Research Article
Fault Classification with Convolutional Neural Networks for Microgrid Systems
Table 9
Comparison of accuracies for the developed model with literature and conventional approaches.
| References | Approach | Validation accuracy (%) | Testing accuracy (%) | Detection time |
| [10] | Decision tree | | | Not available | k-nearest neighbor | | | Support vector machine | | | Naive Bayes | | | [11] | Decision tree | Not available | | | Over current relay | | Differential relay | | Random forest | | [13] | Cosine radial basis function network (RBFN) | | | | Gaussian Euclidian RBFN | | | Manual fusion RBFN | | | Dynamic fusion RBFN | | | Conventional approaches (SA mode) | Support vector machine | | | | k-nearest neighbor | | | | Decision trees | | | | Conventional approaches (SA mode) | Support vector machine | | | | k-nearest neighbor | | | | Decision trees | | | | Proposed approach (SA mode) | Convolutional neural networks | | | | Proposed approach (GC mode) | Convolutional neural networks | | | |
|
|