Boosting Transmission System Flexibility in Network-Constrained Unit Commitment by Incorporating Distributed Series Reactors

Table 7

Optimal hourly generation schedules (in MW) in Case study 4 (compared with Case study 1).

Time (h)	Unit ^#
	G1	G2	G3	G4	G5	G6	G7	G8	G9	G10	G11	G12
t1	253	313	40	41.6	0	54.3	205	184	0	0	0	300
t2	264	266	54	55.6	0	71	226	212	0	0	0	271
t3	311	313	68	69.6	0	92	247	240	0	0	0	300
t4	358	360	82	83.6	0	113	268	268	0	0	0	300
t5	400	388	96	97.6	0	134	289	296	0	0	0	300
t6	400	400	110	112	0	155	310	324	0	0	0	300
t7	400	400	124	126	65	155	310	350	0	0	0	300
t8	400	400	138	138	65.1	155	310	350	75	0	0	300
t9	400	400	152	152	86.1	155	310	350	123	0	0	300
t10	400	400	138	138	96.3	155	310	350	75	0	0	300
t11	400	400	138	138	117	155	310	345	83.2	0	0	300
t12	400	400	152	152	138	155	310	350	132	0	0	300
t13	400	400	138	138	117	155	310	322	83.2	0	0	300
t14	362	400	124	124	96.3	134	289	294	75	0	0	300
t15	400	400	110	110	75.3	155	310	288	75	0	0	300
t16	353	353	96	96	54.3	134	289	260	75	0	0	300
t17	353	353	110	110	54.3	113	268	278	75	0	0	264
t18	400	400	124	124	0	134	289	306	80	0	0	300
t19	400	400	138	138	65	155	310	334	129	0	0	300
t20	400	400	152	152	119	155	310	350	178	0	0	300
t21	400	383	138	138	98	134	289	322	129	0	0	300
t22	353	336	124	124	77	113	268	294	80	0	0	262
t23	306	289	110	110	0	92	247	266	0	0	0	248
t24	259	242	96	96	0	71	226	238	0	0	0	256