Research Article | Open Access
Yanping Zhou, Shanhe Wu, "Busemann-Petty Problems for Quasi Intersection Bodies", Journal of Function Spaces, vol. 2017, Article ID 3124285, 6 pages, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3124285
Busemann-Petty Problems for Quasi Intersection Bodies
We investigate the dual geominimal surface area and volume forms of Busemann-Petty problems for the quasi intersection bodies and establish some new geometric inequalities. Our results provide a significant complement to the researches on Busemann-Petty problems for intersection bodies.
1. Introduction and Main Results
Let denote the unit sphere in Euclidean space . If is a compact star-shaped (about the origin) set in , then its radial function, , is defined by (see [1, 2]) If is positive and continuous, then will be called a star body (about the origin), and denotes the set of star bodies in . We will use and to denote the subset of star bodies in containing the origin in their interiors and origin-symmetric star bodies, respectively. Two star bodies and are said to be the dilation of one another if is independent of .
Let denote the set of convex bodies (compact, convex subsets with nonempty interiors) in Euclidean . For , denotes the -dimensional subspace orthogonal to . We use to denote the -dimensional volume of a -dimensional compact convex set . Instead of we usually write . For the standard unit ball in , we write for its volume.
Busemann and Petty posed a problem : let and be origin-symmetric convex bodies in . Is it true that, for any ,
A long list of authors contributed to the solution of this famous problem over a period of 40 years; see [4–18]. The question has a negative answer for and an affirmative answer for . For a detailed account of the interesting history of the Busemann-Petty problem, see the books by Gardner [1, Chapter 8] and Koldobsky [19, Chapter 5].
The crucial idea in the solution of the problem was to define new convex body which was called intersection body. This was done by Lutwak  whose work is considered the starting point of the solution of the Busemann-Petty problem in all dimensions. For , the intersection body, , of is a star body whose radial function in the direction is equal to the -dimensional volume of the section of by ; that is,
The intersection bodies have been intensively studied in recent years (see [20–28] and the books [19, 29]). From (3) and the fact that star bodies and satisfy if and only if , we see that the Busemann-Petty problem can be rephrased in the following way: for , is it true that
Lutwak  showed that the problem has an affirmative answer if the body is restricted to the class of intersection bodies. In addition, Lutwak proved that if is a sufficiently smooth origin-symmetric star body with positive radial function which is not an intersection body, then there exists an origin-symmetric star body such that but . Further, Busemann-Petty problems have been considered in the context of Brunn-Minkowski Theory (see [30–41]). In particular, Haberl and Ludwig  generalized the intersection body to form and introduced the notion of intersection body: let be a star body and nonzero . The intersection body of , , is the symmetric star body whose radial function is defined by
After that, associated with intersection bodies, Yuan and Cheung  gave an affirmative form of Busemann-Petty problem for the intersection bodies.
Theorem 1. Let be intersection body and be a star body in . If , then In both cases equality holds if and only if .
Suppose that is a Borel function on . The spherical Radon transform  of is defined by for . Using the spherical Radon transform, the definition of is rewritten by for .
One aim of this paper is to establish the volume forms of the Busemann-Petty problems for the quasi intersection bodies. For convenience, let denote the set of quasi intersection bodies.
Theorem 2. Let and . If and , then If and , then And if and only if .
Theorem 4. For , if , then there exists such that but
Recall the definition of dual geominimal surface area, , of for in :
Another aim of this paper is to give the dual geominimal surface area forms of Busemann-Petty problems for the quasi intersection bodies. If , then we rewrite the definition of dual geominimal surface area by
Theorem 5. If and , then implying And if and only if .
Theorem 6. For , if , then there exists such that but
2.1. Dual Mixed Volume
For , , and (), the radial combination, , of and is defined by (see )
The polar coordinate formula for the volume of a body is
For , the dual mixed volume, , of was defined by (see )
The Minkowski inequality for the dual mixed volume was established in : if , then, for , for , In every case, equality holds if and only if is a dilation of .
2.2. Dual Blaschke Body
For , , and (), the dual Blaschke combination, , of and is defined by (see )
The proof of Theorem 2 needs the following Lemma.
Lemma 7 (see ). If , then, for ,
Proof of Theorem 2. For a star body with , it follows from Lemma 7 that Since we have From , we obtain that, for , that is,From the equality condition of (25), we know that if and only if .
From a star body with , By Lemma 7, we have Thus that is, For , it follows from that namely,
Lemma 8 (see ). If and (), then, for , with equality if and only if is a dilation of .
Corollary 9. If , then, for , with equality if and only if is origin-symmetric.
Lemma 10. If , then, for ,
Lemma 11. If and , then with equality if and only if is origin-symmetric.
Proof. From (14), (27), and (28), we get Note that ; thus we have . Together with (53), this yields Equality holds in (53) if and only if is a dilation of . This gives . Namely, is origin-symmetric. Hence, equality holds in (54) if and only if is origin-symmetric.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 11371239) and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (no. 2016J01023).
- R. J. Gardner, Geometric tomography, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2006.
- R. Schneider, Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2014.
- H. Busemann and C. M. Petty, “Problems on convex bodies,” Mathematica Scandinavica, vol. 4, pp. 88–94, 1956.
- K. M. Ball, “Some remarks on the geometry of convex sets,” in Geometric Aspects of Functional Analysis, J. Lindenstrauss and V. D. Milman, Eds., vol. 1317 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pp. 224–231, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1988.
- J. Bourgain, “On the Busemann-Petty problem for perturbations of the ball,” Geometric and Functional Analysis, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 1991.
- R. J. Gardner, “Intersection bodies and the Busemann-Petty problem,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 342, no. 1, pp. 435–445, 1994.
- R. J. Gardner, “A positive answer to the Busemann-Petty problem in three dimensions,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 435–447, 1994.
- R. J. Gardner, A. Koldobsky, and T. Schlumprecht, “An analytic solution to the Busemann-Petty problem on sections of convex bodies,” Annals of Mathematics: Second Series, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 691–703, 1999.
- A. A. Giannopoulos, “A note on a problem of H. Busemann and C. M. Petty concerning sections of symmetric convex bodies,” Mathematika, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 239–244, 1990.
- M. Giertz, “A note on a problem of Busemann,” Mathematica Scandinavica, vol. 25, pp. 145–148, 1969.
- H. Hadwiger, “Radialpotenzintegrale zentralsymmetrischer Rotationskörper und Ungleichheitsaussagen Busemannscher Art,” Mathematica Scandinavica, vol. 23, pp. 193–200, 1968.
- A. Koldobsky, “Intersection bodies in ,” Advances in Mathematics, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 1998.
- A. Koldobsky, “Intersection bodies, positive definite distributions, and the Busemann-Petty problem,” American Journal of Mathematics, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 827–840, 1998.
- D. G. Larman and C. A. Rogers, “The existence of a centrally symmetric convex body with central sections that are unexpectedly small,” Mathematika, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 164–175, 1975.
- E. Lutwak, “Intersection bodies and dual mixed volumes,” Advances in Mathematics, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 232–261, 1988.
- M. Papadimitrakis, “On the Busemann-Petty problem about convex, centrally symmetric bodies in ,” Mathematika. A Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 258–266, 1992.
- F. E. Schuster, “Valuations and Busemann-Petty type problems,” Advances in Mathematics, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 344–368, 2008.
- G. Zhang, “A positive solution to the Busemann-Petty problem in ,” Annals of Mathematics: Second Series, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 535–543, 1999.
- A. Koldobsky, Fourier analysis in convex geometry, vol. 116 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA, 2005.
- P. Goodey, E. Lutwak, and W. Weil, “Functional analytic characterizations of classes of convex bodies,” Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 222, no. 3, pp. 363–381, 1996.
- E. Grinberg and G. Zhang, “Convolutions, transforms, and convex bodies,” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. Third Series, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 77–115, 1999.
- N. J. Kalton and A. Koldobsky, “Intersection bodies and -spaces,” Advances in Mathematics, vol. 196, no. 2, pp. 257–275, 2005.
- A. Koldobsky, “A functional analytic approach to intersection bodies,” Geometric and Functional Analysis, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1507–1526, 2000.
- M. Ludwig, “Intersection bodies and valuations,” American Journal of Mathematics, vol. 128, no. 6, pp. 1409–1428, 2006.
- T.-Y. Ma, “-mixed intersection bodies,” Journal of Mathematical Inequalities, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 559–579, 2014.
- V. D. Milman and A. Pajor, “Isotropic position and inertia ellipsoids and zonoids of the unit ball of a normed n-dimensional space,” in Geometric Aspects of Functional Analysis, vol. 1376 of Lecture Notes in Math, pp. 64–104, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1989.
- W. Wang and Y. Li, “General -intersection bodies,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1247–1259, 2015.
- J. Wang and W. Wang, “-dual affine surface area forms of Busemann-Petty type problems,” The Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences—Mathematical Sciences, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2015.
- A. C. Thompson, Minkowski geometry, vol. 63 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
- W. Chen, “ Minkowski problem with not necessarily positive data,” Advances in Mathematics, vol. 201, no. 1, pp. 77–89, 2006.
- K.-S. Chou and X.-J. Wang, “The -MINkowski problem and the MINkowski problem in centroaffine geometry,” Advances in Mathematics, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 33–83, 2006.
- Y. Feng and W. Wang, “The Shephard type problems and monotonicity for -mixed centroid body,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 265–284, 2014.
- Y. Feng and W. Wang, “Blaschke-Minkowski homomorphisms and affine surface area,” Publicationes Mathematicae, vol. 85, no. 3-4, pp. 297–308, 2014.
- F. Yibin and W. Weidong, “Shephard type problems for -centroid bodies,” Mathematical Inequalities & Applications, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 865–877, 2014.
- E. Lutwak, “The Brunn-MINkowski-Firey theory. I. MIXed volumes and the MINkowski problem,” Journal of Differential Geometry, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 131–150, 1993.
- E. Lutwak, “The Brunn-Minkowski-Firey theory II. Affine and geominimal surface areas,” Advances in Mathematics, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 244–294, 1996.
- E. Lutwak, D. Yang, and G. Zhang, “ affine isoperimetric inequalities,” Journal of Differential Geometry, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 111–132, 2000.
- E. Lutwak, D. Yang, and G. Zhang, “Sharp affine Sobolev inequalities,” Journal of Differential Geometry, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 17–38, 2002.
- W. D. Wang and Y. N. Li, “Busemann-Petty problems for general -intersection bodies,” Acta Mathematica Sinica, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 777–786, 2015.
- W. Y. Yu, D. H. Wu, and G. S. Leng, “Quasi -intersection bodies,” Acta Mathematica Sinica, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1937–1948, 2007.
- J. Yuan and W.-S. Cheung, “ intersection bodies,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 338, no. 2, pp. 1431–1439, 2008.
- C. Haberl and M. Ludwig, “A characterization of intersection bodies,” International Mathematics Research Notices, vol. 2006, Article ID 10548, 29 pages, 2006.
- S. Helgason, The Radon transform, vol. 5 of Progress in Mathematics, Boston, Mass, USA, Birkhaauser, 2nd edition, 1999.
- X. Y. Wan and W. D. Wang, “-dual geominimal surface area,” Journal of Wuhan University, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 515–518, 2013.
Copyright © 2017 Yanping Zhou and Shanhe Wu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.