Corrigendum

Corrigendum to “Are Sacred Groves of Kathmandu Valley Efficient in Sequestering Carbon?”

Table 2

Carbon stock (per ha) of trees in different forests of the study area.

SNTree speciesForest types
Schima-PyrusMyrsine-PerseaQuercus-MyrsineNeolitsea cuipala

1Albizia julibrissin Durazz.---0.90

2Albizia lebbeck (L.) Benth.---0.43

3Alnus nepalensis D. Don.0.34--

4Areca catechu L.---1.24

5Araucaria bidwillii Hook.3.59--

6Castanopsis indica (Roxb.) Miq.---31.29

7Castanopsis tribuloides (Sm.) A. DC.0.097.11-5.37

8Cassia fistula L.---3.45

9Celtis australis L.2.02--0.54

10Choerospondias axillaris (Roxb.) Burtt & Hill.-3.28-13.74

11Eurya acuminate DC.0.11--

12Hymenodictyon excelsum (Roxb.) Wall.0.12--0.48

13Myrica esculenta Buch.-Ham. ex. D. Don.-1.20-1.75

14Myrsine capitellata Wall.0.9610,817.122.03

15Myrsine semiserrata Wall.-0.42-0.73

16Neolitsea cuipala (Buch.-Ham. ex D. Don.) Kosterm.---49.71

17Persea odoratissima (Ness) Kosterm.10.4110.0911.220.52

18Pyrus pashia Buch-Ham. ex. D. Don.2.241.11-

19Quercus glauca Thunb.2.281.9616.37

20Rhus succedanea L.---0.64

21Sapium insigne (Royle) Benth. ex. Hook. F.---0.57

22Schima wallichii (DC.) Korth.51.6818.2741.8227.02

23Stranvaesia nussia (D. Don.) Decne.0.361.53-

24Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels.1.948.921.052.96

25Ziziphus incurva Roxb.0.22--