Research Article
How Good is the Governance Status in Community Forestry? A Case Study from Midhills in Nepal
Table 3
Governance status at the CFUG level.
| Criteria | CFUG | Kuwadi | Jalbire | Koldanda | Chisapani | Thangsing | Average total (%) |
| Rule of Law | 80.8 | 84.4 | 80.0 | 81.8 | 83.3 | 82.06 | Transparency | 74.2 | 83.9 | 77.9 | 71.2 | 64.2 | 74.28 | Accountability | 65.9 | 67.9 | 68.2 | 64.3 | 60.4 | 65.34 | Participation | 69.1 | 78.8 | 73.6 | 72.2 | 67.5 | 72.24 | Responsiveness | 86.8 | 90.0 | 85.7 | 82.3 | 83.4 | 85.64 | Inclusive and Equitable | 73.4 | 64.2 | 79.6 | 72.2 | 61.9 | 70.26 | Efficient and Effective | 73.6 | 78.1 | 74.7 | 66.3 | 59.9 | 70.52 | Consensus-oriented | 89.6 | 91.1 | 98.1 | 89.3 | 85.5 | 90.72 | Average | 76.68 | 79.80 | 79.73 | 74.95 | 70.76 | 76.38 |
|
|