Table of Contents
Journal of Anthropology
Volume 2017, Article ID 9129801, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9129801
Research Article

Estimating Sex of Modern Greeks Based on the Foramen Magnum Region

Department of Animal and Human Physiology, Faculty of Biology, School of Sciences, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, 157 81 Athens, Greece

Correspondence should be addressed to Maria-Eleni Chovalopoulou; rg.aou.loib@vohcaneliram

Received 2 March 2017; Revised 28 May 2017; Accepted 3 July 2017; Published 31 July 2017

Academic Editor: Hugo Cardoso

Copyright © 2017 Maria-Eleni Chovalopoulou and Andreas Bertsatos. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Graw, “Morphometrische and Morphognostische. Geschlecthsdiagnostik an der menschlichen Schadelbasis,” in Osteologische Identifikation and Altersschatzung., Lubeck: Schmidt-Romhild, M. Oehmicen and G. Geserick, Eds., pp. 103–121, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Bruzek, “A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone,” The American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 157–168, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. E. Buikstra and D. H. Ubelaker, Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains, Arkansas Archaeological Survey, Fayetteville, North Carolina, 1994.
  4. D. E. Walrath, P. Turner, and J. Bruzek, “Reliability test of the visual assessment of cranial traits for sex determination,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 132–137, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. L. Rogers, “Determining the sex of human remains through cranial morphology,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 493–500, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Giles and O. Elliot, “Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 53–68, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. L. Walker, “Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. Ferreira, B. Rosenberg, and H. P. da Luz, “The Foramen Magnum index in brazilians,” Revista da Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 297–302, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  9. I. N. Zadvornov, “Variations in the shape of the foramen magnum and the structure of its posterior border,” Arkhiv Anatomii, Gistologii I Embriologii, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 42–50, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  10. W. R. Teixeira, “Sex identification utilizing the size of the foramen magnum,” The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 203–206, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Gapert, S. Black, and J. Last, “Sex determination from the foramen magnum: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample,” International Journal of Legal Medicine, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. H. Ubelaker, A. H. Ross, and S. M. Graver, “Application of forensic discriminant functions to a spanish cranial sample,” Forensic Sci Commun 4, 2002, http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/july2002/ubelaker1.htm. View at Google Scholar
  13. F. Ramsthaler, K. Kreutz, and M. A. Verhoff, “Accuracy of metric sex analysis of skeletal remains using Fordisc® based on a recent skull collection,” International Journal of Legal Medicine, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 477–482, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. F. W. Rösing, M. Graw, B. Marré et al., “Recommendations for the forensic diagnosis of sex and age from skeletons,” HOMO- Journal of Comparative Human Biology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 75–89, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. Natsis, M. Piagkou, G. Skotsimara, G. Piagkos, and P. Skandalakis, “A morphometric anatomical and comparative study of the foramen magnum region in a Greek population,” Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 925–934, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. Radinsky, “Relative brain size: A new measure,” Science, vol. 155, no. 3764, pp. 836–838, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. D. Kizilkanat, N. Boyan, R. Soames, and O. Oguz, “Morphometry of the hypoglossal canal, occipital condyle, and foramen magnum,” Neurosurgery Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 121–125, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. V. C. Chancey, D. Ottaviano, B. S. Myers, and R. W. Nightingale, “A kinematic and anthropometric study of the upper cervical spine and the occipital condyles,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1953–1959, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. A. Murshed, A. E. Cicekcibasi, and I. Tuncer, “Morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum and variations in its shape: a study on computerized tomographic images of normal adults,” Turkish Journal of Medical Science, vol. 33, pp. 301–306, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  20. S. R. M. Uysal, D. Gokharman, M. Kacar, I. Tuncbilek, and U. Kosar, “Estimation of Sex by 3D CT Measurements of the Foramen Magnum,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1310–1314, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  21. C. J. Catalina-Herrera, “Study of the anatomic metric values of the foramen magnum and its relation to sex,” Acta Anatomica, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 344–347, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. R. Routal, G. P. Pal, S. S. Bhagwat, and B. P. Tamankar, “Metrical studies with sexual dimorphism in foramen magnum of human crania,” Journal of the Anatomical Society of India, vol. 2, no. 33, pp. 85–89, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  23. D. J. Wescott and P. H. Moore-Jansen, “Metric variation in the human occipital bone: forensic anthropological applications,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1159–1163, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  24. R. Gapert, S. Black, and J. Last, “Sex determination from the occipital condyle: Discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century british sample,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 138, no. 4, pp. 384–394, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Scheuer and S. M. Black, The juvenile skeleton, Elsevier Academic Press, London, UK, 2004.
  26. J. Bruzek and P. Murail, “Methodology and reliability of sex determination from the skeleton,” in Forensic Anthropology and Medicine: Complementary Sciences From Recovery to Cause of Death. Springer e-Books, A. Schmitt, E. Cunha, and J. Pinheiro, Eds., pp. 225–242, Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  27. C. S. Larsen, Bioarcheology, Interpreting Behavior from The Human Skeleton, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  28. H. Wolff, “Anmerkungen zur Pathophysiologie der Funktionsstörungen des Kopfgelenkbereiches,” in Der kraniozervikale Übergang, M. Hülse, Ed., Aktuelle, 1998. View at Google Scholar