Table of Contents
Journal of Criminology
Volume 2014, Article ID 827194, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/827194
Research Article

Motorist's Response to an Increase in Traffic Fines

Research and Documentation Centre, Ministry of Security and Justice, P.O. Box 20301, 2500 EH Den Haag, The Netherlands

Received 25 September 2013; Revised 31 December 2013; Accepted 18 January 2014; Published 2 March 2014

Academic Editor: P. N. S. Hoaken

Copyright © 2014 Debora E. G. Moolenaar. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Becker, “Crime and Punishment: an Economic Approach,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 76, pp. 169–217, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  2. Significant, Effecten Verhoging Verkeersboetes. De Gevolgen van de 20% Verhoging en de “Motie VAn Geel”Voor Opbrengsten en Werklast (Effects of Raising Fines. The consequences of a 20% Raise on Proceeds and Work Load), Ministry of Justice, Den Haag, The Netherlands, 2008.
  3. P. Wilms, I. Blankers, and R. Friperson, “Opbrengsten boetes en transacties uit verkeersovertredingen (Proceeds from fines and out-of-court settlements for traffic offences),” APE Den Haag, 2011.
  4. S. Briscoe, “Raising the bar: can increased statutory penalties deter drink-drivers?” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 919–929, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. P. M. Mathijssen, “Rijden Onder Invloed in Nederland, 1992-1993, Ontwikkeling van Het Alcoholgebruik van Automobilisten in Weekendnachten (Driving Under the Influence, 1992-1993, Developments in Alcohol Use by Motorists in Weekend Nights),” Tech. Rep. R-94-21, SWOV, Leidschendam, The Netherlands, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. C. Wagenaar, M. M. Maldonado-Molina, D. J. Erickson, L. Ma, A. L. Tobler, and K. A. Komro, “General deterrence effects of U.S. statutory DUI fine and jail penalties: long-term follow-up in 32 states,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 982–994, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Moffat and S. Poynton, “The deterrent effect of higher fines on recidivism: driving offences,” New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research 106, Crime and Justice Bulletin, Sydney, Australia, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. Elvik and P. Christensen, “The deterrent effect of increasing fixed penalties for traffic offences: the Norwegian experience,” Journal of Safety Research, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 689–695, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Mäkinen, D. M. Zaidel, G. Andersson, and M. B. Biecheler-Fretel, “Traffic enforcement in Europe: effects, measures, needs and future,” Tech. Rep., ESCAPE, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  10. H. L. Oei and P. H. Polak, “Effect van automatische waarschuwing en toezicht op snelheid en ongevallen. Resultaten van een evaluatie-onderzoek in vier provincies (Effect of automatic warning and monitoring on speed and accidents. Results from an evaluation in four provinces),” Tech. Rep. R-92-23, SWOV, Leidschendam, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  11. C. Goldenbeld and I. van Schagen, “‘Verkeerstoezicht en straffen voor verkeersveiligheid’ (Traffic monitoring and punishments for road safety),” Trema Straftoemetingsbulletin, vol. 31, pp. 34–42, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  12. SWOV, De Werking en Effecten van Snelheidscamera's (the Workings and Effects of Speed Camera’s), SWOV, Leidschendam, The Netherlands, 2009.
  13. M. P. M. Mathijssen, “Drink driving policy and road safety in the Netherlands: a retrospective analysis,” Transportation Research E, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 395–408, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. Tierolf, A. Mein, L. Drost, and I. De Groot, Effectiviteit van Sancties in Het Verkeer (Effectiveness of Sanctions in Traffic), Verwey-Jonker Instituut, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2009.
  15. T. Bjørnskau and R. Elvik, “Can road traffic law enforcement permanently reduce the number of accidents?” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 507–520, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. M. Polinsky and S. Shavell, “The optimal use of fines and imprisonment,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 89–99, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. M. Polinsky and S. Shavell, “A note on optimal fines when wealth varies among individuals,” American Economic Review, vol. 81, pp. 618–621, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  18. N. Garoupa, “Optimal law enforcement and imperfect information when wealth varies among individuals,” Economica, vol. 65, no. 260, pp. 479–490, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Bar-Ilan and B. Sacerdote, “The response to fines and probability of detection in a series of experiments,” Working Paper 8638, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  20. S. Lawpoolsri, J. Li, and E. R. Braver, “Do speeding tickets reduce the likelihood of receiving subsequent speeding tickets? A longitudinal study of speeding violators in Maryland,” Traffic Injury Prevention, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 26–34, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. E. G. Moolenaar, T. Zuidema, and J. De Boer, “De afname van het aantal boetes en transacties voor verkeersovertredingen nader verklaard (The decrease in the number of fines and out-of-court settlements for traffic offences further explained),” WODC, Den Haag, Cahier 2011-09, 2011.
  22. S. D. Levitt, “Why do increased arrest rates appear to reduce crime: deterrence, incapacitation, or measurement error?” Economic Inquiry, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 353–372, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. H. Pesaran and R. J. Smith, “A generalized R2  criterion for regression models estimated by the Instrumental variables method,” Econometrica, vol. 62, pp. 705–710, 1994. View at Google Scholar