Table of Contents
Journal of Complex Systems
Volume 2013, Article ID 390454, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/390454
Research Article

Bluffing as a Rational Strategy in a Simple Poker-Like Game Model

1Department of Education and Psychology, University of Florence, Via San Salvi 12, Building 26, 50135 Florence, Italy
2Statistical Materials Modeling Laboratory (CNR-IENI), Via R. Cozzi 53, 20125 Milano, Italy

Received 28 January 2013; Accepted 8 May 2013

Academic Editor: Fuwen Yang

Copyright © 2013 Andrea Guazzini and Daniele Vilone. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. A. Real, “Animal choice behavior and the evolution of cognitive architecture,” Science, vol. 253, no. 5023, pp. 980–986, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. L. A. Real, “Information processing and the evolutionary ecology of cognitive architecture,” American Naturalist, vol. 140, pp. S108–S145, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. Brandstätter, G. Gigerenzer, and R. Hertwig, “The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs,” Psychological Review, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 409–432, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. R. Busemeyer and J. T. Townsend, “Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment,” Psychological Review, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 432–459, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. I. Erev and G. Barron, “On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies,” Psychological Review, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 912–931, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. T. Fong, D. H. Krantz, and R. E. Nisbett, “The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 253–292, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. R. Fox and L. Hadar, “Decisions from experience = sampling error + prospect theory: reconsidering Hertwig, Barron, Weber & Erev,” Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 159–161, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. Hau, T. J. Pleskac, and R. Hertwig, “Decisions from experience and statistical probabilities: why they trigger different choices than a priori probabilities,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 48–68, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, and V. Loreto, “Statistical physics of social dynamics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 591–646, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Camerer, Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments on Strategic Interaction, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2003.
  11. H. Gintis, The Bounds of Reason, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2009.
  12. I. Bárány and Z. Füredi, “Mental poker with three or more players,” Information and Control, vol. 59, no. 1–3, pp. 84–93, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. D. Billings, A. Davidson, J. Schaeffer, and D. Szafron, “The challenge of poker,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 134, no. 1-2, pp. 201–240, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Johansen-Berg and V. Walsh, “Cognitive neuroscience: who to play at poker,” Current Biology, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. R261–R263, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Koller and A. Pfeffer, “Representations and solutions for game-theoretic problems,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 94, no. 1-2, pp. 167–215, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Rapoport, I. Erev, E. V. Abraham, and D. E. Olson, “Randomization and adaptive learning in a simplified poker game,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 31–49, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Z. Shen, “A study of a generalization of a card problem,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 385–410, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Miekisz, “Evolutionary game theory and population dynamics,” in Multiscale Problems in the Life Sciences, vol. 1940 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pp. 269–316, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. H. W. Kuhn, “A simplified two-person poker,” in Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 24, pp. 97–103, 1950. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. Von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1947.
  21. A. Guazzini and D. Vilone, The emergence of bluff in poker-like games [Ph.D. thesis], University of Florence, 2009.
  22. A. Guazzini, D. Vilone, F. Bagnoli, T. Carletti, and R. Lauro Grotto, “Cog-nitive network structure: an experimental study,” Advances in Complex Systems, vol. 15, no. 6, Article ID 1250084, 2012. View at Google Scholar