Research Article | Open Access

Akif Gadjiev, Oktay Duman, A. M. Ghorbanalizadeh, "Ideal Convergence of -Positive Linear Operators", *Journal of Function Spaces*, vol. 2012, Article ID 178316, 12 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/178316

# Ideal Convergence of -Positive Linear Operators

**Academic Editor:**Maria Carro

#### Abstract

We study some ideal convergence results of -positive linear operators defined on an appropriate subspace of the space of all analytic functions on a bounded simply connected domain in the complex plane. We also show that our approximation results with respect to ideal convergence are more general than the classical ones.

#### 1. Introduction

The classical Korovkin theory (see [1]) is mainly based on the β*positivity*β of real-valued linear operators. In [2], this theory was improved by Gadjiev and Orhan via the concept of statistical convergence (see, also, [3β6]). However, in order to obtain the Korovkin-type results for complex-valued linear operators, the concept of β*-positivity*β introduced by GadΕΎiev [7] is used instead of the classical positivity. Such results may be found in the papers [7β10]. In the recent works [11, 12], with the help of some convergence methods, such as -statistical convergence and ideal convergence, various approximation theorems have been obtained for -positive linear operators defined on some appropriate subspaces of all analytic functions on the unit disk. In the present paper, we study some ideal convergence results of a sequence of -positive linear operators on a bounded simply connected domain that does not need to be the unit disk. Furthermore, we present a general family of -positive linear operators which satisfy all conditions of our results but not the classical ones.

We first recall the concept of β*ideal convergence.*β

Let be a nonempty set. A class of subsets of is said to be an *ideal* in provided that(i) (the empty set) ,(ii)if , then ,(iii)if and , then .

An ideal is called *nontrivial* if . Also, a nontrivial ideal in is called *admissible* if for each (see [13] for details). In [14, 15], using the above definition of ideal, a new convergence method which is more general than the usual convergence has been introduced as follows.

Let be a nontrivial ideal in , the set of all positive integers. A sequence is *ideal convergent* (or *-convergent*) to a number if, for every , , which is denoted by . Notice that the method of ideal convergence includes many convergence methods such as -statistical convergence, statistical convergence, lacunary statistical convergence, usual convergence, and so forth. For example, if is the class of all finite subsets of , then -convergence reduces to the usual. Furthermore, -convergence coincides with the concept of -statistical convergence (see [16]) by taking , where is a nonnegative regular summability matrix and denotes the density of . Besides, if we choose , the CesΓ‘ro matrix of order one, then we immediately obtain the statistical convergence (see [17]). With these properties, using the ideal convergence in the approximation theory provides us many advantages.

Now, we also recall some basic definitions and notations used in the paper.

Let be a bounded simply connected domain in , the set of all complex numbers. By we denote the space of all analytic functions on . Let be any analytic function mapping conformally and one to one on the unit disk. Then, for every , we have the Taylor expansion of given by where , , is the Taylor coefficient of satisfying It is known that Taylorβs coefficients are calculated by the following formula (see [18]): where is any closed contour lying in the interior of . It is not hard to see that the series (1.1) under the condition (1.2) is uniformly convergent if . It is well known that is FrΓ©chetβs space with topology of compact convergence in any closed subset of . In this paper, we use the norm on the space defined by and therefore the convergence in is the convergence in norm for any .

Now let . Following [7] (see also [9]), if a linear operator mapping into itself satisfies the condition
then we say that is a β*-positive linear operator*β. As usual, for a function , the value of at a point is denoted by and also the Taylor expansion of is
where is the Taylor coefficient of and is the Taylor coefficient of . If is a sequence of -positive linear operators from into itself, then, as in (1.6), we may write that
where, of course, is the Taylor coefficient of for and . Observe that is -positive if and only if for every and .

Throughout the paper we use the following three test functions:

We also consider the following subspace of :

#### 2. Ideal Convergence of -Positive Linear Operators

In order to compute the degree of ideal convergence of sequences we introduce the following definition (see also [2]).

*Definition 2.1. *Let be an admissible ideal in . Then, one says that a sequence is ideal convergent to a number with degree if, for every ,
In this case, we write

Notice that if we choose, in particular, in Definition 2.1, we immediately get the ideal convergence of to . Observe that, according to Definition 2.1, the degree is controlled by the entries of the sequence .

We first need the following two lemmas.

Lemma 2.2. *Let be an admissible ideal in . Assume further that is a sequence of analytic functions on with the Taylor coefficients for each and . Then, for ,
**
if and only if there exists a sequence for which the following conditions hold:
*

*Proof. **Necessity. *Assume that (2.3) holds. Then, choosing , the conditions (2.4) and (2.5) can be obtained immediately. Now we prove (2.6). By (2.3), we may write that, for each fixed ,
By (1.3), for any , we obtain that
Hence, it follows from (2.8) that, for a given ,
By (2.7), we get
where . Therefore, from (2.9), we conclude that
which gives (2.6).*Sufficiency. *Assume now that conditions (2.4)β(2.6) hold. It follows from (2.5) that the series is convergent for any . Then, for every , there exists a positive natural number such that
holds. Using (2.4) and (2.12) and also considering the fact that
we get
which yields that
Since for every and for every and , we obtain that
Now, for a given , choose an such that . Then, define the following sets:
From (2.16), it is clear that
By hypothesis (2.6), we know for each . Hence, by the definition of ideal, we immediately obtain that the set belongs to for every , which implies (2.3). So, the proof is completed.

Lemma 2.3. *Let be an admissible ideal in , and let be a sequence of -positive linear operators from into itself. If, for some with ,
**
holds, then there exists a sequence satisfying (2.5), (2.6) with such that the following inequality
**
holds, where is the same as (1.7).*

*Proof. *We first observe that
By (2.19) and Lemma 2.2, there exist sequences and numbers with satisfying (2.5), (2.6) such that the following conditions
hold. Hence, we easily get
where . Since , we can see that
whence the result.

Then, we are ready to give our main result.

Theorem 2.4. *Let be an admissible ideal in , and let be a sequence of -positive linear operators from into itself. If, for some with , (2.19) holds, then, for every , one has
**
where .*

*Proof. *Assume that (2.19) holds for some with . Let and be fixed. By (1.1) and (1.7), we may write that
The last inequality gives that
By Lemmaββ2.2(ii) of [11], we know the fact that . Also, since , we see that . Hence, combining these inequalities, we have
By Lemma 2.3, there exist a sequence satisfying (2.5), (2.6) with such that the inequality
holds. Hence, we get, for every , that
Since, for every ,
we easily get that
Now taking as in both sides of the last inequality and also using (2.5), we observe that the series in the right-hand side of (2.30) converges for any . Therefore, the remain of the proof is very similar to the proof of the sufficiency part of Lemma 2.2.

#### 3. Concluding Remarks

In this section, we give some useful consequences of our Theorem 2.4.

We first observe that, for with , Then, defining the next result is equivalent to Theorem 2.4.

Theorem 3.1. *Let be an admissible ideal in , and let be a sequence of -positive linear operators from into itself. If, for some with ,
**
then, for every , (2.25) holds for the same as in Theorem 2.4.*

If we take in Theorems 2.4 and 3.1, then we immediately get the following characterization for ideal approximation by -positive linear operators.

Corollary 3.2. *Let be an admissible ideal in , and let be a sequence of -positive linear operators from into itself. Then, for every ,
**
if and only if, for each ,
**
or equivalently,
*

*Proof. *Since each , the implications (3.4) *β* (3.5) and (3.4) *β* (3.6) are obvious. The sufficiency immediately follows from Definition 2.1 and Theorems 2.4 and 3.1.

Finally, if we choose , where is a nonnegative regular summability matrix and denotes the density of , and also if we take , then from Theorem 2.4 we obtain a slight modification of the result proved in [11].

It is known from [14] that if we choose , where denotes the asymptotic density of given by then -convergence reduces to the concept of statistical convergence which was first introduced by Fast [17]. In the last equality, by we denote the cardinality of the set . Hence, let be a sequence whose terms are defined by Then, we easily observe that holds. Assume now that is any sequence of -positive linear operators from into itself, such that, for every , the sequence is uniformly convergent to on a bounded simply domain with respect to any norm . Then, consider the following operators: Therefore, observe that is a sequence of -positive linear operators from into itself. By (3.10), we can write, for each , that So, the last inequality gives by our conditions on . Then, it follows from (3.9) that, for each , Hence, by Corollary 3.2, we obtain, for every , that However, by the definition (3.8), we see that, for every , Now since , we immediately obtain that the subsequence converges to while the subsequence converges to zero. Hence, the sequence is nonconvergent. Therefore, we see that the sequence cannot be uniformly convergent to on . Therefore, we can say that our ideal approximations by -positive linear operators presented in this paper are more general and applicable than the classical ones.

Finally, for a given , we consider the following subspace of : In this case, we consider the following test functions: Thus, considering the same methods used in this paper, one can immediately get the following ideal approximation result on the subspace , .

Corollary 3.3. *Let be an admissible ideal in , and let be a sequence of -positive linear operators from into itself. Then, for every , ,
**
if and only if, for each ,
*

#### References

- P. P. Korovkin,
*Linear Operators and Theory of Approximation*, Hindustan, Delhi, India, 1960. - A. D. Gadjiev and C. Orhan, βSome approximation theorems via statistical convergence,β
*The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics*, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 129β138, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - G. A. Anastassiou and O. Duman, βA Baskakov type generalization of statistical Korovkin theory,β
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 340, no. 1, pp. 476β486, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - G. A. Anastassiou, O. Duman, and E. ErkuΕ-Duman, βStatistical approximation for stochastic processes,β
*Stochastic Analysis and Applications*, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 460β474, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - O. Duman, M. K. Khan, and C. Orhan, β$A$-statistical convergence of approximating operators,β
*Mathematical Inequalities & Applications*, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 689β699, 2003. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - O. Duman and C. Orhan, βStatistical approximation by positive linear operators,β
*Studia Mathematica*, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 187β197, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - A. D. GadΕΎiev, βLinear $k$-positive operators in a space of regular functions, and theorems of P. P. Korovkin type,β
*Izvestija Akademii Nauk AzerbaΔdΕΎanskoΔ SSR. Serija Fiziko-TehniΔeskih i MatematiΔeskih Nauk*, no. 5, pp. 49β53, 1974 (Russian). View at: Google Scholar - R. A. Ahadov, βOn the convergence of sequences of linear operators in a space of functions that are analytic in the disc,β
*Izvestiya Akademii Nauk AzerbaΔdzhanskoΔ SSR. Seriya Fiziko-Tekhnicheskikh i Matematicheskikh Nauk*, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 67β71, 1981. View at: Google Scholar - A. D. Gadjiev, βThe convergence problem for a sequence of positive linear operators on unbounded sets, and theorems analogous to that of P.P. Korovkin,β
*Soviet Mathematics. Doklady*, vol. 15, pp. 1433β1436, 1974. View at: Google Scholar - N. Δ°spir, βConvergence of sequences of $k$-positive linear operators in subspaces of the space of analytic functions,β
*Hacettepe Bulletin of Natural Sciences and Engineering B*, vol. 28, pp. 47β53, 1999. View at: Google Scholar - O. Duman, βStatistical approximation theorems by $k$-positive linear operators,β
*Archiv der Mathematik*, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 569β576, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - M. A. Γzarslan, β
*β*-convergence theorems for a class of $k$-positive linear operators,β*Central European Journal of Mathematics*, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 357β362, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - C. Kuratowski,
*Topologie. Vol. I*, PaΕstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw, Poland, 1958. - P. Kostyrko, M. MaΔaj, T. Ε alΓ‘t, and M. Sleziak, β
*β*-convergence and extremal*β*-limit points,β*Mathematica Slovaca*, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 443β464, 2005. View at: Google Scholar - P. Kostyrko, T. Ε alΓ‘t, and W. WilczyΕski, β
*β*-convergence,β*Real Analysis Exchange*, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 669β685, 2000. View at: Google Scholar - A. R. Freedman and J. J. Sember, βDensities and summability,β
*Pacific Journal of Mathematics*, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 293β305, 1981. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - H. Fast, βSur la convergence statistique,β
*Colloqium Mathematicum*, vol. 2, pp. 241β244, 1951. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - M. A. Evgrafov, βThe method of near systems in the space of analytic functions and its application to interpolation,β
*Trudy Moskovskogo MatematiΔeskogo ObΕ‘Δestva*, vol. 5, pp. 89β201, 1956 (Russian). View at: Google Scholar

#### Copyright

Copyright Β© 2012 Akif Gadjiev et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.