Research Article

Risk Determination, Prioritization, and Classifying in Construction Project Case Study: Gharb Tehran Commercial-Administrative Complex

Table 4

All project risks categorization gathered from literature review.

Environmental and socialLegal factorsEconomic factors

(i) Brutality
(ii) Assaults
(iii) Neglect
(iv) Seasonal work
(v) Unstable security situation
(vi) Environmental pollution
(vii) Incorrect or incomplete
environmental analysis
(i) Disputes
() Delays in the analysis of disputes
() Legal disputes between the stakeholders involved in the construction project
() Lack of mediators to accelerate solving of dispute
(ii) Contracts
() Delays in payment
() Ambiguities in the contract
(i) Inflation
(ii) Investment
(iii) Changing currency value
(iv) Economic instability
(v) Changing rules and standards
(vi) Contractor financial failure
(vii) Unmanaged cash flow
(viii) Consulting cost
(ix) Political interruptions
(x) Market situation
(xi) Work law ambiguities

PoliticalDesignExecution

(i) New government legislation or new rules
(ii) Exchange rate fluctuations
(iii) Monopoly of raw materials due to the unexpected political conditions
(iv) Internal and external politics
(v) War
(vi) The influence of pressure groups and lobbying by interest groups
(vii) Sanction
(i) Nonqualified designer
(ii) Incorrect choice of raw materials
(iii) The need for design based on exceptions
(iv) Errors in estimating/scheduling
(v) Out-of-date documents for design
(vi) Complexity of design phase of project
(vii) Duplication
(viii) Design changes
(ix) Inconsistency between registry of values, design, and specifications
(x) Hurry in design
(xi) Changes in process of works
(i) Delays in executive plan confirmation
(ii) Available resources
(iii) Events
(iv) Bad design
(v) Deviations between spec. and implementation
(vi) Incorrect size and values
(vii) The complexity of the project implementation
(viii) Difficulty in accessing the project yard
(ix) The difference between the actual values with the values in the contract
(x) Poor weather conditions
(xi) Installation of equipment
(xii) Permits and licenses
(xiii) Surface and subsurface water condition
(xiv) Implementation method
(xv) Events during execution
(xvi) Delayed, incomplete, and incorrect reviews
(xvii) Contradiction of cost, time, scope, and qualitative objectives

Unexpected and nonpreventable eventsProject managementContract

(i) Flood
(ii) Fire
(iii) Earthquake
(iv) Lightning
(i) Losing experienced staffs
(ii) Change in managerial methods
(iii) Not to assign tasks to experienced staff
(iv) Many projects to manage
(v) Inappropriate project team
(vi) Mismanagement of contracts
(vii) Rush at auction
(viii) Commands to change without document
(i) Changing priorities in existing programs
(ii) Changes in the budget for the financial year
(iii) Late changes requested by shareholders
(iv) New shareholders
(v) Cheating
(vi) Ambiguity of planning

Planning and schedulingHuman resourcesResources and Equipment

(i) Conflicting goals of cost, time, quality, and scope
(ii) Uncertain constraints and lack of planning
(iii) Estimation/planning errors
(iv) Wrong time plan prediction
(vi) Weaknesses in project definition and ultimate performance
(vii) Lack of specialized staff
(i) Supplying manpower
(ii) Efficiency of manpower
(iii) Lack of specialists
(iv) Human resources turnover
(i) Machinery failure
(ii) Machinery performance
(iii) Spare parts supply
(iv) Low quality equipment
(v) Theft of equipment
(vi) Lack of access to machinery or equipment
(vii) Lack of materials
(viii) Delay in supplying materials
(ix) Theft of materials

OwnersContractorsConsultants

(i) Delay in payments to contractors
(ii) Owner interference
(iii) Owner’s delay in decision-making
(iv) Methods of contractor selection
(v) Unsuitable forecast period for project implementation
(vi) Change in project tasks
(vii) Owner’s administrative bureaucracy
(i) Small contractors
(ii) Lack of contractors experience
(iii) Workshop mismanagement
(iv) Inefficient planning
(v) Contractor financial power
(vi) Errors during execution
(vii) Contractors delays
(viii) Contractors mismanagement
(i) Lack of consultant knowledge about contract
(ii) Delay in the approval of executive plans
(iii) Quality control/assurance
(iv) Expectations for approval tests and investigations
(v) Consultants delays

Stakeholders relationshipsProcurement managementRisk management

(i) Conflict between stakeholders(i) Limited time
(ii) Underestimation of requirements
(iii) Overestimation of requirements
(iv) Misinterpretation of requirements
(v) Insufficient budget
(vi) Mismanagement of risks
(vii) Dishonesty and unethical relationship
(i) Inattention to risks
(ii) Deficiency of people involved in risk management
(iii) Lack of training
(iv) Lack of cooperation among team members
(v) Lack of control and complexity of changes
(vi) Lack of knowledge
(vii) Weak relationship between project stakeholders
(viii) Unavailability of information

Quality managementProject initiation risksControl

(i) Low quality due to limited timeframe
(ii) Quality of equipment
(iii) Manpower productivity
(iv) Raw material
(v) Construction
(vi) Design
(vii) Mapping
(viii) Laboratory
(i) Unsuitable estimation of customers
(ii) Unsuitable estimation of customer’s requirements
(iii) Vague definition and constant changes in the project
(iv) Choosing high risk lands
(v) Unsuitable marketing
(vi) Unsuitable feasibility study
(vii) The lack of a precise definition of the project
(i) Lack of integrity in control of different areas
(ii) Delays in reporting and identifying the corrective control
(iii) Lack of coordination between the control and implementation
(iv) Different levels of control