Review Article

An Overview on the Field of Micro- and Nanotechnologies for Synthetic Peptide-Based Vaccines

Table 2

Schematic view of the mechanism of action and advantages of the different micro- and nanotechnologies for peptide-based vaccine delivery.

Type of technologyRoleAdvantages

Alum(i) Depot
(ii) Activation of inflamasome and IL-1β release
(i) Enhances antibody responses

Emulsions(i) Promote antigen uptake by DCs
(ii) Strong immunostimulatory activity
(i) Allows reduction of antigen dose
(ii) Well tolerated
(iii) Useful in children
(iv) Mixed Th1/Th2 responses

Polymeric MPs and NPs(i) Enhance IL-1β secretion by DCs(i) Biodegradable and biocompatible
(ii) Release during long time periods
(iii) Modulation of the delivery: continuous, by pulses, or triggered by several factors (pH, temperature, ionic strength, electric or magnetic fields)
(iv) Elicit humoral and cellular immunity

Liposomes(i) Passive targeting
(ii) Tendency to interact with macrophages
(i) CD4+, CD8+ and CLT immune responses
(ii) Modulation of the immune response using different lipids

VLPs(i) Taken up by APCs and MHC class I and II presentation(i) Incorporation of peptides produced by recombination, or chemically coupling them once the VLP is formed
(ii) Potent humoral and cellular immune responses

Virosomes(i) Enter cells through receptor mediated endocytosis(i) Membrane fusion properties of the virus are maintained
(ii) Humoral and CTL responses
(iii) Value for developing multivalent vaccines

ICOMs and ISCOMATRIX(i) Antigen carrier
(ii) Immunostimulation (because of the saponin)
(i) Potent humoral and cellular immune responses
(ii) Reduction of the antigen dose
(iii) Safe and well tolerated

Nanobeads(i) Depends on the size: small ones elicit CD8+
immune response, whereas larger ones facilitate
CD4+ responses
(i) Humoral and cellular immune responses