Table of Contents
Journal of Allergy
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 170693, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/170693
Research Article

Workers with Occupational Contact Dermatitis: Work Outcomes and Return to Work Process in the First Six Months following Diagnosis

Department of Occupational Health and Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital and the Department of Medicine and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 1W8

Received 2 December 2010; Accepted 8 March 2011

Academic Editor: Fabienne Rancé

Copyright © 2011 D. Linn Holness. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. M. Wall and K. A. Gebauer, “A follow-up study of occupational skin disease in Western Australia,” Contact Dermatitis, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 241–243, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Rosen and S. Freeman, “Prognosis of occupational contact dermatitis in New South Wales, Australia,” Contact Dermatitis, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 88–93, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. L. Holness and J. R. Nethercott, “Work outcome in workers with occupational skin disease,” American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 807–815, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Adisesh, J. D. Meyer, and N. M. Cherry, “Prognosis and work absence due to occupational contact dermatitis. Outcome of cases reported to EPIDERM,” Contact Dermatitis, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 273–279, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. S. Cvetkovski, K. J. Rothman, J. Olsen et al., “Relation between diagnoses on severity, sick leave and loss of job among patients with occupational hand eczema,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 93–98, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. Meding, R. Lantto, G. Lindahl, K. Wrangsjö, and B. Bengtsson, “Occupational skin disease in Sweden—a 12-year follow-up,” Contact Dermatitis, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 308–313, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. S. Cvetkovski, R. Zachariae, H. Jensen, J. Olsen, J. D. Johansen, and T. Agner, “Prognosis of occupational hand eczema: a follow-up study,” Archives of Dermatology, vol. 142, no. 3, pp. 305–311, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Lazarov, B. Rabin, N. Fraidlin, and D. Abraham, “Medical and psychosocial outcome of patients with occupational contact dermatitis in Israel,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1061–1065, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Mälkönen, R. Jolanki, K. Alanko et al., “A 6-month follow-up study of 1048 patients diagnosed with an occupational skin disease,” Contact Dermatitis, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 261–268, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. D. L. Holness, “Return-to-work barriers for workers with contact dermatitis,” Contact Dermatitis, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 273–275, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. D. L. Holness, “Health care services use by workers with work-related contact dermatitis,” Dermatitis, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 18–24, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus