Journal of Function Spaces

Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 980352, 22 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/980352

## Hybrid Steepest-Descent Methods for Triple Hierarchical Variational Inequalities

^{1}Department of Mathematics, Shanghai Normal University, and Scientific Computing Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Shanghai 200234, China^{2}Department of Mathematics, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia^{3}Center for Fundamental Science, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan^{4}Department of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Jeddah, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

Received 28 October 2014; Accepted 5 January 2015

Academic Editor: Mohamed-Aziz Taoudi

Copyright © 2015 L. C. Ceng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We introduce and analyze a relaxed iterative algorithm by combining Korpelevich’s extragradient method, hybrid steepest-descent method, and Mann’s iteration method. We prove that, under appropriate assumptions, the proposed algorithm converges strongly to a common element of the fixed point set of infinitely many nonexpansive mappings, the solution set of finitely many generalized mixed equilibrium problems (GMEPs), the solution set of finitely many variational inclusions, and the solution set of general system of variational inequalities (GSVI), which is just a unique solution of a triple hierarchical variational inequality (THVI) in a real Hilbert space. In addition, we also consider the application of the proposed algorithm for solving a hierarchical variational inequality problem with constraints of finitely many GMEPs, finitely many variational inclusions, and the GSVI. The results obtained in this paper improve and extend the corresponding results announced by many others.

#### 1. Introduction

Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space and let be the metric projection of onto . Let be a nonlinear mapping on . We denote by the set of fixed points of and by the set of all real numbers. A mapping is called -Lipschitz continuous if there exists a constant such that In particular, if , then is called a nonexpansive mapping; if , then is called a contraction.

Let be a nonlinear mapping on . We consider the following variational inequality problem (VIP): find a point such that The solution set of VIP 2 is denoted by .

The VIP 2 was first discussed by Lions [1]. In 1976, Korpelevich [2] proposed an iterative algorithm for solving the VIP 2 in Euclidean space : with a given number, which is known as the extragradient method.

Let be a real-valued function, let be a nonlinear mapping, and let be a bifunction. In 2008, Peng and Yao [3] introduced the following generalized mixed equilibrium problem (GMEP) of finding such that We denote the set of solutions of GMEP 4 by .

It was assumed in [3] that is a bifunction satisfying conditions (A1)–(A4) and is a lower semicontinuous and convex function with restriction (B1) or (B2), where(A1) for all ;(A2) is monotone, that is, for any ;(A3) is upper-hemicontinuous; that is, for each , (A4) is convex and lower semicontinuous for each ;(B1) for each and , there exists a bounded subset and such that, for any , (B2) is a bounded set.

For a given positive number , let be the solution set of the auxiliary mixed equilibrium problem; that is, for each ,

On the other hand, let be a single-valued mapping of into and let be a multivalued mapping with . Consider the following variational inclusion: find a point such that We denote by the solution set of the variational inclusion 8. It is known that problem 8 provides a convenient framework for the unified study of optimal solutions in many optimization related areas including mathematical programming, complementarity problems, variational inequalities, optimal control, mathematical economics, equilibria and game theory. Let be a maximal monotone set-valued mapping. We define the resolvent operator associated with and as follows: where is a positive number.

Let be two mappings. Consider the following general system of variational inequalities (GSVI) of finding such that where and are two constants. It was considered and studied in [4–6]. In particular, if , then the GSVI 10 reduces to the following problem of finding such that which is defined by Verma [7] and it is called a new system of variational inequalities (NSVI). Further, if , additionally, then the NSVI reduces to the classical VIP 2. In 2008, Ceng et al. [6] transformed the GSVI 10 into a fixed point problem in the following way.

Proposition CWY (see [6]).* For given **, ** is a solution of the GSVI 10 if and only if ** is a fixed point of the mapping ** defined by**where **.*

In particular, if the mapping is -inverse strongly monotone for , then the mapping is nonexpansive provided for . We denote by the fixed point set of the mapping .

Let and be two nonexpansive mappings. In 2009, Yao et al. [8] considered the following hierarchical VIP: find hierarchically a fixed point of , which is a solution to the VIP for monotone mapping ; namely, find , such that The solution set of the hierarchical VIP 13 is denoted by . It is not hard to check that solving the hierarchical VIP 13 is equivalent to the fixed point problem of the composite mapping ; that is, find , such that . The authors [8] introduced and analyzed the following iterative algorithm for solving the hierarchical VIP 13:

Theorem YLM (see [8, Theorem ]).* Let ** be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space **. Let ** and ** be two nonexpansive mappings of ** into itself. Let ** be a fixed contraction with **. Let ** and ** be two sequences in **. For any given **, let ** be the sequence generated by 14. Assume that the sequence ** is bounded and that*(i)*;*(ii)*, **;*(iii)*, ** and **;*(iv)*;*(v)*there exists a constant ** such that ** for each **, where **. Then, ** converges strongly to ** which solves the hierarchical VIP *

Very recently, Iiduka [9, 10] considered a variational inequality with a variational inequality constraint over the set of fixed points of a nonexpansive mapping. Since this problem has a triple structure in contrast with bilevel programming problems or hierarchical constrained optimization problems or hierarchical fixed point problem, it is refereed as triple hierarchical constrained optimization problem (THCOP). He presented some examples of THCOP and developed iterative algorithms to find the solution of such a problem. The convergence analysis of the proposed algorithms was also studied in [9, 10]. Since the original problem is a variational inequality, in this paper, we call it a triple hierarchical variational inequality (THVI). Subsequently, Zeng et al. [11] introduced and considered the following triple hierarchical variational inequality (THVI).

*Problem I*. Assume that(i)each is a nonexpansive mapping with ;(ii) is -inverse strongly monotone;(iii) is -strongly monotone and -Lipschitz continuous;(iv).Then, the objective is to

In [11], the authors proposed the following algorithm for solving Problem I.

*Algorithm ZWY* ([11, Algorithm 3.2]). Let and satisfy assumptions (i)–(iv) in Problem I. The following steps are presented for solving Problem I.

*Step 0*. Take , , and , choose arbitrarily, and let .

*Step 1*. Given , compute as
where , for integer , with the mod function taking values in the set ; that is, if for some integers and , then if and if .

The following convergence analysis was presented in [11].

Theorem ZWY ([11, Theorem ]).* Let **, **, and **, such that (i) **, (ii) **, (iii) ** or **, (iv) ** or **, and (v) ** for all **. Assume in addition that*
Then, the sequence generated by Algorithm ZWY satisfies the following properties:(a) is bounded;(b) and ;(c) converges strongly to the unique solution of Problem I provided .

In this paper, we introduce and study the following triple hierarchical variational inequality (THVI) with constraints of finitely many GMEPs, finitely many variational inclusions, and general system of variational inequalities.

*Problem II*. Let be two integers. Assume that(i) is a sequence of nonexpansive self-mappings on and is -inverse strongly monotone for ;(ii) is -inverse strongly monotone and is -strongly monotone and -Lipschitz continuous;(iii) is a bifunction from to satisfying (A1)–(A4) and is a proper lower semicontinuous and convex function, where ;(iv) is a maximal monotone mapping, and and are -inverse strongly monotone and -inverse strongly monotone, respectively, where and ;(v), where . Then, the objective is to

Motivated and inspired by the above facts, we introduce and analyze a relaxed iterative algorithm by combining Korpelevich’s extragradient method, hybrid steepest-descent method, and Mann’s iteration method. We prove that under mild conditions, the proposed algorithm converges strongly to a common element of the fixed point set of infinitely many nonexpansive mappings , the solution set of finitely many GMEPs, the solution set of finitely many variational inclusions, and the solution set of GSVI 10, which is just a unique solution of the THVI 19. In addition, we also consider the application of the proposed algorithm to solve a hierarchical variational inequality problem with constraints of finitely many GMEPs, finitely many variational inclusions, and GSVI 10. That is, under appropriate conditions, we prove that the proposed algorithm converges strongly to a unique solution of the VIP: , ; equivalently, . The results obtained in this paper improve and extend the corresponding results announced by many others including [12, 13]. A comprehensive survey on triple hierarchical variational inequalities can be found in [14].

#### 2. Preliminaries

Throughout this paper, we assume that is a real Hilbert space whose inner product and norm are denoted by and , respectively. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . We write to indicate that the sequence converges weakly to and to indicate that the sequence converges strongly to . Moreover, we use to denote the weak -limit set of the sequence ; that is,

Recall that a mapping is called(i)monotone if (ii)-strongly monotone if there exists a constant such that (iii)-inverse strongly monotone if there exists a constant such that

It is obvious that if is -inverse strongly monotone, then is monotone and -Lipschitz continuous. Moreover, we also have that, for all and , So, if , then is a nonexpansive mapping from to .

The metric (or nearest point) projection from onto is the mapping which assigns to each point the unique point , satisfying the property

Some important properties of projections are gathered in the following proposition.

Proposition 1. *For given and :*(i)*, ;*(ii)*, ;*(iii)*, .**Consequently, is nonexpansive and monotone.*

*Definition 2. *A mapping is said to be

(a) nonexpansive if
(b) firmly nonexpansive if is nonexpansive or, equivalently, if is -inverse strongly monotone (-ism),
alternatively, is firmly nonexpansive if and only if can be expressed as
where is nonexpansive; projections are firmly nonexpansive.

It can be easily seen that if is nonexpansive, then is monotone. It is also easy to see that a projection is -ism. Inverse strongly monotone (also referred to as cocoercive) operators have been applied widely in solving practical problems in various fields.

Next, we list some elementary conclusions for the mixed equilibrium problem (MEP) where is the solution set.

Proposition 3 (see [15]). *Assume that satisfies (A1)–(A4) and let be a proper lower semicontinuous and convex function. Assume that either (B1) or (B2) holds. For and , define a mapping as follows:
**
for all . Then, the following hold:*(i)*for each is nonempty and single-valued;*(ii)* is firmly nonexpansive; that is, for any ,
*(iii)*;*(iv)* is closed and convex;*(v)*, for all and .*

*We need some facts and tools in a real Hilbert space which are listed as lemmas below.*

*Lemma 4. Let be a real inner product space. Then, there holds the following inequality:
*

*Lemma 5. Let be a monotone mapping. In the context of the variational inequality problem, the characterization of the projection (see Proposition 1(i)) implies
*

*Lemma 6 (see [16, demiclosedness principle]). Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . Let be a nonexpansive self-mapping on . Then, is demiclosed. That is, whenever is a sequence in weakly converging to some and the sequence strongly converges to some , it follows that . Here, is the identity operator of .*

*Let be an infinite family of nonexpansive self-mappings on and let be a sequence of nonnegative numbers in . For any , define a mapping on as follows:
Such a mapping is called the -mapping generated by and .*

*Lemma 7 (see [17, Lemma 3.2]). Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . Let be a sequence of nonexpansive self-mappings on such that and let be a sequence in for some . Then, for every and , the limit exists where is defined as in 33.*

*Lemma 8 (see [17, Lemma ]). Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . Let be a sequence of nonexpansive self-mappings on such that , and let be a sequence in for some . Then, .*

*Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . We introduce some notations. Let be a number in and let . Associating with a nonexpansive mapping , we define the mapping by
where is an operator such that, for some positive constants , is -Lipschitzian and -strongly monotone on ; that is, satisfies the conditions:
for all .*

*Lemma 9 (see [18, Lemma 3.1]). is a contraction provided ; that is,
where .*

*Lemma 10 (see [18]). Let be a sequence of nonnegative numbers satisfying the conditions
where and are sequences of real numbers such that(i) and or, equivalently,
(ii), or .Then, .*

*Lemma 11 (see [16]). Let be a real Hilbert space. Then, the following hold:(a) for all ;(b) for all and with ;(c)If is a sequence in such that , it follows that
*

*Finally, recall that a set-valued mapping is called monotone if, for all , and imply
A set-valued mapping is called maximal monotone if is monotone and for each , where is the identity mapping of . We denote by the graph of . It is known that a monotone mapping is maximal if and only if, for for every implies . Let be a monotone, -Lipschitz-continuous mapping and let be the normal cone to at ; that is,
Define
Then, is maximal monotone (see [19]) such that
*

*Let be a maximal monotone mapping. Let be two positive numbers.*

*Lemma 12 (see [20]). There holds the resolvent identity
*

*Remark 13. *For , there holds the following relation:

*In terms of Huang [21], there holds the following property for the resolvent operator .*

*Lemma 14. is single-valued and firmly nonexpansive; that is,
Consequently, is nonexpansive and monotone.*

*Lemma 15 (see [22]). Let be a maximal monotone mapping with . Then, for any given , is a solution of problem 12 if and only if satisfies
*

*Lemma 16 (see [23]). Let be a maximal monotone mapping with and let be a strongly monotone, continuous, and single-valued mapping. Then, for each , the equation has a unique solution for .*

*Lemma 17 (see [22]). Let be a maximal monotone mapping with and let be a monotone, continuous, and single-valued mapping. Then, for each . In this case, is maximal monotone.*

*3. Main Results*

*3. Main Results*

*In this section, we will introduce and analyze a relaxed iterative algorithm for finding a solution of the THVI 19 with constraints of several problems: finitely many GMEPs, finitely many variational inclusions, and GSVI 10 in a real Hilbert space. This algorithm is based on Korpelevich’s extragradient method, hybrid steepest-descent method, and Mann’s iteration method. We prove the strong convergence of the proposed algorithm to a unique solution of THVI 19 under suitable conditions. In addition, we also consider the application of the proposed algorithm to solve a hierarchical VIP with the same constraints.*

*We are now in a position to state and prove our first main result.*

*Theorem 18. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . Let , be two integers. Let be a bifunction from to satisfying (A1)–(A4) and let be a proper lower semicontinuous and convex function, where . Let be a maximal monotone mapping and let and be -inverse strongly monotone and -inverse strongly monotone, respectively, where , . Let be a sequence of nonexpansive self-mappings on and be a sequence in for some . Let be -inverse strongly monotone for . Let be -inverse strongly monotone with and let be -strongly monotone and -Lipschitz continuous. Assume that either (B1) or (B2) holds and that where . Let and and be sequences in . For arbitrarily given , let be a sequence generated by
where is defined as in 12 with for , and is the -mapping defined by 33. Suppose that the following conditions are satisfied:(H1), and ;(H2) and ;(H3) and ;(H4) and for all ;(H5) and for all . Then, there hold the following:(i);(ii);(iii) provided additionally.*

*Proof. *Let . Taking into account that , we may assume, without loss of generality, that and for all . Since is -Lipschitz continuous, we get
Putting for all , we have
Moreover, observe that
(This is Mann’s iteration method.) Since and , we know from the convexity of that . Put
for all and ,
for all , , and , where is the identity mapping on . Then, we have that and .

We divide the rest of the proof into several steps.*Step 1*. We prove that is bounded.

Indeed, utilizing 24 and Proposition 3(ii), we have
Utilizing 24 and Lemma 14, we have
Combining 54 and 55, we have
Since is -inverse strongly monotone for , and for , we deduce that, for any ,
Since is -inverse strongly monotone and , we have
Utilizing Lemma 9, the nonexpansivity of and the one of (due to Proposition CWY), we obtain from 24 and 56 that
where . By induction, we find that
Thus, is bounded and so are the sequences , , , and .*Step 2*. We prove that .

Indeed, utilizing 24 and 45, we obtain that
where
for some and for some . Hence, it follows from 24 and that
Also, utilizing Proposition 3(ii), (v), we deduce that