Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Function Spaces
Volume 2018, Article ID 4716047, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4716047
Research Article

Limit Cycles and Invariant Curves in a Class of Switching Systems with Degree Four

1School of Business, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
2Logistics School, Linyi University, Linyi 276000, China
3Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Xinli Li; moc.anis@9350ilnixil

Received 10 September 2018; Accepted 31 October 2018; Published 25 November 2018

Academic Editor: Liguang Wang

Copyright © 2018 Xinli Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In this paper, a class of switching systems which have an invariant conic , is investigated. Half attracting invariant conic , is found in switching systems. The coexistence of small-amplitude limit cycles, large amplitude limit cycles, and invariant algebraic curves under perturbations of the coefficients of the systems is proved.

1. Introduction

It is well known that the 16th problem stated in 1900 by D. Hilbert is considered to be the most difficult problem in the 23 problems; it is far from being solved. Over past three decades, there have been many good results about this problem. As far as the maximal number of small-amplitude limit cycles which are bifurcated from an elementary center or focus is concerned, the best known result obtained by Bautin in 1952 [1] is , where denotes the maximal number of small-amplitude limit cycles around a singular point with being the degree of polynomials in the system. For cubic-degree system, many good results have also been obtained. For example, a cubic system was constructed by Lloyd and Pearson [2] to show limit cycles with the aid of purely symbolic computation. Moreover, Yu and Tian [3] proved that there can exist limit cycles around an elementary center in a planar cubic-degree polynomial system. As far as we know this is the best result obtained so far for cubic-degree polynomial systems with all limit cycles around a single singular point. For , because of the difficulty of computation of focal values, there are very few results. An example of a quartic system with 8 limit cycles bifurcating from a fine focus [4] was given by Huang et al. Theory of rotated equations and applications to a population model can be found in [5]; they gave a new method to solve the center problem.

As far as the maximal number of limit cycles of polynomial systems is concerned, the best results published were given as follows. Articles [6, 7] proved that , then [810] gave and [11, 12] obtained etc. Here, denotes the maximal number of limit cycles of polynomial systems. Furthermore, 13 limit cycles bifurcated from -equivariant systems with degree 3 were proved in [1315], respectively. An improvement on the number of limit cycles bifurcating from a nondegenerate center of homogeneous polynomial systems was given in [16].

Center and the coexistence of large and small-amplitude limit cycles problems are two closely related questions of the 16th problem. Algebraic trajectories play an important role in the dynamical behavior of polynomial systems, so it has been an interesting problem in planar polynomial systems. Over the past twenty years, many interesting results were got for quadratic systems; the authors in [17, 18] proved that quadratic systems with a pair of straight lines or an invariant hyperbola, ellipse, can have no limit cycles other than the possible ellipse itself. Furthermore, if there is an invariant line, there can be no more than one limit cycle. The case of parabola was considered in [19]. For cubic systems, there exist different classes of cubic systems in which there may coexist an invariant hyperbola or straight lines with limit cycles (see [2028]). For a given family of real planar polynomial systems of ordinary differential equations depending on parameters, the problem of how to find the systems in the family which become time-reversible was solved in [29].

In modelling many practical problems in science and engineering, switching systems have been widely used recently. The richness of dynamical behavior found in switching systems covers almost all the phenomena discussed in general continuous systems. For example, the maximum number of limit cycles bifurcating from the periodic orbits of the quadratic isochronous centers of switching system was studied in [30]. In [31], limit cycles in a class of continuous and switching cubic polynomial systems were investigated. Bifurcation of limit cycles in switching quadratic systems with two zones was considered in [30]. In [32, 33], the authors considered nonsmooth Hopf bifurcation in switching systems. Limit cycles bifurcating from centers of discontinuous quadratic systems were studied by Chen and Du [34]. Switching Bautin system was also investigated in [35]; they got 10 limit cycles for this system. -equivariant cubic systems were also investigated, and 14 limit cycles were obtained in [36]. Bifurcation of periodic orbits by perturbing high-dimensional piecewise smooth integrable systems was investigated in [37]. Bifurcation theory for finitely smooth planar autonomous differential systems was considered in [38]. All results obtained show that the dynamical behavior of switching systems is more complex than continuous system.

About algebraic invariant curves, as far as we know, there are few papers to consider switching system with algebraic invariant curves. In this paper we are concerned with the limit cycle problem and the center problem for a class of degree four polynomial differential systemswhich have an invariant conic , , and we prove the coexistence of large elliptic limit cycle that contains at least four small-amplitude limit cycles generated by Hopf bifurcations.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In the next section, we prove that the switching system (1) has an invariant conic , , and there exists a large limit cycle in switching system (1); half attracting invariant conic , , is found in switching systems. In Section 3, the first eight Lyapunov constants will be computed; bifurcation of limit cycles and center conditions of (1) are investigated. Section 4 is devoted to discuss the number of limit cycles with different parameter of (1). At last, coexistence of invariant curve and limit cycles of (1) is drawn in Section 5.

2. Invariant Curve and Large Limit Cycle of (1)

In this section, we will prove that the switching system (1) has an invariant conic , , and there exists a large limit cycle in switching system (1).

Lemma 1. The conic , , is an invariant algebraic curve of system (1). In particular, if and , this conic is an elliptic hyperbolic limit cycle, attracting if , a repelling if , and half attracting if .

Proof. It is easy to know that the conic , , is an invariant algebraic curve of systemsandbecause respectively, where In particular, according to Lemma 1 in [39], if and , this conic is an elliptic hyperbolic limit cycle of system (2), attracting if and a repelling if . Similarly, if and , this conic is an elliptic hyperbolic limit cycle of system (3), attracting if and a repelling if . Especially, if and and , the stability of the conic , , is contradict for the upper half system and lower half system.
So, for switching system (1), the conic , , is an invariant algebraic curve. Furthermore, if and , this conic is an elliptic hyperbolic limit cycle, and

Remark 2. For planar continuous system, if and , the conic , , is an elliptic hyperbolic limit cycle, attracting if , a repelling if . For switching system, half attracting cases which are different from continuous systems appear. Namely, for the conic , , it is attracting (repelling) for and repelling (attracting) for . It is an interesting phenomena; see Figure 1.

Figure 1: The half attracting conic when or

3. Bifurcation of Limit Cycle and Center Conditions of (1)

First of all, it is easy to know that the origin of upper half system and lower half system is a fine focus if , so we let in order to consider the center conditions and the number of small limit cycles. With the aid of symbolic computation, we obtain the following result.

Theorem 3. For system (1), the first eight Lyapunov constants at the origin are given bywith two cases: (I) . (II) . where Note that in computing the above expressions , , and have been used.

The following proposition follows directly from Theorem 3.

Proposition 4. The first eight Lyapunov constants at the origin of system (1) become zero if and only if one of the following conditions is satisfied:They are also the center conditions of system (1).

Proof. When the conditions in (11) hold, system (1) can be brought toObviously, the system is symmetric with the -axis, and so the origin is a center of system (14).
When the conditions in (12) hold, system (1) can be rewritten aswhich is symmetric with the -axis, and so the origin is a center of system (15).
When the conditions in (13) hold, system (1) becomes a continuous systemBy elementary integration, the above system in is topologically equivalent to the systemwhich has the first analytic integral

Remark 5. The phase plane of system (16) can be drawn by Maple; see Figure 2.

Figure 2: The phase plane of system (16) when or

As far as limit cycles are concerned, it follows from Theorem 3 that at most limit cycles can bifurcate from the origin of system (1). We have the following theorem.

Theorem 6. If the origin of system (1) is a th-order weak focus, then for , small-amplitude limit cycles can bifurcate from the origin of the perturbed system (1).

Proof. When the origin of system (1) is a th-order weak focus, the conditions should be satisfied. Furthermore, one has the following:
When , When , When , When , So it implies that small-amplitude limit cycles can bifurcate from the origin of the perturbed system (1).

4. Number of Limit Cycles with Different Parameter of (1)

In this section, we devote to discuss the number of limit cycles with different parameter of (1). The following theorem could be concluded from Theorem 3.

Theorem 7. The number of limit cycles with different parameter of (1) can be shown in the Table 1.

Table 1: The maximum number of small limit cycles around the origin for different parameter c.

Proof. Let , it is easy to obtain that If , it is easy to check that the origin is a three-order weak focus. Furthermore, if , when , the Lyapunov constants in case 1 yield that the origin is a seventh order weak focus.
When , the Lyapunov constants yield that the origin is an eighth-order weak focus if where and satisfy that It is easy to conclude that if and , there exist 8 limit cycles; namely, If , and , there exist 7 small limit cycles.
If , there exist 6 limit cycles.
When , the Lyapunov constants yield that the origin is a sixth-order weak focus. The conclusion can be given in Table 1 for simplify.

5. Coexistence of Invariant Curve and Limit Cycles of (1)

From above discussion, we study the coexistence of invariant curve and limit cycles of (1), by perturbation method of small parameters, the following conclusions could be got easily; for example, when , there exist eight small limit cycles at least and is an invariant algebraic curve. The distribution of limit cycle can be drawn in Figure 3.

Figure 3: When , an invariant algebraic curve and eight small limit cycles.

When , there exist seven small limit cycles at least and is an invariant algebraic curve. The distribution of limit cycle can be drawn in Figure 4.

Figure 4: When , an invariant algebraic curve and seven small limit cycles.

When , there exist three small limit cycles at least and and are two invariant lines. The distribution of limit cycle can be drawn in Figure 5.

Figure 5: When , two invariant lines and three small limit cycles.

When , there exist eight small limit cycles and a large limit cycle at the same time, namely, nine limit cycles in total for this system. The distribution of limit cycle can be drawn in Figure 6.

Figure 6: When , an invariant algebraic curve and eight small limit cycles.

When , there exist seven small limit cycles at least and there is a large limit cycle at the same time. The distribution of limit cycles can be drawn in Figure 7.

Figure 7: When , an invariant algebraic curve and seven small limit cycles.

When , there exist six small limit cycles at least and there is a large limit cycle at the same time. The distribution of limit cycles can be drawn in Figure 8.

Figure 8: When , an invariant algebraic curve and six small limit cycles.

6. Conclusion

In this paper, a class of switching systems is investigated; the coexistence of small limit cycles and algebraic an invariant curve is proves. An interesting phenomenon that the algebraic invariant curve , can be half attracting is found.

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the support of Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (no. ZR2014FL017) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 71874172, 11275186, and 91024026).

References

  1. N. N. Bautin, “On the number of limit cycles appearing with variation of the coefficients from an equilibrium state of the type of a focus or a center,” Math Sbor, vol. 30, pp. 181–196, 1952. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. N. G. Lloyd and J. M. Pearson, “A cubic differential system with nine limit cycles,” Journal of Applied Analysis and Computation, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 293–304, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. P. Yu and Y. Tian, “Twelve limit cycles around a singular point in a planar cubic-degree polynomial system,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 2690–2705, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. W. Huang, A. Chen, and Q. Xu, “Bifurcation of limit cycles and isochronous centers for a quartic system,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 23, no. 10, 1350172, 10 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. M. Han, X. Hou, L. Sheng, and C. Wang, “Theory of rotated equations and applications to a population model,” Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - Series A, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2171–2185, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. S. L. Shi, “A concrete example of the existence of four limit cycles for plane quadratic systems,” Scientia Sinica, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 153–158, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. L. S. Chen and M. S. Wang, “The relative position, and the number, of limit cycles of a quadratic differential system,” Acta Mathematica Sinica, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 751–758, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. P. Yu and M. Han, “Small limit cycles bifurcation from fine focus points in cubic order Z 2-equivariant vector fields,” Solitons and Fractals, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 329–348, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. Y. Liu and W. Huang, “A cubic system with twelve small amplitude limit cycles,” Bull. Sci. Math, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 83–98, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. M. Han, Y. Lin, and P. Yu, “A study on the existence of limit cycles of a planar system with third-degree polynomials,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 41–60, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. Q. Wang, Y. Liu, and C. Du, “Small limit cycles bifurcating from fine focus points in quartic order Z 3-equivariant vector fields,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 337, no. 1, pp. 524–536, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. Y. Wu, Y. Gao, and M. Han, “Bifurcations of the limit cycles in a z3-equivariant quartic planar vector field,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1177–1186, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. C. Li, C. Liu, and J. Yang, “A cubic system with thirteen limit cycles,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 246, no. 9, pp. 3609–3619, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. Y.-r. Liu and J.-b. Li, “Z 2-equivariant cubic system which yields 13 limit cycles,” Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 781–800, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. J. Yang, M. Han, J. Li, and P. Yu, “Existence conditions of thirteen limit cycles in a cubic system,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 2569–2577, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. P. Yu, M. Han, and J. Li, “An improvement on the number of limit cycles bifurcating from a nondegenerate center of homogeneous polynomial systems,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 28, no. 6, 1850078, 31 pages, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. W. A. Coppel, “Some quadratic systems with at most one limit cycle,” in Dynamics Reported, vol. 2, pp. 61–68, Wiley, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. L. A. Cherkas and L. I. Zhilevich, “The limit cycles of certain differential equations,” Differ. Uravn, vol. 8, pp. 1207–1213, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  19. C. Christopher, “Quadratic systems having a parabola as an integral curve,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section: A Mathematics, vol. 112, no. 1-2, pp. 113–134, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. D. Cozma and A. Suba, “The solution of the problem of center for cubic differential systems with four invariant straight lines,” An. Stiint. Univ. Al. I. Cuza Iasi, Ser. Nuova, Mat, vol. 44, pp. 517–530, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. D. Cozma and A. Suba, “Solution of the problem of the centre for a cubic differential system with three invariant straight lines,” Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 129–143, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. J. Chavarriga, E. Sáez, I. Szántó, and M. Grau, “Coexistence of limit cycles and invariant algebraic curves for a Kukles system,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 673–693, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. D. Guoren and W. Songlin, “Closed orbits and straight line invariants in E3 systems,” Acta Mathematica Sci, vol. 9, pp. 251–261, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  24. R. Kooij, Limit cycles in polynomial systems [Ph.D. thesis], University of Technology, Delft, 1993.
  25. Z. Liu, E. Sez, and I. Sznt, “A cubic system with an invariant triangle surrounding at least one limit cycle,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 275–281, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. N. G. Lloyd, J. M. Pearson, E. Sez, and I. Sznt, “Limit cycles of a cubic Kolmogorov system,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 15–18, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  27. N. G. Lloyd, J. M. Pearson, E. Sez, and I. Sznt, “A cubic Kolmogorov system with six limit cycles,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 44, no. 3-4, pp. 445–455, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. E. Sez, I. Sznt, and E. Gonzlez-Olivares, “Cubic Kolmogorov system with invariant straight lines,” Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 4521–4525, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  29. M. Han, T. Petek, and V. G. Romanovski, “Reversibility in polynomial systems of {ODE}'s,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 338, pp. 55–71, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  30. J. Llibre and A. C. Mereu, “Limit cycles for discontinuous quadratic differential systems with two zones,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 413, no. 2, pp. 763–775, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  31. J. Llibre, B. D. Lopes, and J. R. De Moraes, “Limit cycles for a class of continuous and discontinuous cubic polynomial differential systems,” Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 129–148, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. R. I. Leine and H. Nijmeijer, Dynamics and Bifurcations of Non-Smooth Mechanical Systems, vol. 18, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  33. Y. Zou, T. Kupper, and W. J. Beyn, “Generalized Hopf bifurcation for planar Filippov systems continuous at the origin,” Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 159–177, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  34. X. Chen and Z. Du, “Limit cycles bifurcate from centers of discontinuous quadratic systems,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 3836–3848, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  35. Y. Tian and P. Yu, “Center conditions in a switching Bautin system,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 259, no. 3, pp. 1203–1226, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  36. F. Li, P. Yu, Y. Tian, and Y. Liu, “Center and isochronous center conditions for switching systems associated with elementary singular points,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 28, no. 1-3, pp. 81–97, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  37. H. Tian and M. Han, “Bifurcation of periodic orbits by perturbing high-dimensional piecewise smooth integrable systems,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 263, no. 11, pp. 7448–7474, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. Han, L. Sheng, and X. Zhang, “Bifurcation theory for finitely smooth planar autonomous differential systems,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 264, no. 5, pp. 3596–3618, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  39. E. Sez, E. Stange, and I. Sznt, “Coexistence of small and large amplitude limit cycles of polynomial differential systems of degree four,” Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, vol. 57(132), no. 1, pp. 105–114, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet