Table of Contents
Journal of Computational Engineering
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 793074, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/793074
Research Article

A Comparative Study on Decision Making Methods with Interval Data

School of Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Himachal Pradesh 175 001, India

Received 11 November 2013; Revised 12 January 2014; Accepted 27 January 2014; Published 11 March 2014

Academic Editor: Gui Yun Tian

Copyright © 2014 Aditya Chauhan and Rahul Vaish. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Jahan, M. Y. Ismail, S. M. Sapuan, and F. Mustapha, “Material screening and choosing methods—a review,” Materials and Design, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 696–705, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. D. Pohekar and M. Ramachandran, “Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—a review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 365–381, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Wang, S. H. Huang, and J. P. Dismukes, “Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. F. Ashby, “Multi-objective optimization in material design and selection,” Acta Materialia, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 359–369, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. P. Yoon and C. L. Hwang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage Publications, 1995.
  6. A. Chauhan and R. Vaish, “Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach,” Materials and Design, vol. 36, pp. 1–5, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Chauhan and R. Vaish, “A comparative study on material selection for micro-electromechanical systems,” Materials & Design, vol. 41, pp. 177–181, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. A. Chauhan and R. Vaish, “Hard coating material selection using multi-criteria decision making,” Materials & Design, vol. 44, pp. 240–245, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Chauhan and R. Vaish, “Pareto optimal microwave dielectric materials,” Advanced Science, Engineering and Medicine, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 149–155, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. A. S. Milani, A. Shanian, R. Madoliat, and J. A. Nemes, “The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 312–318, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. O. Parate and N. Gupta, “Material selection for electrostatic microactuators using Ashby approach,” Materials and Design, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1577–1581, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Pratap and A. Arunkumar, “Material selection for MEMS devices,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 358–367, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Vaish, “Piezoelectric and pyroelectric materials selection,” International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 682–689, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Chauhan and R. Vaish, “An assessment of bulk metallic glasses for microelectromechanical system devices,” International Journal of Applied Glass Science, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 231–241, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. A. Chauhan and R. Vaish, “Material selection for piezoelectric devices,” Advanced Science, Engineering and Medicine, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 715–719, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Chauhan, R. Vaish, and C. Bowen, “Piezoelectric material selection for ultrasonic transducer and actuator applications,” Journal of Materials Design and Applications, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. T. Y. Chen and C. Y. Tsao, “The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 159, no. 11, pp. 1410–1428, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. H. Park, I. Y. Park, Y. C. Kwun, and X. Tan, “Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision making problems under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2544–2556, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. Sevastianov, “Numerical methods for interval and fuzzy number comparison based on the probabilistic approach and Dempster-Shafer theory,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 21, pp. 4645–4661, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. H. Lotfi, and M. Izadikhah, “An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 1375–1384, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, and A. R. Davoodi, “Extension of TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data: interval efficiency,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 49, no. 5-6, pp. 1137–1142, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Sevastjanov and A. Tikhonenko, “Direct interval extension of TOPSIS method,” in Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics, pp. 504–512, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  23. Z. Meng, Y. Jingsong, and R. Rongrong, “The method of interval multi-attribute decision-making based on cross entropy,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS '12), pp. 461–464, June 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. M. K. Sayadi, M. Heydari, and K. Shahanaghi, “Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 2257–2262, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, “Methods for multiple attribute decision making,” in Multiple Attribute Decision Making, vol. 186, pp. 58–191, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. D. Yong, “Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 28, no. 7-8, pp. 839–844, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. Zhang and D. Q. Zhou, “A study on R-TOPSIS method and its application to web site building alternatives selection,” Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 232, no. 2, pp. 466–474, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. Ren, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, and Z. Sun, “Comparative analysis of a novel M-TOPSIS method and topsis,” Applied Mathematics Research eXpress, vol. 2007, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. N. Kwak and C. H. Choi, “Input feature selection for classification problems,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 143–159, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus