Journal of Catalysts

Journal of Catalysts / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 413693 |

A. El Yadini, H. Saufi, P. S. M. Dunlop, J. Anthony Byrne, M. El Azzouzi, S. El Hajjaji, "Supported TiO2 on Borosilicate Glass Plates for Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Fenamiphos", Journal of Catalysts, vol. 2014, Article ID 413693, 8 pages, 2014.

Supported TiO2 on Borosilicate Glass Plates for Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Fenamiphos

Academic Editor: Raghunath V. Chaudhari
Received04 Sep 2013
Revised17 Nov 2013
Accepted04 Dec 2013
Published15 Jan 2014


Supported titanium dioxide (TiO2) was investigated for the photodegradation of the insecticide fenamiphos in water. The photocatalyst was immobilised on borosilicate glass plates and the kinetics of degradation were studied in a stirred tank reactor under UV irradiation. Two types of TiO2, for example, Millennium PC500 (100% anatase) and Degussa P25 (80% anatase, 20% rutile), were used. Their activities have been based on the rates of insecticide disappearance. Experiments were investigated to evaluate the effect of pH and initial concentrations of fenamiphos as well as catalyst doses on the photocatalytic degradation of fenamiphos. Kinetic parameters were experimentally determined and an apparent first-order kinetic was observed. For photolysis process of fenamiphos, two photoproducts were identified and characterized using high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS). The plausible mechanism of photolysis involved is the oxidation of sulfonamide group. In presence of photocatalyst TiO2, photodegradation was observed. Under identical conditions, Degussa P25 shows higher photocatalytic activity in regard to PC500 Millennium and complete degradation was observed after 180 min.

1. Introduction

In recent years, novel methods for water, soil, and air purification have been developed including chemical, electrochemical, and photochemical processes [14]. Indeed, photocatalytic degradation has been shown to be a promising technology for the treatment of water contaminated with organic and inorganic pollutants [1, 2]. Furthermore, photocatalysis has been reported to be effective for the degradation of persistent organic pollutants, such as pesticides, exhibiting chemical stability and resistance to natural biodegradation in water [511].

Using titanium dioxide as photocatalyst has been extensively investigated as an alternative physical-chemical process for decontamination of water pollution. Thus, the use of UV energy and TiO2 as semiconductor either in suspension or immobilized on a thin layer can completely degrade or mineralize organic pollutants [1217]. The Degussa P25 TiO2-type is a commercially available powder preparation and has emerged as the research standard in the field of photocatalysis. However, since the final filtration of titania powders in suspension for the release of cleaned water and the recovery of the catalysts is a tedious process, titania has been successfully deposited on different supports [1824].

The pesticide selected here is fenamiphos (ethyl 4-methylthio-m-tolyl isopropylphosphoramidate) which is a typical organophosphate derivative and blocks the enzyme acetylcholinesterase in the target pests [25]. Generally, under environmental conditions, fenamiphos can be oxidized primarily to fenamiphos sulfoxide (FSO) followed by further oxidation to fenamiphos sulfone (FSO2) [2628]. These oxidation products have nematicidal activity and toxicity similar to the parent compound, but they are much more mobile and persistent [27]. The soils of a neutral nature favour the accumulation of residues of this pesticide for a longer time which may contribute to groundwater pollution [29].

In this work, the original titania has been deposited on glass supports to be easily removed and recycled. The supporting substrates were borosilicate glass plates, transparent to UVA.  The aim of this work is to study the photocatalytic degradation kinetics of fenamiphos by using these immobilised films of TiO2 in a stirred tank reactor. Both PC500 and P25 titanium dioxide were used as photocatalysts. The kinetics of degradation were determined at different pH and temperature values. In parallel, the effect of catalyst loading as immobilised films was studied to optimise the fenamiphos degradation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Commercial fenamiphos with 99.5% purity was used. The absorbance spectrum of fenamiphos in aqueous solution is presented in Figure 1. All other chemicals were of analytical grade and were used without further purification. Solutions were prepared with high purity water. Also, all solvents used for HPLC analysis were of chromatography grade. A stock fenamiphos standard solution (1000 ppm in water) was prepared and an aliquot stock solution of 10 ppm was prepared.

2.2. Immobilisation of TiO2

TiO2 was immobilised on borosilicate glass using spray coating technique [18, 23]. This is a simple and effective means to produce coatings on conducting and nonconducting supporting substrates. The process is not limited to substrate sizes and involves minimal equipment, operator training, and time. Two commercial preparations of TiO2 were used, that is, Degussa P25 (now Evonik Aeroxide P25) and Millennium PC500 (Table 1). The borosilicate glass plates (110 mm × 110 mm) were cleaned by sonication in hot 5% Decon 90/water solution, rinsed three times in distilled water, and then dried under a stream of nitrogen gas. The plates were then dried and weighed. TiO2 was spray coated using a 5% TiO2 methanol suspension using a lab spray gun. The spray gun reservoir was shaken between applications to ensure that the catalyst powders remained in suspension. The plates were dried after each coating using an IR lamp. This procedure was repeated to produce plates with a range of TiO2 loadings. The plates were annealed in air at 673 K for 1 h to improve particle adhesion to the glass and particle-particle cohesion. Gravimetric analysis of the plates was used to determine the TiO2 loading. Glass plates with catalyst loadings ranging from 0.2 to 1.2 mg/cm2 were produced for each photocatalyst. The borosilicate glass has a refractive index of 1.489 at  nm, which gives a corresponding loss due to reflection of a perpendicular beam of 3.8%.

ProductSupplierCompositionCrystallites size (nm)Surface area (m2/g)

P25DegussaAnatase/rutile (4/1)25–30

2.3. Photocatalytic Reactor

A custom-built stirred tank photoreactor (STR), previously reported [18, 23, 24], was used in this study. The closed system consisted of a water-jacketed walled vessel reservoir and a stainless steel propeller in order to create a turbulent flow. Thus, good mass transfer behaviour is obtained based on a turbulent flow inside the reactor. This principle transports the organic pollutant towards the coated TiO2 plate and disperses oxygen from the headspace into the liquid. The TiO2 coated glass plate was illuminated from below by PL-S 9 W/10 UV-A fluorescent lamps (Philips) with a stable output between 350 and 400 nm (peak emission at 370 nm) or HPK 125 W mercury lamp with a high level of UV radiation (peak emission at 365 nm), positioned at a distance of 2.5 cm under the TiO2 glass plate. The light intensity entering the reactor was determined by potassium ferrioxalate actinometry technique. Oxygen (99.5%) or air was added to the headspace of the reactor at a constant flow of 900 cm3 min−1. A schematic representation of the STR is given in Figure 2.

2.4. Photocatalytic Experiments and Kinetics

Prior to sample irradiation, the UVA lamps were allowed to stabilize for a period of 20 min. An aqueous solution of fenamiphos was added to the reactor and equilibrated in the dark at the studied pH and temperature. For photolysis experiments (UVA only), a borosilicate glass plate was used without the TiO2 coating. Dark control experiments were also carried out to investigate adsorption of fenamiphos to the TiO2 films. Degradation of micropollutants in the environment is mainly driven by different environmental forces such as biotic degradation. Thus, temperature is considered among the most factors that can influence the degradation rates of micropollutants by increasing the biotic and/or abiotic reactions of these compounds. It is well known that the degree of the effect of the temperature on the kinetic degradation of the pesticides depends on (i) their chemical structures types and (ii) the pH of the medium [30, 31]. The kinetic experiments were performed by following the disappearance of herbicide by means of HPLC at the pH 5.8 and the temperature of 25°C. All solutions were stirred and samples from considered solutions were taken at regular time intervals and then analyzed directly without preconcentration by HPLC. Other tests were made on the degradation kinetics using natural sunlight. The samples were irradiated continuously for 2 h under the effect of light lamps. All experiments were performed in duplicate.

2.5. Analytical Methods
2.5.1. High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

The analysis was performed using an HPLC system. The instrument used for the photochemical study was a GBC equipped with a detector and a GBC LC 1150 pump. A column Agilent Zorbax SB-C18 ( mm) was used for analysis. The other HPLC conditions are as follows: (i) mobile phase was a mixture of water (30%) and methanol (70%), (ii) wave length was 249 nm, and (iii) flow rate was 1 mL/min.

2.5.2. Total Organic Carbon Analysis (TOC)

TOC analysis was carried out using a Shimadzu 5000A TOC analyser. This system uses a Pt furnace at 650°C with detection of carbon by IR-CO2 analysis. Inorganic carbon (IC) is measured by CO2 analysis following acidification. Total carbon .

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Photolysis of Fenamiphos
3.1.1. Kinetics

The direct irradiation of a solution containing 32,9 μM (10 ppm) of fenamiphos was conducted over a period of 2 hours or 3 hours using UV light, with regular sampling every 10 minutes. Analysis of solutions by HPLC-UV shows a steady decrease in the concentration of fenamiphos versus the time of irradiation (Figure 3). The photolysis of fenamiphos in water was modeled with a first-order kinetic. The evolution of versus time is shown in Figure 3. The disappearance of fenamiphos follows apparent first-order kinetics and the rate constant is presented in Table 2. HPLC/MS analysis was carried out to follow the main intermediates resulted from the photolytic process of fenamiphos.

LampKinetics parameters

HPLK 125 WKinetic constant (10−3 min−1)14.470.986
HPLK 125 WHalf-life (min)48
PL-S 9 W/10Kinetic constant (10−3 min−1)4.110.9893
PL-S 9 W/10Half-life (min)168.6

3.1.2. Identification of Photoproducts

Figure 4 shows HPLC chromatograms illustrating the disappearance of fenamiphos over irradiation time. According to different irradiation time, the peak of fenamiphos decreases with the formation of two intermediates products at retention times 2.9 and 1.89 minutes, respectively (Table 3).

FenamiphosFenamiphos sulfoxide (FSO)Fenamiphos sulfone (FSO2)

Masse ( )304.02320.51336.50
Retention time (min)4.592.91.89

Analysis by HPLC-MS allowed us to identify the byproducts of photolysis with and , which can be assigned, respectively, to fenamiphos sulfoxide (FSO) and fenamiphos sulfone FSO2 (Figure 4).

The evolution of fenamiphos and its intermediate as a function of the irradiation time is shown in Figure 5. We can clearly observe the appearance of two intermediates products, 10 and 30 minutes, after the irradiation by UV lamps. The transformation of fenamiphos corresponds to the transformation of fenamiphos to fenamiphos sulfoxide (FSO) which occurs rapidly and continues during the irradiation (2 hours). After 20 minutes, fenamiphos sulfoxide (FSO) was oxidized on fenamiphos sulfone (FSO2) and the concentration of FSO decreases during the first 30 minutes, but the rate of fenamiphos transformation on FSO is more important than the oxidation of FSO on FSO2 as shown in Figure 5 and Table 3.

On the basis of the identified photoproducts and the sequence of their formation during the experiment, we would suggest that the photolysis of fenamiphos in water proceeds via oxidation pathway [32, 33]. Fenamiphos oxidizes in fenamiphos sulfoxide (FSO) by the effect of light and it oxidizes to fenamiphos sulfone (FSO2). No other products were observed like the phenol derivative which corresponds to the photohydrolysis of fenamiphos as generally observed for the photodegradation of fenamiphos in soil [11].

3.2. Photocatalysis of Fenamiphos
3.2.1. Nature of TiO2 Effect

Our study started on the use of P25 as immobilised photocatalyst. Figure 6 shows that the parent pesticide is completely degraded following 180 min of photocatalytic treatment in the reactor. It is interesting to note that, as this reactor was designed to determinate the intrinsic kinetics of photocatalytic degradation, the data obtained are useful for the development of large-scale photocatalytic reactions for water purification. Therefore, the time taken for pesticide degradation should not be used for comparison but rather the rate in terms of moles degraded per area of illuminated catalyst.

As shown in Figure 6, the photocatalytic degradation of fenamiphos follows a pseudo first-order kinetic by a good linear correlation between concentrations and time. The data of the constant kinetic and the half-life time are given in Table 4.

(min−1) (min)


Then, we turned our attention on the use of PC500 as photocatalytic agent (Figure 6). Also, the degradation follows pseudofirst-order kinetics (Figure 6), but the rate is much lower, taking up to 270 min to reach complete destruction of the parent compound, in comparison with P25 showing a complete degradation after 180 min.

The first-order rate constant “” and the half-life () are determined (Table 4). For the two TiO2 types, the disappearance of fenamiphos follows apparent first-order kinetics. The rate of photocatalysis and the half-life varied with respect to the type of TiO2, being more rapid with P25 than with PC500. As reported by other authors, in the majority of studies, which have compared TiO2 catalysts like PC500 to Degussa P25, the last one present the higher efficiency. Degussa P25 contains a small rutile core surrounded by anatase crystallites. According to this structure, the high photocatalytic efficiency has been attributed to catalytic “hot spots” at the intersection of the two phases due to the unique surface chemistry [18].

3.2.2. Effect of Catalyst Loading

For both of the photocatalysts used, further work was undertaken to determine the effect of photocatalyst loading on the rate of degradation of fenamiphos. The rate of degradation was determined using different catalyst loadings. The selected catalyst loadings are as follows: 0.2; 0.4; 0.6; 0.8; 1.0; and 1.2 mg cm−2. The initial concentration of fenamiphos was 10 ppm.

As shown in Table 4, the rate of degradation increased by increasing the catalyst loading up to around 1 mg cm−2. A decrease in the degradation rate was observed with a catalyst loading above. Strongly, these results correlate with previous results concerning the degradation of atrazine in the same system, where the initial rate increased with TiO2 loading up to an optimum of 1.10 mg cm−2 [24]. The effect of catalyst loading was also determined for PC500 and the results are presented in Table 5. Also, it was found that the optimum catalyst loading was around 1 mg cm−2 and, above this loading, low increase in the rate of degradation was observed. For higher quantities of catalyst, the reaction kinetic decreases because of the saturation of photons absorption [11, 18, 23, 24].

Amount of TiO2 P25 (mg/cm2)
 TOC % 14.7543.0748.0953.2659.8461.47
Amount of TiO2 PC500 (mg/cm2)
 TOC % 21.9325.2829.4636.1541.2536.22

The bold values are the corresponding values to 1 mg cm2 because there are the best values obtained.
3.2.3. Effect of Initial Concentration of Fenamiphos

Figure 7 shows the kinetic curve of degradation of fenamiphos in the presence of P25 catalyst supported on glass with different concentrations of fenamiphos (4, 6, 10, and 15 ppm); the initial pH was of 5.8. Plots of disappearance of fenamiphos versus time for each concentration (Figure 7) suggested that the kinetics appeared to deviate from first-order kinetics.

According to the obtained results, the rate of degradation is relatively constant with changing initial concentration suggesting that we are operating in the high end of concentrations assuming a Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic model, widely observed for the photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants on TiO2 [11].

3.2.4. Evaluation of TOC

Finally, photocatalysis is a degradative process; the evaluation of the total organic carbon as a global measurement of the concentration of the organic intermediates produced during the degradation has been evaluated. Figure 8 shows the decrease of TOC versus time for the photocatalytic degradation of fenamiphos on P25.

4. Conclusion

The photocatalytic degradation of the pesticide fenamiphos was studied in a custom-built stirred tank photoreactor using two commercial preparations of TiO2: Degussa P25 and Millennium PC500. The catalysts were immobilised on borosilicate glass at different loadings. It was found that the degradation of fenamiphos followed pseudofirst-order kinetics for both catalysts studied. Also, it was determined that the optimum catalyst loading for both preparations was around 1 mg cm−2. The degradation rate was also studied as a function of initial concentration of fenamiphos and it was found that the initial rate remained relatively constant in the range of concentrations studied, suggesting that we were operating in the high end of concentrations resulting in an observed zero-order kinetic, as predicted by a Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic model. Furthermore, when the initial solution pH was below the PZC of TiO2, there was an increase in the rate of degradation as compared to neutral pH and in slightly alkaline conditions. Finally, the removal of TOC indicates the mineralisation of fenamiphos. These results show that immobilised films of TiO2 are able to degrade the pesticide fenamiphos and may find application in the remediation of water contaminated with pesticide residues where efficient reactor design is employed.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors wish to acknowledge NATO Science for Peace and Security for funding this research under Grant no. ESP.MD.CLG 983344.


  1. G. Centi and S. Perathoner, “Remediation of water contamination using catalytic technologies,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 41, no. 1-2, pp. 15–29, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Chiron, A. Fernandez-Alba, A. Rodriguez, and E. Garcia-Calvo, “Pesticide chemical oxidation: state-of-the-art,” Water Research, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 366–377, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. D. Burrows, L. M. Canle, J. A. Santaballa, and S. Steenken, “Reaction pathways and mechanisms of photodegradation of pesticides,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 71–108, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. Tajeddine, M. Nemmaoui, H. Mountacer, A. Dahchour, and M. Sarakha, “Photodegradation of fenamiphos on the surface of clays and soils,” Environmental Chemistry Letters, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 123–128, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. F. Ollis, “Contaminant degradation in water,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 480–484, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. R. W. Matthews, “Solar-electric water purification using photocatalytic oxidation with TiO2 as a stationary phase,” Solar Energy, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 405–413, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  7. M. Schiavello, Photocatalysis and Environment—Trends and Applications, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988.
  8. N. Serpone and E. Pelizetti, Photocatalysis, Fundamentals and Applications, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1989.
  9. J. M. Herrmann, “Water treatment by heterogeneous photocatalysis,” in Environmental Catalysis, F. J. J. G. Janssen and R. A. van Santen, Eds., pp. 171–194, Imperial Press, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. M. Herrmann, “Solar detoxification of wastewaters,” in Industrial Applications of Solar Chemistry, D. Martinez, Ed., pp. 31–63, CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Choi, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 69–96, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  12. K. Djebbar and T. Sehili, “Kinetics of heterogeneous photocatalytic decomposition of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid over titanium dioxide and zinc oxide in aqueous solution,” Pesticide Science, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 269–276, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  13. M. E. Madani, C. Guillard, N. Pérol et al., “Photocatalytic degradation of diuron in aqueous solution in presence of two industrial titania catalysts, either as suspended powders or deposited on flexible industrial photoresistant papers,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 65, no. 1-2, pp. 70–76, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. C. Garcia and K. Takashima, “Photocatalytic degradation of imazaquin in an aqueous suspension of titanium dioxide,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 155, no. 1–3, pp. 215–222, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  15. C. Guillard, J. Disdier, C. Monnet et al., “Solar efficiency of a new deposited titania photocatalyst: chlorophenol, pesticide and dye removal applications,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 319–332, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Harir, A. Gaspar, B. Kanawati et al., “Photocatalytic reactions of imazamox at TiO2, H2O2 and TiO2/H2O2 in water interfaces: kinetic and photoproducts study,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 84, no. 3-4, pp. 524–532, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. E. Kinkennon, D. B. Green, and B. Hutchinson, “The use of simulated or concentrated natural solar radiation for the TiO2-mediated photodecomposition of Basagran, Diquat, and Diuron,” Chemosphere, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 3663–3671, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. S. M. Dunlop, A. Galdi, T. A. McMurray, J. W. J. Hamilton, L. Rizzo, and J. A. Byrne, “Comparison of photocatalytic activities of commercial titanium dioxide powders immobilised on glass substrates,” Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 99–106, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  19. R. L. Pozzo, M. A. Baltanás, and A. E. Cassano, “Supported titanium oxide as photocatalyst in water decontamination: state of the art,” Catalysis Today, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 219–231, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  20. M. El Madani, M. Harir, A. Zrineh, and M. El Azzouzi, “Photodegradation of imazethapyr herbicide by using slurry and supported TiO2: efficiency comparison,” Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. C. Guillard, J. Disdier, J. M. Herrmann et al., “Solar efficiency of a photocatalytic nonwoven: dye removal applications,” in Serie Ponencias, pp. 59–66, CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  22. C. Sarantopoulos, E. Puzenat, C. Guillard, J. M. Herrmann, A. N. Gleizes, and F. Maury, “Microfibrous TiO2 supported photocatalysts prepared by metal-organic chemical vapor infiltration for indoor air and waste water purification,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 91, no. 1-2, pp. 225–233, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. A. McMurray, J. A. Byrne, P. S. M. Dunlop, J. G. M. Winkelman, B. R. Eggins, and E. T. McAdams, “Intrinsic kinetics of photocatalytic oxidation of formic and oxalic acid on immobilised TiO2 films,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 262, no. 1, pp. 105–110, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. T. A. McMurray, P. S. M. Dunlop, and J. A. Byrne, “The photocatalytic degradation of atrazine on nanoparticulate TiO2 films,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 43–51, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. H. Kidd and D. R. James, The Agrochemicals Handbook, Royal Society of Chemistry Information Services, Cambridge, UK, 3rd edition, 1991.
  26. L. T. Ou, J. E. Thomas, and D. W. Dickson, “Degradation of fenamiphos in soil with a history of continuous fenamiphos applications,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1139–1147, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  27. T. Cáceres, M. Megharaj, and R. Naidu, “Toxicity of fenamiphos and its metabolites to the cladoceran Daphnia carinata: the influence of microbial degradation in natural waters,” Chemosphere, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 1264–1269, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. El Hajjaji, A. El Yadini, A. Dahchour, M. El Azzouzi, A. Zouaou, and M. M’Rabet, “Phototransformation of organophosphorus pesticide in aqueous solution under irradiation light,” Environmental Science, vol. 5, no. 6, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  29. P. D. Franzmann, L. R. Zappia, A. L. Tilbury, B. M. Patterson, G. B. Davis, and R. T. Mandelbaum, “Bioaugmentation of atrazine and fenamiphos impacted groundwater: laboratory evaluation,” Bioremediation Journal, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 237–248, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  30. A. Chnirheb, M. Harir, B. Kanawati et al., “Hydrolysis of mefenpyrdiethyl: an analytical and DFT investigation,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 398, no. 5, pp. 2325–2334, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. B. Lartiges and P. P. Garrigues, “Degradation kinetics of organophosphorus and organonitrogen pesticides in different waters under various environmental conditions,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1246–1254, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. R. S. Kookana, C. Phang, and L. A. G. Aylmore, “Transformation and degradation of fenamiphos nematicide and its metabolites in soils,” Australian Journal of Soil Research, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 753–761, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  33. P. Dureja, “Photolysis of benfuracarb,” Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 189–244, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 A. El Yadini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles