Evaluation and Comparison of Different Methods for Improving Fault Ride-Through Capability in Grid-Tied Permanent Magnet Synchronous Wind Generators

Mahmoud, Mohamed Metwally; Atia, Basiony S.; Esmail, Yahia M.; Bajaj, Mohit; Mbadjoun Wapet, Daniel Eutyche; Ratib, Mohamed Khalid; Biplob Hossain, Md.; AboRas, Kareem M.; Abdel-Rahim, Abdel-Moamen M.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7717070

International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 7717070 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7717070

Evaluation and Comparison of Different Methods for Improving Fault Ride-Through Capability in Grid-Tied Permanent Magnet Synchronous Wind Generators

Mohamed Metwally Mahmoud,¹Basiony S. Atia,²Yahia M. Esmail,³Mohit Bajaj,^4,5,6Daniel Eutyche Mbadjoun Wapet ,⁷Mohamed Khalid Ratib,⁷Md. Biplob Hossain,⁸Kareem M. AboRas,⁹and Abdel-Moamen M. Abdel-Rahim¹

Academic Editor: Mouloud Denai

Received09 Oct 2022

Revised22 Nov 2022

Accepted20 Dec 2022

Published18 Jan 2023

Abstract

Several advantages make wind-driven permanent magnet synchronous generators (PMSGs) very promising in the wind energy market, especially their fault ride-through capabilities. With the high penetration levels of today, both the grid and wind power (WP) systems are being affected by each other. Due to grid faults, the DC-bus in PMSG systems typically experiences overvoltage, which can negatively affect the generator parameters and trip the system. However, advancements in power electronics, control systems, fault limiters, FACTS, and energy storage technology make it possible to find and design satisfactory solutions and approaches. The most recent FRTC-improving techniques are mainly modified or external techniques based on controllers in PMSG-based WP. This paper evaluates the in-depth schemes of FRTC, introducing the underlying theory and traits of the different approaches to highlight the advantages and drawbacks of each. Five scenarios of DC-link voltage under zero-grid voltage are carried out by using the MATLAB SIMULINK program to assess the FRTC methods. This study shows that external device-based approaches can be efficient, but some of them are expensive, thus updated controller methods are recommended to cut costs. Research findings of this study are expected to support the deployment of FRTC technologies, as well as provide valuable input into WP research on grid integration.

1. Introduction

Recent years have seen a rapid growth in the integration of renewable energy systems (RESs), and by the middle of this century, about $12 trillion are supposed to be saved by the decarbonized global energy system [1, 2]. The RESs specially wind farm will assist increasing a global access to green energy by lowering the production and distribution prices and losses as well as enabling capturing higher levels of the renewable energy output [3–6]. As a result, the researchers have focused their efforts on utilizing the wind energy. In particular, the number of wind farms rated at MW or more has grown significantly in recent years. Few of these are now under development across the world, with mega-plants proposed in Australia, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Paraguay, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States [3, 5].

With a projected installed capacity of 20 GW, the Jiuquan Wind Power Base is the world’s biggest wind farm [7]. In Gansu, China, 7,000 wind turbines will be built throughout the provinces of Jiuquan, Inner Mongolia, Hebei, Xinjiang, Jiangsu, and Shandong. The Renewable Energy Law was established in February 2005, with the objective of installing 200 GW of wind power throughout the country [7, 8]. Another is a 1,600 MW wind park in Jaisalmer, Rajasthan, which is India’s largest wind farm [9]. Suzlon built wind farms for independent power producers and power utilities, in addition to private and public sector clients. The Alta Wind Energy Centre (AWEC) has a capacity of 1,548 MW and is located near Tehachapi, Kern County, California [10]. The first five stages of AWEC were completed. Two more stages were added the following year. The first stage will use 100 Ge 1.5 MW SLE turbines. Vestas V 90–3.0 MW turbines power the last six operating phases. The identical Vestas turbines power the seventh, eighth, and ninth stages. The latter two stages have GE 1.7 MW and GE 2.85 MW turbines installed [10]. However, to force the impact of renewable energy generation on the energy sector and the environment, pioneer countries have set strict goals to be achieved in this sector as indicated in Table 1 [5, 11, 12]. Given the rising levels of wind and solar systems’ penetration in the electrical power grid and the results of loss of inertia and inconsistency of the energy supply and taking the requirements of the grid codes (GCs) into consideration, the necessity to keep those wind systems (WS) connected to the power grid during a disruption is now urgent and the failure to do so will have reprehensible influences on the security and reliability of the power system (PS) [13, 14]. Figure 1 shows the top ten global WS markets, encompassing on- and offshore industries [6, 15, 16].

Recently, the two mainstream wind generators (WGs) are the doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG) [17, 18] and the permanent magnet synchronous wind generator (PMSWG) [19, 20]. Currently, PMSWG has received a lot of interest due to its advantages over other dominant ones such as higher efficiency, maximum power extraction, reliability, and operation at low speeds with high torque and no need for gearbox, these merits are enough to shift the wind market to push the industry of PMSWG [21–24]. PMSWG needs to adopt full-scale back-to-back converters (BTBCs) whereas DFIG uses partial BTBCs and requires a gearbox for accomplishing its operation. The full-scale BTBCs offer better efficiency and high cost compared with its partial counterpart so, protecting them is an essential and important thing to do [25–28]. Nonetheless, the fault ride-through capability (FRTC) of PMSWG is higher than DFIG, it is still revolutionary to augment its FRTC since the accrued excess power in the DC linkage under the voltage sag and swell will result in overvoltage which might subsequently lead to the tripping of the overall WS [29–31]. Many methods are examined with their control systems during symmetrical and asymmetrical faults to achieve FRTC, even at zero system voltage. They are presented and studied to solve this problem; however, these systems have benefits and of course limitations and this paper is here trying to address and conclude some of these limitations [32–37].

Faults may occur due to different reasons namely as a result of a short circuit, starting of induction machines, disconnection of capacitive loads, etc. The fault types which occur in the electrical power system are usually categorized as unsymmetrical (like: 1 LG, 2 LL, 2 LLG) and symmetrical (like: 3 LG) as listed in Table 2. From Table 2, 1 LG represents the highest happening percentage but it has a much lesser impact on the system. On the contrary, 3 LG is scarcely happening but its impact on the system is much more severe [38, 39]. To achieve a safe and reliable operation, FRTC has become the most prevalent grid connection specification for PMSWG around the world. The inherent instability and intermittency of WS, as well as the increasingly poor grid link, pose a major challenge and importance for FRTC topic [40, 41].

For achieving FRTC, WS must endure faults and continue to be connected to the power grid to maintain voltage and frequency both before and after the fault. The control-based system (CBS) [42–44], the unit-based system (UBS) [29, 45, 46], and the coordinated control system (CCS) [47] are three major categories for the current FRTC techniques. Due to its lower cost and simplicity, UBS is renowned and consistently demonstrates its success in satisfying the FRTC for WGs, particularly the braking chopper (BC) system. The research on superconducting application technology has increased due to the ongoing efforts to lower the system’s cost of these materials. Superconducting innovations, including SMES, supercapacitors, and superconducting fault current limiters (SFCL), have recently demonstrated potential benefits in improving the FRTC of WGs.

This study thoroughly evaluates several FRTC methods for PMSWG and introduces the fundamental ideas and features of the different methods to encourage the adoption of CBS, UBS, and CCS for achieving the FRTC and consequently boosting the grid integration of WS. The purpose of this essay is to assess the most recent developments in this field of study and summaries its current state. MATLAB software is used to illustrate and simulate the effect of the most well-known of these strategies on the DC-link (DCL) voltage. Based on the topics of research studies, the overall trends in the technological advancement are shown in percentage values. As a result, the article discusses potential future trends as well as the FRTC methods’ existing advancements and difficulties.

2. PMSWG Description and Modeling for FRTC Studies

The operating system of WS is composed of two parts. First, the wind’s kinetic energy is captured by the turbine’s aerodynamic rotor, which converts it into mechanical energy. Second, the power conversion process is finished by using a WG to convert ME into electrical energy, which is then sent to an electrical power grid [48, 49]. As can be seen in Figure 2, the examined WS’s basic structure is made up of a wind turbine (WT), PMSWG, machine side converter (MSC), DCL, grid side converter (GSC), filters, and associated complete control systems.

2.1. WT Characteristics

WS characteristics such as and are expressed as in surveys [6, 50] and are given by equations (1)–(12).

From equation (4), we can obtain the value of at optimal and operated

2.2. Modeling of PMSWG, DC-Link, and Grid

The PMSWG model is represented by the equations from (7) to (12). DCL can be characterized by equation (13) and serves as a middle bridge for transmitting power from MSC to GSC. The voltage at DCL according to [51] and [52]. Equations from (14) to (17) can be used to represent the grid model. In addition, the definitions and descriptions of the utilized symbols are given in [53–56].

3. FRTC Realization for a Grid-Connected PMSWG

This part explains the concepts of FRTC and discusses why modern GCs necessitate the realization of FRTC.

3.1. Operation of PMSWG during FRTC

As the penetration of WS increases, the need to address FRTC issues becomes more critical. Earlier, WS was allowed to trip when a fault occurs but now this cannot even be thought about. Normally, the is often equal to the , and thus, the DCL voltage is maintained at its regular value. When grid fault takes place, the voltage dip causes the to rapidly decrease but the does not change. Due to this accumulation of visible excess power, DCL experiences an overvoltage [57]. The DCL capacitor could be harmed as a result of this overvoltage, which could also stress MSC, GSC, and cause PMSWG saturation. To maintain continuous injected P to the electric grid, the GSC current increases. Therefore, eliminating excess power and avoiding DCL overvoltage constitute the fundamental principles for improving FRTC. As seen in Figure 2, there are three different types of strategies that can be employed to accomplish the goal: (1) decreasing , which includes modified pitch angle control (PAC) and converter control; (2) raising , symbolized by SFCL; and (3) immediately dissipating excess power ΔP, which is commonly carried out by BC [58]. In this study, the authors’ passion is to analyze and evaluate the different methods as well as the PMSWG control systems studied in the literature.

Only when they are technically necessary for the reliable and secure functioning of a PS are WS designs obliged to include FRTC in accordance with GC specifications. The WS must maximize its reactive power (Q) injections into the system while staying within the WT restrictions, this is actually the fundamental need for FRTC. After the fault had already been cleared, the reactive current must be maximized for at least 150 milliseconds, or until the grid voltage is returned to its normal operating range [59]. For more clarification, Figure 3 is presented.

(a)

(b)

3.2. Modern GCs

The practical necessities obligatory on WSs are identified as GCs, which are demarcated by transmission systems operators to specify the mission of grid components such as generators or loads in all situations and rough draft the constitutional rights [52]. One of the significant topics in GCs instructions is the FRTC. Figure 3(a) displays the FRTC curves related to the GCs of different countries.

As depicted in Figure 3(a), the WS keeps on tied to the power grid (PG) above the curves during fault situations, and the WS may be separated from the PG under these curves. GCs require the WS to care about the voltage stability of the PG as well. Figure 3(b), as a portion of the Danish GC, displays how the Q behavior should be when voltage dips occur at the point of common coupling (PCC) [52, 60].

4. FRTC Enhancement Methods

UBS and CBS are the two most common forms of FRTC improvement approaches. To improve FRTCs, UBS solutions such energy storage, BC, FACTS, SFCL, and series dynamic braking resistor (SDBR) are frequently utilized [29]. The CBS options can be like PAC and modified converter control loops as reported in [52, 57, 61]. The possible FRTC methods are summed up in Figure 4.

4.1. UBS Methods

UBSs are presented here to clarify their benefits, drawbacks, and principles of operation.

4.1.1. Energy Storage Units (ESUs)

ESUs can be linked to the DCL through a (DC\DC) power converter or at the PCC bus in the investigated system as depicted in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. The ESS can absorb or feed P&Q from or to the system in need of compensation by managing and controlling the DC/DC and voltage source converters (VSCs). The two converters give system-side a very high degree of controllability but at a considerable cost and power loss. Compared to the AC side, DC side ESU mitigates the application of a VSC which results in reducing losses and prices. The DC side integration can stabilize the DCL voltage and achieve FRTC [62, 63]. The majority of current research focuses on the ESU control approach, involving enhanced control strategy and optimizing PI controller gains, as illustrated in Table 3.

Battery, flywheel, SMES, and supercapacitor are four different types of ESUs utilized in FRTC realization [52].

Batteries come in a variety of forms, including lead-acid (LA), nickel-cadmium (NiCd), sodium-sulfur (NaS), and lithium-ion (LiI) and are one of the oldest and most widely used choices for ESUs. The LA performs extremely poorly at both low & high environmental temperatures while also having a brief lifespan. The NiCd has a high cyclic life and requires a little maintenance. Despite its positive technical qualities, the NiCd type has not been commercially successful owing to its high prices which are more than ten times that of LA. One of the most promising choices for high-power energy storage applications is the NaS. This sort has high energy density as well as high energy efficiency. The LiI type is commonly utilized in tiny applications such as mobile phones and portable electrical gadgets. Its major characteristic is its ability to charge and discharge quickly. Because of its short-time constants, it is suitable for applications where response time and weight are essential factors to care about (about 200 ms) [69].

A flywheel is an electromechanical tool used to store kinetic energy. Energy is transferred to the flywheel when the system is operating as a motor, and the flywheel charges as an ESU. The machine regenerates through the drive, which causes energy to be released. It offers advantageous qualities in terms of a longer cyclic life, a wide working temperature range, higher power, and energy density. Due to their self-discharge, they are poor long-term ESU candidates [70].

SMES is an electromagnetic storage unit that stores energy in the form of a magnetic field. It is composed of 3 parts: a superconducting coil, a refrigeration system, and a power conditioning system. The energy is stored across the coil during SMES charging mode, and the stored energy is fed into the power grid using power converters during SMES discharging mode. The SMES coil is kept cool below its superconducting critical temperature, and the amount of energy it can store depends on the current’s strength and coil’s inductance. These systems are an excellent choice for FRTC because of their intriguing properties such as high-power density, longer cyclical life, low energy density, almost minimal energy loss, and rapid time response. Despite their technological capabilities, few systems are developed, due to their exorbitant cost [71, 72]. The internal resistance of the power circuit and nontrivial quantities of self-discharge could be detrimental to SMES and its managing system might impact the overall WS efficiency. The SMES can be linked at the DC bus through the DC\DC converter or at the PCC bus, but it needs a VSC in addition to the DC\DC as depicted in Figures 5 and 6. These converters can be controlled with different controllers such as FLC, optimized PI, ANN, and others. The feasibility of this solution is low.

The electrochemical cell types that form the basis of supercapacitors (SCs) have two conducting poles, a solution, and a pore membrane that allows ions to pass between the two poles. Due to its extremely low relative resistance, and short-time constant, it is a candidate for short-time scale applications with high responses. Other important features are long cyclical life, no need for maintenance, independence of chemical reactions, very fast response, and a high degree of energy effectiveness. Last but not the least, it should be highlighted that the biggest disadvantage of SC is its high price, which is expected to be five times that of a LA [73].

Based on the characteristics of the various ESU types, tools for FRTC augmentation such as SCs and SMES are short-term, small power saving systems. SC is an appealing alternative for improving FRTC since, in comparison to other types of ESUs, it offers a very fast response [74]. SC’s power capacity was decreased in [75] using mechanical momentum. In normal and abnormal conditions, SC improved power smoothing and store the excess power at the DCL. Nonetheless, to store some energy in the rotor, the speed target in the MSC is adjusted to greater than it would be under regular circumstances. As a result, the power generated from the PMSWG will be lower and consequently, the SC rating may be decreased. In [76], SC reference current was obtained by after going via the PI controller with an error. Additionally, the rating of SC was selected at 30% of the BTBC rating in order to lower its budget. The BC system dissipates the remaining gap in P.

SMES is now another alternative for usage in WS because of its great efficiency. Despite being expensive, it also responds quickly. SMES and SC were hence preferable choices among ESUs for realizing FRTC in PMSWG. The fundamental disadvantage of ESUs is that they need a large amount in deep continuous voltage drop in MW-class WTs [77].

4.1.2. BC System

A BC system was suggested to be installed in DCL to dissipate surplus power during grid disturbances. The BC is composed of a high-power resistor and a series of IGBT switches, with the advantages of low cost and a simple control structure. BC can only dissipate power and cannot enhance Q injection to the grid since it must dissipate all WG power in order to free the GSC capacity to inject Q into the grid. This methodology may be used with other methods to improve the system performance [45, 54, 71, 78]. Figure 7 depicts the BC system and its control.

4.1.3. SDBR System

As shown in Figure 8, the SDBR is a series-connected resistor that is normally short-circuited between the WG and PCC and is put into the circuit during a failure. It is most commonly utilized in fixed-speed WS types [72, 73]. The output GSC voltage is boosted during grid voltage drops by the flowing current through the resistance, as explained in [74]. Overvoltage in the DCL is prevented as a result of dissipated energy at the DCL. When the safety thresholds for DCL voltage or GS current are exceeded, the bypass switch opens.

As a result, both GS current and DCL voltage are constrained. A centralized control strategy utilizing an SDBR and a STATCOM was presented in [79] to address this issue. Similar to the BC technique, the fundamental shortcoming of SDBR is the loss of Q injection to the grid. Despite the fact that SDBR is recommended for fixed-speed WS, it can also be used for other WGs when integrated with an appropriate FACTS instrument.

4.1.4. FACTS Units

FACTS units are other solutions to keep the WS connected to the PG under fault states, and they may be divided into 3 sets: shunt, series, and hybrid connections. Shunt connections such as STATCOM and SVC are linked to the PCC to improve the system’s stability, and their configurations are depicted in Figure 9. In voltage sag circumstances, both STATCOM and SVC can inject Q into the grid, although STATCOM’s output Q is greater than SVC’s [80]. In [81], when both PMSWG and fixed-speed WS were utilized, the PMSWG’s GSC was employed as a STATCOM to supply needed Q. Results show that this configuration allows for reducing the STATCOM size and cost.

(a)

(b)

The series type dynamic voltage restorer (DVR) injects series voltage to compensate voltage sags [82]. The DVR, as shown in Figure 10, consists of a 3-phase VSC linked in series between the WS and PG by an injecting transformer [79, 83]. The structure of the injecting transformers is different from that of regular transformers in order to avoid saturation and high inrush current [84]. Although DVR can address voltage sag, it is incapable to handle the deep voltage sag. Therefore, it needs additional units [85, 86].

UPQC is a hybrid connection type and consists of a series part and shunt part as seen in Figure 11. The series portion give a jab voltage to pay off for voltage dip and the shunt portion give a shot Q to the PG. This type can effectively enhance FRTC; however, it needs higher costs in comparison with the shunt or series methods [87].

A SMES-based interline AC-DC UPFC security system was proposed in [88] and is depicted in Figure 12. The connection between the DFIG and the bus is linked in series with the AC side of the UPQC to adjust for the PCC voltage. Regarding the UPQC’s DCL, it is attached in parallel with the PMSWG’s DCL. The UPQC performs admirably in improving the hybrid WS’s overall performance in a variety of conditions, but the price remains prohibitively expensive. The cost of the UPQC investigation was computed in [84].

4.1.5. SFCL Technique

The GS application of SFCL raises the terminal voltage and generates resistance heat by converting extra electricity during faults [89, 90]. The SFCL can be categorized in to three types, resistive SFCL (R-SFCL), flux-coupling-type SFCL (FC-SFCL), and voltage compensation type active SFCL (VCTA-SFCL) [91]. Even though there are some additional SFCLs, they have not been used in the field of PMSWG [91–93].

Simple structure, quick responsiveness, and self-healing are traits of the R type. Additionally because it automatically detects high currents and automatically transitions from quench states to superconducting states, it does not require any kind of control mechanism. It can be inserted at any position between the GSC and the failure point.

In [94, 95], a 34.5 kV transmission system with the improved GSC control method was used to maintain the P and give Q support. It was sometimes placed into the PMSWG’s DCL as seen in Figure 13 [96]. The resistance is fixed and created for a specific voltage dip, which is its main drawback. Therefore, when the voltage droop deviates from the postsituation, an extreme or inadequate voltage augmentation may take place, which could further degrade the FRTC performance. Furthermore, it is unable to support Q on its own.

Figure 14(a) depicts the FC-structural SFCL’s layout. It is made up of a superconducting coil, a MOV, a controlled switch S, and a coupling transformer [97, 98]. S is closed in a regular condition, and SC has no resistance; and when S is open, considerable resistance is found. Although its structure is more complex and its price is higher, its purpose is comparable to that of the first type.

(a)

(b)

The VCTA-SFCL configuration is shown in Figure 14(b). Its main components are an air-core superconducting transformer, an air-core ES unit, a VSC, and a filter [95]. The secondary winding of the transformer’s current could be adjusted by adjusting VSC, which enables the appropriate resistance of VCTA-SFCL to be attained. It has a lot more flexibility than the other two categories listed. Its cost is also considerable, and its control system is sophisticated. A comparative study among the three presented types is in Table 4. In Table 4, L refers to low, M refers to medium, and H refers to high, and those are used to indicate the level of complexity and financial expenditure needed.

4.1.6. Hybrid Methods: (SMES + SFCL)

Dynamic performance enhancement of PMSWG based on hybrid methods may be obtained by two strategies (1) a combination use Figure 15 of SFCL Figure 16 and SMES device, (2) integrating the functions of (SFCL + SMES) into one device [101].(1)Both SFCL and SMES were aggregated with a coordinated control method in [101] to compensate for voltage and current during short circuit faults as depicted. In [101], the SFCL was linked directly to PCC and SMES linked through power converters to maintain the energy balance. In [102, 103], the SMES was used to reduce the power imbalance between the MSC and the GSC, and the SFCL was applied to reduce the fault current and increase the GSC output voltage. The SFCL’s resistance is intended to raise Pg to half of the desired value during a fault, and the SMES absorbs the remaining extra power. Decreasing the critical current and the SFCL resistance results in the system’s reduced cost.(2)A SFCL + SMES strategy was designed to be a one tool to realize FRTC as well as smoothing the real power P [104]. The new proposed strategy has series and parallel connection parts to limit the fault current and to deliver power compensation, respectively. The hybrid SFCL + SMES strategy suggested in [105] was linked to the grid through a power transformer as depicted. The device generally functions in the SMES mode to allow for the rapid power transfer; however, when a fault occurs, fault current restriction is directly put in action and once the fault has been addressed, the device returns back to the SMES mode.

4.2. CBS Methods

All of the methods listed in the previous section involve additional equipment that adds to the system’s overall cost. It is wanted to augment FRTC with minutest added fee. Therefore, several research papers concentrate on CBS techniques. As follows, two types of these techniques are listed:

4.2.1. PAC Method

PAC was utilized in WS in [102] to limit incoming power during wind gusts. It may be used to supplement FRTC and other capabilities such as power levelling in PMSWG. It reduces the taken WT energy by regulating the PA of the blades, even if it has a sluggish response due to the mechanical dynamic forces of the sluggish system.

In [106], an upgraded FRTC control by mutual modified BTB converter controller (MBTBCC) and PAC were presented as seen in Figure 17. The standard control option is initiated once the wind speed exceeds the prescribed range. However, once the PG voltage decreases, the employed controller (PI/FLC), after flowing through it, regulates the set point of the PA. The solution’s delayed start to a drop in PG voltage is among its key drawbacks. However, this strategy substantially reduces the input power to the DCL, and the requisite Q cannot be fed into the PG, per the GCs. Due to the lack of extra needs, PAC is a comparatively inexpensive solution.

4.2.2. MBTBCC Method

The BTBC interface between PMSWG and the PG can be used for FRTC augmentation. The PMSWG deloading (DL) approach for FRTC was proposed in [104], as shown in Figure 18. The result is that the excess energy was transformed into and stored as kinetic energy. The PMSWG is calculated by dividing the desired target torque by a DL decline. As a result, the DCL voltage remains within the allowable range. However, in the event of PG issues, the GSC might go out of control.

In [107], a new control structure was performed, in which MSC regulated the DCL voltage and the GSC improved MPPT as seen in Figure 19. In this method, the power generation in the PMSWG was lowered when the grid voltage dropped and the DCL voltage deviates from the nominal value, resulting in the lower input power to the DCL and keeping its voltage constant [108]. The P controlled and the Q is fed to the PG based on GCs since the WG-P is regulated via GSC. The mechanical portion of the WT functions as energy storage in this strategy, which is comparable to the deloading concept. In [107], FRTC was investigated under which case the GSC functioned as a STATCOM in a fault scenario, and the studied methodology was determined to be successful and effective when compared to the BC method. Reference [108] employed a feedback linearization approach to improve FRTC due to the nonlinear relationship flanked by V_dc and desired P, and the method used resulted in a reduction in V_dc overshoot.

The BTBCs and their controllers are becoming more vital in PMSWG with the role of filling the GC necessities. The PMSWG controllers are classified into MSC and GSC controllers. A comprehensive summary of controller structures used during FRTC of PMSWG is presented in Table 5.

4.3. Comparison Assessment of Complexities and Economics FRTC Methods

It is significant to compare the complexities and economic systems of the investigated FRTC approaches. In place of previously discussed, some FRTC systems, particularly those relying on superconducting science, are more costly than others. Approaches can be divided into three cost categories: high (H), medium (M), and low (L) depending on the quantity of electronic switches and further components are utilized, such as coupling transformers, magnetic inductance, resistance, and superconducting elements. The priciest types of equipment are FACTS because they have a lot of switches and typically require coupling transformers. However, the knowledge and technical abilities of their switches may make this FRTC approach more difficult. The ESSs are also an expensive strategy because the majority of them are pricey hardware. The BC and SDBR technologies are less expensive than UBS because they use high-power resistors and fewer switches. Finally, because they do not incorporate extra components into their design, CBS technologies are more economical FRTC techniques. Table 6 sums up a comparative assessment among the aforementioned solutions in terms of cost, simplicity, DCL overvoltage suppression, favorable Q support capability, and additional device requirements.

5. Trends in Technology and Research Status (Statistical Analysis)

In this section, investigations on the most current advancements in the state of the art of FRTC enhancement methods for PMSWG have been carried out and presented as follows:

5.1. Grid Integration (GI) Issues

Achieving FRTC, production smoothness P, and Q compliance are required in contemporary [145, 147–149]. In numerous research studies, FRTC has been noted as a significant issue [150–154]. Numerous academic publications have examined the two aforementioned needs. Figure 20 shows the desirability of the GI issues in the percentage form to demonstrate the FRTC issue’s 63% market domination.

5.2. FRTC Methods

In conclusion, researchers have shown interest in investigating PMSWG that will benefit much from the example of the current development in FRTC approaches [31, 51, 59, 96, 150–153, 155, 156]. According to the priorities of research investigations, Figure 21 depicts the general tendencies of the technological advancement in percent figures.

6. Simulation Results and Comparisons of Different Methods

During voltage dips, the main issue in the system is the overvoltage in the DCL capacitor of the BTBC. Keeping the DCL voltage at allowable limits during zero voltage dip proves the effectiveness of the applied methods. Five simulation scenarios are carried out for clarifying some of the FRTC enhancement methods’ impact on the DCL voltage using the MATLAB\Simulink program. The investigated zero voltage dip persists for 0.2 seconds and that leads to overvoltage at this link as depicted in Figure 22. In Figure 22, the symbols C, C₁, C₂, C₃, and C₄ represent system without the FRTC method, with storage unit, with FACTS unit, with improved control system-addition unit, and with BC unit, respectively. Figure 22 demonstrates that all approaches except C₁ limit the DCL’s overvoltage but still exceed the permitted value (1.1 pu) [157], which is shown in Table 7. Finally, it can be concluded that Figure 22 and Table 7 clarify the clear benefit of C₁. Tables 8–10, respectively, contain the parameters for the simulated PMSWG, FRTC improvement techniques, and controllers’ parameters.

7. Future Research Directions

(i)WSs are expected to be one of the pillars for achieving net zero emissions and driving the worldwide energy evolution, it might become one of the main sources of energy as the use of green energy increases. WSs support the global energy subsidy reform policies and implications. Because of this, we must shift our attention from how effectively WSs function to how to increase their potential for their active support.(ii)In light of UBS′ large prices, CBS for FRT is an alluring substitute. Together, CBS and UBS can reduce the costs associated with the schemes and increase PMSWG’s capacity to offer active support.(iii)Hybrid approaches can increase the performance of the PMSWG as a whole, rather than only the FRTC, at a reduced cost.(iv)The bulk of WSs are located in remote areas and are transferred by LCC-based HVDC, making it crucial to investigate FRTC techniques under complex voltage variations caused by LCC-based HVDC faults. In this case, a disturbance that is not only a brief low voltage is bothering the WT.(v)Even though PMSWGs have more control flexibility than DFIG, there is not much research on this topic. Extensive research should be carried out on the PMSWG since it can efficiently handle these disruptions by fully using controllability.(vi)Application of recent controllers such as neuro-fuzzy, hybrid ANN controllers in FRTC methods and PMSWG to assess their effectiveness.(vii)Optimal sizing of the units using recent metaheuristic techniques for FRTC enhancement methods.(viii)The designed FRTC methods only consider the DCL voltage, however additional research and analysis are required to determine how these methods would affect the WG system.

8. Conclusion

This review paper assesses several FRTC augmentation systems for PMSWG, which may be classed as CBS, UBS, and CCS. Several techniques’ topology and fundamental operation are presented throughout the study. In this work, several approaches from both categories were presented, assessed, and simulated for PMSWG to improve FRTC by maintaining DCL voltage within permissible ranges. The merits and downsides of the FRTC enhancement techniques classes have been contrasted and appraised. A comparison of simulated and discussed approaches revealed that UBS and CBS are efficient procedures, although UBS raises system costs and CBS raises system complexity. In addition, the cost, simplicity, GCs compliance, power smoothing, and additional unit needs of the FRTC approaches were compared. According to the comparative study, the cost-effective solutions are adequate for the FRTC difficulties and reflect the future trend for increasing PMSWG’s FRTC as well as its dynamic performance. By advocating the use of FRTC technology, this study is intended to help utility operators, researchers, manufacturers, and engineers working in the field of grid integration of WSs.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

B. Ślusarczyk, P. Żegleń, A. Kluczek, A. Nizioł, and M. Górka, “The impact of renewable energy sources on the economic growth of Poland and Sweden considering COVID-19 times,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 332, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
International Energy Agency, Electricity Market Report, International Energy Agency, Paris, France, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site
Z. Zheng, J. Ren, X. Xiao, C. Huang, Y. Wang, and Q. Xie, “Response mechanism of DFIG to transient voltage disturbance under commutation failure of LCC-HVDC system,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 2972–2979, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bajaj and A. K. Singh, “Grid integrated renewable DG systems: a review of power quality challenges and state‐of‐the‐art mitigation techniques,” International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 26–69, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
International Energy Agency, in Renewables 2017: Analysis and Forecasts to 2022, International Energy Agency, Paris, France, 2017, [Online]. Available:.
M. M. Mahmoud, M. M. Aly, and A. M. M. Abdel-Rahim, “Enhancing the dynamic performance of a wind-driven PMSG implementing different optimization techniques,” SN Applied Sciences, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 684, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Martinot and L. Junfeng, Powering China’s development: the role of renewable energy, Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
N. Hilmi, R. Chami, M. D. Sutherland et al., “The role of blue carbon in climate change mitigation and carbon stock conservation,” Frontiers in Climate, vol. 3, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Saurabh, D. Sudhanshu, S. Suraj Kumar, and M. Sc, “Paleontological resources for Geotourism in barmer area of western Rajasthan, India: implication for A national fossil park development,” GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 203–216, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zografos and S. Saladié, “La ecología política de conflictos sobre energía eólica. Un estudio de caso en Cataluña,” Documents d’Analisi Geografica, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 177–192, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Y. Lee and M. J. Fields, “An overview of wind-energy-production prediction bias, losses, and uncertainties,” Wind Energy Science, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 311–365, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Tarafdar Hagh and T. Khalili, “A review of fault ride through of PV and wind renewable energies in grid codes,” International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1342–1356, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. D. Hansen, K. Das, P. Sørensen, P. Singh, and A. Gavrilovic, “European and indian grid codes for utility scale hybrid power plants,” Energies, vol. 14, p. 4335, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Q. Al-Shetwi and M. Z. Sujod, “Grid-connected photovoltaic power plants: a review of the recent integration requirements in modern grid codes,” International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1849–1865, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Solman, M. Smits, B. van Vliet, and S. Bush, “Co-production in the wind energy sector: a systematic literature review of public engagement beyond invited stakeholder participation,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 72, Article ID 101876, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
ANEEL, ““Annual Wind Energy Report,” 2020, https://abeeolica.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/PT_Boletim-Anual-de-Geracao_2020.pdf[Online]. Available:.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Zhang, J. Yao, P. Sun et al., “Improved continuous fault ride through control strategy of DFIG-based wind turbine during commutation failure in the LCC-HVDC transmission system,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 459–473, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. E. Okedu and H. F. A. Barghash, “Enhancing the performance of DFIG wind turbines considering excitation parameters of the insulated gate bipolar transistors and a new PLL scheme,” Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 8, p. 2021, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Jaiswal, Y. Belkhier, S. Chandra et al., “Design and implementation of energy reshaping based fuzzy logic control for optimal power extraction of PMSG wind energy converter,” Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 10, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Mahmoud, M. K. Ratib, M. M. Aly, and A. M. M. Abdel–Rahim, “Application of whale optimization technique for evaluating the performance of wind-driven PMSG under harsh operating events,” Process Integr. Optim. Sustain., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 447–470, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gencer, “Modelling and Analysis of Operation PMSG Based WECS under Different Load Conditions,” in Proceedings of the 2016 8th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), Ploiesti, Romania, June 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Alsumiri and R. Althomali, “Enhanced low voltage ride through capability for grid connected wind energy conversion system,” International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 369–377, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Belkhier, T. Makhlouf, R. N. Shaw, A. Achour, and M. Bajaj, “Novel Energy-Based Speed Control of Grid-Connecting PMSG Wind System,” in Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 4th International Conference on Computing, Power and Communication Technologies, pp. 1–6, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, September 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Errami, A. Obbadi, and S. Sahnoun, “A survey of control strategies for grid connected wind energy conversion system based permanent magnet synchronous generator and fed by multi-level converters,” International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 51–63, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Metwally, M. K. Ratib, M. M. Aly, A. Abdel‑Rahim, and M. A. Rahim, “Effect of grid faults on dominant wind generators for electric power system integration: a comparison and assessment,” Energy Systems Research, vol. 4, no. 3(15), pp. 70–78, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Srivastava, M. Bajaj, Y. Belkhier, N. K. Sharma, S. Choudhury, and B. Srikanth Goud, “Power quality issues with penetration of wind energy and the role of ldc: a mini review,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Sustainable Technologies. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems, K. N. Das, D. Das, A. K. Ray, and P. N. Suganthan, Eds., Springer, Singapore, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. E. M. Ardjoun, M. Denai, and M. Abid, “A robust power control strategy to enhance LVRT capability of grid-connected DFIG-based wind energy systems,” Wind Energy, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 834–847, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Mahmoud, M. M. Aly, H. S. Salama, and A. M. M. Abdel-Rahim, “A Combination of an OTC Based MPPT and Fuzzy Logic Current Control for a Wind-Driven PMSG under Variability of Wind Speed,” Energy System, vol. 13, Article ID 0123456789, pp. 1075–1098, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Yuan, K. Meng, J. Huang, Z. Y. Dong, W. Zhang, and X. Xie, “Development of HVRT and LVRT control strategy for PMSG-based wind turbine generators,” Energies, vol. 13, pp. 5442–5520, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Mohamed, S. A. Basiony, K. R. Mohamed, A. Mohamed, E. Abdallah, and A. R. Abdel-Moamen, “Investigations on OTC-MPPT strategy and FRT capability for PMSG wind system with the support of optimized wind side controller based on GWO technique,” Energy Systems Research, vol. 4, no. 4(16), pp. 79–91, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Sahri, S. Tamalouzt, F. Hamoudi et al., “. Ghoneim, New intelligent direct power control of DFIG-based wind conversion system by using machine learning under variations of all operating and compensation modes,” Energy Reports, vol. 7, pp. 6394–6412, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Q. Al-Shetwi, M. Z. Sujod, F. Blaabjerg, and Y. Yang, “Fault ride-through control of grid-connected photovoltaic power plants: a review,” Solar Energy, vol. 180, pp. 340–350, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Bayrak, D. Ghaderi, and P. Sanjeevikumar, “Fault ride-through (FRT) capability and current FRT methods in photovoltaic-based distributed generators,” in Power Quality in Modern Power Systems, pp. 133–149, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kondoh, H. Mizuno, and T. Funamoto, “Fault ride-through characteristics of small wind turbines,” Energies, vol. 12, pp. 4587–4623, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Yang, X. Yang, and Y. A. W. Shardt, “An ADRC-based control strategy for FRT improvement of wind power generation with a doubly-fed induction generator,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 1150, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Mahmoud, M. Khalid Ratib, M. M. Aly, and A. M. M. Abdel-Rahim, “Wind-driven Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generators Connected to a Power Grid: Existing Perspective and Future Aspects,” Wind Engineering, vol. 46, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Metwally Mahmoud, H. S. Salama, M. M. Aly, and A. M. M. Abdel-Rahim, “Design and implementation of FLC system for fault ride-through capability enhancement in PMSG-wind systems,” Wind Engineering, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1361–1373, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
ELProcus, in Type of Faults and Effects in Electrical Power Systems, pp. 1–4, ELprocus, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India, 2014.
N. M. Khoa and D. D. Tung, “Locating fault on transmission line with static var compensator based on phasor measurement unit,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 2380, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ma, M. Soltani, A. Hajizadeh, J. Zhu, and Z. Chen, “Wind farm power optimization and fault ride-through under inter-turn short-circuit fault,” Energies, vol. 14, pp. 3072–3111, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Tian, P. Cheng, L. Wei, G. Li, H. Jiao, and H. Liu, “Transient stability and FRT technologies of different synchronous wind turbine,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 363–373, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Barros, C. B.-E. P. S. Research, and undefined, “An internal model control for enhanced grid-connection of direct-driven PMSG-based wind generators,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 151, pp. 440–450, 2017‏.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Nasiri, A. Arzani, and M. Savaghebi, “Current limitation for the machine side converter of permanent magnet synchronous generator wind turbines during grid faults,” IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 14, no. 17, pp. 3448–3456, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gencer, “Analysis and control of low-voltage ride-through capability improvement for PMSG based on an NPC converter using an interval type-2 fuzzy logic system,” Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 63–70, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Liu, J. Hu, G. Tian, L. Xu, and S. Wang, “Study on high voltage ride through control strategy of PMSG‐based wind turbine generation system with SCESU,” Journal of Engineering, vol. 2019, no. 17, pp. 4257–4260, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ouari, Y. Belkhier, H. Djouadi et al., “Improved nonlinear generalized model predictive control for robustness and power enhancement of a DFIG-based wind energy converter,” Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 10, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Tait, S. Wang, K. Ahmed, and G. P. Adam, “Comparative assessment of four low voltage fault ride through techniques (LVFRT) for wind energy conversion systems (WECSs),” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 10463–10476, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kamarzarrin, M. H. Refan, P. Amiri, and A. Dameshghi, “A new intelligent fault diagnosis and prognosis method for wind turbine doubly-fed induction generator,” Wind Engineering, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 308–340, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Raza, H. M. Munir, N. Shafique, W. Amjad, M. Bajaj, and M. L. Alghaythi, “Implementation of islanding recognizing technique for wind distributed generations considering insignificant NDZ,” Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 10, Article ID 830750, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. H. H. Mousa, A. R. Youssef, and E. E. M. Mohamed, “Optimal power extraction control schemes for five-phase PMSG based wind generation systems,” Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 144–155, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Tripathi, A. N. Tiwari, and D. Singh, “Grid-integrated permanent magnet synchronous generator based wind energy conversion systems: a technology review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 51, pp. 1288–1305, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Nasiri, J. Milimonfared, and S. H. Fathi, “A Review of Low-Voltage Ride-Through Enhancement Methods for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator Based Wind Turbines,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 47, pp. 399–415, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. C. Lin, V. E. Balas, J. F. Yang, and Y. H. Chang, “Adaptive takagi-sugeno fuzzy model predictive control for permanent magnet synchronous generator-based hydrokinetic turbine systems,” Energies, vol. 13, pp. 5296–5320, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-N. Wang, W.-C. Lin, and X.-K. Le, “Modelling of a PMSG wind turbine with autonomous control,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 856173, 9 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Badoni and S. B. Prakash, “Modeling and simulation of 2 MW PMSG wind energy conversion systems,” IOSR Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 53–58, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kim, I. Chung, and S. Moon, “Tuning of the PI Controller Parameters of a PMSG Wind Turbine to Improve Control Performance under Various Wind Speeds,” Energies, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1406–1425, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Kim and W. Kim, “Enhanced low-voltage ride-through coordinated control for PMSG wind turbines and energy storage systems considering pitch and inertia response,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 212557–212567, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wang, N. Chen, D. Yu et al., “Flexible fault ride through strategy for wind farm clusters in power systems with high wind power penetration,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 93, pp. 239–248, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tohidi and B. Mohammadi-ivatloo, “A comprehensive review of low voltage ride through of doubly fed induction wind generators,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 57, pp. 412–419, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Tsili and S. Papathanassiou, “A review of grid code technical requirements for wind farms,” IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 308–332, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Hiremath and T. Moger, “Comprehensive review on low voltage ride through capability of wind turbine generators,” International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, vol. 30, no. 10, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. A. Behabtu, M. Messagie, T. Coosemans et al., “A review of energy storage technologies’ application potentials in renewable energy sources grid integration,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 10511–10520, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. K. Das, O. Bass, G. Kothapalli, T. S. Mahmoud, and D. Habibi, “Overview of energy storage systems in distribution networks: placement, sizing, operation, and power quality,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 91, pp. 1205–1230, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Aly, M. Abdel-Akher, S. M. Said, and T. Senjyu, “A developed control strategy for mitigating wind power generation transients using superconducting magnetic energy storage with reactive power support,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 83, pp. 485–494, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Hasanien and S. M. Muyeen, “Particle swarm optimization-based superconducting magnetic energy storage for low-voltage ride-through capability enhancement in wind energy conversion system,” Electric Power Components and Systems, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1278–1288, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. H. M. A. Rahim and M. H. Khan, “A swarm-based adaptive neural network SMES control for a permanent magnet wind generator,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 7957–7965, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Muyeen, H. M. Hasanien, and A. Al-Durra, “Transient stability enhancement of wind farms connected to a multi-machine power system by using an adaptive ANN-controlled SMES,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 78, pp. 412–420, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Hasanien, “A set-membership affine projection algorithm-based adaptive-controlled SMES units for wind farms output power smoothing,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1226–1233, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Matos, J. F. Carneiro, and P. P. Silva, “Overview of large-scale underground energy storage technologies for integration of renewable energies and criteria for reservoir identification,” Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 21, pp. 241–258, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rufer, in Energy Storage, pp. 1131–1170, Springer Handbooks, New York, NY, USA, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site
P. H. A. Barra, W. C. de Carvalho, T. S. Menezes, R. A. S. Fernandes, and D. V. Coury, “A review on wind power smoothing using high-power energy storage systems,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 137, Article ID 110455, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Huang, Z. Zheng, X. Xiao, and X. Chen, “Cooperative strategy of SMES device and modified control for cost-effective fault ride-through enhancement and power smoothing of 10 MW class superconducting wind turbine,” Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 033302, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. H. M. A. Rahim and E. P. Nowicki, “Supercapacitor energy storage system for fault ride-through of a DFIG wind generation system,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 59, pp. 96–102, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Wu, Y. Yoshida, and T. Minakawa, “Mitigation of wind power fluctuation by combined use of energy storages with different response characteristics,” Energy Procedia, vol. 12, pp. 975–985, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. H. Nguyen and D. C. Lee, “Advanced fault ride-through technique for PMSG wind turbine systems using line-side converter as STATCOM,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 2842–2850, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Abbey and G. Joos, “Short-term energy storage for wind energy applications,” in Proceedings of the Fourtieth IAS Annual Meeting. Conference Record of the 2005 Industry Applications Conference, pp. 2035–2042, IEEE Industry Applications Society, Hong Kong, China, October 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Zhang, Y. Duan, J. Wu et al., “Low Voltage Ride through Control Strategy of Directly Driven Wind Turbine with Energy Storage System,” in Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Detroit, MI, USA, July 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Mahmoud, A. Mohamed Hemeida, and A. M. M. Abdel-Rahim, “Behavior of PMSG wind turbines with active crowbar protection under faults,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies, I-PACT, pp. 1–6, Vellore, India, March 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Muyeen, “A combined approach of using an SDBR and a STATCOM to enhance the stability of a wind farm,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 922–932, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Molinas, J. A. Suul, and T. Undeland, “Low voltage ride through of wind farms with cage generators: STATCOM versus SVC,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1104–1117, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang and D. N. Truong, “Dynamic stability improvement of four parallel-operated PMSG-based offshore wind turbine generators fed to a power system using a STATCOM,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 111–119, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. M. Molla and C. C. Kuo, “Voltage sag enhancement of grid connected hybrid PV-wind power system using battery and SMES based dynamic voltage restorer,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, Article ID 130003, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Mahmoud, Y. M. Esmail, B. S. Atia et al., “Voltage quality enhancement of low-voltage smart distribution system using robust and optimized DVR controllers: application of the harris hawks algorithm,” International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, vol. 2022, Article ID 4242996, 18 pages, 2022, [Online]. Available:.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tamalouzt, Y. Belkhier, Y. Sahri et al., “Enhanced direct reactive power control-based multi-level inverter for DFIG wind system under variable speeds,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 16, p. 9060, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Naguib Eskander and S. I. Amer, “Mitigation of voltage dips and swells in grid-connected wind energy conversion systems,” IETE Journal of Research, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 515–524, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Chandrika and B. C. Sujatha, “Voltage sag mitigation for PMSG system using DVR based hybrid fuzzy logic controller,” Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol. 626, pp. 503–513, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Kamarposhti, M. Alinezhad, H. Lesani, and N. Talebi, “Comparison of SVC, STATCOM, TCSC, and UPFC Controllers for Static Voltage Stability Evaluated by Continuation Power Flow Method,” in Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Canada Electric Power Conference, Vancouver, Canada, October 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. X. Jin, R. H. Yang, R. T. Zhang, Y. J. Fan, Q. Xie, and X. Y. Chen, “Combined low voltage ride through and power smoothing control for DFIG/PMSG hybrid wind energy conversion system employing a SMES-based AC-DC unified power quality conditioner,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 128, Article ID 106733, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Safaei, M. Zolfaghari, M. Gilvanejad, and G. B Gharehpetian, “A survey on fault current limiters: development and technical aspects,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 118, Article ID 105729, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. M. Zhang, H. Wang, Q. Qiu, Z. Zhang, L. Xiao, and L. Lin, “Recent progress of superconducting fault current limiter in China,” Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 34, no. 1, Article ID 013001, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Rashid and M. H. Ali, “Fault ride through capability improvement of DFIG based wind farm by fuzzy logic controlled parallel resonance fault current limiter,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 146, pp. 1–8, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Du, X. Y. Xiao, Y. Wang, Z. X. Zheng, and C. S. Li, “Enhancing fault ride-through capability of DFIG-based wind turbines using inductive SFCL with coordinated control,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Heidary, H. Radmanesh, K. Rouzbehi, A. Mehrizi-Sani, and G. B. Gharehpetian, “Inductive fault current limiters: A review,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 187, Article ID 106499, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Moghadasi and A. I. Sarwat, “Optimal analysis of resistive superconducting fault current limiters applied to a variable speed wind turbine system,” in Proceedings of the SoutheastCon 2015, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, April 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kheibargir, R. Zeinali, and S. M. Aliabadi, “Augmentation of fault ride-through capability of PMSG in a wind power plant using resistive SFCL and a new reactive current injection controller,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Power System Conference (PSC), pp. 623–631, Tehran, Iran, December 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Yehia, D. E. A. Mansour, and W. Yuan, “fault ride-through enhancement of PMSG wind turbines with DC microgrids using resistive-type SFCL,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1–5, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chen, H. He, H. Chen et al., “Study of a modified flux-coupling-type SFCL for efficient fault ride-through in a PMSG wind turbine under different types of faults,” Canadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 189–200, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chen, G. Li, H. Chen et al., “Investigation of a modified flux-coupling-type SFCL for low-voltage ride-through fulfillment of a virtual synchronous generator,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1–6, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Moghadasi, A. Sarwat, and J. M. Guerrero, “Multiobjective optimization in combinatorial wind farms system integration and resistive SFCL using analytical hierarchy process,” Renewable Energy, vol. 94, pp. 366–382, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chen, H. Chen, J. Yang, and H. He, “Development of a voltage compensation type active SFCL and its application for transient performance enhancement of a PMSG-based wind turbine system,” Advances in Condensed Matter Physics, vol. 2017, Article ID 9635219, 12 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chen, H. He, L. Zhu et al., “Coordinated control of SFCL and SMES for transient performance improvement of microgrid with multiple DG units,” Canadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 158–167, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chen, G. Li, H. Chen, and L. H. Koh, “Combined Use of SFCL and SMES for Augmenting FRT Performance and Smoothing Output Power of PMSG Based Wind Turbine,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Asian Conference on Energy, Power and Transportation Electrification (ACEPT), Singapore, October 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Huang, X. Y. Xiao, Z. Zheng, and Y. Wang, “Cooperative Control of SFCL and SMES for Protecting PMSG-Based WTG<roman>s</roman> under Grid Faults,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Guo, L. Xiao, G. Zhang et al., “Development of a 1-MVA/1-MJ superconducting fault current limiter-magnetic energy storage system for LVRT capability enhancement and wind power smoothing,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1–5, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Elshiekh, D. E. A. Mansour, M. Zhang, W. Yuan, H. Wang, and M. Xie, “New technique for using SMES to limit fault currents in wind farm power systems,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1–5, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Liu, C. Liu, and G. Li, “Power coordinated control of wind turbines with permanent magnet synchronous generator for low voltage ride through,” in Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting Conference & Exposition, National Harbor, MD, USA, July 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Alhmoud and H. Al-Zoubi, “IoT applications in wind energy conversion systems,” Open Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 490–499, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. D. Hansen and G. Michalke, “Multi-pole permanent magnet synchronous generator wind turbines’ grid support capability in uninterrupted operation during grid faults,” IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 333–348, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Musunuri and H. L. Ginn, “Comprehensive Review of Wind Energy Maximum Power Extraction Algorithms,” in Proceedings of the 011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Detroit, MI, USA, July 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Campos-Gaona, E. L. Moreno-Goytia, and O. Anaya-Lara, “Fault ride-through improvement of DFIG-WT by integrating a two-degrees-of-freedom internal model control,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1133–1145, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Hazari, M. A. Mannan, A. Umemura, R. Takahashi, and J. Tamura, “Stabilization of wind farm by using PMSG based wind generator taking grid codes into consideration,” Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, vol. 06, no. 11, pp. 40–52, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. W. Gao, Z. Wu, W. Yan, H. Zhang, S. Yan, and X. Wang, “Comprehensive frequency regulation scheme for permanent magnet synchronous generator-based wind turbine generation system,” IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 234–244, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mali, S. James, and I. Tank, “Improving low voltage ride-through capabilities for grid connected wind turbine generator,” Energy Procedia, vol. 54, pp. 530–540, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Tahir, T. Allaoui, M. Denai, S. Mekhilef, C. Belfedal, and M. Doumi, “Second-order sliding mode control of wind turbines to enhance the fault-ride through capability under unbalanced grid faults,” International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, vol. 49, no. 7, p. 1959, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Nie, T. Liu, G. Cai, L. Gao, F. Wu, and Z. Wang, “Low-voltage ride-through handling in doubly fed induction generators based on model-predictive rotor current control,” Dianwang Jishu/Power Syst. Technol., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 905–914, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Huang, Q. Xie, and T. Dai, “A SFCL-Based Fault Ride through Method for PMSG-Based Wind Turbine,” in Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Applied Superconductivity and Electromagnetic Devices (ASEMD), Tianjin, China, October 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhang, “Advanced control strategies for direct-drive PMSG wind turbine systems: direct predictive torque control approaches,” CPSS Transactions on Power Electronics and Applications, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 217–225, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Belkhier, R. N. Shaw, M. Bures et al., “Robust interconnection and damping assignment energy-based control for a permanent magnet synchronous motor using high order sliding mode approach and nonlinear observer,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 1731–1740, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Vijayapriya, P. Raja, and S. Mp, “A modified active power control scheme for enhanced operation of PMSG-based WGs,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 630–638, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Yaramasu, A. Dekka, M. J. Durán, S. Kouro, and B. Wu, “PMSG-based wind energy conversion systems: survey on power converters and controls,” IET Electric Power Applications, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 956–968, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, X. Yuan, J. Li, H. Xiao, Z. Xu, and Z. Du, “Novel grid-forming control of PMSG-based wind turbine for integrating weak AC grid without sacrificing maximum power point tracking,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1613–1625, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Yassin, H. H. Hanafy, and M. M. Hallouda, “Design and implementation of PI controllers of direct drive PMSG wind turbine system tuned by Linearized biogeography-based optimization technique,” in Proceedings of the IECON Proceedings (Industrial Electronics Conference), pp. 4072–4077, Florence, Italy, October 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Thet and H. Saitoh, “Pitch Control for Improving the Low-Voltage Ride-Through of Wind Farm,” in Proceedings of the 2009 Transmission & Distribution Conference & Exposition: Asia and Pacific, Seoul, Korea (South), October 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Korkos, M. Linjama, J. Kleemola, and A. Lehtovaara, “Data annotation and feature extraction in fault detection in a wind turbine hydraulic pitch system,” Renewable Energy, vol. 185, pp. 692–703, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Luo, Y. Vidal, and L. Acho, “Wind Turbine Control and Monitoring,” in Surrey, pp. 157–190, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2014, [Online]. Available:.
View at: Google Scholar
M. M. Mahmoud, M. M. Aly, H. S. Salama, and A. M. M. Abdel-Rahim, “An Internal Parallel Capacitor Control Strategy for DC-link Voltage Stabilization of PMSG-Based Wind Turbine under Various Fault Conditions,” Wind Engineering, vol. 46, no. 3, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lin, X. Tong, X. Zhao, and G. Weiss, “The parallel virtual infinite capacitor applied to DC-link voltage filtering for wind turbines,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 1649, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ahuja, G. Bhuvaneswari, and R. Balasubramanian, “Ride through of Grid Faults for PMSG Based Wind Energy Conversion Systems,” in Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 7th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS), Chennai, India, August 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Belkhier, Y. Sahri, T. Makhlouf, R. N. Shaw, M. Bajaj, and A. Ghosh, “Passivity-based control of tidal turbine based PMSG using interconnection and damping assignment approach,” in Innovations in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. ICEEE, Malaysia, S. Mekhilef, R. N. Shaw, and P. Siano, Eds., Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Ngamroo and T. Karaipoom, “Improving low-voltage ride-through performance and alleviating power fluctuation of DFIG wind turbine in DC microgrid by optimal SMES with fault current limiting function,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1–5, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Kim and W. Kim, “Coordinated fuzzy-based low-voltage ride-through control for PMSG wind turbines and energy storage systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, Article ID 105874, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Sathya and P. Maruthupandi, “Enhancement of low voltage ride through capability for PMSG based wind energy conversion system with super capacitor,” in Proceedings of the 2018 4th International Conference on Electrical Energy Systems, ICEES, pp. 57–60, Chennai, India, February 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Nasiri and A. Arzani, “Robust control scheme for the braking chopper of PMSG-based wind turbines–A comparative assessment,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 134, Article ID 107322, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. K. Mohammedsaeed and K. Jia, “Comparison of some low voltage ride-through strategies,” in Proceedings of the IECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 152–157, Beijing, China, October 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, K. D. E. Kerrouche, A. Mezouar, A. Van Den Bossche, A. Draou, and L. Boumediene, “Feasibility study of wind farm grid-connected project in Algeria under grid fault conditions using D-facts devices,” Applied Sciences, vol. 8, pp. 2250–2311, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Mahmoud, A. M. Hemeida, T. Senjy, and A. M. Ewais, “fault ride-through capability enhancement for grid-connected permanent magnet synchronous generator driven by wind turbines,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Power Electronics and Renewable Energy CPERE, pp. 567–572, Aswan, Egypt, October 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Uthra and D. Suchitra, “Fault ride through in grid integrated hybrid system using facts device and electric vehicle charging station,” Energies, vol. 14, pp. 3828–3913, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ji, X. He, X. Li, K. Liu, and M. Zhang, “Performance analysis and research on LVRT of PMSG wind power systems with SDBR,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control Conference, Cancer Causes & Control, pp. 6953–6958, Nanjing, China, July 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tamalouzt, Y. Belkhier, Y. Sahri, N. Ullah, R. N. Shaw, and M. Bajaj, “New direct reactive power control based fuzzy and modulated hysteresis method for micro-grid applications under real wind speed,” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 4862–4887, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Peng and X. Du, “SDBR: a secure depth-based anonymous routing protocol in underwater acoustic networks,” International Journal of Performability Engineering, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 731–741, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Huang, L. Zhang, S. Sang et al., “Optimized series dynamic braking resistor for LVRT of doubly-fed induction generator with uncertain fault scenarios,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 22533–22546, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Kim and W. Kim, “Low-voltage ride-through coordinated control for PMSG wind turbines using de-loaded operation,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, Article ID 66599, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Mahmud, T. K. Roy, K. Littras, S. N. Islam, and M. T. Amanullah Oo, “Nonlinear Partial Feedback Linearizing Controller Design for PMSG-Based Wind Farms to Enhance LVRT Capabilities,” in Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), Chennai, India, December 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Hossain, “Improvement of transient stability of DFIG based wind generator by using of resistive solid state fault current limiter,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 2557–2570, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Firouzi, M. Nasiri, M. Benbouzid, and G. B. Gharehpetian, “Application of multi-step bridge-type fault current limiter for fault ride-through capability enhancement of permanent magnet synchronous generator-based wind turbines,” International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, vol. 30, no. 11, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Alam, M. A. Y. Abido, and I. El-Amin, “Fault current limiters in power systems: a comprehensive review,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 1025, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Jain, S. Jain, and R. K. Nema, “Control strategies of grid interfaced wind energy conversion system: an overview,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 47, pp. 983–996, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gencer, “Analysis and control of fault ride through capability improvement pmsg based on WECS using active crowbar system during different fault conditions,” Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 63–69, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. E. Okedu and H. Barghash, “Enhancing the transient state performance of permanent magnet synchronous generator based variable speed wind turbines using power converters excitation parameters,” Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 9, p. 2021, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ma, L. Tao, X. Zhou, and X. Shi, “Analysis and control of fault ride-through capability improvement for wind energy conversion system using linear active disturbance rejection control with correction link,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, Article ID 73816, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Ibrahim, M. S. Hamad, Y. G. Dessouky, and B. W. Williams, “A review on recent low voltage ride-through solutions for PMSG wind turbine,” in Proceedings of 2012 International Symposium on Power Electronics Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion, pp. 265–270, Sorrento, Italy, June 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-L. Hu, Y. K. Wu, C.-K. Chen, C. H. Wang, W. T. Chen, and L. I. Cho, “A review of the low-voltage ride-through capability of wind power generators,” Energy Procedia, vol. 141, pp. 378–382, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. P. Mahela, N. Gupta, M. Khosravy, and N. Patel, “Comprehensive overview of low voltage ride through methods of grid integrated wind generator,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, Article ID 99299, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Bian, C. Tian, and Y. Fu, “A coordinated control strategy for fault ride-though capacity of direct-drive permanent magnet wind power generating units,” Dianli Xitong Baohu yu Kongzhi/Power System Protection and Control, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 69–74, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. E. Okedu and S. M. Muyeen, “Enhanced performance of PMSG wind turbines during grid disturbance at different network strengths considering fault current limiter,” International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, vol. 31, no. 8, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Justo, F. Mwasilu, and J. W. Jung, “Doubly-fed induction generator based wind turbines: a comprehensive review of fault ride-through strategies,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 45, pp. 447–467, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Huchel, M. S. El Moursi, and H. H. Zeineldin, “A parallel capacitor control strategy for enhanced FRT capability of DFIG,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 303–312, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Metwally Mahmoud, “Improved current control loops in wind side converter with the support of wild horse optimizer for enhancing the dynamic performance of PMSG- based wind generation system,” International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–15, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Mohamed Metwally Mahmoud et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1102

Downloads

679

Citations