Research Article

Identification of Constraining Experimental-Design Factors in Mycorrhizal Pot-Growth Studies

Table 2

Root colonization summary for the pot size and water deficit experiment.

Frequency (%)Root Length Colonized (%)Density (mm-1)
Pot sizeIrrigationHyphaeVesiclesArbusculesHyphaeVesiclesArbusculesVesiclesArbuscules

SmallDrought33.6 (6.7)a24.4 (7.1)a25.6 (4.8)a54.0 (5.8)b22.6 (5.2)b28.0 (1.9)c2.6 (0.2)b3.2 (0.1)a
Well-Watered40.8 (3.0)a37.6 (4.1)a25.2 (2.6)a76.4 (5.1)b43.0 (3.6)a35.7 (9.2)bc3.2 (0.3)a3.6 (0.4)a
LargeDrought44.6 (9.7)a34.6 (9.5)a31.0 (8.3)a71.6 (6.1)b24.2 (5.7)b39.5 (6.8)b2.7 (0.2)b3.5 (0.1)a
Well-Watered50.8 (8.4)a38.8 (6.2)a38.2 (7.1)a85.2 (1.1)a30.8 (1.3)b56.1 (2.4)a3.4 (0.4)a3.7 (0.1)a
F-values and levels of significance
Pot size (P)1.9 ns0.6 ns2.9 ns 1.4  ns 0.2 ns1.1 ns
Irrigation (Ir)0.0 ns0.4 ns0.5 ns0.7 ns2.4 ns1.0 ns0.0 ns0.9 ns
PxIr0.8 ns1.4 ns0.4 ns 1.6 ns
Block0.8 ns0.6 ns2.2 ns0.7 ns0.7 ns 0.8 ns1.0 ns

Means ( ) and SE (inside parentheses) are shown,
Shared letters within each column designate treatments that are not significantly different according to Bonferonni and Scheffé mean comparison tests,
“ns” nonsignificant,
,
,
.