Table of Contents
Journal of Construction Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 465493, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/465493
Research Article

Using the Network Metaphor to Design, Deliver, and Maintain a Construction Management Curriculum

Department of Construction Management, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA

Received 22 June 2015; Accepted 19 November 2015

Academic Editor: F. Pacheco-Torgal

Copyright © 2015 Ihab M. H. Saad. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. American Council for Construction Education (ACCE), 2014, http://www.acce-hq.org/accredited_programs/category/baccalaureate-programs/.
  2. A. B. Badiru, J. M. Slagley, and D. A. Smith, “Project management application for engineering program accreditation preparation,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. B. Badiru and R. R. Jones, “Project management for executing distance education programs,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 154–162, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. J. Hannon, “Construction management program curriculum content derived from industrial workflow processes,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Southeast Section Conference, Tuscaloosa, Ala, USA, April 2006.
  5. D. McDaniel, “Developing an integrated curriculum model for construction management education,” Online Journal for Workforce Education and Development, vol. 1, no. 3, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  6. Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK), Project Management Institute, 5th edition, 2013.
  7. M. E. Huba and J. E. Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning, Allyn & Bacon, Needham, Mass, USA, 2000.
  8. B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, David McKay Company, New York, NY, USA, 1956.
  9. D. R. Krathwohl, “A revision of bloom's taxonomy: an overview,” Theory into Practice, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 212–218, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Abeysekera and P. Dawson, “Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research,” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 34, no. 1, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus