Table of Contents
Journal of Crystallography
Volume 2014, Article ID 856498, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/856498
Research Article

Synthesis, X-Ray Crystallography, Thermal Analysis, and DFT Studies of Ni(II) Complex with 1-Vinylimidazole Ligand

1Department of Opticianry, Vocational High School of Health Services, Kilis 7 Aralık University, 79000 Kilis, Turkey
2Department of Chemistry, Arts and Sciences Faculty, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55139 Samsun, Turkey
3Department of Physics, Arts and Sciences Faculty, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55139 Samsun, Turkey
4Department of Chemistry, Arts and Sciences Faculty, Giresun University, 28100 Giresun, Turkey

Received 12 September 2013; Revised 23 December 2013; Accepted 11 January 2014; Published 14 April 2014

Academic Editor: Hasan Küçükbay

Copyright © 2014 Fatih Şen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The paper presents a combined experimental and computational study of hexa(1-vinylimidazole)Ni(II) perchlorate complex. The complex was prepared in the laboratory and crystallized in the monoclinic space group P21/n with (5), (8), (9) Å, , (5), and . The complex has been characterized structurally (by single-crystal X-Ray diffraction) and its molecular structure in the ground state has been calculated using the density functional theory (DFT) methods with 6-31G(d) and LanL2DZ basis sets. Thermal behaviour and stability of the complex were studied by TGA/DTA analyses. Besides, the nonlinear optical effects (NLO), molecular electrostatic potential (MEP), frontier molecular orbitals (FMO), and the Mulliken charge distribution were investigated theoretically.

1. Introduction

Imidazole was first reported in 1858, although various imidazole derivatives had been discovered as early as the 1840s [1]. Derivatives of imidazole represent a class of heterocyclic compounds of great importance. Both imidazole and its derivatives have found widespread applications in industry and pharmacy [25]. For example, imidazole has been used extensively as a corrosion inhibitor on certain transition metals, such as copper in industry [1], and also the substituted imidazole derivatives are valuable in treatment of many systemic fungal infections in pharmacy [6]. The imidazole ligand is of particular interest due to its important role in many biological systems, especially as the side group in histidine which plays an essential role in the active motif of many enzymes [7]. Imidazole in polymers has traditionally been utilized in a variety of applications such as immobilized catalysts [8, 9], redox reactions [10], water purification [11, 12], hydrometallurgy/metal recovery [13, 14], and ion and proton conductors [15].

Imidazoles are useful ligands in coordination chemistry and the synthesis of the compounds containing the imidazole ring is an important area of scientific investigation [1619]. Numerous complexes derived from -block metals and imidazole ligands are well known [7]. A large number of investigations on the complexation of copper(II) with imidazole ligands and vinylimidazole ligands have been reported, with some of them reporting structures determined crystallographically [20]. The title compound is a novel complex firstly synthesized by us.

Determination of the structural and spectroscopic properties of compounds using both experimental techniques and theoretical methods has attracted interest for many years. In recent years, among the computational methods calculating the electronic structure of molecular systems, DFT has been the favorite one due to its great accuracy in reproducing the experimental values of in molecule geometry, vibrational frequencies, atomic charges, dipole moment, and so forth [21, 22].

In this present study, hexa(1-vinylimidazole)Ni(II) perchlorate has been investigated both experimentally and theoretically. In experimental study, the complex was synthesized and characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods. In theoretical study, the geometric parameters of the title complex in the ground state have been calculated using the density functional method (DFT) (UB3LYP) with 6-31G(d) and LanL2DZ basis sets. The calculated optimized structures were compared with their X-ray structure. It was noted here that the experimental results belong to solid phase and theoretical calculations belong to gaseous phase. In the solid state, the existence of the crystal field along with the intermolecular interactions has connected the molecules together, which result in the differences of bond parameters between the calculated and experimental values [23].

2. Experimental and Theoretical Methods

2.1. Reagents

Nickel(II) perchlorate hexahydrate [Ni(H2O)6] (ClO4)2, 1-vinylimidazole, and ethanol were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification. Perkin Elmer Diamond TG/DTA thermal analyzer was used to record simultaneous TG, DTG, and DTA curves in the static air atmosphere at a heating rate of 10 K min 21 in the temperature range 30–750°C using platinum crucibles.

2.2. Synthesis

Nickel(II) perchlorate hexahydrate (0.36 g; 1.0 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL ethanol and 1-vinylimidazole (0.56 g; 6.0 mmol) was added slowly. The mixture was stirred for 1 h, filtered, and left for crystallization. Single crystals of hexa(1-vinylimidazole)Ni(II) perchlorate suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained after one week (yield %56).

2.3. Crystal Structure Analysis

Diffraction data for complex was collected on Agilent Diffraction SuperNova (single source at offset) Eos diffractometer using graphite monochromated Mo Ka radiation ( Å) at 296 K. The structure was solved by direct methods using SHELXS-97 [24] and implemented in the WinGX [25] program suite. The refinement was carried out by full-matrix least-squares method on the positional and anisotropic temperature parameters of the nonhydrogen atoms, or equivalently corresponding to 241 crystallographic parameters, using SHELXL-97 [26]. All H atoms were positioned geometrically and treated using a riding model, fixing the bond lengths at 0.86, 0.93, 0.97, and 0.96 Å for NH, CH, and CH2 atoms, respectively. All other H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined with a riding model with Uiso 1.2 times that of attached atoms. Data collection is by CrysAlis PRO [27], cell refinement by CrysAlis RED [28], and data reduction by CrysAlis RED [28]. The general-purpose crystallographic tool PLATON [29] was used for the structure analysis and presentation of the results. Details of the data collection conditions and the parameters of the refinement process are given in Table 1.

tab1
Table 1: Crystal data and structure refinement parameters for the title complex.
2.4. Computational Procedures

All the calculations were performed by using Gaussian 03 package [30] and Gauss-View molecular visualization programs [31] on the personal computer without restricting any symmetry for the title complex. For modeling, the initial guess of the complex was first obtained from the X-ray coordinates. The molecular structure of the title complex in the ground state (in vacuo) is optimized by UB3LYP methods with 6-31G(d) and LanL2DZ basis sets. Besides, the nonlinear optical effects, the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP), frontier molecular orbitals (FMO), and the Mulliken population analysis of the title complex were determined by theoretical calculation results.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Description of the Complex

The title complex, a ORTEP-3 [32] view of which is shown in Figure 1, is crystallizing in the monoclinic space group P21/n with four molecules in unit cell. The asymmetric unit in the crystal structure contains the Ni(II) that is a cation, perchlorate anions, and six 1-vinylimidazole molecules. The Ni(II) atom displays a Jahn-Teller distorted octahedral coordination geometry, with six N atoms from six 1-vinylimidazole ligands in the equatorial plane and in axial positions. Ni–N1, Ni–N3, and Ni–N5 bond lengths are 2.110(3) Å, 2.129(3) Å, and 2.125(3) Å, respectively. These Ni–N bond lengths are comparable with those reported by [33, 34]. When the bond lengths and angles of the imidazole rings in the title complex are compared with literature [35], it is seen that there are no significant differences.

856498.fig.001
Figure 1: An ORTEP view of the title complex with the atomic numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 30% probability level.

The crystal packing is stabilized by a single intermolecular C–HO hydrogen-bonding interaction (Table 2, Figure 2), giving a view of the crystal structure of complex approximately along the a axis. Also, in the structure, there is a C2–H2π interaction between the C2 atom and imidazole (N5, N6, C11–C13) ring (symmetry code: (b) , , and ). The distance of atom C2 between the centroids of these rings is 3.46 A.

tab2
Table 2: Hydrogen bond geometry (Å, °).
856498.fig.002
Figure 2: Part of the crystal packing of the title complex. For clarity, hydrogen atoms and hydrogen bonds are not shown.
3.2. Magnetic Properties and Thermal Analysis

Magnetic moment determined for the hexa(1-vinylimidazole)Ni(II) perchlorate complex at room temperature is 2.90 BM. These values are characteristic of high-spin octahedral complexes of metals [36].

The thermal decomposition behavior of the complex was followed up to 750°C in a static air atmosphere. The complex is thermally stable up to 178°C. The results of TGA/DTA curves of complex are illustrated in Figure 3. The TG curves exhibit a continuous mass loss. Therefore, it was almost impossible to calculate mass loss value for each step. The stages of the temperature range of 178–590°C are related to the repeatedly decomposition of the six 1-vinylimidazole ligands by giving both endo- and exothermic effects. The mass loss calculations suggest that the remainder is left as a final product. NiO is the end product (Teo: 11.1%, exp: 12.2%).

856498.fig.003
Figure 3: TGA/DTA curves of complex.
3.3. Quantum Chemical Computational Studies
3.3.1. Theoretical Structures

The molecular structure of the title complex was also investigated theoretically; see Scheme 1. The starting coordinates were those obtained from the X-ray structure determination and in the ground state (in vacuo) was optimized using DFT(UB3LYP) with the 6-31G(d) and LanL2DZ basis sets. However, it should not be forgotten in here that the experimental results belong to solid phase and theoretical calculations belong to gaseous phase. The optimized molecular structure of the title molecule was obtained from Gaussian 03 program as shown in Figure 4. The molecular structure of the complex belongs to C1 point group symmetry with 89 atoms composing the structure. Randomly selected geometric parameters (bond length, bond angle, and torsion angles) were experimentally obtained and theoretically calculated by UB3LYP methods with basis sets listed in Table 3. And these selected parameters are compared with their experimental data. Correlation values are 0.9949 and 0.9881 for bond lengths, 0.9522 and 0.9994 for bond angles, and 0.1988 and 0.1043 for torsion angles, respectively. Consequently, according to correlations values, for the bond length and torsion angle, the 6-31G(d) basis set method is more useful than the LanL2DZ basis set method. Conversely, for bond angles, the LanL2DZ basis set method is more useful than the 6-31G(d) basis set method.

tab3
Table 3: Randomly selected geometric parameters (Å, °).
856498.sch.001
Scheme 1: The chemical diagram of the title complex.
fig4
Figure 4: The theoretical geometric structures of the title compound ((a) = UB3LYP/6-31G(d), (b) = UB3LYP/LanL2DZ).

A logical method for globally comparing the structures obtained with the theoretical calculations is by superimposing the molecular skeleton with that obtained from X-ray diffraction, giving RMSEs of 0.084 and 0.071 A for the same methods, respectively. As a result, 6-31G(d) correlates a little well with the geometrical parameters when compared with LANL2Z method (Figure 5).

fig5
Figure 5: Atom-by-atom superimposition of the structures calculated (red) ((a) = UB3LYP/6-31G(d), (b) = UB3LYP/LanL2DZ) on the X-ray structure (yellow) of the title complex. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity.
3.3.2. Nonlinear Optical Effects

Nonlinear optical (NLO) effects arise from the interactions of electromagnetic fields in various media to produce new fields altered in phase, frequency, amplitude, or other propagation characteristics from the incident fields [37]. In the recent years, because of potential applications in modern communication technology, data storage, telecommunication, and optical signal processing, a large number of research papers in new materials exhibiting efficient nonlinear optical (NLO) properties have been of great interest [3842].

The calculations of the mean linear polarizability and the mean first hyperpolarizability from the Gaussian output have been explained in detail previously and DFT has been extensively used as an effective method to investigate the organic NLO materials [43]. The values of the polarizability and the first hyperpolarizability of Gaussian 03 output are reported in atomic units (a.u.), so the calculated values have been converted into electrostatic units (esu) (: 1 a.u. = 0.1482 × 10−24 esu; : 1 a.u. = 8.6393 × 10−33 esu).

The total molecular dipole moment , linear polarizability (), and first-order hyperpolarizability of the title compound were calculated with the UB3LYP/6-31G(d) and UB3LYP/LanL2DZ methods. The calculated values of , , and are 2.939 D, 59.95 A3, and 69.86 10−30 cm5/esu for UB3LYP/6-31G(d) and 3.958 D, 65.52 A3, and 278.1 10−30 cm5/esu for UB3LYP/LanL2DZ, respectively. Urea is one of the prototypical molecules used in the study of the NLO properties of molecular systems. Therefore, it was used frequently as a threshold value for comparative purposes. Theoretically, the first-order hyperpolarizability of the title compound is of 12 and 14.4 times magnitude of urea at the same levels, respectively. According to these results, the title compound is a good candidate of NLO material.

3.3.3. Molecular Electrostatic Potential

The molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) is related to the electronic density and is a very useful descriptor in understanding sites for electrophilic attack and nucleophilic reactions as well as hydrogen-bonding interactions [4446].

The molecular electrostatic potential, , at a given point in the vicinity of a molecule is defined in terms of the interaction energy between the electrical charge generated from the molecule electrons and nuclei and a positive test charge (a proton) located at . For the system studied, the values were calculated as described previously using the following [47]: where is the charge of nucleus A located at , is the electronic density function of the molecule, and is the dummy integration variable. Being a real physical property, can be determined experimentally by diffraction or by computational methods [48]. To predict reactive sites for electrophilic and nucleophilic attack for the title molecule, MEP was calculated at the 6-31G(d) and LanL2DZ optimized geometries. The negative (red) regions of MEP were related to electrophilic reactivity and the positive (blue) regions to nucleophilic reactivity shown in Figure 6. As can be seen from the figure, there is one possible site on the title complex for electrophilic attack. The negative region is localised on the carbon atom of the imidazole ring, C13, with a maximum value of −0.049 and −0.064 a.u. for UB3LYP/6-31G(d) and UB3LYP/LanL2DZ basis sets. These results provide information concerning the region where the complex can interact intermolecularly and bond metallically. Therefore, Figure 6 confirms the existence of an intermolecular C13–H13O2 interaction between the O atoms perchlorate ion and C atoms of the imidazole ring.

856498.fig.006
Figure 6: Molecular electrostatic potential map (MEP) (in a.u.) calculated at UB3LYP/6-31G(d) and UB3LYP/LanL2DZ level frontier molecular orbitals analysis.
3.3.4. HOMO-LUMO Analysis

The highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest lying unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) are named as frontier molecular orbitals (FMO).

The distributions and energy levels of the HOMO and LUMO orbitals computed at the UB3LYP/6-31G(d) and UB3LYP/LanL2DZ level for the title complex are shown in Figure 7. The calculations indicate that the title complex has 89 and 84 occupied molecular orbitals and the value of the energy separation between the HOMO and LUMO are −1.5 and −1.14 eV for at the same levels, respectively.

856498.fig.007
Figure 7: The distributions and energy levels of the HOMO and LUMO orbitals computed at the UB3LYP/6-31G(d) and UB3LYP/LanL2DZ levels for the title complex.

A molecule with a small frontier orbital gap is more polarizable and is generally associated with a high chemical reactivity and low kinetic stability and is also termed as soft molecule [49]. The HOMO and LUMO energies, the energy gap , the ionization potential , the electron affinity , the absolute electronegativity , the absolute hardness , and softness for molecule have been calculated at the same levels and the results are given in Table 4. By using HOMO and LUMO energy values for a molecule, electronegativity and chemical hardness can be calculated as follows: (electronegativity),   (chemical hardness), and (chemical softness), where and are ionization potential and electron affinity, and , respectively [50].

tab4
Table 4: The calculated frontier orbital energies, electronegativity, hardness, and softness of complex using UB3LYP/6-31G(d) and UB3LYP/LanL2DZ levels.
3.3.5. The Mulliken Charge Population

The Mulliken atomic charge calculation has an important role in the application of quantum chemical calculation to molecular system because of atomic charges effect dipole moment, molecular polarizability, electronic structure, and a lot of properties of molecular systems.The charge distributions calculated by the Mulliken method [5154] for the equilibrium geometry of the complex is given in Figure 8. The calculated Mulliken charges of C13 and H13 atoms are determined as −0.12 and 0.16 e and −0.21 and 0.26 e for the 6-31G(d) and LanL2DZ methods, respectively. These values confirm intermolecular hydrogen bond C13–H13O2.

856498.fig.008
Figure 8: The charge distribution calculated by the Mulliken method for complex.

4. Conclusions

In this present investigation, molecular structure, nonlinear optical effects, molecular electrostatic potential, HOMO-LUMO analysis, and the Mulliken charge populations of hexa(1-vinylimidazole)Ni(II) perchlorate have been studied using DFT (UB3LYP/6-31G(d) and UB3LYP/LanL2DZ) calculations. They are compared with the calculated geometric parameters (bond lenght, bond angle, and torsion angle) with their experimental data. It is seen that there are no significant differences, when the experimental structure is compared with theoretical structures. It was noted here that the experimental results belong to solid phase and theoretical calculations belong to gaseous phase. The predicted nonlinear optical (NLO) properties of the complex are much greater than those of urea. The complex is a good candidate as second-order nonlinear optical material. Besides, The MEP map shows that the negative potential sites are on electronegative atoms and the positive potential sites are around the hydrogen atoms. These sites provide information concerning the region from where the compound can undergo intra- and intermolecular interactions. Similarly, the Mulliken charges confirm the intermolecular hydrogen bonds in the crystal.

Disclosure

Supplementary file (crystallographic data) for the structure reported in this paper has been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center as Supplementary Publication no. CCDC–940965. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK (fax: (+44)1223 336-033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by TÜBİTAK-The Scientific and Technologıcal Research Council of Turkey (Project no. 110T131 ).

References

  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imidazole.
  2. K. Kurdziel and T. Glowiak, “Palladium(II) complexes of 1-vinylimidazole,” Journal of Coordination Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 327–334, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. S. Yoshida and H. Ishida, “A study on the orientation of imidazoles on copper as corrosion inhibitor and possible adhesion promoter for electric devices,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 6960–6969, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Yoshida and H. Ishida, “A FT-IR reflection-absorption spectroscopic study of an epoxy coating on imidazole-treated copper,” Journal of Adhesion, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 217–232, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. N. K. Tatel, J. Franco, and I. S. Patel, “Corrosion of 63/37 brass in citric acid solution and its inhibition by azole-type compounds,” Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, vol. 54, pp. 815–816, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  6. L. Shargel, A. H. Mutnick, P. F. Souney, and L. N. Swanson, Comprehensive Pharmacy Review, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 6th edition, 2006.
  7. R. J. Sundberg and R. B. Martin, “Interactions of histidine and other imidazole derivatives with transition metal ions in chemical and biological systems,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 471–517, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Challa, J. Reedijk, and P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, “Macromolecular metal complexes as catalysts with improved stability,” Polymers for Advanced Technologies, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 625–633, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. G. Overberger and R. Tomko, “Catalysis by water-soluble imidazole-containing polymers,” ACS Symposium Series, vol. 212, pp. 13–21, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Suzuki, S. Kobayashi, T. Koyama et al., “Kinetics of intra-polymer electron-transfer reactions in macromolecule-metal complexes,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, vol. 91, no. 17, pp. 2877–2880, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. Manecke and R. Schlegel, “Polymere imidazolcarbonsäuren, 2. Über das schwermetallionenbindungsvermögen von chelatharzen mit 4,5-sicarboxyimidazolyl-gruppen,” Macromolecular Chemistry, vol. 179, pp. 19–27, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Wang and C. Chen, “Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 195–226, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Pramanik, S. Dhara, S. S. Bhattacharyya, and P. Chattopadhyay, “Separation and determination of some metal ions on new chelating resins containing N, N donor sets,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 556, no. 2, pp. 430–437, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. L. Rivas, M. Jara, and E. D. Pereira, “Preparation and adsorption properties of the chelating resins containing carboxylic, sulfonic, and imidazole groups,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 2852–2856, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. D. Green and T. E. Long, “Designing imidazole-based ionic liquids and ionic liquid monomers for emerging technologies,” Polymer Reviews, vol. 49, pp. 291–314, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. M. R. Grimmett, “Imidazoles,” in Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry II, A. R. Katritzky, C. W. Ress, and E. F. V. Scriven, Eds., vol. 3, pp. 77–220, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. R. Grimmett, Imidazole and Benzimidazole Synthesis, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
  18. M. R. Grimmett, “Advances in imidazole chemistry,” Advances in Heterocyclic Chemistry, vol. 12, pp. 103–183, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Novelli and A. de Santis, “General synthesis of C substituted imidazoles,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 265–269, 1967. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Kurimura, T. Abe, Y. Usui, E. Tsuchida, H. Nishide, and G. Challa, “Characteristic behaviour of the complexation of copper(II) with polymer-bound vinylimidazole ligands,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, vol. 90, no. 23, pp. 3563–3566, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T. Ziegler, “Density functional theory as a practical tool for the study of elementary reaction steps in organometallic chemistry,” Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 63, pp. 873–878, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, J. A. Pople, and M. J. Frisch, “The performance of the Becke-Lee-Yang-Parr (B-LYP) density functional theory with various basis sets,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 197, no. 4-5, pp. 499–505, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. F. F. Jian, P. S. Zhao, Z. S. Bai, and L. Zhang, “Quantum chemical calculation studies on 4-phenyl-1-(propan-2- ylidene)thiosemicarbazide,” Structural Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 635–639, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL 97, Program for the Solution of Crystal Structures, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 1997.
  25. L. J. Farrugia, “WinGX suite for small-molecule single-crystal crystallography,” Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 837–838, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-97, Program for Crystal Structures Refinement, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 1997.
  27. CrysAlis PRO, Oxford Diffraction, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK, 2007.
  28. CrysAlis RED, Oxford Diffraction, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK, 2007.
  29. A. L. Spek, “Structure validation in chemical crystallography,” Acta Crystallographica D, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 148–155, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel et al., Gaussian 03, Revision E.01, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, Conn, USA, 2004.
  31. R. Dennington II, T. Keith, and J. Millam, Gauss View, Version 4.1.2, Semichem Inc., Shawnee Mission, Kan, USA, 2007.
  32. L. J. Farrugia, “ORTEP-3 for Windows—a version of ORTEP-III with a Graphical User Interface (GUI),” Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 30, p. 565, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. N. Şireci, Ü. Yılmaz, H. Küçükbay et al., “Synthesis of 1-substituted benzimidazole metal complexes and structural characterization of dichlorobis(1-phenyl-1 H -benzimidazole- κN3)cobalt(II) and dichlorobis (1-phenyl-1 H -benzimidazole- κN3)zinc(II),” Journal of Coordination Chemistry, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 1894–1902, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. M. Akkurt, S. Karaca, H. Küçükbay, E. Orhan, and O. Büyükgüngör, “Dichlorobis[1-(2-ethoxyethyl)-1H-benzimidazole-κN3]nickel(II),” Acta Crystallographica E, vol. 61, pp. m41–m43, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. F. Şen, R. Şahin, Ö. Andaç, and M. Taş, “trans-Bis(nitrato-κO)tetrakis(1-vinyl-1H-imidazole-κN3)copper(II),” Acta Crystallographica E, vol. 68, p. m1045, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. A. B. P. Lever, Inorganic Electronic Spectroscopy, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984.
  37. Y.-X. Sun, Q.-L. Hao, W.-X. Wei et al., “Experimental and density functional studies on 4-(3,4-dihydroxybenzylideneamino)antipyrine, and 4-(2,3,4-trihydroxybenzylideneamino)antipyrine,” Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM, vol. 904, no. 1–3, pp. 74–82, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. Zhang, B. Du, G. Sun, and Y. Sun, “Experimental and theoretical studies on o-, m- and p-chlorobenzylideneaminoantipyrines,” Spectrochimica Acta A, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 1115–1124, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Yazıcı, Ç. Albayrak, I. Gümrükçüoğlu, I. Şenel, and O. Büyükgüngör, “Experimental and density functional theory (DFT) studies on (E)-2-acetyl-4-(4-nitrophenyldiazenyl) phenol,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 985, no. 2-3, pp. 292–298, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. D. S. Chemia and J. Zyss, Non Linear Optical Properties of Organic Molecules and Crystal, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1987.
  41. J. Zyss, Molecular Non Linear Optics, Academic Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 1994.
  42. A. Ben Ahmed, H. Feki, Y. Abid, and C. Minot, “Molecular structure, vibrational spectra and nonlinear optical properties of orthoarsenic acid-tris-(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane DFT study,” Spectrochimica Acta A, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 1315–1320, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. G. A. Babu and P. Ramasamy, “Growth and characterization of an organic NLO material ammonium malate,” Current Applied Physics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 214–220, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. E. Scrocco and J. Tomasi, “Electronic molecular structure, reactivity and intermolecular forces: an euristic interpretation by means of electrostatic molecular potentials,” Advances in Quantum Chemistry, vol. 11, pp. 115–193, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. F. J. Luque, J. M. López, and M. Orozco, “Perspective on “Electrostatic interactions of a solute with a continuum. A direct utilization of ab initio molecular potentials for the prevision of solvent effects”,” Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, vol. 103, no. 3-4, pp. 343–345, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. N. Okulik and A. H. Jubert, “Theoretical analysis of the reactive sites of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,” Internet Electronic Journal of Molecular Design, vol. 4, pp. 17–30, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  47. P. Politzer and J. S. Murray, “The fundamental nature and role of the electrostatic potential in atoms and molecules,” Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 134–142, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. P. Politzer and D. G. Truhlar, Chemical Applications of Atomic and Molecular Electrostatic Potentials, Plenum, New York, NY, USA, 1981.
  49. I. Fleming, Frontier Orbitals and Organic Chemical Reactions, John Wiley & Sons, London, UK, 1976.
  50. R. G. Pearson, “Absolute electronegativity and hardness correlated with molecular orbital theory,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 83, no. 22, pp. 8440–8841, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. R. S. Mulliken, “Electronic population analysis on LCAO-MO molecular wave functions. I,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1833–1840, 1955. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. R. S. Mulliken, “Electronic population analysis on LCAO-MO molecular wave functions. II. Overlap populations, bond orders, and covalent bond energies,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1841–1846, 1955. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. R. S. Mulliken, “Electronic population analysis on LCAO-MO molecular wave functions. III. effects of hybridization on overlap and gross AO populations,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2338–2342, 1955. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. R. S. Mulliken, “Electronic population analysis on LCAO-MO molecular wave functions. IV. bonding and antibonding in LCAO and valence-bond theories,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2343–2346, 1955. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus