Table of Contents
Journal of Earthquakes
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 123092, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/123092
Research Article

Potential of Fractal Analysis of Earthquakes through Wavelet Analysis and Determination of b Value as an Aftershock Precursor: A Case Study Using Earthquake Data between 2003 and 2011 in Turkey

Department of Applied Geophysics, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad, Jharkhand 826004, India

Received 14 October 2013; Revised 23 January 2014; Accepted 22 February 2014; Published 20 March 2014

Academic Editor: Morteza Fattahi

Copyright © 2014 V. Srivardhan and Uppala Srinu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Farrell, S. Husen, and R. B. Smith, “Earthquake swarm and b-value characterization of the Yellowstone volcano-tectonic system,” Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, vol. 188, no. 1–3, pp. 260–276, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. Hirose and K. Maeda, “Earthquake forecast models for inland Japan based on the G-R law and the modified G-R law,” Earth, Planets and Space, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 239–260, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Hirose and K. Maeda, “Earthquake forecast models for inland Japan based on the G-R law and the modified G-R law,” Earth, Planets and Space, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 239–260, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Ceylan, “Fractal properties of earthquakes in Marmara,” Journal of Istanbul Kültür University, vol. 4, pp. 99–108, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  5. P. N. S. Roy and S. K. Mondal, “Identification of active seismicity by fractal analysis for understanding the recent geodynamics of central Himalaya,” Journal of the Geological Society of India, vol. 79, pp. 353–360, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  6. K. Aki, “A probabilistic synthesis of precursory phenomena,” Earthquake Prediction, pp. 566–574, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. R. Brown and C. H. Scholz, “Broad bandwidth study of the topography of natural rock surfaces,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 90, pp. 12575–12582, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  8. K. Aki, “Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N = a - b M and its confidence limits,” Earthquake Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, vol. 43, pp. 237–239, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  9. B. Gutenberg and C. F. Richter, “Seismicity of the Earth,” Geological Society of America Special Papers, vol. 34, 131 pages, 1941. View at Google Scholar
  10. K. Mogi, “Magnitude-frequency relationship for elastic shocks accompanying fractures of various materials and some related problems in earthquakes,” Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, vol. 40, pp. 831–883, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  11. C. H. Scholz, “The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 58, pp. 399–415, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Wyss, “Towards a physical understanding of the earthquake frequency distribution,” Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 31, pp. 341–359, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  13. P. Midha, “Multifractal Analysis of Seismicity of Kutch Region (Gujarat),” in Proceedings of the 9th Biennial International Conference & Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics, pp. 1–382, 2012.
  14. Y. Bayrak, R. B. S. Yadav, D. Kalafat et al., “Seismogenesis and earthquake triggering during the Van (Turkey) 2011 seismic sequence,” Tectonophysics, vol. 601, no. 1, pp. 163–176, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. D. Amitrano, “Variability in the power-law distributions of rupture events, how and why does b-value change,” European Physical Journal—Special Topics, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 199–215, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. M. C. Göncüoğlu, Introduction to the Geology of Turkey: Geo dynamic evolution of the Pre- Alpineand Alpineterranes, ODTU, Jeoloji Müh, Bölümü, Ankara, Turkey, 2010.
  17. R. Reilinger, S. McClusky, P. Vernant et al., “GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa-Arabia-Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions,” Journal of Geophysical Research B: Solid Earth, vol. 111, no. 5, Article ID B05411, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Koçyiǧit, A. Yilmaz, S. Adamia, and S. Kuloshvili, “Neotectonic of East Anatolian Plateau (Turkey) and Lesser Caucasus: implication for transition from thrusting to strike-slip faulting,” Geodinamica Acta, vol. 14, no. 1–3, pp. 177–195, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Koçyigit, “Newfieldandseismic data about the intraplate strike-slipdeformationinVanregion, East Anatolianplateau, E. Turkey,” Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, vol. 62, pp. 586–605, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. E. J. Fielding, P. R. Lundgren, T. Taymaz, S. Yolsal-Çevikbilen, and S. E. Owen, “Fault- Slip Source Models forthe 2011 M7.1 Van earthquake in Turkey from SAR interferometry, Pixel Offset Tracking, GPS, and Seismic Wave form Analysis,” Seismological Research Letters, vol. 84, no. 4, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  21. H. Kanamori and D. L. Anderson, “Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 65, pp. 1073–1095, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  22. V. P. Dimri, N. Vedanti, and S. Chattopadhyay, “Fractal analysis of aftershock sequence of the Bhuj earthquake: a wavelet-based approach,” Current Science, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 1617–1620, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. V. P. Dimri, Application of Fractals in Earth Sciences, CRC Press, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2000.
  24. U. Y. Kalyoncuoglu, “Evaluation of seismicity and seismic hazard parameters in Turkey and surrounding area using a new approach to the Gutenberg-Richter relation,” Journal of Seismology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 131–148, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus