Table of Contents
Journal of Anthropology
Volume 2015, Article ID 908535, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/908535
Research Article

The Difficulty of Sexing Skeletons from Unknown Populations

Biological Anthropology and Comparative Anatomy Research Unit, School of Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia

Received 8 October 2015; Revised 4 December 2015; Accepted 9 December 2015

Academic Editor: Hugo Cardoso

Copyright © 2015 Ingrid Sierp and Maciej Henneberg. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. R. Loth and M. Henneberg, “Mandibular ramus flexure: a new morphologic indicator of sexual dimorphism in the human skeleton,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 473–485, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. N. C. Lovell, “Test of Phenice's technique for determining sex from the os pubis,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 117–120, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. M. MacLaughlin and M. F. Bruce, “The accuracy of sex identification in European skeletal remains using the Phenice characters,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1384–1392, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. Rogers and S. Saunders, “Accuracy of sex determination using morphological traits of the human pelvis,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1047–1056, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. G. Steele and C. A. Bramblett, The Anatomy and Biology of the Human Skeleton, A&M University Press, College Station, Tex, USA, 1988.
  6. T. D. White and P. A. Folkens, The Human Bone Manual, Elsevier Academic Press, London, UK, 2005.
  7. G. Acsadi and J. Nemeskeri, History of Human Life Span and Mortality, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary, 1970.
  8. W. M. Krogman and M. Y. Iscan, The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, Charles C Thomas Publisher, Springfield, Ill, USA, 2nd edition, 1986.
  9. T. W. Phenice, “A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 297–301, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Steyn and M. Y. Işcan, “Osteometric variation in the humerus: sexual dimorphism in South Africans,” Forensic Science International, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 77–85, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. G. Steele, “The estimation of sex on the basis of the talus and calcaneus,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 581–588, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Kajanoja, “Sex determination of finnish crania by discriminant function analysis,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 29–33, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. R. Dayal, M. A. Spocter, and M. A. Bidmos, “An assessment of sex using the skull of black South Africans by discriminant function analysis,” HOMO—Journal of Comparative Human Biology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 209–221, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Dabbs, “Sex determination using the scapula in New Kingdom skeletons from Tell El-Amarna,” HOMO—Journal of Comparative Human Biology, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 413–420, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. Di Vella, C. P. Campobasso, M. Dragone, and F. Introna Jr., “Skeletal sex determination by scapular measurements,” Journal of Biological Research, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 299–305, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. L. Walker, “Greater sciatic notch morphology: sex, age, and population differences,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 385–391, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. V. L. Vance, M. Steyn, and E. N. L'Abbé, “Nonmetric sex determination from the distal and posterior humerus in black and white South Africans,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 710–714, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Pearson and J. Bell, “A study of long bones of the English skeleton, 1. The femur,” in The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, Charles C Thomas Publisher, Springfield, Ill, USA, 1917–1919. View at Google Scholar
  19. P. L. Walker, “Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. Psonak and B. Kwiatkowska, “Selection of skull morphological traits for sexual dimorphism analysis,” HOMO—Journal of Comparative Human Biology, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 258–274, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. W. Stęślicka, “Badania dymorfizmu płciowego czaszek ludzkich (seria lapońska),” Folia Morphologica, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 126–184, 1951. View at Google Scholar
  22. W. Stęślicka, “Wskaźniki dymorfizmu,” Materiały i Prace Antropologiczne, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–23, 1958. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. A. Gómez-Valdés, M. Quinto-Sánchez, A. Menéndez Garmendia, J. Veleminska, G. Sánchez-Mejorada, and J. Bruzek, “Comparison of methods to determine sex by evaluating the greater sciatic notch: visual, angular and geometric morphometrics,” Forensic Science International, vol. 221, no. 1–3, pp. 156.e1–156.e7, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Dittrick and J. M. Suchey, “Sex determination of prehistoric Central California skeletal remains using discriminant analysis of the femur and humerus,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 3–9, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P. Urbanová, P. Hejna, L. Zátopková, and M. Šafr, “What is the appropriate approach in sex determination of hyoid bones?” Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 996–1003, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. V. L. Vance and M. Steyn, “Geometric morphometric assessment of sexually dimorphic characteristics of the distal humerus,” HOMO—Journal of Comparative Human Biology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 329–340, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Steyn, E. Pretorius, and L. Hutten, “Geometric morphometric analysis of the greater sciatic notch in South Africans,” HOMO—Journal of Comparative Human Biology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 197–206, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus