Research Article
Consistency Test between Scoring Systems for Predicting Outcomes of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in a Saudi Population Treated with Imatinib
Table 3
The number of patients in different risk groups as per calculated scores.
| | | Not achieving MMR | Achieving MMR | Accuracy |
| | Combined groups (1) | Sokal score risk group | | | | | High | 25 | 11 | 14 | 62.10 | Low and intermediate | 70 | 22 | 48 | Hasford score risk group | | | | | High | 6 | 4 | 2 | 67.37 | Low and intermediate | 89 | 29 | 60 | EUTOS score risk group | | | | | High | 10 | 4 | 6 | 63.15 | Low | 85 | 29 | 56 | ELTS score risk group | | | | | High | 17 | 7 | 10 | 62.10 | Low and intermediate | 78 | 26 | 52 |
| | Combined groups (2) | Sokal score risk group | | | | | Intermediate and high | 62 | 23 | 39 | 48.42 | Low | 33 | 10 | 23 | Hasford score risk group | | | | | Intermediate and high | 46 | 20 | 26 | 58.94 | Low | 49 | 13 | 36 | EUTOS score risk group | | | | | High | 10 | 4 | 6 | 63.15 | Low | 85 | 29 | 56 | ELTS score risk group | | | | | Intermediate and high | 42 | 19 | 23 | 61.05 | Low | 53 | 14 | 39 |
|
|