Table of Contents
International Scholarly Research Notices
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 159289, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/159289
Research Article

Simulation-Based Rule Generation Considering Readability

1Research into Artifacts, Center for Engineering (RACE), The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8568, Japan
2ANA Strategic Research Institute, 1-5-2 Higashi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-7140, Japan

Received 3 January 2015; Accepted 1 March 2015

Academic Editor: Xudong He

Copyright © 2015 H. Yahagi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Yahagi, Y. Kariya, M. Takehisa, S. Shimizu, T. Hara, and J. Ota, “Multi-level and multi-objective design methodology of taxiways for large airports,” Journal of Mechanical Systems for Transportation and Logistics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  2. Y. Kariya, H. Yahagi, M. Takehisa et al., “Modeling and designing aircraft taxiing patterns for a large airport,” Advanced Robotics, vol. 27, no. 14, pp. 1059–1072, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Bussmann, “An agent-oriented architecture for holonic manufacturing control,” in Proceedings of the 1st Open Workshop on Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, pp. 1–12, 1998.
  4. K. Fischer, “Agent-based design of holonic manufacturing systems,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 27, no. 1-2, pp. 3–13, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. I. Kosonen, “Multi-agent fuzzy signal control based on real-time simulation,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 389–403, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Merz, B. Liberman, and W. L. Lamersdorf, “Using mobile agents to support interorganizational workflow management,” Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 551–572, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. L. Soyster, “Technical note—convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming,” Operations Research, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1154–1157, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. P. J. Huber, “Robust estimation of a location parameter,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 73–101, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. B. D. Youn and K. K. Choi, “A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization,” Computers & Structures, vol. 82, no. 2-3, pp. 241–256, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Z. He, J. Wang, J. Oh, and S. H. Park, “Robust optimization for multiple responses using response surface methodology,” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 157–171, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. R. Koza and J. P. Rice, “Automatic programming of robots using genetic programming,” in Proceedings of the 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 194–201, July 1992. View at Scopus
  12. T. Blickle, “Evolving compact solutions in genetic programming: a case study,” in Parallel Problem Solving from Nature—PPSN IV, vol. 1141 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 564–573, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. S. Bleuler, M. Brack, L. Thiele, and E. Zitzler, “Multiobjective genetic programming: reducing bloat using SPEA2,” in Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, pp. 536–543, Seoul, Republic of Korea, May 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Tanji and H. Iba, “ConBreO: a music performance rendering system using hybrid approach of IEC and automated evolution real world applications,” in Proceedings of the 12th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO '10), pp. 1275–1282, July 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. P. L. Buse and W. R. Weimer, “A metric for software readability,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA '08), pp. 121–130, July 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. Posnett, A. Hindle, and P. Devanbu, “A simpler model of software readability,” in Proceedings of the 8th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR '11), pp. 73–82, 2011.
  17. H. Yahagi, M. Takehisa, S. Shimizu, T. Hara, and J. Ota, “Simulation-based simple and robust rule generation for motion coordination of multi-agent system,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC '13), pp. 421–426, IEEE, Manchester, UK, October 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Teller and M. Veloso, “PADO: a new learning architecture for object recognition,” in Symbolic Visual Learning, pp. 81–116, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Dignum and R. Poli, “Operator equalisation and bloat free GP,” in Genetic Programming, vol. 4971 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 110–121, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. H. Halstead, Elements of Software Science, Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, 1977.
  21. S. Silva, S. Dignum, and L. Vanneschi, “Operator equalisation for bloat free genetic programming and a survey of bloat control methods,” Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 197–238, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus