Table of Contents
International Scholarly Research Notices
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 6875195, 4 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6875195
Research Article

S-100β and Antioxidant Capacity in Cerebrospinal Fluid during and after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Vijay Krishnamoorthy

Received 14 February 2017; Revised 10 May 2017; Accepted 31 May 2017; Published 27 June 2017

Academic Editor: Suhel Parvez

Copyright © 2017 Koichiro Nandate et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Y. P. Wan, G. D. Angelini, A. J. Bryan, I. Ryder, and M. J. Underwood, “Prevention of spinal cord ischaemia during descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery,” European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 203–213, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. M. Sullivan and T. M. Sundt III, “Complications of thoracic aortic endografts: spinal cord ischemia and stroke,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. A85–A88, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Matsuda, T. Fukuda, O. Iritani et al., “Spinal cord injury is not negligible after TEVAR for lower descending aorta,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 179–186, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. W. Ullery, G. J. Wang, D. Low, and A. T. Cheung, “Neurological complications of thoracic endovascular aortic repair,” Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 123–140, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Buth, P. L. Harris, R. Hobo et al., “Neurologic complications associated with endovascular repair of thoracic aortic pathology: incidence and risk factors. a study from the european collaborators on stent/graft techniques for aortic aneurysm repair (EUROSTAR) registry,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1103–1111, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Khoynezhad, C. E. Donayre, H. Bui, G. E. Kopchok, I. Walot, and R. A. White, “Risk factors of neurologic deficit after thoracic aortic endografting,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. S882–S889, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. P. Morales, P. R. Taylor, R. E. Bell et al., “Neurological complications following endoluminal repair of thoracic aortic disease,” CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 833–839, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. J. Feezor, T. D. Martin, P. J. Hess Jr. et al., “Extent of aortic coverage and incidence of spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 1809–1814, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. C. Sinha and A. T. Cheung, “Spinal cord protection and thoracic aortic surgery,” Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 95–102, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. L. Bobadilla, M. Wynn, G. Tefera, and C. W. Acher, “Low incidence of paraplegia after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair with proactive spinal cord protective protocols,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1537–1542, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. K. Kwon, A. M. T. Stammers, L. M. Belanger et al., “Cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory cytokines and biomarkers of injury severity in acute human spinal cord injury,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 669–682, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. M. Bloomfield, J. McKinney, L. Smith, and J. Brisman, “Reliability of S100B in predicting severity of central nervous system injury,” Neurocritical Care, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 121–138, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. D. Hall, “Antioxidant therapies for acute spinal cord injury,” Neurotherapeutics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 152–167, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Bains and E. D. Hall, “Antioxidant therapies in traumatic brain and spinal cord injury,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1822, no. 5, pp. 675–684, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Z. Jia, H. Zhu, J. Li, X. Wang, H. Misra, and Y. Li, “Oxidative stress in spinal cord injury and antioxidant-based intervention,” Spinal Cord, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 264–274, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. B. Brunnekreef, R. H. Heijmen, W. B. Gerritsen, M. A. Schepens, H. T. ter Beek, and E. P. van Dongen, “Measurements of cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of s100β protein during and after thoracic endovascular stent grafting,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 169–172, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N. Khaladj, O. E. Teebken, C. Hagl et al., “The role of cerebrospinal fluid s100 and lactate to predict clinically evident spinal cord ischaemia in thoraco-abdominal aortic surgery,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. Kahlert, H. Eggebrecht, R. A. Janosi et al., “Silent cerebral ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a neuroimaging study,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 53–58, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus