Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Biomedical Education
Volume 2014, Article ID 412786, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/412786
Research Article

Mobile Learning in a Rural Medical School: Feasibility and Educational Benefits in Campus and Clinical Settings

1School of Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Northways Road, Churchill, VIC 3842, Australia
2HealthPEER, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
3Information Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia

Received 30 December 2013; Accepted 11 June 2014; Published 29 June 2014

Academic Editor: Chandrashekhar T. Sreeramareddy

Copyright © 2014 Debra Nestel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Gippsland Medical School, http://www.med.monash.edu.au/medical/gippsland/.
  2. S. J. Geddes, “Mobile learning in the 21st century: benefit for learners,” Knowledge Tree e-journal, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 214–228, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Traxler, “Defining mobile learning,” in Mobile Learning 2005, P. Isaias, C. Borg, P. Kommers, and P. Bonanno, Eds., International Association for development of the Information Society Press, Valletta, Malta, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  4. D. Nestel, H. Brenton, and R. Kneebone, “Handheld computers in veterinary medical education: a view from human medical education,” Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 121–126, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Seabra, M. Srougi, R. Baptista, L. J. Nesrallah, V. Ortiz, and D. Sigulem, “Computer aided learning versus standard lecture for undergraduate education in urology,” Journal of Urology, vol. 171, no. 3, pp. 1220–1222, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. Yamey, “The professor of “telepreventive medicine”,” British Medical Journal, vol. 328, no. 7449, article 1158, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. W. Callas, T. F. Bertsch, M. P. Caputo, B. S. Flynn, S. Doheny-Farina, and M. A. Ricci, “Medical student evaluations of lectures attended in person or from rural sites via interactive videoconferencing,” Teaching and Learning in Medicine, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 46–50, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. J. Solomon, G. S. Ferenchick, H. S. Laird-Fick, and K. Kavanaugh, “A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats ISRCTN40455708,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 4, article 27, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. C. Stain, M. Mitchell, R. Belue et al., “Objective assessment of videoconferenced lectures in a surgical clerkship,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 81–84, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. M. Fleiszer, N. H. Posel, and S. P. Steacy, “New directions in medical e-curricula and the use of digital repositories,” Academic Medicine, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 229–235, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Howatson-Jones, “Designing web-based education courses for nurses,” Nursing standard, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 41–44, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. W. Matkin, “Distance education: its concepts and constructs,” Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 220–225, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. B. McGee and M. Begg, “What medical educators need to know about ‘Web 2.0’,” Medical Teacher, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 164–169, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. G. Ruiz, M. J. Mintzer, and R. M. Leipzig, “The impact of e-learning in medical education,” Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 207–212, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. M. Sargeant, “Medical education for rural areas: opportunities and challenges for information and communications technologies,” Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 301–307, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. H. Sims, N. Howell, and B. Harbison, “Videoconferencing in a veterinary curriculum,” Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 299–310, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Nestel, A. Ng, K. Gray et al., “Evaluation of mobile learning: students' experiences in a new rural-based medical school,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 10, no. 1, article 57, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Varsavsky, W. McKenzie, G. Romeo, and L. Webster, InterLearn—A Tool for Collaborative Learning, Ascilite, Auckland, New Zealand, 2002.
  19. R. S. Barbour, “Making sense of focus groups,” Medical Education, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 742–750, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Kitzinger, “The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants,” Sociology of Health & Illness, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 103–121, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  21. J. Kitzinger, “Focus groups,” in Qualitative Research in Health Care, C. Pope and N. Mays, Eds., pp. 21–31, BMJ, Oxford, UK, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  22. D. Morgan, “Focus groups,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 22, pp. 129–152, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. D. L. Morgan, Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 1997.
  24. D. Mertens, Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2005.
  25. K. Garman, “Eastside, westside... an exercise in applying document analysis techniques in educational evaluation,” Research on Evaluation Program Paper and Report Series 78, Northwest Regional Educational Lab, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  26. S. Merriam, Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1977.
  27. L. Prior, Using Documents in Social Research, Sage, London, UK, 2003.
  28. J. Scott, Documentary Research, Sage, London, UK, 2006.
  29. M. Patton, Qualitative Research Evaluation Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 3rd edition, 2002.