Journal of Botany

Journal of Botany / 2011 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 297097 |

R. K. Chaturvedi, A. S. Raghubanshi, J. S. Singh, "Effect of Small-Scale Variations in Environmental Factors on the Distribution of Woody Species in Tropical Deciduous Forests of Vindhyan Highlands, India", Journal of Botany, vol. 2011, Article ID 297097, 10 pages, 2011.

Effect of Small-Scale Variations in Environmental Factors on the Distribution of Woody Species in Tropical Deciduous Forests of Vindhyan Highlands, India

Academic Editor: Guang Sheng Zhou
Received09 Jul 2011
Accepted22 Sep 2011
Published21 Dec 2011


The aim of this study is to investigate the changes in the composition of mature, naturally established and unmanaged TDF in response to small-scale variations in environmental factors. All woody species with a minimum circumference of 10 cm at 1.37 m height were surveyed in forty-five  m plots distributed over 5 sites in the TDF of Vindhyan highlands, India. Cluster analysis identified two distinct groups of plots. Group 1 plots had higher soil moisture content (SMC), clay, organic C, total N, total P, and light attenuation than group 2 plots. A total of 48 native species belonging to 25 families were encountered in the sampled area. High eigenvalues for the first two Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) axes indicated the occurrence of species in distinct groups, and significant correlations of the axes with environmental variables indicated the effect of these variables on species grouping. In conclusion, patchiness in the soil resources needs to be considered in restoration efforts. The results of this study are expected to facilitate the decision regarding choice of species in afforestation programmes for restoring the TDF.

1. Introduction

Tropical forests cover about 30% of the world’s land area and 50% of the world’s forested area which is around 4 billion ha [1, 2]. The dominant vegetation type in tropical forests is the tropical dry forest (TDF) which occupies 42% of the tropical forest area [3]. In India, the share of TDF is 38.2% of the total forest cover [4]. According to Singh et al. [5], the TDF is continuously decreasing in the Vindhyan region and the remnant forest cover exists in the form of noncontiguous patches of varying sizes dominated by single or mixed species. The study of change detection using satellite images (1982–1989) of a part of Vindhyan hills identified only 31% of the forested area which remained unchanged since 1982. About 40% of the total forest area was converted from mixed forest with crown cover >50% to mixed forest with crown cover 30–<50%. The rate of conversion from good to poor forest was 6.6% of the forested area each year and savannization in the forest area took place at a rate of 3.3% per year [6]. This calls for massive restoration efforts through reforestation.

Distribution of plant communities, their species, and structural diversity are highly affected by soil water and soil nutrient status [7]. In environments where soil nutrients are abundant, species allocate more to above-ground parts, have more rapid growth rates, and have higher rates of nutrient uptake per gram of root biomass than species from low-nutrient environments [8]. Soil organic carbon (C) is a major constituent of soil organic matter which has a major effect on forest productivity and sustainability by influencing soil chemical and biological properties [9]. According to Tateno and Takeda [10], soil nitrogen is strongly linked with forest structure and tree species distribution. In various reports, phosphorus has been estimated to be the principal nutrient limiting tree growth and productivity in tropical forests [7].

De Souza et al. [11] reported significant effect of small variations in soil fertility parameters on the distribution of trees in a Brazilian deciduous forest. Patchiness in the composition of Indian TDF was emphasized by Jha and Singh [12]. However, there was a lack of information on the influence of small-scale variation in the environmental factors on the distribution of the tree species. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of small-scale variation in selected environmental factors on the composition of mature, naturally established and unmanaged TDF of Vindhyan highlands. To do so, we first applied cluster analysis to separate the experimental plots on the basis of the selected environmental factors. Finally, we investigated the relationship between the mean values of environmental factors and corresponding woody species composition. The results of this study are expected to facilitate the decision regarding choice of species in afforestation programmes for restoring the TDF.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Site

The present investigation was conducted in five sites, Hathinala West ( N and  E, 291 m.a.s.l.), Gaighat ( N and  E, 245 m.a.s.l.), Harnakachar ( N and  E, 323 m.a.s.l.), Ranitali ( N and  E, 287 m.a.s.l.), and Kotwa ( N and  E, 196 m.a.s.l.). Hathinala, Gaighat, Harnakachar, and Ranitali sites are situated in Sonebhadra district and Kotwa in Mirzapur district of Uttar Pradesh. They occupy land area of 2555, 394, 1507, 2118, and 199 ha, respectively. The area experiences tropical monsoon climate with three seasons in a year, namely, summer (April to mid-June), rainy (mid-June to September), and winter (November to February). The months of March and October constitute transition periods, respectively, between winter and summer and between rainy and winter seasons. According to the data collected from the meteorological stations of the state forest department for 1980–2010, The mean annual rainfall ranges from 1196 mm (Hathinala) to 865 mm (Kotwa site). About 85% of the annual rainfall occurs during the monsoon season from the southwest monsoon, and the remaining from the few showers in December and in May-June. There is an extended dry period of about 9 months in the annual cycle [12]. The maximum monthly temperature varies from 20°C in January to 46°C in June, and the mean minimum monthly temperature reaches 12°C in January and 31°C in May.

2.2. Data Collection

At each site, nine plots, each of 1000 m2 (50 × 20 m) were selected at random for sampling vegetation and soil. Plots were randomly selected to reduce bias caused by within-site differences in soil conditions. Rectangular plots were used because most plant distributions are clumped, and a rectangle can best encompass patches of different species [13]. Further, rectangular quadrats may survey heterogeneity better than square quadrats [14]. The size was decided on the basis of species area curve [15]. In each plot, all woody species with a minimum circumference of 10 cm at 1.37 m height were identified, counted, and measured for basal area. Plant nomenclature was based on “Flora of Madhya Pradesh” 1997 (eds. Mudgal V, Khanna KK, Hajra PK) Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta, India. Soil moisture content (SMC) was measured as percentage by volume by theta probe instrument (type ML 1, Delta-T devices, Cambridge, England) at 10 random locations from all plots. Composite surface soil (0–10 cm) samples were also collected from those locations for chemical analysis. These samples were analysed for texture following Sheldrick and Wang [16]. Analyses of soil samples were also carried out for C [17], total nitrogen (N) [18], and total phosphorus (P) [19] contents. Light attenuation (L) in each plot was measured with a digital lux meter (Lutron LX 101 Lux Meter). It was calculated as follows: Light attenuation is a surrogate for canopy cover; the higher the attenuation, the lower the solar radiation incident on the soil surface and, hence, its effects on SMC.

2.3. Data Analyses

Cluster analysis was performed using the PC-ORD 5 program [20] to identify groups among the sampling plots based on soil physiochemical properties and L. The euclidean distance was used for cluster analysis.

The importance value index (IVI) of each species, was calculated as the sum of relative density, relative frequency, and relative basal area [15]. Species richness [21], species evenness [22], Shannon-Wiener diversity index [23], and Simpson’s index [24] were also calculated. β-diversity was calculated according to Whittaker [22].

Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) was performed by using the PC-ORD 5 program [20] to correlate environmental variables and vegetation variables [11]. Density data for tree and shrub species were used for the construction of main matrix, and environmental variables were selected as second matrix.

3. Results

3.1. Environmental Variables

A cluster analysis based on the soil properties and L of the 45 experimental plots showed two distinct groups (Figure 1). Group 1 consisted of 20 plots (1 to 9 plots of Hathinala; 16 to 18 plots of Gaighat; 19, 20, and 25 to 27 of Harnakachar; 28, 35, and 36 of Ranitali). Group 2 consisted of the remaining 25 plots (10 to 15 of Gaighat; 21 to 24 of Harnakachar; 29 to 34 of Ranitali; 37 to 45 of Kotwa). All the plots of Hathinala were placed in group 1, and all the plots of Kotwa were categorized in group 2 showing a very high difference in environmental variables between the two sites. The largest variation between the two groups was in P, the mean value for group 1 (0.04%) being more than five times the mean value for group 2 (0.006%) (Figure 2). Significant differences were found in SMC, clay, silt, rockiness, C, N, P, and L between the two groups; however, there was no significant difference in sand content (Figure 2).

3.2. Phytosociological Survey

A total of 4, 680 individuals belonging to 48 species and 25 families were encountered in the 45 experimental plots with a total area of 4.5 ha (Table 1). Leguminosae (10), Rubiaceae (5), Anacardiaceae (3), Combretaceae (3), Euphorbiaceae (3), and Rhamnaceae (3) were the families with the largest number of species. Of the 48 species, 30 were common to both groups, whereas 13 were exclusive to group 1 and 5 to group 2. The species that scored maximum IVI in group 1 was Terminalia tomentosa and in group 2 Dendrocalamus strictus (Table 1). The most important species in both of the groups were Terminalia tomentosa, Shorea robusta, Diospyros melanoxylon, Buchanania lanzan, Lagerstroemia parviflora, Soymida febrifuga, Anogeissus latifolia, and Acacia catechu. These species accounted for 62% of the total IVI in group 1 and 48% in group 2 (Table 1). Bridelia retusa, Adina cordifolia, Bauhinia racemosa, Pterocarpus marsupium, Gardenia turgida, Semecarpus anacardium, Mitragyna parvifolia, Grewia serrulata, Cassia fistula, Ougeinia oogenesis, Schleichera oleosa, Terminalia chebula, and Albizia odoratissima were exclusive to group 1, whereas Abrus precatorius, Dendrocalamus strictus, Ficus racemosa, Lantana camara, and Sterculia urens were exclusive to group 2. In group 1, there were 22 species per ha, whereas group 2 consisted of 14 species per ha (Table 2). Margalef’s species richness and Whittaker’s species evenness were also greater in group 1 compared to group 2; whereas β-diversity was maximum in group 2 compared to group 1 (Table 2). Shannon-Wiener index did not differ significantly between the two groups (Table 2); however, site-level differences were significant and the index ranged from 1.48 at Kotwa to 2.52 at Hathinala. The distribution of tree circumference varied significantly between the two groups for the individuals having stem circumference less than 90 cm (Figure 3). The number of stems having circumference less than 90 cm was fewer in group 2 compared to group 1 (Figure 3).

SpeciesFamilyGroup 1Group 2

Terminalia tomentosa (Roxb.) Wight & Arn.Combretaceae33510.21335.80
Shorea robusta Gaertn. f.Dipterocarpaceae3249.821967.39
Diospyros melanoxylon Roxb.Ebenaceae3228.451766.56
Buchanania lanzan Spreng.Anacardiaceae1997.441365.71
Lagerstroemia parviflora Roxb.Lythraceae2497.232038.20
Soymida febrifuga A. Juss.Meliaceae2116.511013.89
Anogeissus latifolia (Roxb. ex DC.) Wall. ex Guill. & Perr.Combretaceae1886.281014.67
Acacia catechu (L.) Willd.Mimosaceae2206.011345.35
Hardwickia binata Roxb.Caesalpiniaceae1204.41331.83
Bridelia retusa (L.) A. Juss.Euphorbiaceae472.3400
Holarrhena antidysenterica Wall.Apocynaceae812.28863.30
Boswellia serrata Triana. & Planch.Burseraceae162.2420.46
Gardenia latifolia Aiton.Rubiaceae642.0630.43
Adina cordifolia (Roxb.) Ridsdale.Rubiaceae572.0200
Miliusa tomentosa (Roxb.) J. Sinclair.Annonaceae281.8450.59
Emblica officinalis Gaertn.Euphorbiaceae91.71161.55
Lannea coromandelica L.Anacardiaceae141.62403.34
Flacourtia indica Merr.Flacourtiaceae301.61141.35
Zizyphus glaberrima Satap.Rhamnaceae231.59572.71
Bauhinia racemosa Lam.Caesalpiniaceae301.4200
Madhuca longifolia (J.König ex L.) J.F.Macbr.Sapotaceae230.93160.86
Zizyphus oenoplea Mill.Rhamnaceae210.92372.14
Cassia siamea Lam.Caesalpiniaceae280.8710.15
Acacia auriculiformis A.Cunn. ex Benth.Mimosaceae300.85301.19
Zizyphus nummularia Wight and Am.Rhamnaceae100.8180.89
Nyctanthes arbor-tristis Linn.Oleaceae310.78922.96
Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb.Fabaceae110.7400
Gardenia turgida Roxb.Rubiaceae70.7400
Elaeodendron glaucum (Rottb.) Pers.Celastraceae70.7350.94
Holoptelea integrifolia (Roxb.) Planch.Ulmaceae60.6720.29
Semecarpus anacardium L.f.Anacardiaceae230.6600
Mitragyna parvifolia (Roxb.) Korth.Rubiaceae150.6200
Grewia serrulata DC.Tiliaceae70.5300
Cassia fistula L.Fabaceae150.4700
Carissa spinarum L.Apocynaceae60.4470.85
Woodfordia fruticosa (L.) Kurz.Lythraceae80.43331.73
Ougeinia oogenesis Hochreut.Leguminosae40.3700
Schrebera swietenioides Roxb.Oleaceae90.3430.29
Schleichera oleosa (Lour.) Oken.Sapindaceae60.3100
Hymenodictyon excelsum (Roxb.) Wall. in Roth.Rubiaceae20.2440.44
Terminalia chebula  Retz.Combretaceae10.1700
Azadirachta indica A. Juss.Meliaceae10.1730.62
Albizia odoratissima Roxb.Mimosaceae20.1400
Abrus precatorius L.Fabaceae00181.08
Dendrocalamus strictus (Roxb.) Nees.Poaceae0010420.07
Ficus racemosa Linn.Moraceae00371.79
Lantana camara L.Verbenaceae0010.14
Sterculia urens Roxb.Sterculiaceae0030.47

ParametersGroup 1Group 2

Total number of species4335
Number of species per ha2214
Number of exclusive species135
Number of stems per ha142007360
Species richness (Margalef)5.284.65
Species evenness (Whittaker)7.406.78
Shannon-Wiener index2.942.94
Simpson’s index0.070.07
Beta diversity2.673.14

3.3. Relationships between Tree Communities and Soil Properties

Results of canonical correspondence analysis using the density data for all species and soil properties and L as environmental variables are presented in Figure 4. Eigenvalues for CCA axes 1, 2, and 3 were 0.443, 0.294, and 0.159, respectively, and the species environment correlations for the axes were 0.889, 0.870, and 0.775, respectively. High eigenvalues for the first two axes indicated the occurrence of species in distinct groups [25], and significant correlations of the axes with environmental variables indicated the effect of these variables on species grouping (Table 3). First axis showed significant positive correlation with SMC , ), total N (, ), P (, ), clay (, ), and L (, ) and negative with sand (, ) and rockiness (, ). Second axis showed significant positive associations with P (, ) and sand (, ) and negative with silt , ) and rockiness (, ). Third axis was positively correlated with silt , ) and rockiness (, ) and negatively with C (, ), N (, ), sand (, ), and L (, ).

Axis 1Axis 2Axis 3

Species-environment correlation0.8890.8700.775
Cumulative percentage of variance for species20.133.440.6
Species-environment variance20.113.37.2

Adina cordifolia, Albizia odoratissima, Bauhinia racemosa, Bridelia retusa, Cassia fistula, Flacourtia indica, Gardenia latifolia, Grewia serrulata, Miliusa tomentosa, Mitragyna parvifolia, Ougeinia oogenesis, Pterocarpus marsupium, Schleichera oleosa, Schrebera swietenioides, Semecarpus anacardium, Shorea robusta, Terminalia chebula, and Terminalia tomentosa were more frequent in plots with high SMC, clay, N, P, and L (upper left quadrant in Figure 4). Carissa spinarum, Dendrocalamus strictus, Ficus racemosa, Holarrhena antidysenterica, Nyctanthes arbor-tristis, Zizyphus glaberrima, and Zizyphus oenoplea were dominant in plots with high rockiness and sand content (Figure 4). Abrus precatorius, Acacia auriculiformis, Anogeissus latifolia, Azadirachta indica, Buchanania lanzan, Cassia siamea, Diospyros melanoxylon, Elaeodendron glaucum, Emblica officinalis, Lagerstroemia parviflora, Lannea coromandelica, Lantana camara, and Woodfordia fruticosa were associated with rocky soil with high silt content. Acacia catechu, Boswellia serrata, Gardenia turgida, Hardwickia binata, Holoptelea integrifolia, Hymenodictyon excelsum, Soymida febrifuga, and Zizyphus nummularia were abundantly present in plots with high C, N, sand, and L.

4. Discussion

There was significant difference in SMC in the studied plots of the two groups. Group 1 having high SMC also had greater C, N, P, clay, and L compared to group 2, which had greater silt and rockiness. According to Yang et al. [26], high SMC lowers the rate of organic matter decomposition, which increases C in soils having high moisture content. Yang et al. [27] have also stressed the importance of C and N in structuring the diversity of desert riparian forest of China. Nitrogen mineralization [28] and P availability [29] in soil have also been reported to increase at high SMC. Clay-rich soils have greater availability of water at the surface compared to sand-rich soils where water availability to plants is at greater depths [30]. Clay-rich soils are normally also rich in soil organic matter [31]. According to Lowman [32], L is also predicted to vary according to canopy density and structure.

The number of species in semideciduous forests (50–70) and rainforests (100–150) is greater than in tropical deciduous forests [33]. In tropical deciduous forests, species richness is significantly lower due to anthropogenic disturbances, such as burning, grazing, and wood collection [34]. The species diversity is also low in these forests, and only few species show high dominance [35]. According to Gentry [33], the common species in these forests are generally concentrated in few important families, and it is assumed that the abundance of species is mostly governed by ecological factors rather than nonequilibrium chance-based dynamics [11]. Forest structure and species diversity have been widely studied in various regions of the tropics (e.g., [3641]). Gentry [42] recorded 275–283 tree species ha−1 for trees ≥10 cm in diameter at breast height (DBH) at Yanamono and Mishana near Iquitos, Peru. Valencia et al. [43] enumerated 307 species ha−1 for the same DBH in Amazonian Ecuador. These figures formed the world highest record of tree species on a hectare basis for stem ≥10 cm DBH [37]. A direct comparison of tree inventories across tropical forests is difficult due to lack of uniformity in the criteria considered and method employed. In the present study, 48 species were enumerated in the Vindhyan dry tropical forest within the 4.5 ha area for woody species ≥10 cm circumference. The values reported from other large-scale permanent plot inventories (for trees ≥10 cm DBH, i.e., ≥31.4 cm circumference) were as follows: 37 species in Kampong Thom province, Cambodia [44]; 49 species in Vindhyan dry tropical forest, India [45]; 996 species in 52 ha plot of Lambir Hills National Park, Malaysia [46]; 660 species in a 50 ha plot of Pasoh Forest reserve, Malaysia [47]; 229 species in a 50 ha plot in Barro Colorado Island, Panama [48]; 146 species in a 30 ha plot at Varagaliar, Anamalais, Western Ghat, India [37]; 164 species in a 25 ha plot of Sinharaja Biosphere Reserve, Sri Lanka [46].

For tree species having ≥10 cm DBH, Top et al. [44] found a basal area of 23 m2 ha−1 in Kampong Thom province, Cambodia, and Backéus et al. [49] reported 3.9 to 16.7 m2 ha−1 in Miombo woodlands, Tanzania. Chittibabu and Parthasarathy [50] recorded 23 m2 ha−1 in a highly disturbed site of Mottukkadu Shola and 54 m2 ha−1 in an undisturbed site at Perumakkai Shola, Kolli hills, Eastern Ghats, India. In Vindhyan dry tropical forest, India, Sagar and Singh [51] reported 1.31 to 13.8 m2 ha−1 tree basal area in the five locations. In this study, we report a range of 3.1 m2 ha−1 at the driest site Kotwa to 18.0 m2 ha−1 at the moist site Hathinala for woody species having ≥10 cm circumference. In the two groups, the mean value was 14.3 m2 ha−1 for group 1 and 13.3 m2 ha−1 for group 2.

The most species-rich family in this study is Leguminosae, and it is also reported by Gentry [33] as a common family in tropical dry forests. Singh et al. [52] and Sagar et al. [45] have reported Acacia catechu, Anogeissus latifolia, Diospyros melanoxylon, Lagerstroemia parviflora, and Hardwickia binata as the most frequent tree species in Vindhyan highlands, and, according to Sagar et al. [45], Shorea robusta is the characteristic species of Hathinala site. The low Shannon-Wiener index for both Groups in this study reflects higher dominance of few species (Terminalia tomentosa, Shorea robusta, Diospyros melanoxylon, Buchanania lanzan, and Lagerstroemia parviflora). Sagar et al. [53] and Raghubanshi and Tripathi [54] have also reported low Shannon-Wiener index in different tree communities of Vindhyan highlands. According to Martijena and Bullock [55], the greater dominance of few species in a forest shows that its formation has taken place under extreme environmental conditions such as shallow soils and low water availability. The lowest Shannon-Wiener index of the driest Kotwa site reflects the dominance of only a few species in the low SMC regime. The significant difference in the distribution of the circumference of woody species in the two groups of plots shows a better regeneration in more moist group 1 plots.

The CCA results in our study showed that the distributional response to small variation in environmental variables differed among the woody species. In other studies, Clark et al. [56] showed the effect of topography and soil properties in the distribution of tree species in a tropical forest of Costa Rica. De Souza et al. [11] analyzed the influence of soil fertility on the distribution of tree species in 1 ha area in a deciduous forest of Brazil and reported that edaphic preferences were not absolute to the extent of determining the presence or absence of a species. Pausas and Austin [57] suggested that, over any large region, the species distribution is likely to be governed by two or more environmental factors and not by a single factor. Russo et al. [58] suggested the demographic responses of the species to resource variations among soil types to play an important role in generating and maintaining the edaphically biased spatial distributions of tree species at Lambir in a Bornean rainforest. In our study involving a total of 4.5 ha, the presence or absence of several species was determined by edaphic preferences.

Our study, thus, indicated that small variations in the environmental variables can determine the distribution of woody species resulting into patchiness in the composition of the TDF. While designing the reforestation programmes for the TDF, the response of different species to the patchiness in edaphic resources has to be kept in mind.


The authors thank the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India for the financial support. J. S. Singh is supported under NASI Senior Scientist Scheme.


  1. FAO, “Global forest resources assessment 2000—Main report, FAO Forestry Paper, Vol. 140,” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  2. FAO, “FAOSTAT Online Statistical Service,” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  3. L. Galicia, A. E. Zarco-Arista, K. I. Mendoza-Robles, J. L. Palacio-Prieto, and A. García-Romero, “Land use/cover, landforms and fragmentation patterns in a tropical dry forest in the southern Pacific region of Mexico,” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 137–154, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. MoEF, “National Forestry Action Plan,” Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi, India, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  5. J. S. Singh, K. P. Singh, and M. Agrawal, “Environmental degradation of the Obra-Renukoot-Singrauli area, India, and its impact on natural and derived ecosystems,” Environmentalist, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 171–180, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  6. A. S. Raghubanshi, C. S. Jha, C. B. Pandey, L. Singh, and J. S. Singh, “Effects of forest conversion on vegetation and soil carbon and functional trait of resulting vegetation,” in Impact of Global Climate Changes on Photosynthesis and Plant Productivity, Y. P. Abrol, P. N. Wattal, A. Gnanum, D. R. Govindji, and A. H. Ort, Eds., pp. 723–749, Teramura. Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi, India, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  7. P. A. Palmiotto, S. J. Davies, K. A. Vogt, M. S. Ashton, D. J. Vogt, and P. S. Ashton, “Soil-related habitat specialization in dipterocarp rain forest tree species in Borneo,” Journal of Ecology, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 609–623, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. Tilman, “On the meaning of competition and the mechanisms of competitive superiority,” Functional Ecology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 304–315, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  9. J. Goma-Tchimbakala, “Carbon and nitrogen storage in soil aggregates from different Terminalia superba age plantations and natural forest in Kouilou, Congo,” International Journal of Soil Science, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 104–113, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Tateno and H. Takeda, “Forest structure and tree species distribution in relation to topography-mediated heterogeneity of soil nitrogen and light at the forest floor,” Ecological Research, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 559–571, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. P. De Souza, G. M. Araújo, and M. Haridasan, “Influence of soil fertility on the distribution of tree species in a deciduous forest in the Triângulo Mineiro region of Brazil,” Plant Ecology, vol. 191, no. 2, pp. 253–263, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. S. Jha and J. S. Singh, “Compositions and dynamics of dry tropical forest in relation to soil texture,” Journal of Vegetation Science, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 609–614, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  13. K. A. Kershaw, Quantitive and Dynamic Ecology, Edward Arnold, London, UK, 1964.
  14. G. C. Reese, K. R. Wilson, J. A. Hoeting, and C. H. Flather, “Factors affecting species distribution predictions: a simulation modeling experiment,” Ecological Applications, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 554–564, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  15. D. Mueller-Dombois and H. Ellenberg, Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology, John Wiley & Sons, NewYork, NY, USA, 1974.
  16. B. H. Sheldrick and C. Wang, “Particle-size distribution,” in Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, M. R. Carter, Ed., pp. 499–511, Canadian Society of Soil Science, Lewis, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  17. A. Walkley and I. A. Black, “An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method,” Soil Science, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 29–38, 1934. View at: Google Scholar
  18. J. M. Bremner and C. S. Mulvaney, “Nitrogen-total,” in Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agronomy Monograph No. 9, A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney, Eds., pp. 595–924, American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wis, USA, 2nd edition, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  19. S. R. Olsen and L. E. Sommers, “Phosphorus,” in Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agronomy Monograph No. 9, A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney, Eds., pp. 403–430, American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wis, USA, 2nd edition, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  20. B. McCune and M. J. Mefford, Multivariate Analysis on the PC-ORD System, Version 5, MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Ore, USA, 2005.
  21. R. Margalef, “Information theory in ecology,” General Systems, vol. 3, pp. 36–71, 1958, Translated in Royal Academy of Science and Arts, Barcelona, vol. 32, pp. 373–449, 1957. View at: Google Scholar
  22. R. H. Whittaker, “Evolution and measurement of species diversity,” Taxon, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 213–251, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  23. C. E. Shannon and W. Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill, USA, 1949.
  24. E. C. Pielou, Mathematical Ecology, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1977.
  25. C. J. F. Ter Braak, “Ordination,” in Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology, H. G. Jongman, C. J. F. Ter Braak, and O. F. R. van Tongeren, Eds., pp. 91–173, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  26. X. Yang, M. Wang, Y. Huang, and Y. Wang, “A one-compartment model to study soil carbon decomposition rate at equilibrium situation,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 63–73, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y. Yang, J. Fang, P. Smith et al., “Changes in topsoil carbon stock in the Tibetan grasslands between the 1980s and 2004,” Global Change Biology, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 2723–2729, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. G. Stanford and E. Epstein, “Nitrogen mineralization-water relations in soils,” Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, vol. 38, pp. 103–107, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  29. M. Van Oorschot, E. Robbemont, M. Boerstal, I. Van Strien, and M. Van Kerkhoven-Schmitz, “Effects of enhanced nutrient availability on plant and soil nutrient dynamics in two English riverine ecosystems,” Journal of Ecology, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 167–179, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  30. N. B. English, J. F. Weltzin, A. Fravolini, L. Thomas, and D. G. Williams, “The influence of soil texture and vegetation on soil moisture under rainout shelters in a semi-desert grassland,” Journal of Arid Environments, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 324–343, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. S. Jenkinson, “The Rothamsted long-term experiments: are they still of use?” Agronomy Journal, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 2–10, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  32. M. D. Lowman, “Light interception and its relation to structural differences in three Australian rainforest canopies,” Australian Journal of Ecology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 163–170, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  33. A. H. Gentry, “Diversity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forests,” in Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests, S. H. Bullock, H. A. Mooney, and E. Medina, Eds., pp. 146–194, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  34. R. K. Chaturvedi, Plant functional traits in dry deciduous forests of India, Ph.D. thesis, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India, 2010.
  35. J. A. Ratter, “Transition between cerradão and forest vegetation in Brazil,” in Nature and Dynamics of Forest-Savanna Boundaries, P. A. Furley, J. Proctor, and J. A. Ratter, Eds., pp. 417–429, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  36. S. I. Aiba and K. Kitayama, “Structure, composition and species diversity in an altitude-substrate matrix of rain forest tree communities on Mount Kinabalu, Borneo,” Plant Ecology, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 139–157, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. N. Ayyappan and N. Parthasarathy, “Biodiversity inventory of trees in a large-scale permanent plot of tropical evergreen forest at Varagalaiar, Anamalais, Western Ghats, India,” Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1533–1554, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. T. W. Gillespie, A. Grijalva, and C. N. Farris, “Diversity, composition, and structure of tropical dry forests in Central America,” Plant Ecology, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 37–47, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. P. S. Swamy, S. M. Sundarapandian, P. Chandrasekar, and S. Chandrasekaran, “Plant species diversity and tree population structure of a humid tropical forest in Tamil Nadu, India,” Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1643–1669, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. W. Huang, V. Pohjonen, S. Johansson, M. Nashanda, M. I. L. Katigula, and O. Luukkanen, “Species diversity, forest structure and species composition in Tanzanian tropical forests,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 173, no. 1–3, pp. 11–24, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. F. Q. Brearley, S. Prajadinata, P. S. Kidd, J. Proctor, and Suriantata, “Structure and floristics of an old secondary rain forest in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, and a comparison with adjacent primary forest,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 195, no. 3, pp. 385–397, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. H. Gentry, “Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographic gradients,” Annals of Missouri Botanical Garden, vol. 75, pp. 1–34, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  43. R. Valencia, H. Balslev, and C. G. Paz y Mino, “High tree alpha-diversity in Amazonian Ecuador,” Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  44. N. Top, N. Mizoue, S. Ito, S. Kai, T. Nakao, and S. Ty, “Effects of population density on forest structure and species richness and diversity of trees in Kampong Thom Province, Cambodia,” Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 717–738, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. R. Sagar, A. S. Raghubanshi, and J. S. Singh, “Tree species composition, dispersion and diversity along a disturbance gradient in a dry tropical forest region of India,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 186, no. 1–3, pp. 61–71, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. R. Condit, P. S. Ashton, P. Baker et al., “Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species,” Science, vol. 288, no. 5470, pp. 1414–1418, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. K. M. Kochummen, J. V. Lafrankie, and N. Manokaran, “Floristic composition of Pasoh Forest Reserve, A lowland rain forest in Malaysia,” Journal of Tropical Forest Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  48. R. Condit, S. P. Hubbell, J. V. Lafrankie et al., “Species-area and species-individual relationships for tropical trees: a comparison of three 50-ha plots,” Journal of Ecology, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 549–562, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  49. I. Backéus, B. Pettersson, L. Strömquist, and C. Ruffo, “Tree communities and structural dynamics in miombo (Brachystegia-Julbernardia) woodland, Tanzania,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 230, no. 1–3, pp. 171–178, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. V. Chittibabu and N. Parthasarathy, “Attenuated tree species diversity in human-impacted tropical evergreen forest sites at Kolli hills, Eastern Ghats, India,” Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1493–1519, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. R. Sagar and J. S. Singh, “Tree density, basal area and species diversity in a disturbed dry tropical forest of northern India: implications for conservation,” Environmental Conservation, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 256–262, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. R. S. Singh, S. C. Srivastava, A. S. Raghubanshi, J. S. Singh, and S. P. Singh, “Microbial C, N and P in dry tropical savanna: effects of burning and grazing,” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 869–878, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  53. R. Sagar, A. S. Raghubanshi, and J. S. Singh, “Comparison of community composition and species diversity of understorey and overstorey tree species in a dry tropical forest of northern India,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1037–1046, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. A. S. Raghubanshi and A. Tripathi, “Effect of disturbance, habitat fragmentation and alien invasive plants on floral diversity in dry tropical forests of Vindhyan highland: a review,” Tropical Ecology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  55. N. D. Martijena and S. H. Bullock, “Monospecific dominance of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico,” Journal of Biogeography, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  56. D. B. Clark, D. A. Clark, and J. M. Read, “Edaphic variation and the mesoscale distribution of tree species in a neotropical rain forest,” Journal of Ecology, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 101–112, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. J. G. Pausas and M. P. Austin, “Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: an appraisal,” Journal of Vegetation Science, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 153–166, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  58. S. E. Russo, S. J. Davies, D. A. King, and S. Tan, “Soil-related performance variation and distributions of tree species in a Bornean rain forest,” Journal of Ecology, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 879–889, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 R. K. Chaturvedi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles