Research Article

Comprehensive Approach to Mitigating Solar Photovoltaic Power Penetration Effects in a Microgrid

Table 1

Case study summary for Open Distribution System Simulator (OpenDSS) microgrid (MG) modeling during high photovoltaic (PV) penetration.

ReferenceModelToolObjectiveApproachDuration

Marulanda and Pavas [20]IEEE 73 test bus feeder (comprehensive test feeder—Kersting)OpenDSS with MATLABAnalyze the power flows and voltage profile of the feeder with 10.16% PV generationChronological Monte Carlo simulation for distribution systems with PV generation24 hours
Ahamioje and Krishnaswami [21]IEEE 13 bus feederOpenDSS, MATLAB, and Grid PV with GISDesign on the model the likely real effects of PV on operationsQuasi-static time series analysis with dynamic volt/var and active power control with Grid PV toolbox integration of geographical information180 hours
Solanki et al. [22]12.47 kV distribution feeders for American electric power (AEP)OpenDSSInvestigate the effects of high PV penetration with cloud cover scenarios as percentage system loss and voltage variationChanging the regulator/LTC tap settings, reconductoring distribution lines, changing the placement of capacitor banks, employing storage to efficiently manage the dispatch of PV system24 hours
Ma et al. [23]IEEE 13 test bus feederOpenDSS with MATLAB (optimization tool)Optimizing the generation cost to minimize operation costModel predictive control24 hours
Pukhrem [24]IEEE 55 test bus feeder (European LVDN)OpenDSS with MATLABAlleviate the voltage fluctuation and reduce the overall P/Q network loss against the extreme-case scenariosAutonomous coordinated voltage control techniques of grid-tied PV inverters24 hours (every 5 min)
Ramachandran [25]IEEE 13 node test feeder with PV at the end nodeOpenDSS and CYMDISTDetermine optimal bids to maximize its profit and the effects of voltage imbalance and loss of the feederDynamic programming24 hours
Nowak et al. [26]IEEE 34 test feederOpenDSS and Grid PV toolbox in MATLAB for PV invertersSimulated on PV bus V, P, and Q based on a) maximum standard deviation via distance from the substation, b) total energy loss (kWh) in the feeder via penetration, and c) size difference of PV inverter for voltage PV based on normalized VPI-based reactive power control method of PV inverters24 hours
Liu and Overbye [27]IEEE 13 node test feederOpenDSS and MATLABFind an operating point that maximizes energy savings after minimizing the total system loss and system energy consumptionConservation voltage reduction algorithm from SQP to minimize the deviation from the control voltage level4 hours
Liu et al. [28]IEEE 7 node test feederMATLAB and OpenDSSIncrease PV hosting capacity with different voltage problemsVoltage/var control and voltage/watt control for a smart inverter
Ammar and Sharaf [29]IEEE test feeder 17 buses (25 kV) and IEEE test feeder 69 buses (12.66 kV)MATLAB and OpenDSSMinimize the deviation of the distribution network voltagesFinding optimal coordinated PV generator reactive power and HV/MV OLTC settings throughout the optimization time frame