in inflammation and autoimmunity,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 87–102, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Kotake, N. Udagawa, N. Takahashi et al., “IL-17 in synovial fluids from patients with rheumatoid arthritis is a potent stimulator of osteoclastogenesis,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 103, no. 9, pp. 1345–1352, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  12. M. B. M. Teunissen, C. W. Koomen, R. de Waal Malefyt, E. A. Wierenga, and J. D. Bos, “Interleukin-17 and interferon-γ synergize in the enhancement of proinflammatory cytokine production by human keratinocytes,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 645–649, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. L. Langrish, Y. Chen, W. M. Blumenschein et al., “IL-23 drives a pathogenic T cell population that induces autoimmune inflammation,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 233–240, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. I. I. Ivanov, B. S. McKenzie, L. Zhou et al., “The orphan nuclear receptor RORγt directs the differentiation program of proinflammatory IL-17+ T helper cells,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 1121–1133, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. Annunziato, L. Cosmi, V. Santarlasci et al., “Phenotypic and functional features of human Th17 cells,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 204, no. 8, pp. 1849–1861, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. Cosmi, R. de Palma, V. Santarlasci et al., “Human interleukin 17-producing cells originate from a CD161+CD4+ T cell precursor,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 205, no. 8, pp. 1903–1916, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. E. V. Acosta-Rodriguez, G. Napolitani, A. Lanzavecchia, and F. Sallusto, “Interleukins 1β and 6 but not transforming growth factor-β are essential for the differentiation of interleukin 17-producing human T helper cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 942–949, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. L. Zhou, I. I. Ivanov, R. Spolski et al., “IL-6 programs TH-17 cell differentiation by promoting sequential engagement of the IL-21 and IL-23 pathways,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 967–974, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. X. O. Yang, A. D. Panopoulos, R. Nurieva et al., “STAT3 regulates cytokine-mediated generation of inflammatory helper T cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 13, pp. 9358–9363, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. U. H. Von Andrian and C. R. Mackay, “T-cell function and migration: two sides of the same coin,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 343, no. 14, pp. 1020–1034, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. F. Sallusto and A. Lanzavecchia, “Heterogeneity of CD4+ memory T cells: functional modules for tailored immunity,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 2076–2082, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. N. J. Wilson, K. Boniface, J. R. Chan et al., “Development, cytokine profile and function of human interleukin 17-producing helper T cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 950–957, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. E. Bettelli, Y. Carrier, W. Gao et al., “Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector TH17 and regulatory T cells,” Nature, vol. 441, no. 7090, pp. 235–238, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Cho, J. Kang, Y. Moon et al., “STAT3 and NF-κB signal pathway is required for IL-23-mediated IL-17 production in spontaneous arthritis animal model IL-1 receptor antagonist-deficient mice,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 9, pp. 5652–5661, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  25. S. Aggarwal, N. Ghilardi, M. Xie, F. J. de Sauvage, and A. L. Gurney, “Interleukin-23 promotes a distinct CD4 T cell activation state characterized by the production of interleukin-17,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 3, pp. 1910–1914, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Veldhoen, R. J. Hocking, C. J. Atkins, R. M. Locksley, and B. Stockinger, “TGFβ in the context of an inflammatory cytokine milieu supports de novo differentiation of IL-17-producing T cells,” Immunity, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 179–189, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. L. Yang, D. E. Anderson, C. Baecher-Allan et al., “IL-21 and TGF-β are required for differentiation of human T H17 cells,” Nature, vol. 454, no. 7202, pp. 350–352, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. N. Manel, D. Unutmaz, and D. R. Littman, “The differentiation of human TH-17 cells requires transforming growth factor-β and induction of the nuclear receptor RORγt,” Nature Immunology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 641–649, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. E. Volpe, N. Servant, R. Zollinger et al., “A critical function for transforming growth factor-β, interleukin 23 and proinflammatory cytokines in driving and modulating human TH-17 responses,” Nature Immunology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 650–657, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. V. Santarlasci, L. Maggi, M. Capone et al., “TGF-β indirectly favors the development of human Th17 cells by inhibiting Th1 cells,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 207–215, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Das, G. Ren, L. Zhang et al., “Transforming growth factor β is dispensable for the molecular orchestration of Th17 cell differentiation,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 206, no. 11, pp. 2407–2416, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Korn, E. Bettelli, M. Oukka, and V. K. Kuchroo, “IL-17 and Th17 cells,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 27, pp. 485–517, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. H. Park, Z. Li, X. O. Yang et al., “A distinct lineage of CD4 T cells regulates tissue inflammation by producing interleukin 17,” Nature Immunology, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1133–1141, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. L. Gaffen, “Structure and signalling in the IL-17 receptor family,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 556–567, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Y. Iwakura, H. Ishigame, S. Saijo, and S. Nakae, “Functional specialization of interleukin-17 family members,” Immunity, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 149–162, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Baba, T. Imai, M. Nishimura et al., “Identification of CCR6, the specific receptor for a novel lymphocyte- directed CC chemokine LARC,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 23, pp. 14893–14898, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G. Monteleone, I. Monteleone, D. Fina et al., “Interleukin-21 enhances T-helper cell type I signaling and interferon-γ production in Crohn's disease,” Gastroenterology, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 687–694, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. R. Nurieva, X. O. Yang, G. Martinez et al., “Essential autocrine regulation by IL-21 in the generation of inflammatory T cells,” Nature, vol. 448, no. 7152, pp. 480–483, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. D. Fina, M. Sarra, M. C. Fantini et al., “Regulation of gut inflammation and th17 cell response by interleukin-21,” Gastroenterology, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 1038.e2–1048.e2, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. Brand, F. Beigel, T. Olszak et al., “IL-22 is increased in active Crohn's disease and promotes proinflammatory gene expression and intestinal epithelial cell migration,” American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 290, no. 4, pp. G827–G838, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. M. Leung, M. Davenport, M. J. Wolff, K. E. Wiens, W. M. Abidi, M. A. Poles et al., “IL-22-producing CD4+ cells are depleted in actively inflamed colitis tissue,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 124–133, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Pelletier, L. Maggi, A. Micheletti et al., “Evidence for a cross-talk between human neutrophils and Th17 cells,” Blood, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 335–343, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. L. A. Zenewicz, A. Antov, and R. A. Flavell, “CD4 T-cell differentiation and inflammatory bowel disease,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 199–207, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. C. T. Weaver, C. O. Elson, L. A. Fouser, and J. K. Kolls, “The Th17 pathway and inflammatory diseases of the intestines, lungs, and skin,” Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease, vol. 8, pp. 477–512, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Fujino, A. Andoh, S. Bamba et al., “Increased expression of interleukin 17 in inflammatory bowel disease,” Gut, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 65–70, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J. Seiderer, I. Elben, J. Diegelmann et al., “Role of the novel Th17 cytokine IL-17F in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): upregulated colonic IL-17F expression in active Crohn's disease and analysis of the IL17F p.His161Arg polymorphism in IBD,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 437–445, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. Raza and M. T. Shata, “Letter: pathogenicity of Th17 cells may differ in ulcerative colitis compared with Crohn's disease,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 36, article 204, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  48. S. Bogaert, D. Laukens, H. Peeters et al., “Differential mucosal expression of Th17-related genes between the inflamed colon and ileum of patients with inflammatory bowel disease,” BMC Immunology, vol. 11, article 61, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. N. Kamada, T. Hisamatsu, S. Okamoto et al., “Unique CD14+ intestinal macrophages contribute to the pathogenesis of Crohn disease via IL-23/IFN-γ axis,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 2269–2280, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. A. I. Thompson and C. W. Lees, “Genetics of ulcerative colitis,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 831–848, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. T. Kobayashi, S. Okamoto, T. Hisamatsu et al., “IL23 differentially regulates the Th1/Th17 balance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease,” Gut, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 1682–1689, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. K. Hirota, H. Yoshitomi, M. Hashimoto et al., “Preferential recruitment of CCR6-expressing Th17 cells to inflamed joints via CCL20 in rheumatoid arthritis and its animal model,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 204, no. 12, pp. 2803–2812, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. R. Caruso, D. Fina, I. Peluso et al., “A functional role for interleukin-21 in promoting the synthesis of the T-cell chemoattractant, MIP-3α, by gut epithelial cells,” Gastroenterology, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 166–175, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. D. de Nitto, M. Sarra, F. Pallone, and G. Monteleone, “Interleukin-21 triggers effector cell responses in the Gut,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 16, no. 29, pp. 3638–3641, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. A. Ogawa, A. Andoh, Y. Araki, T. Bamba, and Y. Fujiyama, “Neutralization of interleukin-17 aggravates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. X. O. Yang, H. C. Seon, H. Park et al., “Regulation of inflammatory responses by IL-17F,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 205, no. 5, pp. 1063–1075, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. N. Garrido-Mesa, P. Utrilla, M. Comalada et al., “The association of minocycline and the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 results in an additive beneficial effect in a DSS model of reactivated colitis in mice,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 82, no. 12, pp. 1891–1900, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. T. Kinugasa, T. Sakaguchi, X. Gu, and H. Reinecker, “Claudins regulate the intestinal barrier in response to immune mediators,” Gastroenterology, vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 1001–1011, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  59. K. Sugimoto, A. Ogawa, E. Mizoguchi et al., “IL-22 ameliorates intestinal inflammation in a mouse model of ulcerative colitis,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 534–544, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. L. A. Zenewicz, G. D. Yancopoulos, D. M. Valenzuela, A. J. Murphy, S. Stevens, and R. A. Flavell, “Innate and adaptive interleukin-22 protects mice from inflammatory bowel disease,” Immunity, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 947–957, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. W. Ouyang, S. H. Ranganath, K. Weindel et al., “Inhibition of Th1 development mediated by GATA-3 through an IL-4- independent mechanism,” Immunity, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 745–755, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  62. L. E. Harrington, R. D. Hatton, P. R. Mangan et al., “Interleukin 17-producing CD4+ effector T cells develop via a lineage distinct from the T helper type 1 and 2 lineages,” Nature Immunology, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1123–1132, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. Y. K. Lee, H. Turner, C. L. Maynard et al., “Late developmental plasticity in the T helper 17 lineage,” Immunity, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 92–107, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. K. Hirota, J. H. Duarte, M. Veldhoen et al., “Fate mapping of IL-17-producing T cells in inflammatory responses,” Nature Immunology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 255–263, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. D. Bending, H. de La Peña, M. Veldhoen et al., “Highly purified Th17 cells from BDC2.5NOD mice convert into Th1-like cells in NOD/SCID recipient mice,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 565–572, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. G. Wei, L. Wei, J. Zhu et al., “Global mapping of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 reveals specificity and plasticity in lineage fate determination of differentiating CD4+ T cells,” Immunity, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 155–167, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. K. Nistala, S. Adams, H. Cambrook et al., “Th17 plasticity in human autoimmune arthritis is driven by the inflammatory environment,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 33, pp. 14751–14756, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. L. Cosmi, R. Cimaz, L. Maggi et al., “Evidence of the transient nature of the Th17 phenotype of CD4+CD161+ T cells in the synovial fluid of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 2504–2515, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. L. Zhou, J. E. Lopes, M. M. W. Chong et al., “TGF-Β-induced Foxp3 inhibits TH17 cell differentiation by antagonizing RORγt function,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7192, pp. 236–240, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. L. Xu, A. Kitani, I. Fuss, and W. Strober, “Cutting edge: regulatory T cells induce CD4+CD25Foxp3 T cells or are self-induced to become Th17 cells in the absence of exogenous TGF-β,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 178, no. 11, pp. 6725–6729, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  71. C. Baecher-Allan, E. Wolf, and D. A. Hafter, “MHC class II expression identifies functionally distinct human regulatory T cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 8, pp. 4622–4631, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  72. I. I. Ivanov, R. D. L. Frutos, N. Manel et al., “Specific microbiota direct the differentiation of IL-17-producing T-helper cells in the mucosa of the small intestine,” Cell Host and Microbe, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 337–349, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. P. R. Mangan, L. E. Harrington, D. B. O'Quinn et al., “Transforming growth factor-β induces development of the TH17 lineage,” Nature, vol. 441, no. 7090, pp. 231–234, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. M. O. Li and R. A. Flavell, “TGF-β: a master of all T cell trades,” Cell, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 392–404, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. Y. Chen, P. Thai, Y. Zhao, Y. Ho, M. M. DeSouza, and R. Wu, “Stimulation of airway mucin gene expression by interleukin (IL)-17 through IL-6 paracrine/autocrine loop,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 19, pp. 17036–17043, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. J. Zhu and W. E. Paul, “Heterogeneity and plasticity of T helper cells,” Cell Research, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 4–12, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. M. J. McGeachy and D. J. Cua, “The link between IL-23 and Th17 cell-mediated immune pathologies,” Seminars in Immunology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 372–376, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. A. Izcue, S. Hue, S. Buonocore et al., “Interleukin-23 restrains regulatory T cell activity to drive T cell-dependent colitis,” Immunity, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 559–570, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. D. Mucida, Y. Park, G. Kim et al., “Reciprocal TH17 and regulatory T cell differentiation mediated by retinoic acid,” Science, vol. 317, no. 5835, pp. 256–260, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. M. J. Benson, K. Pino-Lagos, M. Rosemblatt, and R. J. Noelle, “All-trans retinoic acid mediates enhanced T reg cell growth, differentiation, and gut homing in the face of high levels of co-stimulation,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 204, no. 8, pp. 1765–1774, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. J. D. Milner, J. M. Brenchley, A. Laurence et al., “Impaired TH17 cell differentiation in subjects with autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome,” Nature, vol. 452, no. 7188, pp. 773–776, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. L. de Beaucoudtey, A. Puel, O. Filipe-Santos et al., “Mutations in STAT3 and IL12RB1 impair the development of human IL-17-producing T cells,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 205, no. 7, pp. 1543–1550, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. T. J. Harris, J. F. Grosso, H. Yen et al., “Cutting edge: an in vivo requirement for STAT3 signaling in TH17 development and TH17-dependent autoimmunity,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 7, pp. 4313–4317, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  84. E. V. Dang, J. Barbi, H. Yang et al., “Control of TH17/Treg balance by hypoxia-inducible factor 1,” Cell, vol. 146, no. 5, pp. 772–784, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. A. Hot and P. Miossec, “Effects of interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F in human rheumatoid arthritis synoviocytes,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 727–732, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. C. L. Maynard, C. O. Elson, R. D. Hatton, and C. T. Weaver, “Reciprocal interactions of the intestinal microbiota and immune system,” Nature, vol. 489, pp. 231–241, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. M. Asquith and F. Powrie, “An innately dangerous balancing act: intestinal homeostasis, inflammation, and colitis-associated cancer,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 207, no. 8, pp. 1573–1577, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. C. Manichanh, N. Borruel, F. Casellas, and F. Guarner, “The gut microbiota in IBD,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 9, pp. 599–608, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. P. Lepage, R. Hösler, M. E. Spehlmann et al., “Twin study indicates loss of interaction between microbiota and mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis,” Gastroenterology, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 227–236, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. C. Manichanh, L. Rigottier-Gois, E. Bonnaud et al., “Reduced diversity of faecal microbiota in Crohn's disease revealed by a metagenomic approach,” Gut, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 205–211, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. F. Guarner, R. Bourdet-Sicard, P. Brandtzaeg et al., “Mechanisms of disease: the hygiene hypothesis revisited,” Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 275–284, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. C. Ohnmacht, R. Marques, L. Presley, S. Sawa, M. Lochner, and G. Eberl, “Intestinal microbiota, evolution of the immune system and the bad reputation of pro-inflammatory immunity,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 653–659, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. I. I. Ivanov, K. Atarashi, N. Manel et al., “Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria,” Cell, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 485–498, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. S. Wu, K. Rhee, E. Albesiano et al., “A human colonic commensal promotes colon tumorigenesis via activation of T helper type 17 T cell responses,” Nature Medicine, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1016–1022, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. Y. K. Lee, J. S. Menezes, Y. Umesaki, and S. K. Mazmanian, “Proinflammatory T-cell responses to gut microbiota promote experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 4615–4622, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. S. Uematsu, M. H. Jang, N. Chevrier et al., “Detection of pathogenic intestinal bacteria by Toll-like receptor 5 on intestinal CD11c+ lamina propria cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 868–874, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. K. Atarashi, J. Nishimura, T. Shima et al., “ATP drives lamina propria TH17 cell differentiation,” Nature, vol. 455, no. 7214, pp. 808–812, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. V. Gaboriau-Routhiau, S. Rakotobe, E. Lécuyer et al., “The key role of segmented filamentous bacteria in the coordinated maturation of gut helper T cell responses,” Immunity, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 677–689, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. S. Uematsu and S. Akira, “Toll-like receptors and innate immunity,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 84, no. 9, pp. 712–725, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. T. Prakash, K. Oshima, H. Morita et al., “Complete genome sequences of rat and mouse segmented filamentous bacteria, a potent inducer of Th17 cell differentiation,” Cell Host and Microbe, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 273–284, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. A. Sczesnak, N. Segata, X. Qin et al., “The genome of Th17 cell-inducing segmented filamentous bacteria reveals extensive auxotrophy and adaptations to the intestinal environment,” Cell Host and Microbe, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 260–272, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. M. A. Kinnebrew, C. G. Buffie, G. E. Diehl et al., “Interleukin 23 production by intestinal CD103+CD11b+ dendritic cells in response to bacterial flagellin enhances mucosal innate immune defense,” Immunity, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 276–287, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. S. Lee, J. B. McLachlan, J. R. Kurtz et al., “Temporal expression of bacterial proteins instructs host CD4 T cell expansion and Th17 development,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID e1002499, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. M. H. Shaw, N. Kamada, Y. Kim, and G. Núñez, “Microbiota-induced IL-1β, but not IL-6, is critical for the development of steady-state TH17 cells in the intestine,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 251–258, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. T. L. Denning, B. A. Norris, O. Medina-Contreras et al., “Functional specializations of intestinal dendritic cell and macrophage subsets that control Th17 and regulatory T cell responses are dependent on the T cell/APC ratio, source of mouse strain, and regional localization,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 187, no. 2, pp. 733–747, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. M. B. Torchinsky, J. Garaude, A. P. Martin, and J. M. Blander, “Innate immune recognition of infected apoptotic cells directs T H17 cell differentiation,” Nature, vol. 458, no. 7234, pp. 78–82, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. C. O. Elson, Y. Cong, C. T. Weaver et al., “Monoclonal anti-interleukin 23 reverses active colitis in a T cell-mediated model in mice,” Gastroenterology, vol. 132, no. 7, pp. 2359–2370, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. W. S. Garrett, J. I. Gordon, and L. H. Glimcher, “Homeostasis and inflammation in the intestine,” Cell, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 859–870, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. R. Stepankova, F. Powrie, O. Kofronova et al., “Segmented filamentous bacteria in a defined bacterial cocktail induce intestinal inflammation in SCID mice reconstituted with CD45RBhigh CD4+ T cells,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1202–1211, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. C. Stolfi, A. Rizzo, E. Franzè et al., “Involvement of interleukin-21 in the regulation of colitis-associated colon cancer,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 208, no. 11, pp. 2279–2290, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. C. Becker, H. Dornhoff, C. Neufert et al., “Cutting edge: IL-23 cross-regulates IL-12 production in T cell-dependent experimental colitis,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 5, pp. 2760–2764, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  112. D. Yen, J. Cheung, H. Scheerens et al., “IL-23 is essential for T cell-mediated colitis and promotes inflammation via IL-17 and IL-6,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 1310–1316, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. W. J. Sandborn, C. Gasink, L. L. Gao et al., “Ustekinumab induction and maintenance therapy in refractory Crohn's disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 367, no. 16, pp. 1519–1528, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. Z. Zhang, M. Zheng, J. Bindas, P. Schwarzenberger, and J. K. Kolls, “Critical role of IL-17 receptor signaling in acute TNBS-induced colitis,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 382–388, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. L. P. McLean, R. K. Cross, and T. Shea-Donohue, “Combined blockade of IL-17A and IL-17F may prevent the development of experimental colitis,” Immunotherapy, vol. 5, pp. 923–925, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. E. G. W. Schmidt, H. L. Larsen, N. N. Kristensen et al., “TH17 cell induction and effects of IL-17A and IL-17F blockade in experimental colitis,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1567–1576, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. L. R. Fitzpatrick, J. S. Small, R. Doblhofer, and A. Ammendola, “Vidofludimus inhibits colonic interleukin-17 and improves hapten-induced colitis in rats by a unique dual mode of action,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 342, no. 3, pp. 850–860, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. K. R. Herrlinger, M. Diculescu, K. Fellermann et al., “Efficacy, safety and tolerability of vidofludimus in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: the ENTRANCE study,” Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 636–643, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. M. Veldhoen, K. Hirota, A. M. Westendorf et al., “The aryl hydrocarbon receptor links TH17-cell-mediated autoimmunity to environmental toxins,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7191, pp. 106–109, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. F. J. Quintana, A. S. Basso, A. H. Iglesias et al., “Control of Treg and TH17 cell differentiation by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7191, pp. 65–71, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. C. Esser, A. Rannug, and B. Stockinger, “The aryl hydrocarbon receptor in immunity,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 447–454, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. S. Trifari, C. D. Kaplan, E. H. Tran, N. K. Crellin, and H. Spits, “Identification of a human helper T cell population that has abundant production of interleukin 22 and is distinct from TH-17, TH1 and TH2 cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 864–871, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. M. S. Alam, Y. Maekawa, A. Kitamura et al., “Notch signaling drives IL-22 secretion in CD4+ T cells by stimulating the aryl hydrocarbon receptor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 13, pp. 5943–5948, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. I. Monteleone, A. Rizzo, M. Sarra et al., “Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-induced signals up-regulate IL-22 production and inhibit inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract,” Gastroenterology, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 237.e1–248.e1, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. L. Klotz, S. Burgdorf, I. Dani et al., “The nuclear receptor PPARγ selectively inhibits Th17 differentiation in a T cell-intrinsic fashion and suppresses CNS autoimmunity,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 206, no. 10, pp. 2079–2089, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. R. Hontecillas, W. T. Horne, M. Climent et al., “Immunoregulatory mechanisms of macrophage PPAR-γ in mice with experimental inflammatory bowel disease,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 304–313, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. Q. Q. Chen, L. Yan, C. Z. Wang et al., “Mesenchymal stem cells alleviate TNBS-induced colitis by modulating inflammatory and autoimmune responses,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 19, no. 29, pp. 4702–4717, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. L. R. Fitzpatrick, “Inhibition of IL-17 as a pharmacological approach for IBD,” International Reviews of Immunology, vol. 32, no. 5-6, pp. 544–555, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Julio Gálvez. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.