Review Article

Dual Kidney Transplantation: A Review of Past and Prospect for Future

Table 2

Recipient characteristics DKT versus SKT.

AuthorJournal/year/number of recipient DKT SKT
AgeImmunosuppressionWeightBMIComorbidAge (years)WeightBMIComorbid

Remuzzi et al. [16]Journal of American Society of Nephrology/1999/24 DKT59.4 ± 9.9Prednisolone, Cyclosporine & mycophenolate mofetil. No comment on induction71.4 ± 19.125.3 ± 5.4HTN 77.3%
DM 4.4%
50.2 ± 12.173.1 ± 16.225.3 ± 4.7HTN 71.7%
DM 6.4%

Lu et al. [20]Archives of Surgery/1999/50 DKT57 ± 11Cyclosporine, steroids & MMF or AZA. Induction with OKT3 or IL-2 inhibitor50 ± 12

Snanoudj et al. [24]American Journal of Transplantation/2009/81 DKT69.4 ± 3.0Received IL-2 receptor antagonist or ATG. Cyclosporine or tacrolimus, prednisolone and MMF were used after induction68.4 ± 14.124.3 ± 4.1DM 18.5%
ischemic cardiopathy 18.2%
59.9 ± 6.372.8 ± 17.025.1 ± 4.7DM 18.6%
Ischemic Cardiopathy 12.9%

Ekser et al. [19]American Journal of Transplantation/2010/100 DKT61.7 ± 5.6Induction therapy consisted of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or Basiliximab. Maintenance immunosuppressive sirolimus or everolimus either without a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) or with a reduced CNI25.5 ± 3.557.7 ± 8.624.5 ± 3.4

Klair et al. [28]American Journal of Transplantation/2013/1308 DKTNo comment on immunosuppressive medications used25.1DM 37.5%
HTN 25.6%
49.6  ±  14.829.6DM 28.4%
HTN 34.9%

Bunnapradist et al. [31]Journal of American Society of Nephrology/403 DKT55.1 ± 11.5No comment on immunosuppressive medications used77.1 ± 17.148.1 ± 13.777.4 ± 19.2

. HTN (hypertension), DM (diabetes mellitus), PRA (panel reactive antibody), HLA MM (human leukocyte antigen mismatches), M (male), F(female), MMF (mycophenolate mofetil), AZA(azathioprine), IL-2 (interleukin-2), ATG (antithymocyte globulin), and OKT3 (muromonab-CD3).